An international organisation made up of doctors who have concerns about the medical ethics of drug companies and healthcare providers have denounced the current campaigns to coerece people to accept vaccination for COVID-19, force vaccine passports on the public and to introduce a regime of referesher jabs eveery six months as the vaccines only provide at best a few months protection. The group, Doctors for Covid Ethics, say studies on Covid-19’s closest-related virus to infect humans, SARS, revealed that natural immunity to coronavirus infection is long lasting but fear people will be fear people will be bullied into taking regular top-up vaccines through fear generated by a prolonged and intense propaganda campaign to exaggerate the seriousness of the disease for the vast majority of us, or in order to re-access society when their Digital Green Pass expires after just six months.
Doctors for C~ovid ethics report that people who acquired natural immunity to SARS in 2003 remain protected even
now. They also contend that before the vaccine rollout programmes began most people had developed immunity to Covid-19, either through contact with the virus itself, which was seen off often without symptoms or with only mild ones, by their efficient immune systems, or due to cross-immunity conferred by
other, commonly occurring coronaviruses. It should be remembered that coronavirus is not a unique pathogen, but a generic name for a group of viruses including Influenza and The Common Cold.
Doctors for Covid ethics wisely avoid getting into the political aspects of the pandemic but this blog, our sister publications, and thousands more alt_media news and comment websites have repeatledly warned that the hyping of a trivial infection into an alleged existential threat to the future of civilisation, and as shouts of "Conspiracy Theorists" echo in our ears the European Union just published an Article of Law Decree dictating that its proposed Digital Green Pass will have validity for just six months. Once thi term expires expires the holder would need to be re-vaccinated or produce evidence of having recovered Covid in the last six months or take a test every 48 hours in order to regain their freedoms to travel or engage in normal social activities with friends and family..The group also highlights that vaccine companies have been exempt from legal liability for vaccine-induced harm, adding that, for the vast majority of people, SARS-CoV-2 is a non-lethal, typically mild to moderately severe illness. They said: “The overwhelming majority of people are not at risk from COVID-19 and do not require vaccination for their own protection.
“The vaccines have been touted as a means to prevent asymptomatic infection and, by extension, asymptomatic transmission. However, “asymptomatic transmission” is an artefact of invalid and unreliable PCR test procedures and interpretations, leading to high false-positive rates. Evidence indicates that PCR-positive, asymptomatic people are healthy false-positives, not carriers. A comprehensive study of 9,899,828 people in China found that asymptomatic individuals testing positive for COVID-19 never infected others.
Arguing there is no scientific case for what constitutes an assault on human rights and civil liberties, Doctors for Covid Ethics point out that not only are the documents pointless as the makers and international medical authorities have admitted the vaccine does not prevent people either developing the disease or passing it on to others, but the only other country which currently requires citizens to have a passport for domestic travel is Israel, which is widely condemned for its human rights record by the very people who are most vociferous in support of introducing vaccine passports worldwide,
The Doctors for Covid Ethics statement said: “There is no scientific foundation to the concept of vaccine passports and no rational case at all for vaccine passports. To set a six-month cut-off is bizarre and arbitrary. Examining the time course of antibodies in blood samples is not a valid approach to the question of, ‘how long does immunity last?’.
“This is because antibodies aren’t the most important host defence mechanism in immunity to viruses. That’s considered to be T-cell memory (cytotoxic as well as ‘helper’ lymphocytes) and B-memory (antibody producing) cells. Antibodies naturally fall over time if you’re no longer constantly rechallenged with the infective pathogen. As community prevalence falls away, this re-exposure to the virus also diminishes.
“When durability of immunity to the closest known virus, SARS, was studied, those who had acquired immunity naturally, through infection in 2003, all retained immunity 17 years later. There is speculation that ‘variants’ of SARS-CoV-2 might ‘break through’ the immunity gained through natural infection or vaccination. There is absolutely no evidence for this at all.
“In fact, there is very strong evidence to the contrary – that no variant is sufficiently different from the original virus that it’s even possible for ‘immune escape’ to occur. Several groups of immunologists have shown convincingly that people immune to one variant have T-cells which recognise all the other variants tested. This isn’t a surprise, for no variant differs from the original sequence by more than 0.3 per cent.
“In fact, those who had retained immunity to SARS also possessed cross-immunity to SARS-CoV-2. These two viruses differ by approximately 20 per cent. Obviously, if our immune systems easily recognise two viruses which share 80 per cent similarity, it follows that differences of 0.3 per cent are completely irrelevant, from an immunological perspective.”
Vaccine sceptics and libetarian activists have pointed out that once imposed, the vaccine passports act as digital tracking devices and could easily be extended to become part of a social credit system similar to the one used in Communist China, to grant permissions or impose sanctions based on how obedient a citozen is deemed to be and thus suppress free speech and curtail social activity and thus to restrict access to information to only that which is approved by government. It is pure fascism, disguised as a project to protect people. How many of the propagandized citizens of European Union member states, the UK, USA and other democratic nations will be gullible or fearful enough to accept it is anybody's guess, but we believe that given the laughable track record of governments in implementing massive Information Technology projects
Last week, Doctors for Covid Ethics wrote their third open letter to the European Medicines Agency, warning executive director Emer Cooke that cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) dominates the list of adverse reactions from the vaccines and is not as rare as the EMA suggests. They suggested that the number of unexplained deaths and serious adverse reactions rapidly following vaccination has long surpassed what would normally be considered an acceptable threshold yet governments and medical organisations continue to insist the vaccines are safe and pressure people to accept vaccination.