Friday, September 08, 2023

The Reasons Climate Scientists can't Tell The Full Truth About The Climate Change Threat

Editors at reputedly respectable 'peer reviewed' journals such as Nature stand accused of bias against researchers who challenge the established narratives on topics such as climate change, COVID vaccines and 'net zero' energy policies, appearing to prefer simplistic, scaremongering, unscientific stories based on output from mathematical models and speculation imminent disasters about to occur because climate change. But there are sceptics in the scientific academe who are pushing back against the politicised narratives.

One such sceptic is Patrick Brown, the co-director of climate and energy at the Breakthrough Institute in California, who has now admittted what us free thinkers have known for years about climate science: it’s biased in favour of alarmism.

“It is standard practice to calculate impacts for scary hypothetical future warming scenarios that strain credibility,” Brown wrote in research published by 'Nature.' So, after learning this lesson the hard way when his nuanced papers were rejected, he adapted his latest to suit their apparent prejudices – and it was published. Nature’s editor, Magdalena Skipper, responded by trying to shoot the messenger, criticising Brown’s deception as “poor research practices”.

It has long been an open secret that distinguished scientists who suggest that global warming is a problem but not a “crisis” get rejected, cancelled and marginalised by peer reviewers. Meanwhile, even the most trivial study that can be spun to support an alarmist conclusion – such as a notorious one that found fish behaviour to be affected by carbon dioxide – gets rushed into print, sensationalised and dramatised by mainstream media. Junior scientists, fearing their budding careers will be destroyed if they deviate from the orthodoxy skew their results accordingly.

One of the biggest measurable impacts of increased carbon dioxide is global greening – the recent increase in green vegetation on the planet, equivalent to twice the area of the United States and counting. But pointing this out brings a hail of professorial hate down on your head. I was even singled out in a Boston University press release for daring to suggest that more green vegetation might not be bad news.

Brown says that “there is a taboo against studying or even mentioning the successes of sceptical scientists since they are thought to undermine justifications for the highly political Carbon Dioxide emission reductions”. The problem is all solutions other than the 'Net Zero' policy beloved of the ruling elites areound the world but potentialy disastrous economically and socially are taboo. Brown writes: "If I waved a magic wand and gave the world unlimited clean and cheap energy tomorrow, I expect many climate scientists would be horrified: they would be out of a job."

This is true, The thing "climate scientists" fear most is that the research grants would dry up and they would have to do some real work to earn their living instead of playing with mathematical models on their computers.

Those who argue that climate change is real and a problem, but that other environmental issues are more urgent – the effect of single use plastic dumped in the environment, the effect of burning domestic and industrial waste from developed nations in third world states, overfishing of the oceans, invasive alien species, reliance of poor Africans on bushmeat and charcoal, to name a few – are treated as heretics to be persecuted.

It’s not just climate change. The main science journals have been quick to accept the Chinese regime’s insistence that a lab leak from a US funded bioweapons lab could not have caused the pandemic, ignoring the mountain of evidence suggesting that is exactly how it began refusing to publish several papers that convincingly argued otherwise and to investigate the issue, while gleefully reportin half-baked studies that stretched evience in order to implicate the seafood market in Wuhan. One such study claimed to have found evidence that raccoon dogs were infected and was hyped by mainstem media. The total debunking of that study by Professor Jesse Bloom was ignored by the same broadcast and print news organisations.

Taxpayer, you are not hearing the whole truth from the academics you fund.

One of the things nobody in the climate science community dares mention is in that plants cannot survive in low CO2 environments - anything less than about 250ppm (0.025%) would be disastrous for all life forms because Carbon Dioxide is an essential nutrient from which plant matter is formed and all our food originates from plant matter. Traditionally it has been assumed that the red line for plant survival is 150 ppmtion techniques (the current level is slightly over 400 ppm. Research for intensive cultivation shows 1600 ppm or more is the optimum for plants. 400ppm therefore is far too close to the 'dead planet' end of the scale and yet climate scientists are still trying to scare and bully policy makers into removing Carbon Dioxide from the atmospheres. The highest Carbon Dioxide lavel is estimated at 6000 in the Cambrian explosion of life on earth. (Source: “The Positive Impact Of Human Co2 Emissions On The Survival Of Life On Earth”)

Which is why Carbon Dioxide, demonised by the climate change lobby and politicians, is pumped into poly tunnels where so much of our fruit and vegetables are gown,) at 3,000ppm (0.3%) or higher, over ten times greater than the atmospheric concentration of the same gas.

Oddly, the Royal Society have published a graph purporting to show CO2 levels over the last 200,000 years and it regularly drops below 200ppm - so there can't have been any vegetation in these periods - although there clearly was, as evidenced in tree ring data - scientific data can be most inconvenient sometimes - so best to ignore it when it is. However, ice core data actually shows CO2 levels rising AFTER warming of the Earth, so it's clearly not a 'planet warming' trigger.

What should worry all of us who question the establishment naratives is how happy the global warming believers are about global warming. If our planet is facing imminent destruction from climate change one would expect people who believe that narrative to be crapping temselves. Instead we see them every day on TV smiling and grinning from ear to ear as they tell us how a few days hot weather somewhere, or havy rainfall in a South East Asian nation during the monsoon season is proof of global warming and that’s why in the liberal democracies of Europe and North America we must all be prepared to sacrifice our prosperous and comfortable lifestyles and expect miserable existences of impoverishment and discomfort in future.

A resonable person would think that these doom merchants would be happy to consider and discuss research that might prove the catastrophic predictions of their mathematical models wrong, that the climate change the world is experiencing is more likely to result from long established natural cycles that last occurred before accurate records were kept and that warming might not be as bad as they predict they respond like spolied children who, refused more sweets, become very angry and often abusive. I have lost count of the number of times I have challenged predictions of global destruction with politely worded arguments containing observed evidence only to be told I am an idiot, a child murderer, who, not being a scientist, is obviously incapable of understanding The Science.

However, a quick look at the timeline of their failed predictions shows it is they who for all their degrees and peer reviewed publictions, do not understand The Science and their self righteousness in response to being questioned gives credibility to those of us who point out that 'The Science' has taken on aspects of a religious cult. Tony Watts has kindly complied such a timeline for us HERE.

The truth is Climate Change scaremongering is not actually about changing the weather its about changing people and society to bprepare us for the imposition of an authoritarian, technocratic, global government.

Scientists says Nuclear Is The Way Forward For Clean Energy – Do Ursidae Defecate In Sylvan Landscapes?


Climate Scientists' Mathematical Models Of Reality Wrong Again…New Study Shows Jet Stream Strengthening, Not Weakening
recent research  by Samantha Hallam et al published in the journal Climate Dynamics looks at the seasonal variations over decades in Northern Hemisphere jet stream latitude and speed over land for the period 1871–2011. The authors report that they found no evidence of weakening of the sort climate alarmists have been warning about for the past three decades.

Shock for The Green Blob - Rewilding is to blame for Mediterranean forest fires
Or at least, to be acccurate, rewilding is partially to blame for Mediterranean forest fires. Which is darkly amusing as that man most insistent upon rewilding, George Monbiot, is trying to tell us that it’s all about climate change.

Official Advice - Prepare For Blackouts This Winter

The UK government is putting plans together for days of organised blackouts this winter, in what they call a "reasonable worst-case scenario" for energy shortages, according to reports in manstream media. Naturally they are blaming this on the embargo on importing gas from Russia but in reality Britain has never imported any more than a small amout of its gas from Russia. The real reason politicians and energy company CEOs are panicking is entirely due to their obession with obtaining all our energy from intermittent sources like wind and sunshine ...

UK Households Are Paying Wind Turbine Owners To Not Generate Electricity
On another near windless day here in the United Kingdom, Boggart Blog came across a very interesting piece if news. According to figures published by the business and management consultancy LCP, british taxpayers have been paying operators of wind turbines farms for the time their windmills were NOT generating electricity increased to record levels last year ...

Net Zero Is A Dangerous Fantasy, But Scientists Believe In Fairies It Seems
With oil and gas prices rocketing and the highly propted sustainable energy sources performing way befow expectations the energy crisis currently gripping Europe (with worse to come as food shortages start to bite, polticians still seem more intent on pandering to the green lobby and chasing the dream of a fossil fuel free world rather securing the energy and food supplies needed by the people they serve.

New UN Report on Climate Change – Nothing New, Nothing True
The latest United Nations (“UN”) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) report, published this week, once again, in scaremongering tone and the language of the panic stricken, claims that the planet is in peril (we are facing climate disaster, the clock is at one minute to midnight, we must take urgent action to destroy civilisation if we are to save the planet, the usual over - dramatised guff designed to spread fear and panic,) basically the same claim as they have been making at least twice a month for the past 20 years.

We need energy security – not Net Zero
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted a major rethink in the West. We have suddenly found ourselves vulnerable not just to rising prices in oil and gas, but also to inflation in other commodities – such as food and fertiliser. Of all these problems, the security of our energy supply has most exercised minds.

Net Zero Gone With The Wind - Boris Johnson Plans Seven New Nuclear Plants And Shelves Wind Expansion
Reports in mainstream media suggest Boris Johnson has done a U turn on his recently announced massive expansion of wind powered generating capacity. Sources in Westminster claim Boris has shelved his masterplan for a giant, floating wind farm in The North Sea and the government will reconsider plans to double or even treble the number of wind turbines in the countryside and approve plans for up to seven new nuclear reactors instead.

Climate Change Research Paper Censored by The British Hydrological Society For Telling The Truth
The Daily Sceptic today published an article by retired research scientist James Dent, whose specialist field was hydrology and meteorology. Mr. Dent was involved in research projects aiemd at understanding the factors influencing climate, and their effects on environments, [ ... ] he was the World Meteorology Organisation Chief Technical Advisor to the Flood Forecasting and Warning Centre in Bangladesh, a low lying nation especially prone to flooding ....

Freak Weather Around The World Begs Questions
With Britain and other parts of northern Europe basking in unseasonably warm temperatures which are forecast to last for a few days, while parts of the USA gring to a halt under a blanket of snow dumped by freak storms are, accoring to climate scarmongers, a signal that irreversible warming had arrived, it is perhaps timely for a hot topic from ten years ago, geoengineering came under the microscope again. This report from Global Intel Hub seems a good way to kick off the debate. ... Continue reading >>>

The True Cost Of The Green Energy Boom Is Now Being Realized
For four decades we have been fed a constant stream of propaganda assuring us that green energy was the only way forward if we wanted to secure supplies of the energy essential to a modern society while preventing the environmental catastrophes that would be the inevitable consequence of climate change caused by the Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emitted by human industrial, commercial and social activity. ... Continue reading >>>

Electricity cuts and power crisis predicted for Britain’s New Year Holiday
Shapps carefully omits to mention that the government’s only contingency plan for providing the power needed to meet peaks of demand (a sudden cold snap for example) is to spark up the thousands of diesel generators the earth loving politicians have concealed in goods containers on compounds sited around the country. Yes you read that right, diesel generators ...

Now Even ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann Admits The ‘Pause’ In Global Warming Is Real
“It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims,” the paper in Nature Climate Change says.

German Scientist Confims Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has confirmed what those of us dubbed 'climate deniers' have been telling you for years ...

It Looks As If Carbon Credits Scam Has INCREASED CO2 Emissions
As the climate change scare becomes more and more exposed for the money making fraud it always was, they green weirdie beardie, rope sandal wearing tree huggers get more hysterical and stupid in their arguments that we must all return to medieval lifestyles, the billionaires like Al Gore who hope to profit from it keep flogging the dead horse and the angrier and more vicious the left wing hate mobs become in their witch hunts.

[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]