15 November 2021
From day one, back in March 2020 when the pandemic was declared, this blog has been questioning the fake statistics, highlighting the distortion of statistics to serve the scaremongering narratives of the elites and exposing the lies and dishonesty of politicians, sciencetitis (sic) and, surprisingly perhaps if you are of a credulous nature, doctors and the medical professions.
We were insulted, taunted, reviled, accused of heinous crimes and treated like pariahs. All that is water off the proverbial duck's back to experience controversialists like ourselves, but worst, and most unacceptably of all we, and thousands of independent voices like us, we were censored. Soon after the first lockdowns were imposed it became almost impossible for an independent news and comment site that did not echo the propaganda supporting the official narrative to get any visibility on the major search engines or social media sites.
The science was settled, (now where had we heard that before?) the mathematical models agreed we were in the grip of the most widespread and deadly pandemic since the Black Death and only vaccines could save us. Those who mentioned natural immunity were dismissed as conspiracy theorists and anti - science, reactionaries. Immunity can only come from vaccines scoffed the sciencetits, conveniently forgetting that vaccines have only been around for 200ish years, humankind had survived without vaccinces throughout the 200 millennia since men first stood erect because this non existent natural immunity protected us.
And while these arguments were going on, a mountain of empirical evidence was piling up, showing that the virus driving the pandemic was neither highly infectious nor highly deadly to those under the age of 70 and with no pre - existing medical conditions.
Ah byt empirical evidence does not matter, the politicians, sciencetits and doctors, echoed by mainstream media, argued. We had to 'follow The Science.' And by The Science, which had somehow acquired God - like capital letters, they meant the mathematical modelling.
Unfortunately mathematics is not actually a science but an art, an artifice, something invented by humans, rather like the SARS-COV2 virus itself, a genetically modified micro - organism, created with no good purpose in mind you may be sure ....
Why have we doctors been silent?
published in TCW Defending Freedom
AS an NHS hospital doctor, I have had a front-row seat as the drama of the coronavirus pandemic has unfolded. It has been a year and a half of confusion, frustration and anger for me as I’ve watched our profession drawn into complicity with what I anticipate will be regarded as one of the most egregious public health disasters in history.
I have watched as ‘the science’ has been presented on the national stage flanked by Union Jack flags as an unassailable truth. For something so apparently inviolable, it seems to shift and change disconcertingly from week to week, and for those of us looking beneath the pomp to the plain data, we see the rather unexciting (and unchanging) truth: the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, as it turns out, has a much lower infection fatality rate than early predictions. It is less deadly than the seasonal flu in children. The Office for National Statistics has reported the mean age of a Covid-attributed death in the UK to be 80.3 years, slightly older than deaths from other causes (78.2 years over the comparable time period).
What has been most upsetting for me has been the unquestioning compliance from the medical community as increasingly draconian, non-evidence-based and destructive virus control measures have been implemented. Some of the overt corruption, financial conflict of interests and politicisation has been laid bare in editorials in prominent medical journals such as the BMJ. But the vast majority of doctors have had no interest in asking questions or looking further.
My concern over our professional passivity turned to alarm as our compliance required us to support the roll-out of an experimental vaccine to a trusting population.
Contrary to the basic tenets of evidence-based medicine, pronouncing an experimental medical intervention ‘safe and effective’ now does not seem to require any peer-reviewed evidence of safety or clinically meaningful efficacy. The vaccines have not been shown in clinical trials to reduce transmission, hospitalisation or death. The phase 3 trials are not over and the safety data is not complete; the earliest trials will run into 2023.
The consent form for the Covid-19 vaccine does not disclose its status as an unlicensed experimental product. The risks remain largely unknown, although it is becoming clear that the vaccine has resulted in death or injury in a rising number of healthy people. A growing number of vaccine-induced syndromes are being recognised, including immune thrombotic thrombocytopaenia, myocarditis and menstrual irregularities, among many others being published in the literature. At the time of writing, there have been more than 380,000 reports, 1.2million injuries and 1,700 fatalities submitted under the MHRA Yellow Card scheme.
The Prime Minister himself has communicated the latest evidence, that two doses of the vaccine do not stop one contracting the virus, nor do they stop person-to-person transmission, they merely reduce the severity of symptoms. Despite this, it is clear the public are being subjected to a relentless media campaign of shame and coercion, that they must take this experimental product ‘for the greater good’ lest they be viewed as selfish cowards. A vaccine passport is now likely to be rolled out under ‘Plan B’, which proposes to return unlawfully usurped fundamental human rights and freedoms to only the vaccinated. ... Continue reading >>>
Corinavirus fear and panic ] ... [ Covid Vaccine harm ] ... [ Lockdown pandemic ] ... [ Covid Vaccine Fascism ] ... [ Big Pharma criminality ] ... [ trranshumanism: Genetic engineering for people ] ... [ Health Menu ]