Millions of people around the world are living in fear, convinced that climate change is about to destroy us. Years of being brainwashed by the constant stream of propaganda pumped out by mainstream media they believe there is a climate emergency. For decades we have been told by
the United Nations that Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from human
activity are alone responsible for disastrous warming if the earths atmosphere. In 2018, a UN IPCC
report even warned that ‘we have 12 years to save the Earth’, thus
sending millions of people worldwide into a frenzy.
However, many scientists dispute with the UN-promoted man-made climate change theory, while more and more people worldwide are waking up to the knowledge that the whole 'climate catastrophe' narrative is an elaborate hoax aimed at eventually creating a global government. The full facts (which would fill several large volumes were I to list them,) tell a very different story, of a political agenda, corporate greed, the corruption of science and the censoring of thousands of cometent and respected esearchers who have challenged the official narrative.
In a recent lecture, Nobel Laureate physicist John Clauser exposed
how the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) models and
analyses, which are relied upon by politicians and activists to support
claims of a ‘climate crisis’, do not meet basic standards of scientific
enquiry. Clauser received his Nobel prize in 2022 for the observational
measurement of quantum entanglement and understands well the problem of
distinguishing a physical signal from background noise.
Clauser shows that, when corrected for the IPCC’s error prone
arithmetic and statistics, the observational data do not support the
power imbalance claimed to be responsible for global warming.
Furthermore, the outputs of climate models are at variance with the
observational record. Clauser discusses the roles of convection, clouds
and their variability in providing a negative feedback mechanism, and
proposes that this acts as a thermostat that stabilises surface
temperatures. Clauser’s conclusion is that claims of a ‘climate crisis’
lack scientific substance and that Net Zero policies are an unnecessary
hindrance.
Clauser’s talk is available on YouTube.
The Irish Climate Science Forum (ICSF) website is a
valuable resource for Warmageddon sceptics founded by Jim O’Brien and responsible for a lot of excellent work in highlighting the scientific flaws in the UN
climate narrative. The ICSF provides a comprehensive lecture series from
renowned international scientists providing much evidence, analysis,
and data that contradicts the UN assertions. The lectures are available
at: https://www.icsf.ie/lecture-series
The ICSF scientific view coincides with those of the Climate
Intelligence (CLINTEL) foundation that operates in the fields of climate
change and climate policy. CLINTEL was founded in 2019 by emeritus
professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and science journalist Marcel
Crok. Based on this common conviction, 20 Irish scientists and several
ICSF members have co-signed the CLINTEL World Climate Declaration “There is No Climate Emergency” (see https://clintel.org/ireland/).
The reality is that the climate has always been
changing, the climate changes naturally and slowly in its own cycle, and
CO2 emissions (and methane from livestock, the cow fart scare) are not
dominant factors in climate change. In essence, therefore, the incessant
UN, government, and corporate-media-produced climate hysteria in
relation to CO2 emissions (and also methane from cow farts) has no scientific basis. It appears to me the UN narrative is yet another example of fake
science being used to drive an ulterior agenda, see also the book Godless Fake Science.
The claim that Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is a dangerous pollutant is totally ridiculous, as has been repeated probably millions of times by people who bother to check facts, Carbon Dioxide is a trace atmospheric gas that is essential to the survival of all life on earth. The Carbon Dioxide narrative is a distraction created possibly for the purpose of diverting our attention from the ‘real’ pollution, the toxic shite that is dumped in our environment and fed into our bodies by big business, globalist politics and corrupt academic institutions. The reality is that CO2 is a vital component in the diet of plants. During daylight hours, by means of a process known as photosynthesis, plants use solar energy to absorb Carbon Dioxide and extract the Carbon atoms which they turn into vegetable matter. Pure, breathable oxygen is released back into the atmosphere. This is basic biology, learned at school, usually between the ages of 10 and 13 by school children in the developed nations. Yet so many people who claim to be 'climate scientists' appear to be ignorant of it.
Unfortunately, many misinformed environmentalists and ignorant climate scientists are driving around in electric cars,
the battery production for which has caused vast amounts of ‘real’
pollution via the industrial mining and processing of rare earth metals,
and the consequent pollution to land, air and water systems. See also
this article. Note that the UN does not focus on the thousands of real pollutants that corporate industrial globalisation creates.
A very simple quote from climatologist Judith Curry: “Sure, all things being equal CO2 may cause a
little warming, but all things in Earth’s climate are not equal”.
How many ordinary people have head of John Clauser or other people like
him, and how many will ever read an article like this, let alone the type of
studies to be found by following the links? I suggest a tiny percentage only will do that. This means they
will only be hearing the alarmist version of reality as presented on
mainstream media (BBC, SKY News, CNN, The Daily Mail, Washington Post etc.)
There is a little story in a book by Stephen Einhorn called
“Climate Change, What they rarely teach you in College.”According to
Jewish folklore, The Lord sent two Angels down with a sack full of
foolish souls to be evenly distributed over Earth, but they tripped and
fell spiling them in a little Polish town called Chelm.
Soon a heated
argument started in the town about what was more important, the Sun or
the Moon. After careful consideration the Chief Rabbi decided the Moon
was more important because it shone light at night when people needed it
and not during the day when there as already plenty of light. It
therefore quickly became settled that the Moon was more important. In
fact there was a “consensus” and those who disagreed were classed as
“Moon Deniers”.
There is something very similar happening today and many people getting
their information from mainstream TV News are like the people of Chelm.
They don’t look at facts and empirical science. They listen to , and believe Authority.
FROM THE ARCHIVE:
The UK
government is putting plans together for days of organised blackouts this winter, in what they call
a "reasonable worst-case scenario" for energy shortages, according to reports in manstream media. Naturally they are blaming this on the embargo on importing gas from Russia but in reality Britain has never imported any more than a small amout of its gas from Russia. The real reason politicians and energy company CEOs are panicking is entirely due to their obession with obtaining all our energy from intermittent sources like wind and sunshine ...
UK Households Are Paying Wind Turbine Owners To Not Generate Electricity
On another near windless day here in the United Kingdom, Boggart Blog came across a very interesting piece if news. According to figures published by the business and management consultancy LCP, british taxpayers have been paying operators of wind turbines farms for the time their windmills were NOT generating electricity increased to record levels last year ...
Net Zero Is A Dangerous Fantasy, But Scientists Believe In Fairies It Seems
With oil and gas prices rocketing and the highly propted sustainable energy sources performing way befow expectations the energy crisis currently gripping Europe (with worse to come as food shortages start to bite, polticians still seem more intent on pandering to the green lobby and chasing the dream of a fossil fuel free world rather securing the energy and food supplies needed by the people they serve.
New UN Report on Climate Change – Nothing New, Nothing True
The latest United Nations (“UN”) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) report, published this week, once again, in scaremongering tone and the language of the panic stricken, claims that the planet is in peril (we are facing climate disaster, the clock is at one minute to midnight, we must take urgent action to destroy civilisation if we are to save the planet, the usual over - dramatised guff designed to spread fear and panic,) basically the same claim as they have been making at least twice a month for the past 20 years.
We need energy security – not Net Zero
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted a major rethink in the West. We have suddenly found ourselves vulnerable not just to rising prices in oil and gas, but also to inflation in other commodities – such as food and fertiliser. Of all these problems, the security of our energy supply has most exercised minds.
Net Zero Gone With The Wind - Boris Johnson Plans Seven New Nuclear Plants And Shelves Wind Expansion
Reports in mainstream media suggest Boris Johnson has done a U turn on his recently announced massive expansion of wind powered generating capacity. Sources in Westminster claim Boris has shelved his masterplan for a giant, floating wind farm in The North Sea and the government will reconsider plans to double or even treble the number of wind turbines in the countryside and approve plans for up to seven new nuclear reactors instead.
Climate Change Research Paper Censored by The British Hydrological Society For Telling The Truth
The Daily Sceptic today published an article by retired research scientist James Dent, whose specialist field was hydrology and meteorology. Mr. Dent was involved in research projects aiemd at understanding the factors influencing climate, and their effects on environments, [ ... ] he was the World Meteorology Organisation Chief Technical Advisor to the Flood Forecasting and Warning Centre in Bangladesh, a low lying nation especially prone to flooding ....
Freak Weather Around The World Begs Questions
With Britain and other parts of northern Europe basking in unseasonably warm temperatures which are forecast to last for a few days, while parts of the USA gring to a halt under a blanket of snow dumped by freak storms are, accoring to climate scarmongers, a signal that irreversible warming had arrived, it is perhaps timely for a hot topic from ten years ago, geoengineering came under the microscope again. This report from Global Intel Hub seems a good way to kick off the debate. ... Continue reading >>>
The True Cost Of The Green Energy Boom Is Now Being Realized
For four decades we have been fed a constant stream of propaganda assuring us that green energy was the only way forward if we wanted to secure supplies of the energy essential to a modern society while preventing the environmental catastrophes that would be the inevitable consequence of climate change caused by the Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emitted by human industrial, commercial and social activity. ... Continue reading >>>
Electricity cuts and power crisis predicted for Britain’s New Year Holiday
Shapps carefully omits to mention that the government’s only contingency plan for providing the power needed to meet peaks of demand (a sudden cold snap for example) is to spark up the thousands of diesel generators the earth loving politicians have concealed in goods containers on compounds sited around the country. Yes you read that right, diesel generators ...
Now Even ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann Admits The ‘Pause’ In Global Warming Is Real
“It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims,” the paper in Nature Climate Change says.
German Scientist Confims Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has confirmed what those of us dubbed 'climate deniers' have been telling you for years ...
It Looks As If Carbon Credits Scam Has INCREASED CO2 Emissions
As the climate change scare becomes more and more exposed for the money making fraud it always was, they green weirdie beardie, rope sandal wearing tree huggers get more hysterical and stupid in their arguments that we must all return to medieval lifestyles, the billionaires like Al Gore who hope to profit from it keep flogging the dead horse and the angrier and more vicious the left wing hate mobs become in their witch hunts.
EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]
It is deeply troubling to observe the extent of military aggression currently being carried out by the Israeli state, and perhaps more disturbing is the apparent popular support within Israel itself—where polls suggest that over 80% of the population endorse these actions. That said, recent developments hint at a shift: a growing number of Israelis are beginning to question not only the dominant narrative but also the long-term consequences of these policies.
A widespread belief persists, especially outside the United States, that Israel exerts a disproportionate influence over U.S. foreign policy. This perception—whether accurate or exaggerated—has often served a dual purpose: on one hand, it deflects accountability from U.S. institutions by externalizing blame onto the so-called “Israel Lobby,” and on the other, it helps maintain a domestic self-image of American benevolence. According to this narrative, Israel is the rogue actor, while the United States is cast as the reluctant patron, constantly trying to rein in its unruly ally.
However, this interpretation may obscure a deeper and more systemic reality. Rather than viewing Israel as the puppeteer, it may be more accurate to see it as a key instrument—among many—in the service of a transnational financial and political elite. This elite, which is not subject to democratic oversight, is composed of powerful financial institutions such as Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street. These entities, along with their global network of military, political, and media assets, effectively shape and execute an international agenda oriented around perpetual war, resource extraction, and economic control.
In this broader context, Israel functions as a strategically located forward operating base—or to borrow a metaphor, an “aircraft carrier”—for Western geopolitical interests in the Middle East. Its citizenry, like those of many modern states, are socialized from birth to serve in various roles—soldiers, professionals, workers—within a larger ideological and institutional apparatus. The ideological foundation of Israeli society reinforces a sense of existential threat, encouraging a militarized posture that conveniently aligns with the long-term goals of Western financial power.
To maintain this system, extensive propaganda is required. Media in the West plays a crucial role in manufacturing consent, shaping public perception through a mixture of omission, distraction, and simplification. Critical voices are marginalized, while dissent—both domestic and international—is often criminalized or delegitimized. When Western populations protest the policies of Israel or their own governments’ complicity, they are often met with surveillance, suppression, or accusations of disloyalty or extremism.
The so-called “Israel Lobby” must be understood not merely as a group of ideologically motivated Zionists, but as a tool of influence embedded within a much larger structure of control. This mechanism is fueled not only by private wealth but by vast public funds—especially from inflated and unaccountable defense budgets—which are used to influence legislators, universities, think tanks, and media outlets. While the lobby is visibly staffed by individuals of Jewish background, its true function is not religious or even nationalistic in nature; rather, it is instrumental, designed to shape political outcomes that serve the strategic interests of global capital.
What is at stake is not simply Israeli policy or American foreign policy, but the integrity of democratic institutions globally. The Israeli state serves as a cover—an operational front—for deeper structural forces. So too do other global hotspots: Ukraine, certain European governments, and a host of NGOs and “freedom-promoting” entities. These are not independent actors but functionaries within a larger system that perpetuates conflict and concentrates wealth.
The question then becomes: who is really calling the shots?
The evidence suggests it is not elected governments, but the largest banking institutions and their asset management arms. These entities exert influence over political parties, media ecosystems, and global markets. They control not only the narrative but the very machinery of governance. Political figures who appear powerful—such as former U.S. President Donald Trump—are, in this view, often compromised and manipulated into compliance through covert leverage, including personal scandals and intelligence operations.
In this analysis, almost everything becomes a tool of this unaccountable power: Israel, the lobby, the U.S. military, taxpayers, media conglomerates, even citizens themselves. Belief in the dominant narratives—without question or critique—renders individuals passive participants in a global system that undermines their own autonomy.
If there is to be any meaningful resistance to this state of affairs, it must begin with public awareness, critical thought, and courageous dissent. The mythology of democratic values and humanitarian intervention must be confronted with empirical scrutiny and moral clarity. Only by dismantling the mechanisms of narrative control and exposing the financial structures behind endless conflict can any hope for peace and justice emerge.
FROM THE ARCHIVE: