Wednesday, August 31, 2016

The Difference In Voting For Hillbillary or Trump Is One Promises War With Russia, (the other is named Donald)

We should all know by now (we in Europe certainly do) that a Hillary Clinton presidency will mean more of the neo - con warmongering and crony capitalism that typified her husband's two terms in office and those of his successors George W Bush and Barack Hussein Obama. The Arkansas backwoodsman 'Billy - Jeff' Clinton was always the New World Order's errand boy, his wife a descendant of the Chicago multi millionaires the Rodhams was a convenient way into the upper echelons of society, (I don't believe for one second Bill Clinton's upbringing was as poor as we are told, but I'm sticking close to the official narrative while exaggerating somewhat for effect.) Bill Clinton was owned by the military - industrial complex and was probably the founder of the USA's Orwellian perpetual war policy.

If 'crooked Hillary' Clinton follows her husband into The White House, as the anointed successor of Barack Hussein Obama, another war - loving 'liberal' controlled by Washington's neo - con hawks, she has promised her first act on taking office will be to authorise escalation of the conflict in Syria to ensure the removal of Bashar Al Assad and his regime. Hillary is as stupid as Obama, she has refused to learn from recent mistakes, let alone history. Vladimir Putin of Russia, China's leader Xi Jinping and the Ayatollahs who rule Iran have sworn they will not countenance the forced removal of their ally Assad and only the Syrian people will remove him from office. And he is supported by more that 50% of Syrian voters.

To try to remove Assad would therefore in effect be a declaration of war on Russia, China and Iran (Iran is not in the top league, but is no pushover militarily.) Those peace loving, atheist, caring and sharing, minority rights supporting hippy idiots planning to vote for Hillary have been brainwashed with Obama's talk of American exceptionalism and irrational claims that the USA is the only indispensible nation. They are convinced of American invincibility. This is foolish.

 World War Three might in fact turn out to be a walk-over, but not for the USA. For the pat twenty five years, and particularly in the last eight under Obama, US policy has been to neglect development of defence technology while pursuing vanity projects such as space expoloration, climate change scaremongering, and minority rights agendas. Latterly Obama's obsession with gay and transgender rights in the military has left the services not only ill equipped but demoralised and close to mutiny.  

 Russia and China however have been developing new and ever more formidable weapons, while it is rumoured Iran leads the world in directed energy beam weapons.

The T14 Armata, Russia’s latest tank (above - Image source: Business insider -click image for larger view) is far in advance of anything the USA and its NATO allies have. You don’t want to fight this monster if you can think of a better idea, such as not fighting it but running away. Russia was once famous for having batallions of fifth-rate tanks that broke down or spontaneously combusted on a regular basis. That has changed since the end of communism. This T14 outguns the American M1A2, having a 125mm smoothbore firing APFSDS long-rods to the Abrams 120mm. (As we are sure wannabe Commander In Chief Hillary Clinton would know, that’s Armor-piercing, fin-stabilized, discarding-sabot. You did know, didn’t you, Killary? I didn't until I looked it up, but then I have not promised to take my country to war against the people that have such harware.) This isn’t the place for a dissertation on weapons for modern warfare, but the above beast is a very advanced design as the infographic indicates.  If interested more can be learned, HERE and HERE)
Hillary Clinton's opponent in the final head to head to decide who will be President is property and leisure billionaire Donald Trump, a bell end of the first order. There are only two reasons to vote for Trump and to the open minded American voters; One - he is not Hillary Clinton and Two - he has said he does not want a war with Russia. Hillary and her neo - con ventriloquists are desperate for war because they see their dream of global hegemony, the New American Century evaporating faster than a drop of water in the Mojave desert. 

The anti-Russian hysteria coming from her and the Washington rat pack is propaganda intended to prepare citizens of the USA and NATO nations for war. Such behaviour, and even that such a war can be contemplated is an example (as if any more were needed) of the utter control of America by rich insiders. No ordinary middle or low income American or European, and even very few of the super - rich has anything at all to gain from such a war. And no normal American, rich or poor, can have the slightest influence over whether such a war takes place, except by voting for Trump. The military has become entirely the plaything of unaccountable elites. Terrifyingly these people are completely delusional, they believe their immense wealth  renders them immune to the effects of a war that would be hugely destructive even if fought with conventional weapons, and which with a crazy, vindictive, infantlie loose cannon like Hillary in charge, could easily go nuclear.

A martial principle of great wisdom says that military stupidity comes in three grades: Ordinarily stupid; really, really, really stupid; and fighting Russia. Think Charles XII at Poltava, Napoleon after Borodino, Adolf Hitler, and Kursk.

Letting dilettantes, grifters, con men, arse - prostitutes, pans politicians, demented bottle-blonde geriatrics and corporate lobbyists decide to go to war is insane. Testicularly deficient girly - men in Washington are playing with things they do not understand. They think ordering drone strikes on illiterate third world villagers makes them brave. None of these pussies has been in a bar - room brawl, let alone a war, none has seen a war as a journalist, none will face the brutal, senseless violence of any war they start. George W Bush, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton (as Secretary of State) entangled the west in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria, Libya and Yemen, and can’t win wars against goatherds with AKs. They are going to fight…Russia?

Well what about our stealth bombers, the delusional fools who still believe in the invincibility of American technology will wail. Sorry folks but to the latest version of Russia's ground to air interceptor missile, there is no such thing as stealth (again this is not the place for a long critique of the technology). The S400 Triumf (Growler) unlike the overhyped US Patriot missile that turned out to be a dud in battle, was designed to create a true Iron Domes. “Given its extremely long range and effective electronic warfare capabilities, the S-400 is a game-changing system that challenges current military capabilities at the operational level of war,” Paul Giarra, president of Global Strategies told Defense News. The S-400 will have the “effect of turning a defensive system into an offensive system for Russia, and extend China’s A2/AD (anti-access/area-denial) umbrella over the territory of American allies and the high seas.”

Russia and the US have always had different strategies for defending their territory. During the Cold War the USA relied upon carrier-based aircraft to project power in the Western Pacific, and the strategy continues today. The Russians on the other hand decided these floating airfields were easy targets for their shore-based long-range aviation and anti-ship cruise missiles.

If it came to war, waves of long-range bombers such as the Tu-95M Backfire would take off from safe bases deep in continental Russia, fire their powerful cruise missiles from safe stand-offdistances and blast the carriers out of the water. The Russian pilots would then head home to watch the damage on CNN!

The Russian logic was elegantly simple. Back then the average nuclear powered aircraft carrier cost$1 billion whereas the average anti-ship cruise missile cost $1 million or less. For the money they’d have spent on a single carrier, the Russians figured they could build a thousand cruise missiles. Even if just a fraction of these missiles got through, all American carriers were dead in the water.

A point that the tofu scoffing Social Justice Warriors of Washington, New York, L A and Chicago might bear in mind is that wars seldom turn out as expected, usually with godawful results, often in fact the victors suffer greater long term damage than the defeated side which finds its regime destroyed and news rulers with a clean slate to rebuild society. We do not know what would happen in a war with Russia. 

When Washington pushed the Confederate States into the Civil War, it expected a conflict that might be over in twenty-four hours, not four years with as least 650,000 dead. When Germany began WWI, it expected a swift lunge into Paris, not four years of hideously bloody static war followed by unconditional surrender. When the Japanese Army pushed for attacking Pearl, it did not foresee GIs marching in Tokyo and a couple of cities glowing at night. When Napoleon Bonaparte took on Wellington he thought the British would have no stomach for a war in Europe, when our Empire was expanding in Africa and Asia.

When Hitler invaded Poland, utter defeat and occupation of Germany was not among his war aims. When the US invaded Vietnam, it did not expect to be outfought and outsmarted by a bush-world country. When Russia invaded Afghanistan it did not expect…nor when America invaded Afghanistan, nor when it attacked Iraq, nor….
Do you see a pattern emerging?

The standard American approach to war is to underestimate the enemy, overestimate American capacities, and misunderstand the kind of war it enters. This is particularly true when the war is a manhood ritual for masculine inadequates – think Kristol, Podhoretz, Sanders, the whole Neocon milk bar, and that mendacious wreck, Hillary, who has the military grasp of a Shetland pony. If you don’t think weak egos and perpetual adolescence have a part in deciding policy, read up on Kaiser Wilhelm.

Now, if Washington 'accidentally' provoked a war with Russia in the Baltics, as some EU leaders fear,  or the Ukraine, and actually used its own forces rather than fighting proxy wars such as the one in Syria, where might this lead given the Pentagon’s customary delusional optimism? Wise punters would place a ,odest bet on a humiliating American defeat. The US military has not faced a real enemy in many decades. In that time the armed forces have been feminized and social-justice warriorified (sic), with countless officials having been appointed by Obama for reasons of race, sex, and sexual preference.

Training requirements have been watered down to benefit girl soldiers, physical standards lowered, and the ranks of general officers filled with perfumed, panty - wearing political poseurs, professors of strategic studies and political science.  Somebody one said, “Amateurs think strategy, professionals think logistics.” The Russians are not pansies, they are not stuck in a medivalist timewarp. And they know in any war the logistics favour them (see Bonaparte, Hitler etc.). 

Obama has twice threatened to invade Syria and depose Assad and twice been faced down by Putin. China has Russia's back and Russia has China's. Obama has drawn red lines and the Iranians and Russians, along with Assad promptly stepped over them. Lack of response from the rent boy president set a pattern.  

Could  President Hillbillary Clinton persuade NATO to go to war war with Russia when Britain, France and Germany are right in the killing zone? Would Washington's Neocon hawks have the testicular fortitude to go it alone with real American lives on the line? 

And, since Russia is not going to invade anybody unprovoked, Washington would have to attack. See above, the three forms of military stupidity.

The same dangers exist with regard to a war with China in the Pacific. The American Navy hasn’t fought a war in seventy years. It doesn’t know how well its armament works. The Chinese have invested in weaponry specifically designed to defeat carrier battle groups. A sunken carrier, with accompanying loss of American lives would force Washington to start a wider war to save face, a war that Pentagon Generals have warned Obama the USA could not win. 

What have normal Americans, as distinct from the elites and corporations that employ the lobbyists to gain from war, what has any ordinary American gained from any of the recent proxy wars wars post Nine-Eleven? Hillary Clinton and her Neocon owners have backed all of them.

There are lots of reasons not to vote for Clinton and the suppurating corruption she represents, as many if not more than there are to avoid voting for Trump. But above I have tried to lay out the one reason that outweighs all others when American voters go to the polling stations. We have little reason to believe Donald Trump would be true to his word and back off from confrontation with Russia and China, he may be lying, scaremongering to garner votes. But on one point we can be sure. The only thing Hillary Clinton has not lied about in this campaign so far is her love of war, slaughter, drones strikes and cruise missile shots at $2million each and those beautiful donations to the Peron Clinton foundation that keep rolling in from defence contractors.


Latest Clinton Foundation Hack Shows Abuse Of Power For Personal Gain
Julian Assange was not bluffing it seems, although he appeared to back off from dropping the promised bombshell that would finish Hillary Clinton, a document dump by Goccifer2 contains stuff that is dynamite, revealing email exchanges between Clinton and associates that discuss the abuse of power and position for financial gain, in short giving preferential treatment in warding State Department contracts to people and organisations that made generous donations to the Clinton Foundation ...

Can Americans Overthrow The Evil That Rules Them?
The anti - establishment, anti - globalisation mood that manifested itself in the Brexit vote is sweeping across Europe, the cosy government - corporate cartel is desperately trying to control the narrative, but against the combined strength of millions of new media commentators all challenging the official; narrative, the dark forces of globalism are on the back foot.

Influential Germans Appeal Against Another War In Europe

While the mainstream media has been obsessing about the collapse in oil prices and celebrating the problems of Vladimir Putin's regime in Russia, and fanciful economic pundits have been burbling about all time high stock markets a group of prominent Germans are less concerned about mainstream sensationalism than by something that poses a much bigger threat to the immeditate future of Europe: the threat of the Obama administration pushing us into a war with Russia.

Where Are Grandstanding FUKUS Axis Leaders As Libya Descends Into Oblivion
Remembering a time not so long ago when Libya was being held up by the French, UK and US governments as a striking example of benign and successful military 'humanitarian' intervention? The tyrant Gaddafi had been overthrown by a FUKUS Axis bombing campaign in support of a bloody revolution fought by Islamic Fundamentalists, Tribal Warlords and Common gangsters armed with American, British and French weapons paid for by western taxpayers.

Obama and FUKUS Axis Air Strikes On ISIS Will Make Things Worse
The bombing of ISIS, the Islamic State is well under way in Iraq and Syria, and as predicted the American, British and French led campaign is already making things worse for civilians among whom the ISIS fighters are dispersed. And of course, far from making the west safer, it is stirring up more hatred against us in the Islamic world.

The Third Gulf War Has Started - Should Britain Get Involved

For the third time in twenty five years a British Prime ~Minister has led the nation into a war in Iraq. It's understandable that Iraquis might be a bit pissed off with us. This time the threat is not a brutal dictator like Saddam hussein or Muammar Gadaffi, the Libyan leader we helped depose, but Islamic State, a concept, an idea, but also a rabble of bloodthirsty maniacs funded by European and American money, aremed with European and American weapons and trained by European and American 'military advisers.

Fake NATO Evidence. OSCE Confirms that No Russian Troops, No Tanks, have Crossed the Russia-Ukraine Border

Barack Hussein Obama, putative President of the USA, golf-and-cocaine-addict and rent boy in chief announced to the world on September 3 that “Russian combat forces with Russian weapons in Russian tanks” had been deployed in Eastern Ukraine.That was not only a lie, it was a lie which could have plunged humanity into a global nuclear conflict.
What A Joke These Leftie Hypocrites Are

Much of the build up to the NATO summit at Newport's Celtic Manor on 4 and 5 September, which will attempt to formulate a united strategy for dealing with 'threats' to western security in Ukraine and Iraq, has been focused on the world leaders who will be attending, along with the security operation

We Will Raise The Flag Of Allah In The White House Say ISIS Leaders

The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) or Islamic State for short has a nice line in chutzpah, which seems a very Jewish quality for Islamists. Their leaders have issued a video via Vice media which warns the United States that ...

Why Do The 'Progressive Left' Support Those Who Use Rape As A Weapon Of War

Rape as a weapon of war and genocide is not a pleasant subject but it is one that needs to be raise, like the issue of Female Genital Mutilation. Why visit such unpleasant topics? To expose the hypocrisy of the modern political left who have more in common with Hitler's Nazis, Mussolini's Fascist or Stalin's brutal Soviet regime ...

USA Is Arming Both Sides In The Current Iraq Conflict.

Not so long ago Amerca's President was pushing the case for supporting the 'brave, dmocracy loving freedon fighter in Iraq. Only public opinion and Putin stopped Obama sending troops in to help the Sunni Muslim fanatics who wanted Syria's leader Assad out of the way so they could slaughter Syrias Shiites and Christians. Obama had to content himself with arming the rebels. Now thoise same rebels, defeated by Assad have crossed the border to wreak havoc in Iraq.

Not Waving But Drowning

Looking at the world situation and America's worsening position as it tries (but fails) to manipulate events to its advantage brings to mind Stevie Simith's poem, "Not waving but drowning." which tells of a man who swam out beyond his range and was so far from shore people did not hear his cries for help and thought he was just larking about.

America is not quite like that, rather than waving frantically as it sinks below the surface of its debt pool, it is shaking an angry fist and blaming

World On The Brink - USA And Russia Square Up In Ukraine

It looks like this might be the big one. With all America's plans to destabilise non supine nations in ruins as phase 2, the intstallation of a puppet government proved impossible, Obama who has already been bested by Putin several times cannot back down again. And this time the Russians have forced the crisis in their own backyard where the USA cannot possibly win. Interesting

Can Washington Change Three regimes At Once

The FUKUS axis - let's be honest, the Obama Administration in the USA, France and the UK are just sockpuppets, may have bitten off more than they can chew in trying to deliveer regime change in three nations at one to satisfy their paymasters the global bankers. The log jam has developed because of the failure to remove assad in Syria and the resolute support of Russia, China and Iran for their ally.

War On Syria: Standoff Shows America Is No Longer The Global Superpower

So what's happening in Syria you might well ask? After the FUKUS Axis intervention plans were thwarted by Russia and China there seems to have been a news blackout although the devastating civil war continues to devastate Syria. The really big news however (bigger that Kim Kardiashian's arse) is that America has quietly been demoted from its position as main global military power.

Turkey And Syria On The Brink Of Full Scale War
It has been coming a long time but it seems Syria and Turkey are on the brink of full scale war. The Daily Stirrer did warn the Arab spring would end in regional war when Obama first stirred up the Muslim Brotherhood and other anti western elements of Islam

Will Egypt Seize Libya For Its Oil

If the conflict in Syria, currently showing signs of spreading to Turkey, Iraq and Kurdistan were to escalate into a regional war, a proxy for east and west to butt heads without sustaining too much domestic damage, is Egypt likely to take advantage of the distraction and

Has Everybody Forgotten Obama's War

In the rush to find an excuse for military intervention in Syria mainstream news media seem to have forgotten Obama's war in Afghanistan, the one he said would define his Presidency. Having just passed the grim milestone of 2000 American dead and with the allies no nearer to defeating the Taliban it does actually define Obama's years in power. Lost in the wilderness and going nowhere.

The Wisdom Of Crowds

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]