Officially Confirmed: Turkey is Blackmailing the EU On Migrant Crisis’

When Hausfrau Volksfuhrer Merkel and EU top unelected bureaucrat Jean Claude Juncker were cooking up their corrupt deal with the blackmailer and terrorist supporter Recep Erdogan, the President of terrorist state Turkey, this blog and many other new  media news sites were quick off the mark in pointing out the obvious problem with welcoming paying the gangster President Erdogan for help with controlling the migrant flow into Europe and fast tracking Turkey into the European Union.

For starters, Turkey it was widely known (to everyone except politicians, government bureaucrats and mainstream media) that Turkey has been the primary enabler of ISIS and other terrorists, illegally factoring stolen oil from wells in occupied territory (a trade in which menbers of Erdogan's family were involved)  as well as transporting weapons shipments to ISIS and Free Syrian Army (the human organ eaters barack Obama describes as 'moderate rebels'.

By helping to destabilize Syria and thus being a big player in creating the Syrian conflict and by extension the EU ‘migrant crisis’,  Turkey has been blackmailing Brussels over a problem it helped to create in the first place. Several payments of billions of Euros have been made to Turkey by the EU and political favours promised in retiurn for 'help with the migrant crisis', help which has not been forthcoming.  Each broken promise from Turkey is followed by threats and demands for more money and concessions.

Now at last, we have proof that Turkey is blackmailing the EU. It has been provided by the Turkish government itself in a press statement from the Turkish Foreign Affairs Department:

Turkey would have to suspend its migration agreement with the EU if there is no deal to grant visa-free travel to Turks, Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu told TRT Haber broadcaster on Tuesday.

The fact that EU elected leaders and bureaucrats are so naive and ignorant  they cannot see this blatant blackmail  illustrated the fundamental problem with the EU. If something does not fit comfortably with the politically correct consensus embraced by leaders of the EU and many European nations, they simply  refuse to recognise what is staring them in the fucking face. That our Prime Minister, the leader of the opposition and most senior politicians want to deliver our country lock, stock and barrel into the hands of these delusional idiots is almost too shocking to comprehend.

Considering the horrific state of Syria, this should be a stark warning to any other country (like the EU) about what an open border with Turkey will do to peace and security.
Now Turkey is kicking-up a fuss over the possibility that its EU membership bid may be spiked


RELATED POSTS:
EU mediterranean crisis
EU refugee quotas
Gadaffi's threat realised
Europe human rights compatible with Turkey's terrorism
Europoe and Turkey
Europe unglues
Immigrant invastion
Immigration omnibus
Immigration crisis is a Soros scam
ISIS backed by Turkery in Syria
Turkey at war with Syria
Evidence of Turkey's illegal trade with ISIS
Turkey ISIS trade links

Turkey Resorts To Blackmail (Again), Will Unleash Refugees On Europe If No Visa-Free Travel
EU Turkey Migrant Deal Set To Fail
Russian Foreign Affairs Dept Accuses Turkey Of Hindering Syrian Peace Talks
Assad Accuses Erdogan Of Putting Combat Troops In Syria
EU-Turkey Refugee Plan Puts Women, Children in Concentration Camps
EU / Tukey Migrant Crisis Deal One Veto Away From Being Wrecked
USA, EU and Turkey are not going to like this Greece /Russia deal
Leaked Transcripts Prove ISIS-Turkey Link
The Truth Of What Is Going On In Syria
Turkey / ISIS Oil Trade? Everyone Knows What's Going On Say Istanbul Residents
NATO’s humanitarian Convoys Delivering Arms And Ammo To ISIS Halted at Syrian Border
Know Your Enemy - Who Of Those We Think Are On Our Side Is Helping ISIS
E U offers Turkey Cash And Membership In Return For Cooperation On Migrant Crisis
Assad Says Europe Is Responsible For Refugee Crisis: "If You're Worried About Them, Stop Supporting Terrorists"

War On Terror
Sweden Dystopia Omnibus
Immigration Omnibus
Immigration Germany
War On Terror omnibus
Greenteeth Media Catalogue on Terror




Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Approriate Ending To The Democratic Primary Saga?

posted by Arthur Foxake
June 8, 2016

Image source: morningmail.org

You’ll hear a lot of noise today from main stream media about how Hilary Clinton has won the Democratic nomination. The fact is Hillary actually won the nomination on a day when nobody voted. A few days ago Glenn Greenwald reported in The Intecept before the results of the final six primaries were known:

Last night, the Associated Press — on a day when nobody voted — surprised everyone by abruptly declaring the Democratic Party primary over and Hillary Clinton the victor. The decree, issued the night before the California primary in which polls show Clinton and Bernie Sanders in a very close race, was based on the media organization’s survey of “superdelegates”: the Democratic Party’s 720 insiders, corporate donors, and officials whose votes for the presidential nominee count the same as the actually elected delegates. AP claims that superdelegates who had not previously announced their intentions privately told AP reporters that they intend to vote for Clinton, bringing her over the threshold. AP is concealing the identity of the decisive superdelegates who said this.
Read all at The Intercept

Clinton’s nomination is certainly a milestone in American politics. Even if we remember the fix was in for this process, which is a travesty of democratic politics, to throw up as the Presidential nominee, Obama's anointed successor, (the deal was made in 2008 apparently) Mrs Clinton is still the first woman to be nominated. Americans will of course overstate its world significance and wallow in excessive self-congratulations; I have already seen several 'Liberal' websites proclaiming the USA is about to elect the first female head of state. In fact many countries on the planet have elected women as their leaders (Britain has The Queen as head of State, a non political position, and the Prime Minister - i.e. first servant - as its political leader.) Margaret Thatcher was our Prime Minister from 1979 to 1990. There have been many female presidents, and political leaders in nations where the presidency is a largely ceremonial position, whose close family members have not previously served as president. So claim that the United States of America will be first to elect a female leader are just another example of that lunacy known as American exceptionalism. Unless they are actually anxious to point out that the USA leads the world in nepotism.

Having said all that, the U.S. presidency is an extremely influential political and cultural position in the world. Particularly for a country with such an oppressive history on race and gender The election of the first African- American president was acclaimed as a great breakthrough for black people when in fact only the USA can elect an "African - American" president and nations in Africa and the Caribbean had been electing black leaders for decades before Barack Hussein Obama came along. But there is good reason to express concern about this all-too-predictable conclusion to the 2016 US Democratic Party nomination campaign.

That the winner of the Democratic Party nominating process is declared in such secretive and suspicion - worthy circumstances, an elite-driven stitch up that betrays the brave battle fought by Bernie Sanders against a woman of limited political experience and a very dubious track record in business and her legal career, whose preformance as Secretary of State, the only public office she held, was a disaster, and who is surrounded by scandals and at least one ongoing criminal investigation is symbolic of what the Democratic party, and the political establishment in the USA, actually is. But we could say that in rallying behind a Wall Street-funded, status quo-perpetuating, multimillionaire militarist dubbed 'crooked Hillary' by her opponent, The Democratic Party is getting exactly what it deserved.



RELATED POSTS:
America being destroyed
Failure of American leadership
American exceptionalism
American Liberal Thinking
Trump Blows Through America
Trump versus Clinton for US Presidency
Ameroca's warmonhering
FBI to indict Clinton?
Clinton promises tyranny
Clinton uses voter fraud to secure nomination

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Little Englanders Jibe Lost The Debate And Probably The Referendum For Camereon

In spite of the crude and bungled attempt to rig last night TV debate, with ITV placing race-baiting plants in the audience whose task was to shout down Nigel Farage with idiotic accusations, and appointing a weak moderator who allowed REMAIN supporters in the audience to talk over Farage but was quick to cut off the several audience members whose questions had Cameron waffling, the UKIP leader was judged the winner.

The main thing we learned from the debate is that the establishment will try to rig the referendum. 150% of people elegible to vote by post actually casting votes perhaps?

It was easy to pinpoint the moment Cameron lost the debate and his job too in all probability. it was when he referred to LEAVE supporters as "Little Englanders". Not only did he antagonise a lot of undecideds, he showed one again how far out of touch with the public mood he is. And by using the term Little Englanders in entirely the wrong context (as lefties have for years) he showed he's a lazy bastard who can't be arsed doing his research.

William Gladstone, supported free trade, individual liberty, home rule for Ireland, opposed colonial wars, big government. He was a Little Englander.

The "Little England" movement originated among manufacturers in Manchester and found support among journalists such as Goldwin Smith and politicians like William Gladstone, one of the founders of the UK Liberal Party. The movement objected to the protectionist stance of Canada exemplified by the tariff increase of 1859. The manufacturers resented paying taxes to defend a colony that took few British goods when Canada could be absorbed by the United States, which was an independent country and Britain's best customer outside Europe. Canada had some importance as a supplier of wheat and timber to Britain, but its climate and northerly location meant that it had no significance for Manchester's cotton industry.

There was also a social element to the movement. The Manchester School resented the Empire for providing sinecures for the sons of the aristocracy when the same money could be used for tax breaks and public spending projects at home.

The Little England stance was adopted by the Liberal Party and embraced by its rising star Gladstone (1809-1898), a social reformer who opposed many of Britain's military adventures in the second half of the 19th century and was particularly incensed by the behaviour of Britain's colonial administrations towards naitive populations. Gladstone, though devoutly religious, did not accept the need to impose British religious and cultural traditions on people in the colonies.

The Little Englander movemement is particularly associated with opposition to the Second Boer War (1899–1902). For example, Arthur Ponsonby wrote of the Liberal leader Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman's opposition to the Boer War: "The impression one got of him from the Press in those days was… that he was an unpatriotic Little Englander"

In a nutshell then, Little Englanders were opposed to political or cultural colonialism and therefore were true believers in diversity.

In other words, the Little Englander movement was a left-of-centre, "progressive" movement of its day.


RELATED POSTS:

Quitaly? Will Italy follow Britain out of the EU?

With a referendum in Italy, ostensibly on constitutional reforms but perceived as a referendum on the leadership of the ruling elite, looming in November and the anti - globalisation, pro sovereignty Five Star Party growing in popularity all the time. Should the constitutional changes be voted down, and the against campaign is showing a comfortable lead in opinion polls at the moment, it will put a Quitaly in-out referendum, similar to the so called Brexit vote that kick off the process of Britain leaving the European Union, at the top of the agenda.


Is Brexit A Harbinger Of Doom For The 'Experts'
The Brexit vote, the decision by a democratic majority in Britain to leave the European Union has sent shockwaves around the world. Not only does the EU now face a tsunami of departures, the usurpation of democracy by 'experts' ( technocrats ) has been challenged and exposed as a sham.

Dutch Referendum This Week Shows why We Should Leave The EU.

Few of you were aware probably that there is an EU referendum vote in The Netherlands this week. As usual with anything negative about the EU barely a word has been printed in the topic in mainstream media and the silence from our notionally unbiased national broadcaster The Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) has been deafening.

French, Belgians, Dutch, Italians Follow Britain in Euroskepticism

Europeans want us British to lead them out of Europe. Don't be fooled by project fear, the European Union (aka the Euronazi Federal Superstate) is falling apart. There will not be chaos if we leave, there will be chaos if we stay.

Head Of European Institute: Brexit Better For Everyone

Brexit would be the best result of Britain's in / out referendum for both Britain and the EU i a Belgian professor who heads up the European Institute at the London School of Economics (LSE) has said.

Johnson’s article lines up his reasons why Britain must exit on June 23rd. It’s time to be brave

OK, I know a lot of you think Boris is most accurately described by a word many people find offensive, but he’s put together a very good argument here on why we must leave the EU. Published in part here under ‘fair use’ terms and conditions, in the public interest ...

Cameron’s EU Package: Not A Deal But A Few Turns In The Spin Machine
As we and almost everybody else predicted, David Cameron's deal to improve Britain's relationship with the EU is worthless. It changes nmothing, and can be vetoed once we have voted to stay in.

Cameron Plays Deal Or No Deal In Europe

David Cameron, who was apparently up all night trying to make other European leaders understand why his country needs a better deal in order to poersuade the prople it is a good idea stay in the EU. Unless Cameron gets what will enable him to sell the idea of surrendering national sovereignty to a Federal European Superstate ruled by a committee of unelected bureaucrats in to the British public he will not campaign for the UK to remain in the bloc

EU Refuses to Block Eurozone Integration to Reach Agreement With UK

Austrian Chancellor Werner Faymann said at the E?U summit on British membership terms that the European Union wants to reach an agreement with the United Kingdom, but it is not prepared to compromise the banking union (financial integration) or the further integration of monetary union (UK being forced to abandon the pound join the Euro?) to achieve this goal.

Cameron's EU Deal Worthless. It Can Be Vetoed In European Parliament?
Opinion polls show Britain is evenly divided on the question of whether to leave or remain in the EU, though it has been suggested up to 10 million other voters, many of them women, have yet to make a decision. How they cast their vote will shape the future of the world’s fifth largest economy and the EU itself. But what is really at stake is more important than economics ...

Obama's intervention in UK politics triggers angry backlash
Angry Britons have launched a petition calling for U.S. President Barack Obama to be prevented from speaking in the UK parliament on Britain's forthcoming referendum on European Union (EU) membership.

Europe posts menu
Brexit posts menu

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]