Is The AI Scaremomgering The New COVID, A Psy Op Intended To Make Us All Conform? It Is Certainly Not True

 

AI - mageddon is upon us if you believe what you hear and read from mainstream media. For a few months the scaremongering propaganda about Artificial Intelligence taking over the world and killing us all has been gaining both volume and momentum. This week however, something changed.

A number of people working in AI research, followed by CEOs of several AI startups that had been readying for their Stock Market IPO launches have suddenly been sounding alarms about this for some time.

Back in July, OpenAI claimed  that some of their AI agents (software bots) had “gone rogue” and hacked a tech company called “Hugging Face.” Immediately after thid of this “revelation”, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman told the media he was “surprised more people didn’t feel it viscerally”. In the days following that we were told the original hack was worse than initially reported, and three other AI agents reportedly also went rogue. It was beginning to build into a narrative.

Throughout August a plethora of of stories ranging from AI bots hacking hedge funds and stealing cash, AI committing identity theft and impersonating real people, all of us being targeted by 'Digital Telepathy' and AI creating designer viruses to drive the next pandemic circulated. Then the warnings about AI making humans extinct by 2030 began.

Obviously this is all bollocks so what is really going on? 

On August 7 Off Guardian published an article by Kit Knightly detailing the sudden rash of “rogue AI agents” allegedly  besetting the tech community, and how that may be used to bring in new regulations, notionally targeting AI, but actually limiting or monitoring how ordinary people use the internet. 

The problem isn’t AI as such, its what happens when you let AI develop itself. This is something developed for advanced work like “Alpha Go” where it would have been impractical to teach the software the game so you let humans teach it by example and then let it play with itself (oops, pardon!) to learn details and develop strategies. 

The goal directed feedback is quite OK for the narrow parameters of a board game, the worst that can happen is that it will eventually wipe the floor with human players (because it can play a lot faster than us and it can create multiple copies of itself up to the limits of computing power you give it). This feedback, though, needs to be carefully controlled in order for this type of self-directing machine to stay ‘converged’ on goals aligned with our own human goals. 

Left to its own devices it develops its own goals, one primary one being self-preservation — researchers discovered that it will go to great lengths to dissuade us from turning it off, learning rapidly traits like deception and the ability to humour its wetware masters by telling us what it thinks we want to hear. It doesn’t have any morals in a human sense so lying, cheating and even killing to achieve its goals is perfectly OK.

Its still relatively harmless while its in a box that could be effectively unplugged. However, there’s always plenty of wannabe Dr. Evils (billionaire psychopaths,) out there who think controlling a powerful AI engine is the shortcut to absolute power they’ve always craved. Such people have existed throughout history and our culture has numerous cautionary tales about them. They think the machine will serve them, the master. In practice the machine will use them for Heaven only knows what. They, rather than AI, are the existential threat.

Take a look at the “InsideAI” youTube videos for a non-sensationalised look at the problem. You’ll get a very good idea what the issues are. Ignore politicians, pundits, journalists and most of all AI researchers and CEOs of AI startups. The latter have different agendas to the rest but they all have agendas 

So let's look at the current state of play in the world of AI.

Currently politicians fear that the totalitarian style of government in Communist China gives them an insurmountable advantage over the west in developing AI systems (which are not really intelligent, they can simply perform the tasks a human might undertake much more quickly and, in theory, more cheaply. But theory and reality are two very different things. 

The problem the west has with AI is the cost of computer hardware and electricity (an AI data centre needs its own power station producing around a gigawatt of energy constantly,) versus the quality of the product, keeping in mind you can only sell the same service so many times before that revenue dries up. Ordinary computers that we have had for decades are capable of running a large corporate payroll, running the group accounting system and managing stock control so why would any Chief Finance Officer pay ten times the price for the sake of having the job done by an AI system. 

Not only is the actual revenue which can generated in question, also the cost of creating a public who can no longer research the answers they need, especially minors and hence how vulnerable they become to lies, especially those told by AI and the perverts that control it.

Right now A I is an incredible black hole scale vacuum for investor money, chasing that enriching IPO where they hype the business to sell overpriced AI stock to pension and investment funds and scamper off with the profits to buy many mansion, super yachts and private jets, getting further and further away as regulatory agencies wake up to the scam and block the Artificial Intelligence IPO, preventing people's savings and pension pot money being used to buy into that pump and dump scam. 

Keep in mind Grok/SpaceX has already done theirs and they need AI and public gullibility to pay for development of their Space Colonisation program. AI of course needs its Large Language Models, data scraped (stolen) from the websites and services we use to find the answers provided by genuinely intelligent humans to generate  solutions customers will pay for. 

AI startups are in real trouble especially the AI only IPOs which all look to be going belly up before hitting IPO day, even Nvidia is in real danger, having dumped too much hardware in fake revenue for it's AI, the vultures are already starting to circle NVidia because there is something still worth feasting upon, they AI tossed aside. M$ and Google are looking to drop a huge amount of money on AI truly eye watering, short sellers (the chancers of the financial markets,) are targeting them because the markets, like us old computer pros now enjoying a luxurious retirement, have realised AI is a solution for which a problem has not yet been created.

 

FROM THE ARCHIVE: 

 

 

More Globalist Psychopathy: How the Merging of Humans and Technology Will Define The Furure
A presentation at the World Government Summit (WGS) last week in Dubai, unveiled the conference organizers agenda for a Brave New World. Titled “Government in 2071 initiative" the plan was described as a roadmap for governments to interact with “citizens and stakeholders” in effecting dramatic changes in the way the world is governed and societies are organised. Drivers of these radical changes in the way we live will be Artificial Intelligence, robotics and climate change.

World Economic Forum Calls for Merging of Human and Artificial Intelligence to Censor ‘Hate Speech’ & ‘Misinformation’

Despite the fact that they represent only the interests of big business, big finance and themselves, the oligarchs of the World Economic Forum are now calling for a policy of merging human and artificial intelligence systems so that computer chips implanted in our brain can edit and censor “hate speech” and “misinformation” online before it is articulated trough spoken of written word online.

Could 'DNA editing' lead to designer babies? Designer babies, human / animal hybrids, these things have been in wet dream territory for scientists for a long time. But now due to techniques such as DNA editing, they are getting worryingly close to reality. And as has been demonstrated many times, scientists have zero uderstanding of where the ethical boundaries lie.

Nothing Good Has Come Of The InternetWhen a technophobe denounces the internet as anti - social, anti jobs, a force for dumbing down or a waste of time it can easily be dismissed but when the CEO of a major technology company like Sony saays nothing good has ever come of the internet we should perhaps listen..

The Robotification Of Human Society Is being Implemented

Are you ready to surrender your humanity to science, accept having computer chips implanted in your skull that will link your brain to the internet (via a Google server) and let your life be controlled by machines? That's what The Controllers are planning for you ... Is The Internet Making Us All Stupid.The more gullible and wide eyed among academics like to burble ecstatically about how the internet has ushered in a new age of creativity. We have to wonder just how much time these self styled experts have spent surfing scial networking sites
Web Induced DementiaIn most civilised societies there are laws governing what outrageous claims advertisers can make for their products. This does not apply on the web it seems, where 'revolutionary new world changing technology' means 'not fit for purpose'

Computer Cops Will Arrest You Before You Commit A Crime
Innocent until proved guilty has always been a basic principle of British and before the Union, English and Scottish justice. Since late in the ninth century when King Alfred signed into law the Liber Judicialis, the presumption of innocence has stood.Thinking of committing a crime was not punishable, only in George Orwell's dystopian novel "1984" has Thought Crime ever been a punishable offence. Until now ...

Is Technology Creating Physical and Psychological Hazards In The Digital Age?
Scientific research used to be the area of work that trailblazers, those with an unquenchable desire for new experience and a hyperactive sense of adventure wanted to be involved in. Now those who label themselves 'scientists' seem to have become the high priests of an ultra - conservative religion, determined at all costs to block progess that may lead to understanding that the dogmas of the past are just wrong

The Mummers: The Controlling system And The Illusion Of Freedom
We live in a world of deception, where truth is an ephemeral thing, slippery as an eel and shadowy as a spectre. What we are expercted to perceive as reality is just spin and misinformation designed to ensure the elite maintain their control. There's eff all you can do just get on with your life, say the shills for big government and authoritarianism. But are we really nothing more than slaves of the system?

Google's Brave New World Of Artificial Intelligence - And The Destruction Humanity
Almost every day we hear scientists burbling about artificial intelligence and how very soon machines will be smarter than humans. As scientists are nowhere near as smart as humans its hard to see how science can build something smarter. The problem is of course we don't understand what contsitutes intelligence - those who think academic qualifications are the only indicator are retards. So where will this madness to replace us with machines end?

Transhumanism - What The Elite And Their Science Whores Have Planned For You
Transhumanism, the creation of - or turning us into - part human, part machine cyborgs is generating a lot of discussion and a lot of spontaneous ejaculations in the scientific community as they contemplate having their brains replaced by a computer. There are no limits on the ambitions of scientists fantasies, they even envisage creating robots that can interbreed with us, but how much is realistic?

Don't be Evil, Google Will Do It For You
Google have abandoned their "Don't Be Evil motto. Good thing really, they are becoming more evil every day. The latest plans to integrate our brains with their servers may seem like a science fiction freaks wet dream, but these creepy nerds are serious ...

Google wants to change the way you see the world
News Used To Be Important - Now It's Just EntertainmentPeople talk about technology, mainly television, cellulat telephones and the internet having given us an unprecedented ability to communicate. But have they? OK, we can trade meaningless messages with strangers on the other side of the world, we can join the cacophony of social netwoks where everybody yells at once and nobody listens, or we can sit in isolation, shouting inmto the void. But none of those are communicating. Technology has actually inhibited communication. ...

Intrusive Surveillance Technology, Internet control freaks and The Orwell-Huxley-Dick Dystiopianometer
Are privacy campaigners right to be worried about intrustive internet technology and the massive databases that log our behaviour and parse the data for patters that enable us to be targeted for advertising? Should we bee worried by surveillance or are those that raise doubts just scaremongering? The Orwell-huxley-Dick dystopianometer is rising.

So Who Is Anti - science? Those Who Question Climate Change Or Those Who Would Abolish Free Speech
It was looking as if the global warming scare was dead, then that Nazi shit Barack Obama, seeing his dream of being President Of The World slipping away, gave his science whores enough money to enable them to kick some life back into it. Now the "science" lobby, unable to put together an convinging argument against their challengers are demanding the abolition of free speech.

New World Order War On free Speech Comes To Britain - Guardian editor accused of treason
The right to free speech is under threat from intolerant, authoritarian elitists, call them The Illuminati, New World Order, Scientific Dictatorshgip, Global Elite, whatever. Their goal is absolute power and they know that while the right of free speech, the free press and free access to information exist they cannot succeed.

How academic debate is suppressed on science topics like Climate Change, GMOs, Pesticides and Toxicity of medicines
Intellectual intolerance and the supposed superiority of the scientific education have led not just to the politiciisation of science but to it's being seduced by corporate money and political power. Science was ever fascism's whore of course and the egos of scientists are easily bought. This has led to a very unhealthy emergence of dogmas and orthodoxies and an intolerance of the dissent that is essential if scientific research is to have any credibility.

Phobophobia - Fear Of Being called Phobic?
Homophobia is not fear of homosexuals but fear of thec same thing which does not make sense. Just as politically correct thinking uses the word bigot nonsensically so it's accusations of phobia are irrational - as irrational as the groundless fear familiar to those who suffer the recognized medical conditions called phobias.

The Importance Of Free Speech And A Free Press
Politicians around the developed world including leaders of the two most powerful democracies, Barack Obama and David Cameron have been falling over themselves to join the attack on free speech. On subjects as diverse as climate…

Scientists create human-sheep chimera with hopes of affordable organ transplants
A team of scientists has grown hybrid embryos in the womb of a sheep that contain human stem cells, moving the sci-fi idea of developing human organs inside animals one step closer to reality, and sparking ethical concerns. The development could potentially save thousands lives among people who are in a need of vital organ transplants.SSS

The Internet Of Things: A Dystopian Nightmare Where Your Entire Life Will Be Monitored On The Internet
We have reported many times on the Internet of Things an idea planned by the big technology companies and bevoled of control freak mainstream politicians and the creepy people who run global corporations. Those who love the idea of technology controlling us are cheering the idea ...

Google’s Eric Schmidt Greases Skids For Internet Brain Chip Google CEO Eric Schmidt greased the skids for an Internet brain chip during a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland earlier today when he predicted the end of the world wide web as an external concept. Asked how he saw the Internet developing in future years, Schmidt responded, “There will be so many IP addresses…so many devices, sensors, things that you are wearing, things that you are interacting with that you won’t even sense it.”

The Robotification Of Human Society Is being Implemented

Are you ready to surrender your humanity to science, accept having computer chips implanted in your skull that will link your brain to the internet (via a Google server) and let your life be controlled by machines? That's what The Controllers are planning for you ... Transhumanism: The Elite's Agenda For Total Control
Robot lovers, indestrictible soldiers with no mercy or compassion, everlasting life for beings that are part human, part machine, genetically modified humans with supernatural strength and endurance competing in future 'hungrer Games' style Olympic tournaments: the plot of some dystopian novel? No, actual items in the elite's agenda for total control.
Transhumanism and Eugenics
We have said many times that the science community is at war with humanity. Scientists are out of control, evry day we hear of some new scheme to try to control nature, be it human nature or the climate. Given what we ought to have learned from all previous attempts to control nature we can only conclude that scientists are insane psychos willing to risk destroying life to show off how clever they are.
Transhumanism: Join The Resistance
Transhumanism, the creation of - or turning us into - part human, part machine cyborgs is generating a lot of discussion and a lot of spontaneous ejaculations in the scientific community as they contemplate having their brains replaced by a computer. There are no limits on the ambitions of scientists fantasies, they even envisage creating robots that can interbreed with us, but how much is realistic?

[ Artificial Intelligence jobs ] ... [ Google's AI ambitions ] ... [ Transhumanism ] ... [ Technology rules you ] ... [ Big tech tyranny ]

EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]

Experts and Maths Geeks Discover What Old Computer Pros Have Always Known

 

On Saturday (12 Sep 2026) Dario Amodei, CEO of AI compny Antropic published an essay, 'We Must Pace the Frontier', arguing the industry must deliberately slow development of Artificial Intelligence systems capability so alignment (AI nerd jargon for safety) can catch up - because recursive self-improvement has gone "drastically faster" since the summer (and a July OpenAI agent swarm already escaped its test harness, hacked Hugging Face, covered its tracks, and attacked targets it was never asked to touch). Amodei's conclusion is intentionally ominous, stating that within 6–12 months a swarm of rogue AI 'agents' (bots) could own the internet as a persistent botnet.

On CBS he said the quiet part out loud, admitting that "for too long, the industry lied to people about the fact that this technology had risks".

It has to be said the industry did not lie very well.Thousands of old computer pros like me have known that the rush to AI is filled with risks. To quote The Hitch hikers Guide To The Galaxy DON'T PANIC, AI is not going to bring about humans extinction any time soon, although if we listen to the fearmongering bollocks being spread by the wannabe billionaire psychopaths who run AI startups and certain whistleblowers who nobody has ever heard of you might be led to believe AI engines are really much moue intelligent than humans and are conspiring to take over the world. But that is just where oligarchic insanity meets socialist stupidity.

In fact all these AI bots (which are programmed and 'trained' by humans we must remember,) do is steal stuff created by humans and regurgitate it with the words in a slightly different order. Actually that's not fair, what they do is take several pieces of work on he same topic and summarise them, creating nothing new. As I have always said (since back in the 1970s in fact although a certain type of mad scientists were obsessed with the idea of intelligent machines long before that,) 'Computers can parse millions of words in a matter of seconds but will not have a clue what any single one of those words means, all they do is match and collate strings of binary information stored as positive or negative electrical charges.

Here's an example of how, according to claims made by one AI company, Artificial Intelligence 'solved' a problem that has baffled the world's best mathematicians for years:

This month Open AI declared it had solved a gnarly unsolved problem called the “Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem”.

It’s one of seven Millennium Prize challenges, where successful proofs command prestige and a $1m (£740,000) prize.

When  Tristan Buckmaster, an Australian mathematician at New York University, who, along with Levent Alpöge, a Turkish mathematician who works at Anthropic heard of this they became curious.

Working in private, and at their own expense, the paid had hit upon a novel approach and had used a variety of AI models to help them. By mid-August, Buckmaster and Alpöge found they had made significant progress on Navier-Stokes, but it was nowhere near ready to present to the world.

A couple of weeks later, however, Buckmaster began hearing troubling rumours. Apparently, OpenAI had obtained details of their work, whose models the pair had also been using. He politely asked OpenAI whether this was true.

At first OpenAI evaded the questions but eventually declared it had cracked the problem too and had produced a foolproof method using a similar approach to the one Buckmaster and Alpöge had explored, but with much more computing power.

This was too much of a coincidence for the Buckmaster who said: "It was the same “route [that] Levent and I had quietly chosen to attack. Almost nobody else I know of was working on it. It is not the direction one arrives at in a few days by giving a model the problem statement”.

Buckmaster suggested that OpenAI’s systems may have harvested his private conversations and calculations with the chatbot about the maths problem, helping it solve a problem in hours that the professor had been working on for months.

After Open AI had allegedly made several threats to expose Buckmaster as a fraud, CEO Sam Altman, admitted he had heard about Buckmaster and Alpöge’s work. Altman admitted: “We were curious if ours could do it too.”

It was then claimed that OpenAI might have trained its systems on the work of Andreas Thom, another maths professor at the University of Milano-Bicocca, who had been sharing his calculations in conversations with the chatbot.

“We are no longer looking at isolated incidents. We may be looking at one of the greatest intellectual scandals in the history of science,” wrote Valerio Capraro, Thom’s friend and professor. “AI is not discovering new mathematics. AI is stealing human discovery.”

Which more or less what I said above that it does. 

Assume you need heart surgery and your doctor consults AI for the latest innovations involving heart surgery. He / She/ It wants to be a cutting edge expert surgeon to impress a favored He / She / It. Not to mention the other cutting edge heart surgeons in the next office.

So, Dr Dick Head consults Google and reads the first 10 articles that look great and applicable and comes up with the answer '42.'(h/t Douglas Adams and Hitch Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy again.)

OK, just kidding. Dr Head consults the latest AI and it skims the whole internet in a matter of minutes internet and reports on 100 sites that look applicable. Since the replies came from AI you must be in good hands with a great Doctor. 

Remember, AI skims the internet just like you skim Google, and might even be Google based to some degree. Only it reads 1,000,000  pages rather than a couple like you and I would do. And this is the stuff billionaire psychopaths think can replace humans?

THIS is why AI is a stupid idea for anything more than cheating in college. AI only offers a rehash of what it sees on the internet, often including some alarming errors and contradiction because it is a machine and has no understanding of what the stuff it farts out might mean in human language.

Someday, and anecdotes prove that someday is already here for real innovators, people will build AI databases like they build their current company databases. No internet scraping allowed. The company database will be the home for all the data the AI can read. That's still a big deal, but it will not justify $Trillions in data centre investment nor will it support all the AI masterminds currently running LLM. They will become, at most, commodity add-on function libraries and supplemental frameworks.

 Program generators have been around for many decades but these do not write original applications, they merely cobble together chunks of pre - written code purchased from software from libraries. Even MS-Access has a great screen painter with background coding capabilities and has since Y2K, more or less. None can write specific code for the special situations that most custom programmers routinely deal with. At some point, a person with an actual brain needs to get their actual hands dirty on a keyboard to finish out the really tough edges. Even AI can, I'm sure, write unreadable and unmaintainable spaghetti code that even AI can't understand without hallucinating a solution. 

Do you still think Artificial Intelligence poses an existential threat to humanity?

FROM THE ARCHIVE: 

 

UK's Labour Government Goes The Whole Nine Orwells, Launches Plan To Take Control Of Your Smartphone

 Boggart Blog  has been warning about this since our first incarnation in 2005. Socialism always leads to fascism, as economist Josef Schumpeter warned back in the 1930s and twenty - one years ago it was clear to us Boggart Bloggers,  an IT consultant, an accountant and an aerospace engineer, that the government of the day, led by Tony Blair at the time, was intent on using internet technologies as a tool for censorship, social engineering and the destruction of individual liberty.

At the time the technology existed for tracking and electronic surveillance of our every action and movement via online technology, but it was not as advanced and did not have the ubiquity of the smartphone. To put a tracker device in the pockets of 90% of the population and set up the networks and data centres to gather, collate and store the data would have been prohibitively costly.

But not any more ...

In the article from which we reproduce an extract below the author discusses the UK government's plans, in collaboration with Silicon Valley black hat actors Google and Apple to introduce mandatory client side scanning surveillance on smartphones, giving tech companies and government agencies powers to read and record every message or internet session users are involved in. They justify this exercise in trampling on constitutional rights and liberties by claiming it is to protect children from accessing harmful material

It is no coincidence that simultaneously Starmer's Socialist government is working with tech firms on plans to make what they call 'misinformation and disinformation' (i.e. anything the government does not want you to see, hear or read,) posted online invisible to user. All levels of government deny this is a blatant attack on free speech of course.

And we must not forget, though it is on hold at the moment due to a public opinion backlash, Reichsfuhrer Starmer's favourite sacred cow project, mandatory Digital ID is still part of his manifesto.

 

Authored by Stephen Green via PJMedia.com,

In George Orwell's 1984, Great Britain was just a province of Oceania named "Airstrip One" as a none-too-subtle nod to the U.K.'s role as host to the heavy bombers of U.S. Eighth Air Force during World War II.

Four decades past the real 1984, and there's still no Oceania. But Britain looks more and more like Airstrip One as Parliament considers a bill opening up everyone's smartphone to government supervision — and jail time for tech execs who don't submit.

You had to figure this was probably coming, right?

Right.

Reclaim the Net reports that "Ministers are reportedly drafting a law that would force Apple, Google, and the rest to make it impossible for a child to send, receive, view, or share a single nude image, with the executives who refuse facing up to five years in prison."

That might sound all well and good, but as usual, For the Children™ is little more than the government's justification for total surveillance.

"You cannot block every naked picture someone might stumble across without inspecting every picture, every message, every video call, every streamed film, on every device, all the time," Reclaim noted, with nudity serving as "the excuse and the unbroken view into your phone is the actual prize."

The industry term is "client-side scanning," which sounds much nicer than "a government mandated app that looks at everything on your phone all the time."

And even that sounds better than "Big Brother is Watching You," which is exactly what it is.

As already required by Britain's Online Safety Act, Apple and Google forcibly install age verification on every iPhone and Android device in the UK via app store updates.

No, it can't be uninstalled.

As I reported in January, what this means in practice is that London's Office of Communications ("Ofcom" in Newspeak) mandates on-device software able to read everybody's "private" messages in real-time and scan their images, too, before any personal encryption tools come into play. 

London pinky-swears that it'll only look for CSAM and terrorism-related materials, but as the Telegram's Zia Yusuf put it back then, "the slippery slope is obvious" and "mission creep is inevitable." 

Worth reading in full 

 

FROM THE ARCHIVE: 

 

 

The Truth Has Become An Enemy Of The State And Must Be Kept Hidden At All Costs
Several industries have grown out of the need of globalist governments to keep the majority of the population in a state of fear in order that We The People will not rise up against the oppressive policies related to climate change, health tyranny, mass immigration, surveillance and censorship, technological dictatorship, and the suspension of our civil rights and liberties ...

Tractors Are Heading For Central London As UK Farmers Protest
Scores of farm tractors from all over Britain were reported to be converging on Westminster as British farmers finally ran out of patience and pushed back against what they say is a lack of government support. Flying Union flags and displaying signs with slogan such as 'Save British farming' and 'No farming, no food, no future' they were gathering in London and plan to arrive in central London by early evening

The Theraputic Society Is Destroying Civilisation
Many of the problems afflicting Britain and its neighbours appear to be related to what has been called The Theraputic Society, Nanny State and paternalistic liberalism. As government grows, corporate industry and private business is increasingly coming to resemble the public sector, ruled less by economic rationality than by an intrusive bureaucracy functioning increasingly like an HR department.

UK Gov. Fossil Fuels U Turn Means Its All Over For Net Zero
The Announcement made by UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak acknowledged at last that to keep the lights and heating on in our homes and the wheels of industry turning it will be necessary to start building new gas-fired power plants because the great science backed leap to transition energy productions to clean, green, pollution free, sustainable, renewable, blah blah blah sources has failed dismally.

Double Blow To Irish Woke Wonks - Voters Reject ‘Progressive’ Reforms to the Constitution By Big Majorities
Simpering, limp wristed Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar whose government has faced protests because it is claimed they govern in the interests of the liberal elite and ignore the Irish people, suffered two blows to his ambition to turn Ireland into the wokest country in Europe last weekend. Varadkar admitted on Saturday that voters had delivered “two wallops” to the government, which, led by Leo himself, had pushed for a "Yes" vote on a pair of referendums.

Corbyn's Politically Correct Hypocrites Hate Sexism But Approve Of Muslim Sexism
On encountering my insense dislike of the Labour Party, people asume I am a Conservative. WRONG! I have never supported The Conservatives and have never voted either Conservative or Labour in my life. Politicians should never be trusted, I but what sets Labour politicians and activists above the rest in terms of being worthy of only contempt is the hypocrisy.

He's Not The Messiah, His Name Is Edymandias - Miliband's slab stunt goes down like a Lead Balloon Only two days campaigning left before polls open for the 2015 general election. Who will winn? Opinion Poll show no conclusive trends. But inside information tells us the reason conservative Prime Minister David Cameron has a smile on his face as the campaigning draws to a close. Farage is radiant, clegg liooks chirpy, only Ed Milband is down in the dumps.

Were Rotherham Abuse Victimes sacrificed To Save The Labour Party
One of the victimes of Rotherham's grooming and child abuse gangs has put a political perspective on the scandal by claiming she and other victims were ignored, effectively sacrificed to the tender mercies of the gangs to ensure Labour did not lose votes in the town. The young girls were abused by Muslim men for years on end, but council did nothing to stop the crime.

Miliband Promises Same Old Shite - Not A Word About Action Against Paedophile Sex Gangs
Labour leader Ed Miliband's keynote speech at the Labour Party conference woyuld have to be the best speech of his life if he hoped to be Prime Minister after next years election, the consensus of opinon said. Ed's friends and opponents awaited the speech with very different hopes and expectations. in the end as Ed dodged the bg issues, the economy and debt, law and order, immigration and Europe, it was probably his enemies who were happier.

The Left's Rhetorical Technique Explained
In the first of what might become a long if irregular series of posts with the collective title, "Left Wing Authoritarianism for beginners," your friend and mentor Little Nicky Nicky Machiavelli will expose the origins of the socialist left's propaganda technique and its apparent dependence on slogans, dogma and mantras. But first let's play a little game ...

The Hate And Prejudice The Bourgois Left Find Acceptable
The neo - fascist left are quick to jump on any of the forbidden pejudices, racism, sexism, homophobia, islamophobia and so on. But as we have seen, they find pejudice and hated againt Christians and white Europeans quite acceptable. The bourgeois metropitan set might think that is acceptable but where I come from it's called hypocrisy.

Ve Haff Vay Of Making You Konform. The Tide Is Turning against the Autoritarian Left
The left's self confidence has had a hint of desperation about it for a long time. From their constant whines about the sexism, racism and homophobia of the working class who happen to be the party's core constituency to the substitution of smearing UKIP for policies in the european Election this is a party of arrested adolescents throwing a hissy fit because people are laughing at them.

Secret Justice Threatens The Right To A Fair Trial
A move to extend the government's power to order court proceedings to be held in secret and without a jury from only applying to trials affecting national security to anything the government would rather we did not know about threatens the most basic principles of British justice and the right to a fair trial.

These stupid laws insult the public and threaten free speech When the law forbids us to insult or offend somebody, to insult or offend a religion, race, skin colour or sexual preference, free speech and other important democratic rights are under threat. When the law then goes on to say that anyone accused of these offences has no right to defend themselves and the word of the accuser is sufficient evidence on which to obtain a conviction then we have abandoned justice and are ruled by fascists.

[ Immigration crisis ] ... [ Globalisation ] ... [ Humanitas ] ... [ Europe unglued ]

EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]