Monday, May 22, 2017

Will Trump's Russiagate and Comeygate be Eclipsed By DNC's Seth Rich-gate?

Seth Rich Plot Thickens: "DC Insider" Speaks Of "Complete Panic" At Highest Levels Of DNC

from Zero Hedge

Last week, Fox News dropped a bombshell report officially confirming, via anonymous FBI sources, what many had suspected for quite some time, that murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was the WikiLeaks source for leaks which proved that the DNC was intentionally undermining the campaign of Bernie Sanders. In addition to exposing the corruption of the DNC, the leaks cost Debbie Wasserman Shcultz her job as Chairwoman.

Of course, if it's true that WikiLeaks' emails came from a DNC insider it would end the "Russian hacking" narrative that has been perpetuated by Democrats and the mainstream media for the past several months. Moreover, it would corroborate the one confirmation that Julian Assange has offered regarding his source, namely that it was "not a state actor."

Meanwhile, the plot thickened a little more over the weekend when Kim Dotcom confirmed via Twitter that he was working with Seth Rich to get leaked emails to WikiLeaks.

Which was followed up by the following posts on 4Chan’s /pol/ subgroup that high-ranking current and former Democratic Party officials are terrified of the Seth Rich murder investigation.

“Anons, I work in D.C.

I know for certain that the Seth Rich case has scared the shit out of certain high ranking current and former Democratic Party officials.

This is the reason why they have backed away from impeachment talk. They know the smoking gun is out there, and they’re terrified you will find it, because when you do it will bring the entire DNC, along with a couple of very big name politicians.

It appears that certain DNC thugs were not thorough enough when it came time to cover their tracks. Podesta saying he wanted to “make an example of the leaker” is a huge smoking gun.”

The post went on to claim that a "smoking gun in this case is out of the hands of the conspirators" which has resulted in near "open panic" in DC circles.

Read the full article >>>

Update 25 May 2017

from Gateway Pundit

Trey Gowdy Makes a Fool of Ex-CIA Chief John Brennan (VIDEO)

Cristina Laila May 23rd, 2017 4:32 pm 231 Comments

TGP reported earlier that former CIA Director, John Brennan testified before the House today about the 2016 election interference.

When Dem. Rep. Adam Schiff asked Brennan if Trump or his aides pressured the Intelligence Community to drop the Flynn investigation, he said a clear and concise, ‘No, sir”. MORE >>>

RELATED POSTS:</ br>

Conspiracy theories seem to be filling the news; following a long established pattern

Murdered DNC Staffer Seth Rich Shared 44,053 Democrat Emails With WikiLeaks: Report
Ever since Donald Trump defeated Democratic Party candidate hillary Clinton in the US Presidential Election, Democrats have based their efforts to make a case for having the result overturned on unsubstantiated allegations that the Trump campaign worked with Russian intelligence officials to undermine the 2016 Presidential Election thereby 'stealing' the White House from Hillary Clinton.

FBI Insider Leaks All: Clinton Foundation Exposed! Involves Entire US Government!

American's are have the right of free speech, so long as they don't criticise Obama.

US Media Bias Revealed As Political Fact Checkers Caught Covering Hillary Clinton Crimes

Sanders Supporters Vindicated: Proof DNC Used Media to Rig Election for Hillary

Assange Says Wikileaks will publish â€˜enough evidenceâ€™ to indict Hillary Clinton.

FBI Begins Leaking Damaging Evidence Of Hillary's Treason As Obama and DoJ Block Indictment

Can this woman possibly be a fit and proper person to serve as President Of The USA
Wall Street 'Whistleblower' Exposes Clinton Foundation Fraud
Lifelong Feminist Camille Paglia Slams Hypocrite Hillary Clinton And Her 'Liberal' Supporters
The Hope That Springs Eternal?
If You Are An American Voter Thinking Of Voting For Hillary You Need To Read This
CIA Director Brennan Warns Islamic State Militants Are Entering USA As Refugees
Obama's Economy Is Bad; Clinton's Would Be Worse
Total Opacity Of 'The Most Transparent Administration Ever'
New Report Shows How Hillary Clinton Sold Obama on Regime Change in Libya
The Wisdom Of Crowds

Chasing Bubbles

Greenteeth Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Writerbeat ] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer Headlines]

[ Ian at Facebook ]

Sanders Supporters Class Action Against Democrats - What Mainstream Media Are Not Reporting

by Shane Warren

If you supported Bernie in 2016, chances are you already know how the Democratic National Committee did everything in its power to anoint Hillary Clinton as the Democratic Nominee. What you may not know is that a class-action lawsuit has been filed on your behalf to hold the DNC accountable for their cheating.

Bernie Sanders and Former DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Credit: Credit: AP/Jeff Roberson/Lynne Sladky/Photo montage by Salon)

In essence, the lawsuit claims that the DNC violated their charter’s commitment to “impartiality and evenhandedness between the Presidential candidates and campaigns” by helping Hillary at every turn. If this is true, the plaintiffs want the DNC to compensate all Democrats as well as Bernie supporters who donated money under the assumption that the DNC wasn’t lying about their charter’s commitment to fairness.

Naturally, the mainstream media is silent about this lawsuit.

Progressive media, however, is not. Scroll through a Google search of “DNC class action lawsuit” and you’re bound to find at least one article about a bombshell revelation: According to the DNC, it’s their right to pick a candidate in a backroom deal without caring for what the voters have to say. In fact, posits the DNC, statements in the charter concerning “impartiality” are simple “discretionary rules” that they “didn’t have to adopt in the first place.”

Wouldn’t it be great if everything worked that way? Imagine it: You’re sued for putting horse meat in the food you call chicken, and instead of compensating your customers for the lie, you just walk out of the courtroom scot-free because you “didn’t have to make chicken in the first place”.

Unfortunately, the Democratic Party is not a restaurant, and even if it was, Bernie supporters wouldn’t own it. Instead, we’re stuck with an out-of-touch institution that acts as a coronating party for their favored candidate before the first vote is even cast.

If you’re a Bernie supporter, this story has probably gotten your attention already. Rest assured, this is only the beginning. Read on for the three subtle things that make the DNC’s defense even worse than it already looks.

Read the rest at Medium.com >>>

Greenteeth Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Writerbeat ] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer Headlines]

[ Ian at Facebook ]