
If Keir Starmer's latest attempt to stitch up British taxpayers succeeds the UK will face handing huge amounts of money to the EU for better access to the
single market under the Labour government's ‘Brexit betrayal’ reset.
The PM under pressure
from Europhile Labour MPs and ministers, is pushing for closer ties with the bloc, spuriously arguing it will boost the
economy. The party hopes that as soon as next month a law could be pushed through which will sign the UK up to EU
rules on food standards, the electricity market, animal welfare and
pesticide use. All of these will have an adverse effect on the UK economy. Is it any wonder that Starmer and Labour's attacks on free speech are aimed at suppressing pubic discussion of these topics.
The government has tried to deflect attention from the true nature of this betrayal by presenting it as implementation of a deal agreed last year, but Sir
Keir has already stated unequivocally that he intends to go further – while stressing
that fully rejoining the customs union and single market are off the
table. In other words this slippery slimball human right lawyer want to make the people in whose interests he is duty bound to govern, citizens of a vassal state which takes its laws from unelected bureaucrats in Brussels.
Downing Street said today there were “clear, indisputable benefits of closer alignment” while Brussels sources have been making clear the Government will have to “pay to play” if Labour wants to remove more barriers.
Diplomats told the Financial Times that the bloc’s “red lines” meant the UK would have to obey EU rules and contribute to its budget.
This is a sickening treason against the British People, as the
Stalinist traitors of the Labour government become ever more bold in trampling Brexit and British interests underfoot to drag
us back into the EUSSR. It’s because Brexit disrupted the 1975 Club of
Rome plan to create Ten Kingdoms, Ten World Regions, in which the
British Isles was “assigned” to the EU, with Islamic Turkey stuck onto
the southern end of it, instead of with the Arabic states where it
naturally should be.
“When the 2016 referendum concluded, the choice was made. Love it or
hate it, seventeen million people voted Leave, and though not legally binding, onca accepted by the government of the day the democratic result
should have been final. Yet for years pro - EU MPs in both Conservative and Labour parties have refused to
accept that verdict. They demanded second referendums, staged
parliamentary revolts, and treated Leave voters with open contempt. The
irony is that this very obstruction has now emboldened a Labour
government determined to undo Brexit and take us back into the authoritarian European Union, but without bothering to ask
voters again.”
As one observer put it, the EU has form here. Denmark and Netherlands rejected the
Maastricht Treaty in 1992 and were forced back to the polls. Ireland
rejected EU treaties twice before accepting them. Norway has voted
against EU membership on two separate occasions, yet its elites continue
to push. The pattern is clear: Brussels and its supporters in member state national governments simply
don’t accept ‘no’ as an answer. They simply do not understand what the word Democracy means.
“The proposed EU youth mobility scheme, for instance, will supposedly
grant 80 million Europeans the right to live and work (and claim benefits,) in Britain.
Officials insist this isn’t free movement, but it’s precisely the sort
of incremental step that always precedes full free movement. Once the
door opens, expanding access becomes inevitable.”
Starmer is taking is back into the EU by crawling through the back door as the EU continues to promote unrestricted immigration and ally itself with the auhoritarian regimes of the middle east.
FROM THE ARCHIVE:
The Truth Has Become An Enemy Of The State And Must Be Kept Hidden At All Costs
Several industries have grown out of the need of globalist governments to keep the majority of the population in a state of fear in order that We The People will not rise up against the oppressive policies related to climate change, health tyranny, mass immigration, surveillance and censorship, technological dictatorship, and the suspension of our civil rights and liberties ...
Tractors Are Heading For Central London As UK Farmers Protest
Scores of farm tractors from all over Britain were reported to be converging on Westminster as British farmers finally ran out of patience and pushed back against what they say is a lack of government support. Flying Union flags and displaying signs with slogan such as 'Save British farming' and 'No farming, no food, no future' they were gathering in London and plan to arrive in central London by early evening
The Theraputic Society Is Destroying Civilisation
Many of the problems afflicting Britain and its neighbours appear to be related to what has been called The Theraputic Society, Nanny State and paternalistic liberalism. As government grows, corporate industry and private business is increasingly coming to resemble the public sector, ruled less by economic rationality than by an intrusive bureaucracy functioning increasingly like an HR department.
UK Gov. Fossil Fuels U Turn Means Its All Over For Net Zero
The Announcement made by UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak acknowledged at last that to keep the lights and heating on in our homes and the wheels of industry turning it will be necessary to start building new gas-fired power plants because the great science backed leap to transition energy productions to clean, green, pollution free, sustainable, renewable, blah blah blah sources has failed dismally.
Double Blow To Irish Woke Wonks - Voters Reject ‘Progressive’ Reforms to the Constitution By Big Majorities
Simpering, limp wristed Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar whose government has faced protests because it is claimed they govern in the interests of the liberal elite and ignore the Irish people, suffered two blows to his ambition to turn Ireland into the wokest country in Europe last weekend. Varadkar admitted on Saturday that voters had delivered “two wallops” to the government, which, led by Leo himself, had pushed for a "Yes" vote on a pair of referendums.
Corbyn's Politically Correct Hypocrites Hate Sexism But Approve Of Muslim Sexism
On encountering my insense dislike of the Labour Party, people asume I am a Conservative. WRONG! I have never supported The Conservatives and have never voted either Conservative or Labour in my life. Politicians should never be trusted, I but what sets Labour politicians and activists above the rest in terms of being worthy of only contempt is the hypocrisy.
He's Not The Messiah, His Name Is Edymandias - Miliband's slab stunt goes down like a Lead Balloon
Only two days campaigning left before polls open for the 2015 general election. Who will winn? Opinion Poll show no conclusive trends. But inside information tells us the reason conservative Prime Minister David Cameron has a smile on his face as the campaigning draws to a close. Farage is radiant, clegg liooks chirpy, only Ed Milband is down in the dumps.
Were Rotherham Abuse Victimes sacrificed To Save The Labour Party
One of the victimes of Rotherham's grooming and child abuse gangs has put a political perspective on the scandal by claiming she and other victims were ignored, effectively sacrificed to the tender mercies of the gangs to ensure Labour did not lose votes in the town. The young girls were abused by Muslim men for years on end, but council did nothing to stop the crime.
Miliband Promises Same Old Shite - Not A Word About Action Against Paedophile Sex Gangs
Labour leader Ed Miliband's keynote speech at the Labour Party conference woyuld have to be the best speech of his life if he hoped to be Prime Minister after next years election, the consensus of opinon said. Ed's friends and opponents awaited the speech with very different hopes and expectations. in the end as Ed dodged the bg issues, the economy and debt, law and order, immigration and Europe, it was probably his enemies who were happier.
The Left's Rhetorical Technique Explained
In the first of what might become a long if irregular series of posts with the collective title, "Left Wing Authoritarianism for beginners," your friend and mentor Little Nicky Nicky Machiavelli will expose the origins of the socialist left's propaganda technique and its apparent dependence on slogans, dogma and mantras. But first let's play a little game ...
The Hate And Prejudice The Bourgois Left Find Acceptable
The neo - fascist left are quick to jump on any of the forbidden pejudices, racism, sexism, homophobia, islamophobia and so on. But as we have seen, they find pejudice and hated againt Christians and white Europeans quite acceptable. The bourgeois metropitan set might think that is acceptable but where I come from it's called hypocrisy.
Ve Haff Vay Of Making You Konform. The Tide Is Turning against the Autoritarian Left
The left's self confidence has had a hint of desperation about it for a long time. From their constant whines about the sexism, racism and homophobia of the working class who happen to be the party's core constituency to the substitution of smearing UKIP for policies in the european Election this is a party of arrested adolescents throwing a hissy fit because people are laughing at them.
Secret Justice Threatens The Right To A Fair Trial
A move to extend the government's power to order court proceedings to be held in secret and without a jury from only applying to trials affecting national security to anything the government would rather we did not know about threatens the most basic principles of British justice and the right to a fair trial.
These stupid laws insult the public and threaten free speech
When the law forbids us to insult or offend somebody, to insult or offend a religion, race, skin colour or sexual preference, free speech and other important democratic rights are under threat. When the law then goes on to say that anyone accused of these offences has no right to defend themselves and the word of the accuser is sufficient evidence on which to obtain a conviction then we have abandoned justice and are ruled by fascists.
[ Immigration crisis ] ... [ Globalisation ] ... [ Humanitas ] ... [ Europe unglued ]
EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]
Europe has responded to Trump' incendiary comments by meeting fire with with hot air. France has spearheaded the deployment of a token contingent of European forces to Greenland and warned that a US seizure or the island would imperil trade with the EU.
Polish prime minister Donald Tusk declared that American military intervention in Greenland would be “the end of the world as we know it.” There is also growing chatter about the rollback of European intelligence sharing with the US and a suspension of US-EU trade negotiations.
While European leaders have coalesced around the opinion that Trump’s threats towards Greenland are serious, there is still a potential off-ramp that can avoid a worst-case scenario. Instead of engaging in fiery rhetoric that provokes Trump towards escalation, Europe should seek out a grand bargain solution that acknowledges American concerns and keeps Nato intact.
America’s primary motivation for acquiring Greenland is to prevent the island from becoming a haven of Russian and Chinese influence. While Trump’s assertions that Greenland is flooded with Russian and Chinese vessels are exaggerated, America’s national security concerns are not wholly without foundation. As the ongoing situation in Ukraine has shown, Europe is invapable of defending anything. Since the fall of the Soviet Union and the end of the cold war European leaders have cut back on defence spending and relied on US military strength for protection as the threat posed by eastern powers appeared to diminish. Now China and Russia are resurgent it seems Trump is trying to realign the world order before China does it.
Streamlining America’s return to at least one of its existing but somewhat run down bases on the island could help convince Trump that outright annexation is unnecessary. In response to Russia and China’s enhanced coordination in the Arctic, Europe should consider new customised military readiness exercises with America and increase intelligence sharing about Moscow and Beijing’s intentions. Musings about security partnership decoupling should be replaced with calls for increased collaboration.
However the issue is clearly not about bases. The 1951 agreement pretty well allows the US carte blanche over that. So it must be something else. Is it mineral rights? Is it simply ego? If we take his comments at face value, Trump is prepared to destroy NATO to get Greenland. But observing as somebody familiar with negotiating techniques in business it seems to me the President is merely setting out his position for negotiating a deal. Instead of carrying on like a bunch of maiden aunts who have accidentally logged on to Porn Hub, Leaders of EU Nations, UK, Norway and Canada should get together with Denmark and instead of simply saying 'No' and blethering about 'international law' put together a proposal acceptable to NATO. Denmark and as far as possible the Greenlanders but with a little common ground that can form the basis for negotiation..
Instead of such businesslike approach, they feign outrage and intheir responses to Trump insult and provoke him. He’s now threatening anyone who supports Denmark with increased tariffs. Denmark cannot defend Greenland, it is a socially and tevhnologically advanced nation but has a population of around 6 million and an area of about 25,000 square miles. The native (Inuit) population of Greenland want ull independence and should they gain it, seem to think the major powers would let them continue their traditional way of life while sitting of £$€trillions worth of natural resources. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and say they are politically naive rather than stupid.
Trump is neither naive or stupid ... hate him as much as you like, but accept the truth of this ... and while his approach may be blantanly ained as advancing American economic interests, Europe's leaders, who are both naive and stupid as well as being to arrogant to be aware of their naivete and stupidity, NATO without the USA cannot hold the line against China and Russia. We have seen these two nations gain control in Africa, South East Asia and South America. What makes anyone think they can't do the same in Greenland?
In November, the Russian defence ministry reportedly inaugurated plans to create a new Arctic fleet to ensure the safety of the Northern Sea Route. China has simultaneously plotted an expansion of its Polar Silk Road infrastructure along this route.
A more robust Russian military footprint in the Arctic could increase the risk of hostile actions around Greenland’s GIUK Gap and disruptions to Trans-Atlantic supply chains. China’s track record suggests that it could transform civilian infrastructure investments into dual-use facilities that carry out espionage and reconnaissance.
Instead of dismissing these threats as fabrications, Europe should work with Washington on mitigating these concerns. Building on the 1951 US-Denmark treaty’s provisions, the EU should encourage Greenland to allow expansion and modernisation of American bases. The Sondrestom Air Base in Kangerlussaq aided America’s early warning efforts during the Cold War and the Narsarsuaq Air Base assisted refuelling efforts during the Second World War.
While Trump has not yet publicly tied his takeover ambitions in Greenland to critical minerals, a rare earth deal could dissuade him from unilateral action. Greenland possesses at least 25 of the 34 EU-designated critical minerals and its harsh terrain means that it would profoundly benefit from US extraction technology.
Trump’s incendiary rhetoric about Greenland has provoked righteous anger throughout Europe. Now is the time to compartmentalise those emotions and strike a pragmatic deal with Washington that saves Nato.
FROM THE ARCHIVE: