Dr. David Bell, a former scientist at the World Health Organization, is a public health physician and biotech consultant, has wriiten in Brownstone Institute on the WHO Pandemic treaty, another power grab and profiteering scam by the public health industry.
MUCH has been written on the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) which most countries are making themselves subject to after July 19 (this Saturday). Many raise concerns of loss of sovereignty, censorship, corporate greed, and conflict of interest. But most are missing the main point: the sheer and outright stupidity and fallacy on which the whole pandemic agenda is based.
Saturday is the last day that Member States of the World Health Organization (WHO) can withdraw from the IHR amendments (without entering a multi-year withdrawal process). By failing to withdraw, they will be committing their taxpayers to fund the key surveillance aspects of a rapidly expanding industry that is the pandemic industrial complex. They will be required to set up an extensive network to search for well-established natural phenomena, including the tendency of viruses to mutate into variants. This has been part of the natural world for hundreds of millions of years, but demonstrating it has recently become highly profitable due to a confluence of technological advances and intensive marketing.
[ ... ]
Politics aside, it is worth considering how we got to such a place. The last big natural pandemic was the ‘Spanish flu’ in 1918-19. That was before we invented any modern antibiotics (most flu deaths were probably from secondary bacterial infections) and before all the gizmos and cleverness of modern medicine. Since then, infectious disease death rates have plummeted because we eat better, have better sanitation and live in better conditions, have modern clinics, and all that technology provides. It is inconceivable that an equivalent virus now could cause the same pattern of mortality, unless we really wanted it to. A century of advances in medical technology and human resilience do not amount to anything, although this is what many medical authorities gaining from this would have us believe.
How do the Boggart Bloggers know its a scam? you might well ask. Unfortunately for the WHO and their partners in
crime, true pandemics rarely if ever (black death apart) happen. Naturally this has been
successfully hidden from joe public because there is not mch chance of profit or political gain from telling the truth.
Instead a constant stream of propaganda warns we should remain in perpetual fear of illness and disease and that the only way to salvation lies in their hands and your
wonderful kind and caring health systems.
If only all these pesky pathogens behaved in the way The Science says
they do then maybe reliance upon Big Pharma/theWHO etc. would make sense.
It should though be blindingly obvious that germ theory needs serious modification. transmission of disease and its causes are poorly understood and even worse misunderstood.- what role does fear and anxiety play in illness for example?
Precisely why and how do some
people get sick/die and others do not? Was covid mainly an epidemic of
fear/mass psychosis or a new and novel virus?
The works of Bechamp/terrain theory may hold a lot of answers to the
above, but yield very little profit to those making billions out of
modern pharmaceuticals. The only pandemic we have is one of chronic illness, mainly prevalent in
those who have relied on the miracle of modern medicine.
As they say, doctors are those who prescribe medicines about which they know little, to cure illnesses about which they know even less, in men, women and children about whom they know nothing at all.
I recall the time I discharged myself from hospital, against the doctors’ advice, when some junior dickhead was sure I'd had a stroke and wanted to put me on blood thinners.
Actually I had had a stroke, well a brain haemorrhage - over twenty years ago, it left me paralysed on my left side. After a long slow recovery I had become fairly mobile by developing a lot of workrounds to compensate for functions that were no longer available. What had happened was that for many years my late wife kept me under control, but without her restraining influence I did too much physically and scrambled a lot of nerve connections.
The doctors who treated me seemed unaware that there is an important difference between a haemorhage and an embolism, because when I refused blood thinner they kept telling me that if my blood was thinned there was less chance of arterial plaque breaking off an artey wall and causing another clot. If I had been given blood thinning medication while bleeding from a small blood vessel in my brain all those years ago I would have died then.
After all their tests had come back negative, they were rather taken aback that on being told I was all clear I was not overjoyed but merely said, "I told you so." However they wanted to keep me in hospital overnight “just to be sure”. When I suggested that having been treated overnight in the Emergency Department, (which resembled scenes from a war zone in Ukraine or Gaza,) what I needed was to go home, have a hot drink and some toast and go to sleep away from the chaos ofg a dysfunctional organisation and the potentially lethat advice.
“How dare this man challenge my judgement, my training, my superior person!” is a precis of the doctor's attitude during my follow up appointment, as I talked of the 'evidence based medicine' and pointed out that there was no evidence my arteries as clogged with a substance not dissimilar to that which a few years ago the public health industry were pushing as the healthy alternative to butter, or delivinging a lesson in logical analysis to explaim why, as I had not previously had a blood clot there could not possibly be an increased chance of my having another and explaiing that as the causes of my brain haemorrhage were known with 95% certainty and there had not been a repeat incident in twenty two years, statistically there was little chance of a recurrence but I was still not going on blood thinner as there was no evidence I needed it on a long term basis.
FROM THE ARCHIVE:
No comments:
Post a Comment