by Arthur Foxake, 29 May 2023
It is satisfying to learn today that UK Medical Freedom Alliance is throwing in its lot with grassroots campaign groups in the UK and around the world, and with US , UK and EU, politicians, in strongly opposing the proposed World Health Organisation Pandemic Treaty (CA+) and the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005).
It is important to understand that these are two completely different legal instruments, but individually and combined they add up to a major power grab and a serious threat to national sovereignty and individual liberty from the unelected and unaccountable WHO (which is currently led by Tedros Ghebreyesus, an Ethiopian communist and former terrrorist leader who is accused of being involved in genocide according to The Times. There has been no national or international public comment or vote sought as part of the negotiation process, just as there was no public debate around whether it is appropriate to have a man who is linked to genocidal terrorist groups as head of an organisation supposedly tasked with preserving life, but the public are considered not to be relevant ‘stakeholders’ in the (largely secretive) negotiation process at the World Health Assembly (WHA), the decision-making body of the WHO (a wholly owned subsidiary of the World Economic Forum.
Unlike the proposed Pandemic Treaty, which is bad enough but must be scrutinised by Parliament at least before being ratified by the Government, the IHR (2005) is already embeded in international law which is legally binding on 196 countries. As such, any adopted amendments will require no UK Parliamentary scrutiny or vote. All proposed amendments (307 in the working draft) will simply be adopted at the 77th WHA meeting in May 2024 if a majority of the countries’ representatives vote yes.
Take note of that: "a majority of the countries' representatives vote yes", not "the deal must be ratified by the elected parliament of each country," but a simple majority of hand picked bureaucrats. No democratic oversight, no national referenda, simply a majority of bureaucrats who in turn are picked by bureaucrats, and whose career interests will be advanced by complying with the globalist agenda.