If at any time during the chaos the past eighteen months you have wondered what kind of idiots are running the world and have gleefully trashed economies, disrupted social and commercial life and stripped citizens of their rights and liberties only to bring us, in late October 2021, right back to where we were in late February 2020 when the words pandemic and COVID crept into our consciousness. Yet here was are, talking once more about lockdowns, mask mandates and mass vaccination programs, (of the booster shot this time, because as those of us who understand what immunise means predicted, the much hyped and hugely expensive vaccines don't work. Or as I have written before, they actually work perfectly and are doing what they were designed to do, which is not what we were told the vaccines were being administered for.
The long running pandemic, the storyline of which is now so ludicrously convoluted I feel almost justified in referring to it as a soap opera, has been brought to you not by The People's Republic Of China, nor the scientists of China's Wuhan Biological Weapons \research Laboratory, nor was it produced and directed by the governments of the USA, UK, , European Union member states and other G20 nations,
You may not have heard of the Global Public-Private Partnership (GPPP) but this world-wide network of stakeholders and their proxies as the paternersip was only formalised by an agreement of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the United Nations in 2019.
"Hang on on, wasn't that warmongering, billionaire worshipping, warthog felching gobshite Blair always going on about stakeholders?" you might well ask. Yes he was and surprise, surprise, Blair, the uberr - globalist of British politics had close links with the GPPP, or at least the people at the centre of that informal, unaccountable network of billionaires, bureaucrats, lawyers, academics and general cunts. But back to business ...
Little has been written or reported by mainstream media about GPPP since that agreement was made, which somehow is not surprising even though it affects the life and future of every man, woman and child on the planet. The formal creation of the GPPP, which had actually been around for years even though few people knew of it, signalled a shift in how the ruling elites view our world, not as being made up of ethnically and culturally diverse, self governing nations but as economic units under the contrl of a centralised bureaucracy. Obviously this goes against everything we have been told about the direction in which our nations were moving.
Had such information been widely available there would have been mayhem, so it had to be kept in the background while propagandists, aware that fear is the most potent weapon for those who want to control the minds of large groups of people. So while mainstream media pumped up fear levels in the population by hyping stories of impending catastrophic climate change, pandemics of killer viruses and economic collapse. Thus while an insidious campaign to undermine confidence in democracy unfolded the driving forces behind it were covered up. This explains why you are not likely to have heard of GPPP.
However, you may recently have hears of Klaus Schwab, the 83 year old president of the WEF as he has been talking a lot about The Great Reset and The New Normal. German national Schwab, the scion of afamily prominent in the Nazi party, who physically is a cartoonish figure has gleefully told us many times that we can never go back to the way things were before the hoax pandemic and that we must be willing to surrender our freedoms if we want
The Master Race to take the burden of responsibility from us and micro - manage our lives "from the cradle to the grave," as the saying goes.
The GPPP network of stakeholders (the financial cartel, their partners and the paid help hired from the government / private sector) is made up chiefly of global corporations (including central banks), the kind of philanthropic foundations that focus their philanthropy on making multi-billionaire philanthropists even richer, the kind of bureaucrats and academics who hold lucrative sinecures on policy think-tanks, governments and their overt, covert and subterranean agencies), non-governmental organisations (often indistinguishable from the philanthropic foundations and funded by the same people,),selected academic & scientific institutions, global charities, the labour unions and other chosen “thought leaders.”
The GPPP controls global finance via the Bank for International Settlements , (aka BIS or the Bankers banker,) and the world’s economy through the rigged markets the global banks control. Because it controls money and therefore trade, the GPPP also steers world, national and local policy (via global governance) and then promotes those policies using the mainstream media (MSM) corporations who are also “partners” within the GPPP. Often those policies are devised by the think-tanks and unquestioningly adopted by governments, also GPPP partners. Government in the developed world is no loger the result of democratic process, but over the past few decades has been transformed into global governance with our elected representatives no longer making law or formulating policy but instead performing a middle management role by merely implementing the policies handed down from above.
Under the tradional Westphalian system of national sovereignty, which served well since the 17th century the government of one nation cannot impose legislation or law in another. The European Union (EU,) a Globalist pilot project consigned that international understanding to the wastebin of history when they, with the complicity of national leaders like the aforementioned Blair, and without consultation or debate with the voters of member states, created a system by which it was recognised that EU law superseded all national laws. As we have seen in the COVID epidemic that system now applies globally as vaccine mandates and health passports (based on the Chinese system of Social Credits,) are being adopted by nation aftr nation though not, we are happy to report, without massive public resistance.
Another observable trait of GPPP global governance is that it is enacted through proxies, usually agencies of, or linked to The United Nations. In the case of the COVID hoax pandemic this has been the World Health Organisation (WHO), in the case of the 2008 financial crisis it was the International Monetary Fund, (IMF) and the Global Warming / Climate Change chimera the International Panel on IPCC, (International Panel on Climate Change,)
Since its inception The GPPP has usually been involved in influencing policy in the field of public health and specifically in a number of United Nation’s (UN) documents, including the notorious Agenda 30 and those put forward by agencies such as the WHO.
In their 2005 document Connecting For Health, which was not widely distributed and completely blanked by mainstream media in spite of its significance for every human being on ple planet, the WHO set out what the Millennium Development Goals of the GPPP meant for global health, revealed the emerging GPPP (emphasis ours):
These changes occurred in a world of revised expectations about the role of government: that the public sector has neither the financial nor the institutional resources to meet their challenges, and that a mix of public and private resources is required……Building a global culture of security and cooperation is vital….The beginnings of a global health infrastructure are already in place. Information and communication technologies have opened opportunities for change in health, with or without policy-makers leading the way…….Governments can create an enabling environment, and invest in equity, access and innovation.”
The revised role of governments referred to in that paragraph signalled
the demotion of our democratically elected national assemblies to mere
managers, no longer leading but instead administering the policies of
the real, but invisible leaders.
In January 2019 I wrote these paragraphs on one of the discussion topics at that year's WEF jamboree:
One of the keynote topics the WEF will blether about this year is mental health. The forum will address fears that depression,and other mental health problems are rising to excessive levels. To put that another way the globalists are probably considering whether they can get away with telling us: “If you don’t follow the groupthink, you must have ‘mental health issues’ and be sent away for reprogramming, sorry, ‘treatment’”
The APA (American Psychological Association) which will be represented at Davos, has already pronounced that ‘traditional masculinity’ is a mental health issue. That position is going to be taught in every psychology degree program across the United States, starting NOW !Think on what has been happening since then. Do you remember al the screeching and whining about toxic masculinity, a storm in a beer glass over the notion that any example of men behaving like men. According to those who are to cowardly to lead from the front and arrogant enough to believe they can direct the course of events while cowering behind the barricades, the vague and undefinable state labelled 'traditional masculinity' is a mental illness. So what signs might indicate a man is mad? Carrying out home improvements, maintaining car and motorbike engines, cutting down trees? Toxic masculinity was a propaganda psy - op of course, part of a long term divide-and-rule plan that has over several decades served to divide the societies if the developed world along multiple fault lines, male versus female, black versus white, Muslim versus Christian, religion versus secularism, and those are just the main ones.
Some analysts have suggested the GPPP grew out of the dissatisfaction among bankers and global corporations with the UN, originally conceived in the wake of World War 2 as a potential global government but progressive enmired in east versus west, communist versus capitalist, Islamic vesus everything and science versus nature conflicts. Amid all this a realisation emerged that Benito Mussolini, the Italian fascist leader, had been on to something when he said that the way forward lay in collaboratio between corporate business and the corporate state. The perception that global corporations, and particularly the corporations that make up the Big Pharma cartel, were the key to policy implementation. The drug companies were ideally placed to exploit a propaganda campaing to generate fear in populations, through the threat of a killer virus that had the potential to wipe out humanity. Once the majority of the population had been whipped into a frenzy of fear and panic it would be easy to convince them only global government could save the world (from a threat that never really existed except in the sensationalist rhetoric and fake statistics of propagandists.)
And if the scam could succeed once it could be repeated again and again.
But the push for globalism and a global, technocratic, authoritarian government of appointed bureaucrats, academics, scientists and politicians started long before COVID became a thing.
Do a little research and it is easy to see how GPPP’s terms of reference were designed to facilitate the participation of new breed of corporations. These entities appeared to have recognised the folly of their previously destructive business practices. They were ready to own their mistakes and make amends. They gave the impression this would be achieved by partnering with government to solve global problems and consequently gained influence over vast areas of government policy. The existential threats were of course defined by the GPPP and the selected scientists, academics and economists they funded, and the responses "led by science".
In 1998 the former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan delivered a speech to the keyWorld Economic Forum (WEF) at its annual beano in Davos, the luxury resort in Switzerland where the rich and powerful and their selected political and bureaucratic rubbing rags meet to decide what the future holds for you, me and the other 99.9999999999% of humanity. It was a speech recognised as marking the transition from the Westphalian sovereignty model to a GPPP based global governance system.
The United Nations has been transformed since we last met here in Davos. The Organization has undergo a complete overhaul that I have described as a ‘quiet revolution’…A fundamental shift has occurred. The United Nations once dealt only with governments. By now we know that peace and prosperity cannot be achieved without partnerships involving governments, international organizations, the business community and civil society…The business of the United Nations involves the businesses of the world.”
Freed from the shackles of bureaucratic double, triple and everyple up to twentythousandple speak all that means is, "Forget democracy boys and girls, we the self - appointed global elite are running things now." It is easy to see why the GPPP was such an enticing prospect for global banking, oil, industrianl and pharmaceutical interests. But to clarify, Annan added:
Shifting ideologies and trends in globalization have highlighted the need for closer global governance, an issue for both private and public sectors. We suggest that at least some of the support for GPPPs stems from this recognition, and a desire on the part of the private sector to be part of global regulatory decision-making processes.”
In the flawed democratic systems of government we had lived under there was at least a pretence that our elected representatives served the people who elected them and the wider national constituency. Now, according to the words of Kofi Annan's speech We The People were simply expected to accept, without question, that global corporations are benign and humanitarian organisations that care nothing for profit and are totally committed to saving the planet, alleviating poverty, hunger and disease and persuading us all to be kind to small furry animals. Supposedly, a GPPP led system of global governance is somehow beneficial for us and all we are required to do in order to earn these benefits is surrender our freedom..
The people involved in this wannabe World Domination Society are so detached from reality they seem to seriously believe that voters will fall for this. Many of the stakeholder corporations have been convicted, or publicly held accountable, for the crimes they have commited. These include war crimes. The apparent passive agreement of our elected leaders that these “partners” should effectively set global policy, regulations and spending priorities seems delusional to say the least.
In reality however corporate influence over the political system had been increasing for generations. In UK and USA and probably in other countries I am not so familiar with there now appears to be a two way travelator so that executives can move easily between government and private sector jobs. There have even been cases of people holding a position in government while working in a part time capacity for a corporate business. The phrase "Conflict Of Interest seems to have lost all meaning. Elected politicians have long-been the junior partners in this merger between government and capital.
The arrival of GPPP heralded the birth of a process to formalise this relationship, the creation of a cohesive New World Order, or as Klaus Schwab, President of the WEF, model for several Bond villains and Dr. Evil from the Austin Powers franchise, but necer elected to anything by popular vote predicted recently, "By 2035 you will own nothing and be happy." The politicians have simply stuck to the script ever since that Kofi Anna speech in 1998, and people who saw through the bullshit were dismissed as conspiracy theorists. But one by one, like dominoes falling, the "conspiracy theories" about a hijack of democracy and personal liberty and the imposition of global governance turned out to be true.
MORE ON GLOBALISATION AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER