Too late to save Britain from overheating, says UN climate grifter after Britain's coldest summer on record

o by Arthur Foxake, 7 October 2024 
Jim Skea: ‘We are potentially headed towards 3C of global warming by 2100, if we carry on with the policies we have at the moment’ Picture: Belinda Jiao via Daily Telegraph

The scaremongering never seems to let up these days. Humanity has missed its chance of keeping global warming below 1.5C and it will take “heroic efforts” to stay below 2C this century,  Jim Skea, chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) the smooth faced, soft handed grifter 'scientist' leading the global effort to mitigate climate change warned over the weekend.

Skea said a failure to sufficiently curb carbon emissions had left the world on track to warm by 3C by 2100. This average masks variations between land and sea, with western Europe and the UK facing even greater warming – perhaps as much as 5C by the end of the century.

The alleged affect of CO2 on climate is a logarithmic effect not an arithmetic effect, consequently one has to ask, even if you accept that CO2 is affecting the climate, where are we on the logarithmic graph of this effect? How can they be so sure that cutting emissions now will have such a huge impact on the future climate?

To me the term climate change is something of an oxymoron, climate is a word to describe the changing pattern of our weather and so to say that the climate is changing you need to have some sort of a baseline pattern which you can then show is deviating significantly. As a science it seems as clear and firm as trying to nail a jelly to the barn door. And yet on this dodgy world of modelling, predictions and soothsaying we are being subject to de-industrialisation, poverty and immiseration.

The con Mr. Skea is trying to pull here is the old 'weasel words' scam.

It’s like all those signs where shops have sales “Up to 70% off” – there is one ugly, shop soiled t-shirt on a rack at the back of the shop that is 70% off. Everything else is 5-10% off at most.

Many independent studies by scientists not on government or UN payrolls have shown even if emissions of greenhouse gases were to suddenly stop, Earth’s surface temperature, had it actually incresed as much as the models indicate, would require thousands of years to cool and return to the level in the pre-industrial era.”

The only greenhouse gas is water vapor, the other gases do not have a dipole moments therefore are non-polar, therefore do not directly absorb longwave infrared radiation.

Photons are not longwave infrared radiation (but can contain LWIR).

Photons have no mass or no charge.

Photons are energy carriers and inversely proportional to its wavelength(if wavelength is longer 15µm (absorbed by CO2) then they are of a lower energy than 10µm (emitted by the earth) much shorter wavelength(not absorbed by CO2).

CO2 has no dipole moment therefore no charge. A positive charge therefore will not experience a change in energy. Therefore CO2 does not trap heat. Therefore increased CO2 does not increase the earths temperature.

 I do not have any sort of scientific devices for meauring the effect of CO2 emissions but I did work in Information Technology for thirty years , a significant chunk of it in the nuclear industry, and could therefore spot the flaws in  computer models with a bag over my head. I look out of the window, walk over the moors of northern England and on the coastal paths and it seems to me that in my 70plus years of doing that, nothing has changed all that much, nothing to get excited about. The weather changes it always has, we just had one of the coldest, wettest summers on record, the tides go up and down much like they always have done. And yet these CHIMPS (Completely Hopeless In Modt Practical Situations) who have never held down a real job in their lives think they know better than me and must trash the economies of the developed nations in order, they would have us believe, to save the planet.

What a load of bollocks.