Monday, October 31, 2016

Should The Democrats Ask Hillary To Step Down

There has been a lot of talk over the weekend about whether the US Democratic Party should ask Hillary Clinton to step aside, given the web of scandal she and her corporate capitalist cronies spun around her criminal activities using the phoney charity The Clinton Foundation as a front. The latest bombshell to nuke Hillary's hopes was the announcement last Friday that the FBI was reopening their investigation into the notorious 'servergate' scandal. Having found strong evidence of breaches of federal law relation to national ssecurity in their investigation into Clinton's use of a private email server while she was Secretary of State, the FBI team, allegedly under pressure from The White House, decided not to proceed with charges. That was back in summer and that was when the Democrats should have forced Clinton out of the race. Unfortunately she is the New World Order candidate and the elitists who had anointed her Obama's successor could not tolerate Donald Trump, the wild card  chosen by Republican voters over the party's faithful hacks, or Democrat maverick and career outsider Bernie Sanders who had never previously identified himself as a Democrat, or anyone else the globalist cartel did not own, as a prospective president.

What prompted the change of heart is not quite clear yet. Some reports say FBI Director James Comey, who came under massive pressure for letting Clinton off with a slap on the wrist for greater crimes than others including senior military figures and civil servants had done jail time and seen their careers ruined for. Others believe the cache of emails found on devices owned by Anthony Weiner, husband of Hillary's closest aide Huma Abedin is the problem. These documents only came to light when FBI agents were investigationd Weiner for sexual activity with an underage girl.

This could simply be a case of Clinton having lied under oath, having told the initial investigation that she had at that stage turned over all the emails from all devices pertaining to her time in office at the State Department. Or, and this seems more likely, suspicions were aroused when they requested a search warrant to examine a vast cache of emails on Weinter's computers in pursuit of their investigation into his alleged sex crime. Why did the Demartment of Justice, headed by a close friend of the Clintons and the Obamas not want the Feds to see what was in that cache of emails.

However it turns out, once again we see evidence of the arrogance and sense of entitlement that have done so much damage to the Obama presidency and Hillary Clinton's campaign to succeed him lead to mistakes and misjudgements so stupid they should long ago have desrtoyed any prospect of a Clinton presidency.

And then there's the evidence of corruption, but that's another story..

With only eight days to go and polls suggesting her support is collapsing, it is too late to replace Hillary with either her chosen running mate, the Vice Presidential candidate Tim Kaine, or with the Democratic Party contender Bernie Sanders who, as we now know was robbed of the nomination by a massive electoral fraud enginered by the Clinton campaign team and the Democratic Party National Committee with total cooperation from mainstream media's broadcast and print sections.

Being British I don't know if there is an option for the Democrats to request a delay in the election while they select another candidate but I guess that option would go down like the proverbial lead Zeppelin with Republican and independent voters. The only other option would be to let Clinton run and in the now unlikely event of her winning to demand her immediate resignation (on health grounds or some 'Trumped' up excuse so the VP could take over and at least have a chance of governing without the taint of corruption hamstringing his administration.

It is a sign of how (rigged polls aside) the Democrats have screwed up by not addressing the corruption that surrounds Hillary clinton that a long time supporter, John Kass of the Chicago Tribune can write so scathingly of the wman as he does in the extract below:

John Kass, Chicago Tribune: Remember that Bill Clinton leveraged the "Year of the Woman." Then he preyed on women in the White House and Hillary protected him. But the political left — most particularly the women of the left — defended him because he promised to protect abortion rights and their other agendas.

If you take a step back from tribal politics, you'll see that Mrs. Clinton has clearly disqualified herself from ever coming near classified information again. If she were a young person straight out of grad school hoping to land a government job, Hillary Clinton would be laughed out of Washington with her record. She'd never be hired.

As secretary of state she kept classified documents on the home-brew server in her basement, which is against the law. She lied about it to the American people. She couldn't remember details dozens of times when questioned by the FBI. Her aides destroyed evidence by BleachBit and hammers. Her husband, Bill, met secretly on an airport tarmac with Attorney General Loretta Lynch for about a half-hour, and all they said they talked about was golf and the grandkids.

And there was no prosecution of Hillary.

That isn't merely wrong and unethical. It is poisonous.

Read more >>>


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]