The latest idiocy from a profession that seems to be a magnet for idiots, psychopaths, frauds, charlatans, crooks, liars and general cunts is the suggestion that we will need a vaccine before every trip abroad. This is the latest ramping up of the propaganda campaign aimed at persuading us the Wuhan Coronavirus is so deadly nobody will ever be safe from it, thus giving crooked politicians more excuses to shover taxpayers money into the coffers of Big Pharma.
Another way of interpreting it, though not one that will be quoted by mainstream media, is that it constitutes an admission that he vasty hyped, untested, unscientific vaccines developed in such a hurry are useless against Coronavirus. But as many of us have argued throught most of the past year, they were not designed to protect us punters from a "killer" disease that 95% of us will not get, and 99% of the 5% who develop symptoms will fully recover from.
So what bollocks have the lying lientists come up with now to keep the fear - and - panic generator turned up to eleven?
A report published in the Royal Society Journal last week acknowledged what we all knew, there is little data on how efficient or long lasting the current vaccines are, and so it is likely that countries will require a recent vaccination. This is the inevitable outcome of sidestepping the usual development and testing procedures in order to get a euthanasia vaccine into as many of us as possible before the majority woke up to the fact that COVID-19 is not the killer is has been hyped as. If you are under 80 years old and in reasonable health you have little to fear. So as government medical advisers are suggesting that we may need the double shot every year, or even a third shot, while others suggest there will need to be a new vaccine for every new variant it seems the objective is to keep the taxpayers' money flowing towards Big Pharma
In view of that, having endless injections of something that has been described by respected immunologists as technically not a vaccine but a gene therapy when there is no indication of how effective these will be in either the short or long term (we have already been informed that the vaccine will not stop us eith getting or passing on the virus,) or what long term side effects there may be sounds absolutely mental, but that is what is being suggested.
Speaking to the Daily Telegraph, Epidemiologist Christopher Dye, a leading author of the reports stated “If we thought that the duration of protection was just a matter of months, then the sort of criteria that might be introduced – we’re not saying they should be – is that when one travels internationally for a short trip, going on vacation for example, that one is vaccinated each time on that occasion for that particular trip.”
published a report in the Royal Society Journal last week that acknowledged there is little data on how efficient or long lasting the current vaccines are, and so it is likely that countries will require a recent vaccination.
Having endless vaccinations when there is no indication of how effective they are, or what long term side effects there may be sounds absolutely mental, but that is what is being suggested.
Speaking to the London Telegraph, Epidemiologist Christopher Dye, a leading author of the reports stated “If we thought that the duration of protection was just a matter of months, then the sort of criteria that might be introduced – we’re not saying they should be – is that when one travels internationally for a short trip, going on vacation for example, that one is vaccinated each time on that occasion for that particular trip.”
The report also stated that vaccine passports are “feasible,” but only if and when global standards have been agreed.
“An effective vaccine passport system that would allow the return to pre-Covid activities, including travel, without compromising personal or public health, must meet a set of demanding criteria,” said Dye.
Other co-authors of the study warned that the covid passports, which the government’s vaccines minister has repeatedly said are not going to be used domestically, “need to be fully explored.”
Professor Melinda Mills warned that such a system “could inadvertently discriminate or exacerbate existing inequalities,” adding “The intended use will have significant implications across a wide range of legal and ethical issues. Is it literally a passport to allow international travel or is the intention that it be used domestically to allow holders greater freedoms?” Professor Mills further questioned.
“We need a broader discussion about multiple aspects of a vaccine passport, from the science of immunity through to data privacy, technical challenges and the ethics and legality of how it might be used,” Mills added. It's good to know somebody sees the threat to human rights and individual freedom implicit in these suggestions.
In response tolike Angela Merkel, Boris Johnson and "Dementia Joe" Biden globalists repeatedly pushing for the vaccination passport system, Silkie Carlo, the director of civil liberties campaign group Big Brother Watch, authored an important op-ed warning that we risk “emerging like some sort of China-adjunct – a high-tech dystopia where citizens flash their vaccine IDs and biological risk scores to buy a pint of milk, or government-approved facial recognition for a pint of beer.”
At this moment, with the USA in chaos as resistance grows to the usurper administration in The White House, the UK should be showing moral courage and assuming leadership of the free world to build a freer future - to “set the people free”. Instead, with vaccine IDs and more, the government is offering us a future of more control, more fascistic tyranny instead of more freedom.