Showing posts with label CO2. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 09, 2025

The Collapse Of Net Zero And The Climate Catastrophe Scam Is Gaining Momentum,Gas Oil and Coal Are Staging A Comeback

Accoring to former UK Prime Minister Theresa May, tying the government and by default the long suffering taxpayers of this country into a legally binding commitment to achieve 'net zero' by 2050 was one of the crowning achievements of her time in office. Well let's be honest, the Maybot screwed up every contemporary policy action so there were no other achievements with which anyone who cared thirty years in the future could compare. Ironically 6 years down the line May's 'crowning achievement' has come to look like by far the biggest cock up of her disaster strewn three years in office.

After $£€billions of taxpaters money has been spaffed on crackpot science and whacko technology, the effort to find the Holy Grail of Green political activism, a technology that will give us endless supplies of free, clean, energy, the Net Zero scam has finally run its course.

The case for wind power goes up in flames (Picture: BBC News )

The Tide Is Turning Decisively Against Net Zero

by Tilak Doshi, posted on Substack 6 September 2025

In the belief that atmospheric CO₂ is the control knob of ‘dangerous’ impending climate change, Net Zero emerged in the 2010s as the global rallying cry to ‘save the planet’. By the time the Paris Agreement was concluded in 2015, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) established the arbitrary 1.5°C limit on global temperature increase and established the ‘Net Zero by 2050’ policy target for developed countries around the globe.

But a spate of recent headlines suggests that the ‘Net Zero by 2050’ policy is falling apart. There is a growing realisation across advanced economies that the grandiose project of achieving ‘Net Zero by 2050’ is collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions. What was once heralded as a consensus across the political class, corporate boardrooms and multilateral agencies now looks increasingly like an edifice of ideology built on a vaporous, oxymoronic ‘consensus science‘. The rising tide of empirical reality — the costs of intermittent renewables, the geopolitical consequences of energy insecurity and the sheer scale of power demand growth from artificial intelligence infrastructure — has swept away the carefully constructed narrative of inevitability around the so-called energy transition.

Yet, as David Blackmon reminds us in his well-subscribed Energy Transition Absurdities Substack blog, “climate alarmism is demoralised but it is far from dead”. It would seem that no amount of evidence on prohibitive system costs of intermittent renewable energy and their adverse impact on energy prices can convince diehard climate doomsters otherwise.

In the belief that atmospheric CO2 is the control knob of ‘dangerous’ impending climate change, Net Zero emerged in the 2010s as the global rallying cry to ‘save the planet’. By the time the Paris Agreement was concluded in 2015, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) established the arbitrary 1.5°C limit on global temperature increase and established the ‘Net Zero by 2050’ policy target for developed countries around the globe. But a spate of recent headlines suggests that the ‘Net Zero by 2050’ policy is falling apart. There is a growing realisation across advanced economies that the grandiose project of achieving ‘Net Zero by 2050’ is collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions. What was once heralded as a consensus across the political class, corporate boardrooms and multilateral agencies now looks increasingly like an edifice of ideology built on a vaporous, oxymoronic ‘consensus science‘. The rising tide of empirical reality — the costs of intermittent renewables, the geopolitical consequences of energy insecurity and the sheer scale of power demand growth from artificial intelligence infrastructure — has swept away the carefully constructed narrative of inevitability around the so-called energy transition. Yet, as David Blackmon reminds us in his well-subscribed Energy Transition Absurdities Substack blog, “climate alarmism is demoralised but it is far from dead”. It would seem that no amount of evidence on prohibitive system costs of intermittent renewable energy and their adverse impact on energy prices can convince diehard climate doomsters otherwise." target="_blank">Read in full (long article)

FROM THE ARCHIVE:

Scientists says Nuclear Is The Way Forward For Clean Energy – Do Ursidae Defecate In Sylvan Landscapes?

Climate Scientists' Mathematical Models Of Reality Wrong Again…New Study Shows Jet Stream Strengthening, Not Weakening
recent research by Samantha Hallam et al published in the journal Climate Dynamics looks at the seasonal variations over decades in Northern Hemisphere jet stream latitude and speed over land for the period 1871–2011. The authors report that they found no evidence of weakening of the sort climate alarmists have been warning about for the past three decades.

Shock for The Green Blob - Rewilding is to blame for Mediterranean forest fires
Or at least, to be acccurate, rewilding is partially to blame for Mediterranean forest fires. Which is darkly amusing as that man most insistent upon rewilding, George Monbiot, is trying to tell us that it’s all about climate change.

Official Advice - Prepare For Blackouts This Winter
The UK government is putting plans together for days of organised blackouts this winter, in what they call a "reasonable worst-case scenario" for energy shortages, according to reports in manstream media. Naturally they are blaming this on the embargo on importing gas from Russia but in reality Britain has never imported any more than a small amout of its gas from Russia. The real reason politicians and energy company CEOs are panicking is entirely due to their obession with obtaining all our energy from intermittent sources like wind and sunshine ...

UK Households Are Paying Wind Turbine Owners To Not Generate Electricity
On another near windless day here in the United Kingdom, Boggart Blog came across a very interesting piece if news. According to figures published by the business and management consultancy LCP, british taxpayers have been paying operators of wind turbines farms for the time their windmills were NOT generating electricity increased to record levels last year ...

Net Zero Is A Dangerous Fantasy, But Scientists Believe In Fairies It Seems
With oil and gas prices rocketing and the highly propted sustainable energy sources performing way befow expectations the energy crisis currently gripping Europe (with worse to come as food shortages start to bite, polticians still seem more intent on pandering to the green lobby and chasing the dream of a fossil fuel free world rather securing the energy and food supplies needed by the people they serve.

New UN Report on Climate Change – Nothing New, Nothing True
The latest United Nations (“UN”) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) report, published this week, once again, in scaremongering tone and the language of the panic stricken, claims that the planet is in peril (we are facing climate disaster, the clock is at one minute to midnight, we must take urgent action to destroy civilisation if we are to save the planet, the usual over - dramatised guff designed to spread fear and panic,) basically the same claim as they have been making at least twice a month for the past 20 years.

We need energy security – not Net Zero
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted a major rethink in the West. We have suddenly found ourselves vulnerable not just to rising prices in oil and gas, but also to inflation in other commodities – such as food and fertiliser. Of all these problems, the security of our energy supply has most exercised minds.

Net Zero Gone With The Wind - Boris Johnson Plans Seven New Nuclear Plants And Shelves Wind Expansion
Reports in mainstream media suggest Boris Johnson has done a U turn on his recently announced massive expansion of wind powered generating capacity. Sources in Westminster claim Boris has shelved his masterplan for a giant, floating wind farm in The North Sea and the government will reconsider plans to double or even treble the number of wind turbines in the countryside and approve plans for up to seven new nuclear reactors instead.

Climate Change Research Paper Censored by The British Hydrological Society For Telling The Truth
The Daily Sceptic today published an article by retired research scientist James Dent, whose specialist field was hydrology and meteorology. Mr. Dent was involved in research projects aiemd at understanding the factors influencing climate, and their effects on environments, [ ... ] he was the World Meteorology Organisation Chief Technical Advisor to the Flood Forecasting and Warning Centre in Bangladesh, a low lying nation especially prone to flooding ....

Freak Weather Around The World Begs Questions
With Britain and other parts of northern Europe basking in unseasonably warm temperatures which are forecast to last for a few days, while parts of the USA gring to a halt under a blanket of snow dumped by freak storms are, accoring to climate scarmongers, a signal that irreversible warming had arrived, it is perhaps timely for a hot topic from ten years ago, geoengineering came under the microscope again. This report from Global Intel Hub seems a good way to kick off the debate. ... Continue reading >>>

The True Cost Of The Green Energy Boom Is Now Being Realized
For four decades we have been fed a constant stream of propaganda assuring us that green energy was the only way forward if we wanted to secure supplies of the energy essential to a modern society while preventing the environmental catastrophes that would be the inevitable consequence of climate change caused by the Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emitted by human industrial, commercial and social activity. ... Continue reading >>>

Electricity cuts and power crisis predicted for Britain’s New Year Holiday
Shapps carefully omits to mention that the government’s only contingency plan for providing the power needed to meet peaks of demand (a sudden cold snap for example) is to spark up the thousands of diesel generators the earth loving politicians have concealed in goods containers on compounds sited around the country. Yes you read that right, diesel generators ...

Now Even ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann Admits The ‘Pause’ In Global Warming Is Real
“It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims,” the paper in Nature Climate Change says.

German Scientist Confims Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has confirmed what those of us dubbed 'climate deniers' have been telling you for years ...

It Looks As If Carbon Credits Scam Has INCREASED CO2 Emissions
As the climate change scare becomes more and more exposed for the money making fraud it always was, they green weirdie beardie, rope sandal wearing tree huggers get more hysterical and stupid in their arguments that we must all return to medieval lifestyles, the billionaires like Al Gore who hope to profit from it keep flogging the dead horse and the angrier and more vicious the left wing hate mobs become in their witch hunts.

EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]

Friday, September 05, 2025

Another Climate Scare Hoax Exposed - Polar IceMelt Is Slowing, Not Accelerating.

Those of you who live less than 250 feet above sea level can rest easy. In spite of all the hysterical scaremongering about polar ice melting and sea levels rising from the Cimate Catastrophists, a new study, (one of many to produce the same result, none of which have made headline news, or even been fully eported in mainstream media, has shown that in fact polar ice ment (a yearly occurrence between May and September in the Arctic and November to March at the Antarctic ice cap,) is actually slowing.

This is welcome news for people who live neaer the coast but does not make much difference to be as my house sits 500 feet above sea level, and is a positive disaster for billionaire psychopaths like Bill Gates and others who have planned to scam governments out of obscene amounts of money for schemes to save the planet by, for example, spraying clouds of chemical dust in the upper atmosphere to shut out sunlight.

Explore our archived posts below this extract to learn more about the climate catastrophe hoax.

via Climate Depot:

A new study published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters finds that contrary to many mainstream media reports, the amount of sea ice in the Arctic has not changed appreciably over the past two decades.

After the significant decrease in 2012, many researchers studying climate change claimed it was a harbinger of a permanent decline in Arctic sea ice due to climate change. Of course, sea ice waxes and wanes each year, but beginning in 1995, sea ice began a general, relatively steep decline, reaching its nadir in 2012 and then stabilizing amid yearly ups and downs.

This new research indicates that the popular reading of the situation was wrong. The measured decline slowed as early as 2005 and annual losses remained low or even flat, with the exception of 2012. If this research is correct, over the entire 20-year period arctic sea-ice loss has been slow and minimal. As the international team of mathematicians and physicists from the Universities of Exeter in the U.K. and Columbia in the United States write,

Over the past two decades, Arctic sea-ice loss has slowed considerably, with no statistically significant decline in September sea-ice area since 2005. This pause is robust across observational data sets, metrics, and seasons. … The modeling evidence suggests that internal variability has substantially offset anthropogenically forced sea-ice loss in recent decades.

Despite the authors’ claims that barely measurable sea-ice loss, a loss that is not statistically significant, is consistent with climate model projections for short periods of time ...

worth reading in full >

FROM THE ARCHIVE:

Scientists says Nuclear Is The Way Forward For Clean Energy – Do Ursidae Defecate In Sylvan Landscapes?

Official Advice - Prepare For Blackouts This Winter

The UK government is putting plans together for days of organised blackouts this winter, in what they call a "reasonable worst-case scenario" for energy shortages, according to reports in manstream media. Naturally they are blaming this on the embargo on importing gas from Russia but in reality Britain has never imported any more than a small amout of its gas from Russia. The real reason politicians and energy company CEOs are panicking is entirely due to their obession with obtaining all our energy from intermittent sources like wind and sunshine ...

Saturday, July 12, 2025

United Nations Demands Worldwide Criminalisation Of Climate Scepticism

For the first time in a few decades The Green Blob seem to be on the backfoot and they are getting very panicky about it. The problem is, of course, that the ‘fact’ of global warming becoming an existential threat to life on the planet, signalling the imminent extinction of the human race and everything else besides, is stubbornly refusing to happen. Although the arbitrary danger level of atmospheric CO2 (400 parts per million,) has now been passed warming, which over the past fifty years has been marginal, none of the catatrophies predicted by 'climate scientists; has happened. In fact the deserts are shrinking, the planet is getting greener, crop yields are higher, humanity is thriving, and that worse – far worse – people are discussing it.

The claims of ideological sciencology cults of all kinds championed by the United Nations, not just climate, are now being challenged by people on social media, and even in mainstream news media. And in response the Green Blob, or the global ‘censorship industrial complex‘, as it prefers to be known, is moving to shut down all discussion of climate matters that devites from the orthodox. The problem is that, the more they shift towards draconian interventions, the more they unwittingly signal their inability to understand the debates they wish to suppress.

At the end of June 2025, the UN Human Rights Council published a report by the agency’s “Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights in the context of climate change”, Elisa Morgera. After moving through the long preamble and its obligatory recitation of the climate litany – unimpeachable science… worst year ever… urgent necessity of climate action… blah blah blah – Morgera eventually arrives at her paradox. In order to protect human rights, human rights must be curtailed.

The General Public would more likely listen to people who were open to argument and discussion that those whose position when questioned is, "If you do not agree with us you do not understand the issue therefore what's the point of talking to you. This shows not only the arrogance but the stupidity of thse people, the moment they claim to occupy the high ground and try to shut down Joe Public is the moment tat Joe Public smells a rat and starts to look ever more deeply into the actions and agendas of the slt elected elites. When this happens the elite are usually exposed as either greedy, stupid grifters or political activists trying to set up a one part staye / global government. The “settled science” or “appeal to greater authority” was always and absolutely guaranteed to trigger a backlash.

In spite of all the scaremongering the planet will survive regardless of what the science grifters and political charlatans do. What worries me is the impending civil strife these idiots will cause as they manade insane actions designed to impact the liberty and prosperity of those people our politicians and civil servants are employed to serve.

They are such arrogant arseholes that they believe people who work at proper jobs are incapable of discussion and analysis.

In fact their lunacy is beyond belief in that they simply don’t understand that if their argument is so watertight and it is opened to discussion then most people will accept it through rational thought and they will win the day.

The fact that they are using dishonest dictatorial methods to silence people speaks volumes. These are tactics reminiscent of Nazis and Communists.

FROM THE ARCHIVE:

EXPLORE
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ]

Tuesday, July 01, 2025

1900 Scientists Say There Is No Climate Crisis - The Hoax Exposed?

Millions of people around the world are living in fear, convinced that climate change is about to destroy us. Years of being brainwashed by the constant stream of propaganda pumped out by mainstream media they believe there is a climate emergency. For decades we have been told by the United Nations that Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from human activity are alone responsible for disastrous warming if the earths atmosphere. In 2018, a UN IPCC report even warned that ‘we have 12 years to save the Earth’, thus sending millions of people worldwide into a frenzy.

However, many scientists dispute with the UN-promoted man-made climate change theory, while more and more people worldwide are waking up to the knowledge that the whole 'climate catastrophe' narrative is an elaborate hoax aimed at eventually creating a global government. The full facts (which would fill several large volumes were I to list them,) tell a very different story, of a political agenda, corporate greed, the corruption of science and the censoring of thousands of cometent and respected esearchers who have challenged the official narrative.

In a recent lecture, Nobel Laureate physicist John Clauser exposed how the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) models and analyses, which are relied upon by politicians and activists to support claims of a ‘climate crisis’, do not meet basic standards of scientific enquiry. Clauser received his Nobel prize in 2022 for the observational measurement of quantum entanglement and understands well the problem of distinguishing a physical signal from background noise.

Clauser shows that, when corrected for the IPCC’s error prone arithmetic and statistics, the observational data do not support the power imbalance claimed to be responsible for global warming. Furthermore, the outputs of climate models are at variance with the observational record. Clauser discusses the roles of convection, clouds and their variability in providing a negative feedback mechanism, and proposes that this acts as a thermostat that stabilises surface temperatures. Clauser’s conclusion is that claims of a ‘climate crisis’ lack scientific substance and that Net Zero policies are an unnecessary hindrance.

Clauser’s talk is available on YouTube.

The Irish Climate Science Forum (ICSF) website is a valuable resource for Warmageddon sceptics founded by Jim O’Brien and responsible for a lot of excellent work in highlighting the scientific flaws in the UN climate narrative. The ICSF provides a comprehensive lecture series from renowned international scientists providing much evidence, analysis, and data that contradicts the UN assertions. The lectures are available at: https://www.icsf.ie/lecture-series

The ICSF scientific view coincides with those of the Climate Intelligence (CLINTEL) foundation that operates in the fields of climate change and climate policy. CLINTEL was founded in 2019 by emeritus professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and science journalist Marcel Crok. Based on this common conviction, 20 Irish scientists and several ICSF members have co-signed the CLINTEL World Climate Declaration “There is No Climate Emergency” (see https://clintel.org/ireland/).

The reality is that the climate has always been changing, the climate changes naturally and slowly in its own cycle, and CO2 emissions (and methane from livestock, the cow fart scare) are not dominant factors in climate change. In essence, therefore, the incessant UN, government, and corporate-media-produced climate hysteria in relation to CO2 emissions (and also methane from cow farts) has no scientific basis. It appears to me the UN narrative is yet another example of fake science being used to drive an ulterior agenda, see also the book Godless Fake Science.

The claim that Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is a dangerous pollutant is totally ridiculous, as has been repeated probably millions of times by people who bother to check facts, Carbon Dioxide is a trace atmospheric gas that is essential to the survival of all life on earth. The Carbon Dioxide narrative is a distraction created possibly for the purpose of diverting our attention from the ‘real’ pollution, the toxic shite that is dumped in our environment and fed into our bodies by big business, globalist politics and corrupt academic institutions. The reality is that CO2 is a vital component in the diet of plants. During daylight hours, by means of a process known as photosynthesis, plants use solar energy to absorb Carbon Dioxide and extract the Carbon atoms which they turn into vegetable matter. Pure, breathable oxygen is released back into the atmosphere. This is basic biology, learned at school, usually between the ages of 10 and 13 by school children in the developed nations. Yet so many people who claim to be 'climate scientists' appear to be ignorant of it.

Unfortunately, many misinformed environmentalists and ignorant climate scientists are driving around in electric cars, the battery production for which has caused vast amounts of ‘real’ pollution via the industrial mining and processing of rare earth metals, and the consequent pollution to land, air and water systems. See also this article. Note that the UN does not focus on the thousands of real pollutants that corporate industrial globalisation creates.

A very simple quote from climatologist Judith Curry: “Sure, all things being equal CO2 may cause a little warming, but all things in Earth’s climate are not equal”.

How many ordinary people have head of John Clauser or other people like him, and how many will ever read an article like this, let alone the type of studies to be found by following the links? I suggest a tiny percentage only will do that. This means they will only be hearing the alarmist version of reality as presented on mainstream media (BBC, SKY News, CNN, The Daily Mail, Washington Post etc.)

There is a little story in a book by Stephen Einhorn called “Climate Change, What they rarely teach you in College.”According to Jewish folklore, The Lord sent two Angels down with a sack full of foolish souls to be evenly distributed over Earth, but they tripped and fell spiling them in a little Polish town called Chelm.

Soon a heated argument started in the town about what was more important, the Sun or the Moon. After careful consideration the Chief Rabbi decided the Moon was more important because it shone light at night when people needed it and not during the day when there as already plenty of light. It therefore quickly became settled that the Moon was more important. In fact there was a “consensus” and those who disagreed were classed as “Moon Deniers”.

There is something very similar happening today and many people getting their information from mainstream TV News are like the people of Chelm. They don’t look at facts and empirical science. They listen to , and believe Authority.

FROM THE ARCHIVE:

Scientists says Nuclear Is The Way Forward For Clean Energy – Do Ursidae Defecate In Sylvan Landscapes?

Wednesday, June 25, 2025

Global Temperatures, Impossible Targets and Scientific Follies

Various supranational agengies and Qangos including the United Nations IPCC, World Economic Forum, NASA, World Meteorological Organisation, Friends of the Earth various governmental and academic groups advising on climate change (global warming,) tell us that: ‘The 1.5-degree Celsius warming threshold is considered critical, as it is the point at which the impacts of climate change are expected to become increasingly severe.’

However it has been obvious for some years nowthat there’s no realistic prospect of humanity keeping global temperatures below the Paris Agreement target of 1.5ºC above pre-industrial levels – or indeed below the somewhat less precise target of ‘well below’ 2ºC. Both of these realities, although scientifically verifiable, are widely ignored by propagandists and mainstreeam media. So what is likely to happen if the global mean temperature rises by more. And more worrying, what will happen if some of the nuttier ideas of the clinate lobby, like spraying chemicals in the upper atmosphere to shut out the sun, are ever implemented.Here are a few simple facts about the great Global Warming hoax (all scientifically verifiable):

The 1.5ºC target:

In its 2018 Special Report, the United Nations IPCC recommended that, to achieve the Paris Agreement’s 1.5ºC target, global emissions should ‘decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030’. In 2010 global CO₂ emissions were 34.0 gigatonnes (Gt). Therefore they’d have to come down to 18.7 Gt by 2030 to meet the target. But, just three countries (China, the US and India) already exceed that(by 2.2 Gt) and all are likely to increase their emissions over the next five years – as are over 100 other countries. Therefore, if the IPCC has got it right, it’s clear that the Paris Agreement’s 1.5ºC target will be substantially exceeded.

The Science:

There is no genuine scientific evidence that a higher atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) will trigger the claimed dangerous climatic warming. It is simply an endlessly repeated assertion based only on output from mathematical models of the climate.. The much acclaimed models, run on computer software writteny by incompetent amateurs, are worse than useless, as they mislead the unwary and gullible. (As a former Information Systems progessional I am always astounded at the way 'scientists' assume they can write better programs that people who have been doing the job for over twenty years.)

Well estsablished principles of Physics indicate that whilst CO2 is a greenhouse gas it is a very weak one and its effect soon reduces to zero, each additional succeeding increment of CO2 having a reduced warming effect in comparison to the earlier addition. Most of the energy of the wavelengths that could be absorbed by CO2 have already been absorbed by water vapour, which is by far the more powerful greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. It is largely water and its vapour, in te upper layers of the atmosphere, which keep this planet warm, forming a protective 'blanket' encircling the earth.

From the evidence obtained by paleo - Geology, which allows us to to study the climates of earlier ages, it is clear that there is not even a convincing correlation between atmospheric CO2 concentration and the global mean temperature.

Eminent scientists, Physicists and Geologists, free from the constraints of government funding, or being employed by companies competing for government contracts, are able to explain how this great deception is being maintained. Amongst the physicists who dissent from 'the climate consensus', Prof. Happer, of Princeton, is the best for producing good videos. Australian professor Ian Plimer is a leading authoity on paleo - geology.

What we never hear about through the MS media are the beneficial effects of the slight increase in atmospheric CO2 from our industrial emissions. Most green plants respond by increasing their growth rates, which helps to boost our crop production. An additional benefit is revealed by two decades of satellite photography, showing that the semiarid regions, like the Sahel of W. Australia are greening. This is because more CO2 allows plants to reduce the number of the tiny holes in on their leaves, through which they 'breathe' in the gas, but which through they also lose water.

The above is a very simple summary of the flaws in the so-called science of' 'CO2 = Climate Change', That assumption is not just wrong, it is a total pseudoscientific fraud.

It is a scientific fact that a planet's surface temperature is completely independent of the gaseous composition of its atmosphere, only the surface pressure exerted by the atmosphere does that.
There is plenty of evidence, in addition to the known theory of compressed gases which is, of course, what a planetary atmosphere is.

It is just the same for stars like our Sun which, of course, doesn't have a solid surface.

The 'Net Zero' policy has no scientific basis in fact and will be impossibl to achieve within the promised timescales, and very likely forever without a huge depopulation event. It has the same validity of similar pseudoscientific 'cults' that have had, let me be frank, the aim of eliminating a particular race. Net Zero is, of course, not in any obvious way, to do with race. But it has exactly the same aim as the genocidal policies of certain political and religious groups both past and present: to control and dominate.

The same methods are employed, the 'cult that may not be questioned', the need for all to sign up to believe the mantra that we, the people, are the 'evil ones'. We must sacrifice our wonderful life, fueled using hydrocarbons that give us the ability to 'bestride the world', something that was said (by Shakespeare!) to belong to Caesar alone!

They climate change scaremongers and Net Zero fanatics don't give a toss about Earth's many climates, all they want is you (and me!) under their thumb. And if it destroys the world's economy in the process - so be it!

FROM THE ARCHIVES:

UK Government Belatedly Discovers The Uselessness Of Sustainables In Relation To Energy Security
The policy that Boris Johnson's Premiership will be remembered for is nor 'getting Brexit done,' but the government's disastrous pledge to make Great Britain the first developed nation to achieve a 'net zero' national energy system. The neglect and running down of traditional energy systems (coal, gas, nuclear,) along with flushing money down the toilet by investing in intermitternt power sources (wind, solar,) rather than Putin's war in Ukraine is responsible for the current crisis.

1,200 Scientists and Professionals Go Public With: “There is No Climate Emergency”
As it happens the narrative promoting the risible idea that "The Science Is Settled," and a few other trains of misinformation to keep ramping up the fear level among the general public have been rocked by the publication of The World Climate Declaration (WCD) a study and report signed by over 1,100 scientists and professionals. The authors, meteorologists, physicists, biologists, naturalists and well qualified people drawn from a host of other professions and academic disciplines and from all around the world conclude there is no climate emergency.

Latest Bill Gates Insanity: Injecting Sulfur Into the Atmosphere Will Cause EnvironmentalDisaster
A study published in November by the University of Pennsylvania exposes the insanity of projects such as spraying particles of sulphur compounds into the stratosphere, self - anointed vaccime messiah Bill Gates' latest scheme to “save” the planet with "geoengineering" According to the mathematical modellers Gates pays hansomely to provide him with "scientific" data to persuade politicians to spend taxpayers money on projects run by companies his "charitable foundation" has invested in. Far from saving the planet this latest idiocy is actually destroying environments. Continue reading >>>

Climate: The Science, The Lies, The Malfeasance and The Deep State
Climate change hoax COLLAPSES as new science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on global temperatures We have previously highlighted this report from Finland which exposes the great flaw in "the science" of global warming. The link at the end of this extract takes you to a much more complete account of the research project which, not for the first time debunks the fake science on which the politically - motivate climate change scare.
Continue reading >>>

Forget The Hype About COP26 Saving The Planet, Here's The Reality
As mainstream media heaps praise on the delegates to the COP 26 climate conference because they have managed to agree to save the planet by repeating the same meaningless pledges and setting the same impossible targets as every previous climate conference in the past 20 years has, Boggart Blog brings you a message from a former colleague in Denmark, who tells us of the true condequences of 'gree' policy making in Europe's greenest nation.br> Continue reading >>>

Proof That The Alarmist Claptrap You Are Hearing And Seeing At COP26 Climate Conference Is A Load Of Bollocks
The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places, the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consul Ifft, at Bergen, Norway. Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions in the Arctic zone. Expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met with as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm ... Continue reading >>>

Germany Burns Net Zero Pledges And Fires Up Coal Generating Plants Ahead Of Winter Peak Electricity Season
On Wednesday this week Germany's coalition government approved putting coal power plants back online until the end of March 2024 to ensure energy security when natural gas supplies cannot meet demand. Though Germany has for at least a decade vied with Britain to claim leadership of Europe's ill - advised push for net zero, the Berlin government has been forced into this move

Will Germany be the first to ditch its net zero commitments?
Things are not going well in Germany’s bid to reach net zero by 2045, five years earlier even than Britain’s own unrealistic target. For months, the German government has been trying to devise a way to save its heavy industry from high energy prices which are sending production fleeing to Asia. Last year, chemicals giant BASF announced that it would invest in a new £10 billion plant in China, due to the cost of energy.

Another Setback For UK's Net Zero Green Dreams As Cost Rise Faster Than China's CO2 Emissions
The UK ruling elite's dreams suffered another setback today when Swedish energy company Vattenfall announced work on the Norfolk Boreas offshore wind farm is to be suspended. The reasons given are spiralling costs, uncertainty in supply lines and the economic reality that offshore wind farms are hideously expensive to operate as well as being enormously damaging to the marine environment.

Implosion of Germany's Green Party Threatens To Destabilse EU
With the defeat of Donald Trump in the 2020 US election, the far left parties in Liberal Democracies celebrated the defeat of the far right. At around the same time it appeared that Germany's AfD party, Italy's Lega and and the Sweden Democrats had been discredited and surges in their popularity had been halted by negative propaganda campaigns while Germany's Green Party were at the height of their popularity and were hailed as Europe's great hope for a clean, net zero, woke, gay and trans friendly future.

Common Sense Prevails: Germany Is Dismantling Wind Turbines To Make Room For Coal Mining
We have learned vial a piece in OilPrice.com that turbines at a wind farm in western Germany are being dismantled to allow for the expansion of open cast coal mining operations at an adjacent site. The propsal to increase output at the Garzweiler open-pit lignite coal mine has been described as a “paradoxical” situation given that in recent years the German government has been pushing ahead with the closure of coal and nuclear generating plant to appease its nutty but powerful Green party ... Continue reading >>>

Majority of Conservative Voters want Net Zero Plan Halted
Despite sycophantic support from the party elites, recent polling has found that the majority of Conservative Party voters want the government’s Net Zero agenda halted. The Conservative Party base has had enough of their party’s sycophantic support for climate crazy policies, with recent polling suggesting that a significant majority of individuals who vote for the party want the government’s current Net Zero regime halted. ...

The Truth About Coal And The Lies Of The Elite
So much for all the COP 26 banter late last year. Let me remind you. The elites all flew in on their private jets and promptly told us we’re all (royal we) getting off fossil fuels and killing coal.So how’s that turning out? The usage of coal is now at record highs:

[ Climate change ] ... [ Climate alarmists cheating ] ... [ Climate deception ] ... [ Climate lies ] ... [ Green dreams ] ... [ Green energy delusion ] ... [ Net zero reality ] ... [ Death of Democracy ]

Saturday, April 05, 2025

AI-Led Study Says Natural Drivers Dominate Climate Variability

Energy Security & Freedom (substack) writes :

Anyone seriously examining the arguments over climate change knows the big unanswered question is not whether there is such a thing or not. Climate change is real and has been since the Earth was formed. The only real question today is this:

How much of our recent climate change, regardless of how much there is, can be attributed to natural change versus human causes?

It is the only question that matters and has not yet been addressed adequately to date.

A new analysis, though, casts much new light on the question. And, get this. The lead author is an AI program! Titled “A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence Contradicts IPCC Models and Solar Forcing Assumptions,” it is the work of Grok, a software company owner, a high school student, and a well-known astrophysicist. That last fact alone makes it fascinating, of course, but the astrophysicist is the famous Willie Soon, which makes it worth examining. Read full article >>>

Good to read that the pendulum is swinging back towards common sense. Ten years ago Boggart Blog was exposing the deception on which the CO2 driven climate catastrophe scare is built.

Expert Smeared by Media and Greenpeace for Debunking Global Warming

It was entirely predictable that soon after Dr. Matt Briggs co-authored a major peer-reviewed climate physics paper exposing serious errors in the hugely expensive and allegedly infallible computer models used by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the left would start the usual tactics of smears and lies to discredit briggs' work and the man himself.

The research document's contributors have been smeared by the New York Times, The Guardian, the Washington Post and the Boston Globe because the errors it revealed suggest that there is no climate crisis after all. The planet as a whole is warming but not so rapidly as to suggest what is happening is something other than the normal climate variation cycle.

Dr. Briggs told Breitbart News that he, Lord Monckton, physicist Dr. Willie Soon, and former Delaware Climatologist David Legates developed a simple climate model that exposed the errors in more complex computer models used by the IPCC. The report was released in a joint article titled: “Why Models Run Hot: Results from An Irreducibly Simple Climate Model.”

Dr. Briggs, who has a Ph.D. in mathematical statistics from Cornell University and was assistant editor for the Monthly Weather Review, is widely published on matters concerning climate. He explained that for decades "the computer climate models on which the IPCC and others rely, make forecasts where the temperature will be way up there. But, the reality is the temperature has been way down here. So these monitors are running hot!"

The reason the team know that the models are running hot is based on a 'firm scientific principle,' says Briggs. "If a model is making bad predictions, which these climate models are, the theory that underlies them must be wrong. So these models must be wrong." In saying this he is paraphrasing Richard Feynman, one of the most respected physicists ever.

Briggs explained that atmospheric reaction to carbon dioxide, known as climate sensitivity, is probably set too high in these models. "If you take this climate sensitivity model and tone it down, you get a much closer match to reality." He contends that the computer models are overcompensating for the addition of CO2 to the atmosphere.

Although their findings weren’t that controversial scientifically, it was "unwelcome news" to the IPCC and other 'Warmageddonists'and the left wing politiciized science camp reacted so angrily to cititicism it led a lot of people to conclude thay had a lot to hide; "And that’s when the whole thing began to blow-up," Briggs said.

A Breitbart reporter asked Briggs how he reacts to all the “smug” entertainers, celebrities, personalities, and others who assert that global warming is a settled science. Briggs responded by explaining that what is settled, "is the fundamental, unshakable scientific principle, that if you have a theory that makes bad predictions, that theory must be wrong. And we have had lousy predictions from these climate models for years and years and years. Something must be wrong. This is undeniable."

The smearing of Briggs et al is classical radical left wing tactics. To smear and attack is their modus operandi, truth is irrelevant, the end justifies the means the agenda is to suppress all opposition and create a global, totalitarian , Marxist government - and if you think that might not be so bad, do some research on Russia under Josef Stalin or China under Chairman Mao. Life was not good, people did not live in caring, sharing, all-join-hands-and sing-Kumbaya, utopian harmony. The sharing was that when people have nothing they can share it equally with everybody and be no wprse off and the only equality lay in the fact that everybody had an equal chance of being arrested, given a show trial, tortured until guilt is confessed and executed without ever knowing what their crime was.

The Global Warming scare was always about total control for the left, the elimination of all political diversity, with few or no freedoms for the individual. As Marx wrote in The Communist Maifesto, the concept of the individual will become obsolete, only the 'collective' (the State) is important, individualism is the antithesis of collectivist ideology as defined by The Frankfurt School.

What the 'agenda' needed was a common enemy, an existential threat that would unite the people of the world around a common cause.

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself." - Club of Rome, premier environmental think-tank, consultants to the United Nations

"We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public's imagination... So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts... Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest."
- Prof. Stephen Schneider, Stanford Professor of Climatology, lead author of many IPCC reports

"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony... climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world."
- Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the Environment

“The data doesn't matter. We're not basing our recommendations on the data. We're basing them on the climate models.”
- Prof. Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research.

Proof enough? Not for the left wing promoters of the climate change fraud, a million pieces of evidence, scientific and empirical, must have been offered by those who challenge their quasi - religious dogma. They dismiss it all and simply will not listen to anybody who questions their certainties.

It really does not matter how many scientific papers disproving this monstrous global warming fraud scam are written, the left are just not interested in either in science, or the truth.

They will slag us sceptics off at every turn, whether we are right or wrong, because that's what the agenda demands of them. They will continue to publish claptrap backed up by bogus 'science' and manufactured statistics, with added impetus, this year, because the desired result at the Paris conference on climate change depends upon it.

We know, and they know that none of their "evidence" stacks up, and is blatantly fraudulent, but they will continue to tell themselves, and each other, that they're right, and that the rest of the world must kowtow to their demands, in order to "save" itself. And since the era of the Ancient Greeks, Phobos and Diemos (fear and panic) have been the most efficient way to control the population, so the politicians are happy to get on board with anything that offers to prolong their grip on power.

Having worked with computers for over thirty years, I could without much difficulty make a computer model that says anything I require it to, a computer model is nothing more than a set of calculations, if data gathered from real world observations is used they can be useful (although in the case of the climate there are too many unknowns to build a relable picture) use made up data as the climate science lobby have (their habiyt of 'adjusting' data has been exposed), so they proves absolutely nothing.

But as is shown above science is not an effective weapon to fight political agendas, propaganda and dogma.

Anyone who reads comment threads on internet news sites will be aware of the consequences of opposing the left wing agenda. The hate attacks will be relentless; racist, right wing extremist, and denier are among the milder terms of abuse. And people who insist on defending diversity of ideas will be pursued around the web, attacked and undermined anywhere they try to express an opinion.

But this is par for the course. Just check out the history record for those that resist totalitarian control in places where Marxist or Socialist regimes have gained total power. Hundreds of millions have suffered and a hundred million have died.

In Britain, Germany, Sweden, France we have been lucky, our socialist parties have always been a mix of left wing authoritarianism and democratic liberalism. But the left, having infiltrated education, the public services and the justice system are currently in no mood to compromise with anyone. The behaviour when trying to shout down intelligent debate on the climate change fraud illustrates that.

FROM THE ARCHIVES:

Scientists says Nuclear Is The Way Forward For Clean Energy – Do Ursidae Defecate In Sylvan Landscapes?

Official Advice - Prepare For Blackouts This Winter

RELATED: EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]