World Economic Forum (WEF) Fuhrer and scion of an influential Nazi family in pre World War II Germany Klaus Schwab believes Artificial Intelligence (AI) will lead the way to the technocratic, authoritarian world government, populated, apart from the elite, by human / computer hybrids, he has dreamed of since forming his world domination club for wealthy elitists in 1971. Around 60% of us ordinary punters in Europe, North Americans and the few other liberal democracies scattered around the world believe that AI poses a serious threat to humanity’s future, an impressive figure given the torrent of propaganda that flows past us each day aimed as persuading us to believe that Artificial Intelligence will usher in a golden age for humanity and that transhumanism, the merging of man and machine is the future for humanity.
Emotionally loaded rhetoric about a world dominated by machines obfuscates several much more sinister more serious policy moves which WEF influence has persuaded governments to follow but what is being hidden behinds all the science fiction pipe dreams is the way in which AI is being positioned to facilitate the feudalisation of the of free nations, concentrating power in hands of centralised states bureaucracies and a few corporate cartels in the exact manner of the merging of state and corporate power on which Benito Mussolini attempted to build his state.
AI’s problems start at the top. Unlike the internet which was propelled in its formative years by independent companies like Digital Equipment, Xerox and Intel plus the host of small startups that prospered until Google and Microsoft (with help from various US Government agencies,) crushed all opposition, AI seems to be controlled by existing tech giants, which are investing heavily in these new firms. ARM, for instance, the British-based chip designer whose IPO last week had Wall Street agitated , is garnering huge investments from other Big Tech firms, including Nvidia, Intel, AMD and Apple. Elsewhere, Open AI’s largest investor is Microsoft, while DeepMind was acquired by Google in 2014. Altogether it is not a healthy situation with antitrust andanti - monopoly legislation apparently thrown out of the window like a Russian general who has displeased the Czar.
What nobody appears to have considered in this rush to automate and this enable micromanagement of everything is human nature. Human beings have a few basic needs, food and clean water, shelter, companionship as as well known as our need for the air we breathe. Not so well known or often discussed is the need for something to give our lives purpose, work, labour, jobs and careers. And human societies are created when we trade our labour (a mixture of skills and effort,) for the goods and services we need that are created by the skills and effort of others. The power that the elitists of the WEF seek so assiduously is simply the ability to control how the products are distributed. That is putting it very simply of course, but blinded by the complexities of modern business and social systems we tend to forget how simple things can be at their most basic level.
The availability of labour has always ultimately governed what needs we can satisfy, irrespective of power. Our first needs, as above, are food and shelter. For most of pre - history our ancestors were hunter - gatherers and life was a daily struggle for survival. So much time was taken up with hunting and gathering there wasn’t enough labour to create the surpluses of food and essentials needed to free creative people to expend time and resources on inventing new goods and services, the spear, bow and arrow, wheel, grindstone, fire making technologies, porridge, metalworking and all those other things, the basic principles of which are at the core of the technologies we rely on.
Eventually however, primitive tribes acquired enough skills and knowledge to produce surpluses which enabled some tribe members to devote time to innovate in methods of farming, stone, wood and metal working, curing animal skins, domesticating horses, cattle, sheep and developing other skills which in turn generated more spare labour and more demand for goods. Technological change meant fewer workers needed to produce the basics by hunting and gathering. The spare labour pool eventually found their purpose in life by learning to make things of beauty or things that made life more comfortable and convenient. Only the imagination and wealth needed for us to consume other people’s time and effort determines how much spare labour there is in our economies (barring war and natural disaster).
Productivity increases through improved technology, and population increases through improved lifestyles have created the wealth and freed sufficient time for most people in the developed societies to aspire to higher levels of material consumption, car ownership, air travel etc. We’ve gone from the daily struggle for survival to the struggle to find meaning in our lives. But power and control, the commodities that motivate elitists, have always been exclusively within the domain of certain social groups, the warrior caste and the priestly caste. The rise of technological economies was not a prerequisite for our the development of democracy, theocracy or tyranny, though it may have helped.
The question is: compared to today, how long can societies based on the need for constant economic growth be sustained, how much more can be created and consumed created in the foreseeable future? How much extra self-actualisation can there be, how long can we continue to believe we are what we own?
In recent decades there has been a lot of fuss about the effect on our environment of the waste produts released into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels (gas and oil.) This is a misdirection, while we have been careless of how we treated our planet in the past, as much damage has been done by spraying farmland with pesticides and herbicides to increase crop yields and profits; while burning CO2 has created carbon dioxide, essential to life because all life forms are carbon based, producing plastics, dyes, bleaches and disinfectants, metal goods, adhesives and other industrial products releases far greater quantities of toxic shite into the world.
As a society we cannot grow infinitely. At some point there has to be balance.
When will we reach the limit of human creation and consumption if we have not already done so?
To answer this question, imagine a wealthy medieval landlord or Lord of the Manor who has good food, a solid house, firewood, and a church providing both spiritual structure and moral guidance. If asked what is missing in their lives, they’d merely point to having some more of the material comforts they already have.
The medieval landlord could not imagine the prosperity of middle class people in the modern world, nor the ways in which we earn the money to fund these magical (to the medieval mind,) lives we lead. Our Lord of the Manor would probably feel uncomfortable, even terrified at the witchcraft involved in television or smartphones, and would be appalled by the moral depravity of our lives (whereas he would not be in the least perturbed to learn that his neighbour had slaughtered a few peasants who had been caught trapping rabbits on his land,) about much of what we The past is a different counry as someone once said but future is a different planet, maybe a different universe even.
So in answer to the question is we cannot answer it. It is more than likely in the future we will occupy ourselves creating goods and services unrecognisable today, and probably in ways that require us to sacrifies some of the most basic human qualities that define us. Meanwhile, how The Powers That Be distribute the benefits of modern society will change independently although regression to the mean of history probably means a lot less democracy, less personal liberty and less chances to opt out. Transhumanism and alternative reality worlds are perhaps two candidate technologies that could keep very many of us busy in ways that make me feel quite sick about the world generations that come after me will inhabt. Perhaps our future selves really will be as alien to us as we would be to that medieval Lord of the Manor.
RELATED:
More Globalist Psychopathy: How the Merging of Humans and Technology Will Define The Furure
A presentation at the World Government Summit (WGS) last week in Dubai, unveiled the conference organizers agenda for a Brave New World. Titled “Government in 2071 initiative" the plan was described as a roadmap for governments to interact with “citizens and stakeholders” in effecting dramatic changes in the way the world is governed and societies are organised. Drivers of these radical changes in the way we live will be Artificial Intelligence, robotics and climate change.
Despite the fact that they represent only the interests of big business, big finance and themselves, the oligarchs of the World Economic Forum are now calling for a policy of merging human and artificial intelligence systems so that computer chips implanted in our brain can edit and censor “hate speech” and “misinformation” online before it is articulated trough spoken of written word online.
Could 'DNA editing' lead to designer babies? Designer babies, human / animal hybrids, these things have been in wet dream territory for scientists for a long time. But now due to techniques such as DNA editing, they are getting worryingly close to reality. And as has been demonstrated many times, scientists have zero uderstanding of where the ethical boundaries lie.
Nothing Good Has Come Of The InternetWhen a technophobe denounces the internet as anti - social, anti jobs, a force for dumbing down or a waste of time it can easily be dismissed but when the CEO of a major technology company like Sony saays nothing good has ever come of the internet we should perhaps listen..
The Robotification Of Human Society Is being Implemented
Are you ready to surrender your humanity to science, accept having computer chips implanted in your skull that will link your brain to the internet (via a Google server) and let your life be controlled by machines? That's what The Controllers are planning for you ...
Web Induced DementiaIn most civilised societies there are laws governing what outrageous claims advertisers can make for their products. This does not apply on the web it seems, where 'revolutionary new world changing technology' means 'not fit for purpose'
Computer Cops Will Arrest You Before You Commit A Crime
Innocent until proved guilty has always been a basic principle of British and before the Union, English and Scottish justice. Since late in the ninth century when King Alfred signed into law the Liber Judicialis, the presumption of innocence has stood.Thinking of committing a crime was not punishable, only in George Orwell's dystopian novel "1984" has Thought Crime ever been a punishable offence. Until now ...
Is Technology Creating Physical and Psychological Hazards In The Digital Age?
Scientific research used to be the area of work that trailblazers, those with an unquenchable desire for new experience and a hyperactive sense of adventure wanted to be involved in. Now those who label themselves 'scientists' seem to have become the high priests of an ultra - conservative religion, determined at all costs to block progess that may lead to understanding that the dogmas of the past are just wrong
The Mummers: The Controlling system And The Illusion Of Freedom
We live in a world of deception, where truth is an ephemeral thing, slippery as an eel and shadowy as a spectre. What we are expercted to perceive as reality is just spin and misinformation designed to ensure the elite maintain their control. There's eff all you can do just get on with your life, say the shills for big government and authoritarianism. But are we really nothing more than slaves of the system?
Google's Brave New World Of Artificial Intelligence - And The Destruction Humanity
Almost every day we hear scientists burbling about artificial intelligence and how very soon machines will be smarter than humans. As scientists are nowhere near as smart as humans its hard to see how science can build something smarter. The problem is of course we don't understand what contsitutes intelligence - those who think academic qualifications are the only indicator are retards. So where will this madness to replace us with machines end?
Transhumanism - What The Elite And Their Science Whores Have Planned For You
Transhumanism, the creation of - or turning us into - part human, part machine cyborgs is generating a lot of discussion and a lot of spontaneous ejaculations in the scientific community as they contemplate having their brains replaced by a computer. There are no limits on the ambitions of scientists fantasies, they even envisage creating robots that can interbreed with us, but how much is realistic?
Don't be Evil, Google Will Do It For You
Google have abandoned their "Don't Be Evil motto. Good thing really, they are becoming more evil every day. The latest plans to integrate our brains with their servers may seem like a science fiction freaks wet dream, but these creepy nerds are serious ...
News Used To Be Important - Now It's Just EntertainmentPeople talk about technology, mainly television, cellulat telephones and the internet having given us an unprecedented ability to communicate. But have they? OK, we can trade meaningless messages with strangers on the other side of the world, we can join the cacophony of social netwoks where everybody yells at once and nobody listens, or we can sit in isolation, shouting inmto the void. But none of those are communicating. Technology has actually inhibited communication. ...
Intrusive Surveillance Technology, Internet control freaks and The Orwell-Huxley-Dick Dystiopianometer
Are privacy campaigners right to be worried about intrustive internet technology and the massive databases that log our behaviour and parse the data for patters that enable us to be targeted for advertising? Should we bee worried by surveillance or are those that raise doubts just scaremongering? The Orwell-huxley-Dick dystopianometer is rising.
So Who Is Anti - science? Those Who Question Climate Change Or Those Who Would Abolish Free Speech
It was looking as if the global warming scare was dead, then that Nazi shit Barack Obama, seeing his dream of being President Of The World slipping away, gave his science whores enough money to enable them to kick some life back into it. Now the "science" lobby, unable to put together an convinging argument against their challengers are demanding the abolition of free speech.
New World Order War On free Speech Comes To Britain - Guardian editor accused of treason
The right to free speech is under threat from intolerant, authoritarian elitists, call them The Illuminati, New World Order, Scientific Dictatorshgip, Global Elite, whatever. Their goal is absolute power and they know that while the right of free speech, the free press and free access to information exist they cannot succeed.
How academic debate is suppressed on science topics like Climate Change, GMOs, Pesticides and Toxicity of medicines
Intellectual intolerance and the supposed superiority of the scientific education have led not just to the politiciisation of science but to it's being seduced by corporate money and political power. Science was ever fascism's whore of course and the egos of scientists are easily bought. This has led to a very unhealthy emergence of dogmas and orthodoxies and an intolerance of the dissent that is essential if scientific research is to have any credibility.
Phobophobia - Fear Of Being called Phobic?
Homophobia is not fear of homosexuals but fear of thec same thing which does not make sense. Just as politically correct thinking uses the word bigot nonsensically so it's accusations of phobia are irrational - as irrational as the groundless fear familiar to those who suffer the recognized medical conditions called phobias.
The Importance Of Free Speech And A Free Press
Politicians around the developed world including leaders of the two most powerful democracies, Barack Obama and David Cameron have been falling over themselves to join the attack on free speech. On subjects as diverse as climate…
Scientists create human-sheep chimera with hopes of affordable organ transplants
A team of scientists has grown hybrid embryos in the womb of a sheep that contain human stem cells, moving the sci-fi idea of developing human organs inside animals one step closer to reality, and sparking ethical concerns. The development could potentially save thousands lives among people who are in a need of vital organ transplants.SSS
We have reported many times on the Internet of Things an idea planned by the big technology companies and bevoled of control freak mainstream politicians and the creepy people who run global corporations. Those who love the idea of technology controlling us are cheering the idea ...
Google’s Eric Schmidt Greases Skids For Internet Brain Chip Google CEO Eric Schmidt greased the skids for an Internet brain chip during a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland earlier today when he predicted the end of the world wide web as an external concept. Asked how he saw the Internet developing in future years, Schmidt responded, “There will be so many IP addresses…so many devices, sensors, things that you are wearing, things that you are interacting with that you won’t even sense it.”
The Robotification Of Human Society Is being Implemented
Are you ready to surrender your humanity to science, accept having computer chips implanted in your skull that will link your brain to the internet (via a Google server) and let your life be controlled by machines? That's what The Controllers are planning for you ...
Robot lovers, indestrictible soldiers with no mercy or compassion, everlasting life for beings that are part human, part machine, genetically modified humans with supernatural strength and endurance competing in future 'hungrer Games' style Olympic tournaments: the plot of some dystopian novel? No, actual items in the elite's agenda for total control.
Transhumanism and Eugenics
We have said many times that the science community is at war with humanity. Scientists are out of control, evry day we hear of some new scheme to try to control nature, be it human nature or the climate. Given what we ought to have learned from all previous attempts to control nature we can only conclude that scientists are insane psychos willing to risk destroying life to show off how clever they are.
Transhumanism: Join The Resistance
Transhumanism, the creation of - or turning us into - part human, part machine cyborgs is generating a lot of discussion and a lot of spontaneous ejaculations in the scientific community as they contemplate having their brains replaced by a computer. There are no limits on the ambitions of scientists fantasies, they even envisage creating robots that can interbreed with us, but how much is realistic?
[ Artificial Intelligence jobs ] ... [ Google's AI ambitions ] ... [ Transhumanism ] ... [ Technology rules you ] ... [ Big tech tyranny ]
EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]
No comments:
Post a Comment