Typical of the obsessively self righteous nature of the radical left
that the policies they have forced on governments are having the
opposite effect to what is intended, but “The Green Blob” as the
Thunberg / Friends of the Earth / Ekstinktion Rebellion crusties are
collectively known are so busy signalling their own virtue and hating
everybody who pooints out the obvious errors in their “science” and
flaws in their economic arguments they just don’t have time to think
Like this blog and its sister publication The Daily Stirrer, Natural News is a long established opponent of the climate change scare. Their latest article on the subject exposes more Green idiocy just as Boris Johnson, the UK Conservative Party’s first Cultural Marxist Prime Minister commits his government to economically and socially destructive green policies to augment the damage already done by his “folowing the science” on the hoax virus pandemic of 2020.
“Green” policies aimed at reducing CO2 emissions are having the opposite effectfrom Natural News
Like many liberal policies, so-called “green” policies aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions are full of contradictions and poor reasoning – not to mention the fact that their stated goal does not have the best interests of the planet at heart.
Scientist Charles Rotter takes issue with the fact that burning biomass is considered CO2 neutral to give it the appearance of reducing carbon dioxide emissions and helping control “climate change.” In a piece published on the esteemed climate website Watts Up With That?, he points out that burning biomass raises the instantaneous output of carbon dioxide emissions significantly, and it also causes substantial destruction to natural environments and habitats when it is used at the needed industrial scale.
Fuel substitution policies that see fossil fuels replaced by wind, solar and biomass, which they claim are CO2-emissions free, have already damaged the reliability of power grids in South Australia and California, and other places are sure to follow suit.
Rotter points out that the biomass that has been declared carbon neutral by UK and EU policy isn’t carbon neutral at all. For the same power produced, he says that burning biomass releases far more carbon dioxide than other fossil fuels such as coal, lignite and natural gas. Moreover, biomass destroys the virgin forest environments where the wood it uses is harvested. In Europe in particular, he says there is not enough timber feedstock to maintain even partial power production.
In fact, it will require as long as a century to fully restore the forest wildlife habitat destroyed and therefore reabsorb the carbon dioxide released by burning biomass … Continue reading >>>