Boggart Abroad: 03/15/16

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Castrating Project Fear: Former-UK Army Chief Shoots Down Claims of Brexit Impact on NATO

We told you all when 'Dave's deal' was exposed as a sham that the campaign being led by Prime Minister David Cameron, to keep us in the EU (at the cost of our national sovereignty and our British identity) the Euro - sell -outs next move would be a propaganda war, predicting all sorts of horrors Britain would be exposed to if we left. So do you want vto believe this scaremongering bollocks and vote for a future of serfdom as a province of the Euronazi Empire?

As the great philosopher Cantona once said, "He who forecasts all perils will never sail the seas".

The EU council meets to discuss security concerns. You really think this bunch of limp wristed fairies will keep us ssafe when the denizens of Ragnarok, some really nasty pieces of work created by the very unpleasant sounding by Snorri Sturluson burst out of the past to reclaim their mortal realm?

Well we're a seafaring nation, our ancestors travelled the great oceans in 40 foot rowing boats, ate whales and we did not built our empires (yes there have been several) by being the kind of snivelling cowards who hide in the broom cupboard and hope Nanny State will scare off the dragons. Our Celtic, Saxon and Danish forebears (and a lot of them looked like bears and smelled worse) sailed into unknown waters and faced whatever monsters waited there. So why are so many people being taken in by shite like this.

Claims that the EU and the NATO military alliance could unravel with a potential British exit from the bloc have been rubbished by former British army Commander Colonel Richard Kemp, who says a Brexit from the EU could in fact benefit the UK's national security.

Reacting to claims from the chief of the US Army in Europe, Lieutenant-General Frederick "Ben" Hodges, who said that a Brexit would set a dangerous precedent during a time of increased international uncertainty, Colonel Kemp says that warnings over the EU and NATO disintegrating are not realistic.

"I think clearly the leadership of the EU and our own leaders don't agree with general Hodges that the EU is likely to unravel, because if they did I think… we would have seen a much greater effort by EU leaders to help us [the UK] renegotiate our relationship with the EU in the way that this country wants it, and the way that the prime minister tried to achieve," he told the BBC.

"And the second issue is that if the EU unravels, if the other 27 members of the EU can't hold themselves together coherently without the UK, then you do have to ask questions about the whole future of the EU, whether we're in or out of it."

The comments come after US Army Lieutenant-General Hodges said he was "worried" that a potential Brexit from the EU would create division within the bloc, and ultimately "undermine" NATO efforts at countering what Hodges believes to be Russian aggression.

Coming only a day after Russia withdrew most of its military personnel from Syria after kicking the gonads of the planet's who most dangerous terrorist states, USA and Turkey (both NATO members incidentally) it looks a tad stupid to try to brand Russia the warmongers. The USA provided ISIS with weapons and ammo and trained their men, while Turkey bought oil from the terrorists in exchange for dollars and military hardware.

Arguing that Britain was the second strongest member of the military alliance, Kemp said:

"I don't think that EU membership affects our position within NATO, and I don't think that the fact that one country of the European bloc is on a separate basis is going to significantly affect the NATO alliance."

The former UK commander also rejected claims that it was essential for the EU to remain unified in light of current security issues facing Europe.

He's right, NATO existed before the EU was formed and through the years the 'Common Market' as it was originally known, was no more than a free trade area. The idea of economic and political integration of the six member states was not discussed. But NATO kept us safe throughout the Cold War years, although Russia never actually posed a threat.

RELATED POSTS:

Britain's Choice: Democracy Or Eurocracy

Democracy in the European Union: The people = one vote, the bureaucracy = millions of votes - because, and I quote, "The people are not intelligent enough to understand complex issues". As we have commented before, it is not just a large section of British public opinion that want's to get our country out of Europe. Last week voters in The Netherlands voted by a big majority against the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, which would be a step towards ...

French, Belgians, Dutch, Italians Follow Britain in Euroskepticism
Europeans want us British to lead them out of Europe. Don't be fooled by project fear, the European Union (aka the Euronazi Federal Superstate) is falling apart. There will not be chaos if we leave, there will be chaos if we stay.

Why Should Obama Be Given A Platform From Which To Lecture Britian
Although it seems Sidi Barack Hussein Obama, the wannabe God - Emperor of the world and President Of The Entire Universe and everything Else Besides is still planning to visit Britain in late April to tell us all of HIS vision for Britain's future as a province of the US State of Greater Germany with Europe, British voters are distincylt undwerwhelmed by the prospect

EU Membership Vote in UK to Paralyze Decision Making
After Yugoslavia NATO changed from a mutual defence alliance to an organisation for military aggression.
European Lawmakers Debate Brexit Amid Fears of Domino Effect

Russia's Surprise Withdrawal From Syria? "If We Don't Go Away, We Can't Come back Again."

Propaganda War: US Officials Working to Keep Russia, Europe at Odds

Total Opacity Of 'The Most Transparent Administration Ever'

Turkey 'Blackmailing Europe Over Migrant Crisis'

Britain’s Terror Chief Warns Of Likely Islamic State Terror Attacks

EU Sacrifices Kurds To Turkey's Imperial Ambition For Erdogan Help With Migrants

David Cameron denies migrant crisis is a 'giant David Icke conspiracy' to keep us in the EU.

Support For EU / US Sanctions On Russia Declining In Central Europe

Fear and Panic: EU Defence Budgets Boom Amid ‘Russian Threat’ Paranoia

NATO Rhetoric About Russian Threat is 'Absurd'

Brexit: Britain's future in or out of EU?

Should Britain leave the EU and or remain and surrender even more of our national sovereighty to the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels. The campaign to keep us in the EU, led by Prime Minister David Cameron, has become know as Project Fear, the Europhile having only scaremongering argument to back their case. At the moment, due to the immigrant crisis caused by the Shengen Zone open borders area and 'open doors' immigration policy ...

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Russia's Surprise Withdrawal From Syria? "If We Don't Go Away, We Can't Come back Again."

Russian warplanes: Leaving Syria but for how long?

Although we Boggart Bloggers like to boast we are usually ahead of the news, and in some cases even manage to report news before it happens (and still get it right) we have to admit we did not see yesterday's announcement, following a meeting between Vladimir Putin and Bashir al Assad, of the withdrawal of all Russian army and airforce combat personnel from Syria took us by surprise.

There is no doubt that the withdrawal is not quite what it seems to be, but more likely a tactical move by the Russians. The Kremlin feels it has done enough to secure the regime of President Assad, the remnants of the Sunni Muslim Free Syrian Army are no longer capable of mounting a challenge and the Syrians, along with Shi'ite militias in Iraq and Kurdish irregulars, backed by Iranian Republic an Guard troops ought to be capable of dealing with ISIS whose forces (terrorists rather than an organised fighting force) are dispersing and heading for other failed states and basket case states in Africa.

Thus Putin's move not only draws the sting out of US propaganda from The Pentagon and The State Department that was aimed at convincing the world (and particularly British voters who are making up their minds how to vote in the EU referendum,) that Russia had ambitions to expand its territories in Europe and Asia and this threatened the security of Britain.

Western media are presenting the withdrawal as a move aimed at forcing Assad to negotiate a transition from autocratic rule to a more democratic system. but even such a move could be nuanced, most things that happen in Russian politics are, as Zero Hedge suggests:

On Monday, Putin surprised the world by announcing a partial withdrawal of the Russian military presence from Syria. Moscow’s warplanes, backed by Hezbollah ground troops, had effectively encircled Aleppo where rebels were preparing to make what amounted to a last stand just prior to the ceasefire that took effect late last month.

"I think that the tasks set to the defense ministry are generally fulfilled,” Putin said. “That is why I order to begin withdrawal of most of our military group from Syria starting from tomorrow," he added.

Indeed. Despite President Obama’s early contention that Russia would end up in a “quagmire” in Syria, The Kremlin instead showed what happens when a mishmash of loosely aligned rebels squares off against a modern air force.

Five months and thousands upon thousands of sorties later, the rebel cause has become virtually hopeless. It’s much easier to broker a ceasefire when the enemy has been, for all intents and purposes, decimated.

Now, all eyes are on peace talks in Geneva where there is “no Plan B,” according to United Nations special envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura.

De Mistura has called a political transition the “mother of all issues,” with the only alternative being a return to war. But Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem has shown little willingness to negotiate for the future of President Assad while the main Syrian opposition umbrella group, the High Negotiations Committee looks determined to demand the installation of some manner of interim government devoid of Assad and his top brass.

"[We don't know] who we are negotiating with and what the issues are," Syria's UN representative, Bashar Jaafari complains. All sides probably feel the same way.

Other sources are suggesting the move is a symbolic gesture to the Syrian opposition pill, because while they are involved in negotiations on Syria's future and their US ally in The White House has stepped back, the crushing damage suffered by the anti - Assad guerillas due to Russian air strikes has rendered the opposition groups the west could support completely ineffective.

Not even the rogue state Turkey can support ISIS now so with forces in disarray and their supply lines destroyed they are no longer an "Islamic State" capable of threatening standing armies.

"Assad is clearly not going away anytime soon even if Russia slightly reduces its operations,” Anton Lavrov, an independent Russian military analyst told Bloomberg, adding that “this is clearly linked to the start of negotiations in Geneva [and] it’s a signal to the opposition and an attempt to influence their agreeability.” That underscores our assessment above: the opposition has now seen what can happen when there's a lack of "agreeability," so now Putin will play good cop to his own original bad cop and see if that works to bring the rebels to the table.

Other reports from Syria suggest the general population (a majority of which always supported Assad knowing the alternative was worse) is finding the resolve to resist the terror tactics of Islamic extremists. This from the BBC:

"On Monday, there were reports of demonstrations against the Nusra Front in territory it holds in Idlib province in north-western Syria," BBC reports. "Photos and videos circulated on social media by an analyst with the Brookings Institution think-tank showed supporters of Western-backed rebels marching in the town of Marat al-Numan [and] there were also reports the protestors had stormed a Nusra Front prison, freeing detainees."

Though we are sure this is not the end of the Syria sage, and ISIS are making gains in Afghanistan, Indonesia, Pakistan and many African nations including Libya and Somalia, in the middle east at least it seems things are moving in the right direction.