Although the number of fatalities associated with the spike protein mRNA vaccine have exceeded by hundreds of times the number at which any other medication, either drug or vaccine, would have been withdrawn on safety grounds, the coercive measure used to persuader people to accept these ineffective, experimental, untested and highly dangerous vaccines continues. Even though the manufacturers, Pfizer, Moderna, Astra Zeneca and J&J along the US Food and Drug Administration, the UK's Medical and Healthcare Regulatory Agency and the EU European Medicines Agency knew there were a total of 5000 deaths from the vaccine in the first three months of its rollout, the emergency use authorization was allowed to continue.
It is both unscientific, unethical and immoral to classify post vaccination fatalities as “unexplained deaths,” and dismiss these incidents as "unfortunate coincidences when concerns are raised. Pathologists and medical examiners ought to have no choice but to investigate how these vaccines are killing people in certain demographic groups. Autopsies and pathological evidence show that administration of COVID vaccines has been closely followed by the sudden onset of, or death from cardiovascular damage, immune depletion and serious autoimmune conditions, for those lying, cheating, semi - literate criminally inclined paskudniaks we are obliged to call scientists to get away with their usual excuse by saying "correlation does not prove causation.
Actually saying this proves scientists do not know the difference between coincidence and correlation, (well I said they're semi - literate didn't I?) Correlation does not necessarily prove causation but when correlation of an action and a certain event repeatedly coincide it does not prove there is no causative link. But in the case of any such repeated coincidences, it is certainly worth looking a possible link. But scientists very often don't because finding such a link would be highly inconvenient.
German pathology professors Arne Burkhardt and Walter Lang did take the trouble to look and what they found is astounding. Burkhardt and Lang held a press conference presenting ten autopsies of people who died shortly after taking covid-19 vaccines. The people in the study were all over the age of 50 and died at different intervals in the two weeks following their vaccination. After microscopically studying tissue samples of the deceased, the pathologists found something out of the ordinary, yet common to each sample. The pathologists pinpointed occurrence of a “lymphocyte riot” among the ten autopsied bodies. The pathologists found an overwhelming number of lymphocytes in several tissues, including the liver, kidneys, spleen, and the uterus. This lymphocyte overload resulted in the hosts immune system aggressively attacked the tissue in its own organs, causing potentially fatal organ damage.
This autoimmune nightmare is a likely life-threatening consequence of the covid-19 vaccination. Burkhardt and two other pathologists confirmed that vaccination initiated this pathogenesis for five of the ten cases studied. In two of the cases, the vaccination was ruled a “probable” cause of death. One case is yet to be evaluated, and the other two deaths are “rather coincident” or “possibly” caused by the vaccine.
The doctors whose work has been long since censored by mainstream and social media, like most material which callus into question propagandists claims that the vaccines are safe and effective, have in common with many other researchers not in the pay of United Nations affiliated governments or corporations linked to the Big Pharma cartel been warning of long term risks posed by the untested, experimental vaccines for over a year. Many independant news organisations and websites, most of which have been censored and obliterated from the public domain have also been effectively banned from reporting or commenting in public forums.
At this point it
is mainly younger persons informing their parents of the risks, as
parents and older people are audiences largely captured within propaganda networks that have for decades promoted vaccines as a medicinal messiah that can, in return for our unquestioning devotion, protect us from all ills. In fact they are no such thing, the reputation of vaccines for high levels of effectiveness is based on the simple deception of publicising the relative risk reduction rather than the absolute risk reduction. In a nutshell this trick is achieved by ignoring the fact that humans have an auto immune system and that not all of us are susceptible to a disease. So in the case of COVID, while governments claim vaccination is 88% effective, 90% of us were never going to be made ill by the virus so the vaccines are in fact 2% effective. To facilitate that scam which has boosted by $billions the profits of Big Pharma corporations and kept large portions of the population in a state of fear, making it easy for corrupt governments to strip away hard won rights and liberties, the careers and reputations of many doctors and researchers who cling to their ethical values have been trashed
Now we can add to their number three more supposedly well qualified individuals whom can expect to be banned from public forums and professional publications, censored on social media and forced to resign from university faculties and advisory panels.
When people finally realize it is the COVID vaccines which perpetuate
the pandemic, creating contidions in which mutations can occur to produce new variants such as Delta or Omicron, and without the vaccines we would all have effective natural
immunity by now. We’d have been better off if the governments of the
world, right or left, did absolutely nothing. but is that not inevitably the case with every crisis.
But what’s new? Governments have been ineffective managers of national affairs for many centuries, regardless of the specific political structure of government. The highly visible "invisible hand" is currently smashing what is left of the free market structures that were built by Conservatism and Classical Liberalism. True socialism rather that its modern descendent, Cultural Maxism, is about people doing it for themselves, not the self serving bureaucrats employed by government agencies poking their noses into every nook and cranny of community life and trying to regulate everything to enhance their own power and influence Good ideas do not require force and the use of force is why these systems will fail. If vaccines workedd as well as is claimed, coercive measures, mandates, withdrawal of rights and liberties, fines and threats of imprisonment and social exclusion would not be needed to persuade people to accept them.
The medical professions have been obsessed with vaccines for the past four or five decades, scientists being simple creatures, lower life forms, that have no difficulty in deluding themselves they can vaccinate ecery illness to oblivion. Thus we are now assailed by increasingly hysterical clamour to vaccinate young children and even new born babies with concoctions that will not immunise them against a disease from which "the science" shows they are at zero risk It is the idea that the key to good health can only be found in a doctors consulting room for otherwise healthy children which failed the logic test from the very beginning. The fact the medical professions through stupidity, greed or fear of going against the mainstream subscribed to that ideology is why before the pandemiv these professions and individuals did not have quite as much credibility as they may have supposed and why now they have less that used car dealers, real estate agents and investment salesmen.
I often read in comment threads phrases such as; ‘I believe in vaccines, just not this particular vaccine.’ If all other vaccines are so good how can these wavering sceptics explain why the same drug companies failed so miserably with this one? How could this much incompetent development work and flawed testing be systemically integrated? The truth is vaccines do not work very well at all, the trick that has deceived the world lies in the use of relative risk figures instead of absolute risk figures. Humans like all mammals have this wonderful thing called an immune system (all carbon based life forms have some sort of natural immunity but those of us humans and our fellow mammals are more sophisticated.) Because of out immune systems there has never been a deadly disease to which all humans were susceptible.
So when vacccine makers talk about their vaccines being 95% effective this is the relative risk figure, it refers only to the people who are susceptible to the disease their vaccine protects against. And the true infection rate of COVID has been quite low. The problem with this method of measuring effeciveness however, is that we cannot truly know who is immune and who isn't. When we look at the absolute risk reduction figure it paints a very different picture. With over 90% of the population having not been affected by COVID during 18 months of the pandemic, and since the vaccine roll out as many vaccinated as unvaccinated people being diagnosed with the disease, then the absolute risk reduction falls to around 2%. And for a disease that only kills two per cent of those it infects, it is clearly not worth the admittedly very small risk of accepting the experimental, untested vaccine and suffering the serious side effects that have made people ill. A 0.000,0001% risk of vaccine injury is infinitely higher than the zero risk posed by COVID to healthy people with functioning immune systems.