Little Englanders Jibe Lost The Debate And Probably The Referendum For Camereon

In spite of the crude and bungled attempt to rig last night TV debate, with ITV placing race-baiting plants in the audience whose task was to shout down Nigel Farage with idiotic accusations, and appointing a weak moderator who allowed REMAIN supporters in the audience to talk over Farage but was quick to cut off the several audience members whose questions had Cameron waffling, the UKIP leader was judged the winner.

The main thing we learned from the debate is that the establishment will try to rig the referendum. 150% of people elegible to vote by post actually casting votes perhaps?

It was easy to pinpoint the moment Cameron lost the debate and his job too in all probability. it was when he referred to LEAVE supporters as "Little Englanders". Not only did he antagonise a lot of undecideds, he showed one again how far out of touch with the public mood he is. And by using the term Little Englanders in entirely the wrong context (as lefties have for years) he showed he's a lazy bastard who can't be arsed doing his research.

William Gladstone, supported free trade, individual liberty, home rule for Ireland, opposed colonial wars, big government. He was a Little Englander.

The "Little England" movement originated among manufacturers in Manchester and found support among journalists such as Goldwin Smith and politicians like William Gladstone, one of the founders of the UK Liberal Party. The movement objected to the protectionist stance of Canada exemplified by the tariff increase of 1859. The manufacturers resented paying taxes to defend a colony that took few British goods when Canada could be absorbed by the United States, which was an independent country and Britain's best customer outside Europe. Canada had some importance as a supplier of wheat and timber to Britain, but its climate and northerly location meant that it had no significance for Manchester's cotton industry.

There was also a social element to the movement. The Manchester School resented the Empire for providing sinecures for the sons of the aristocracy when the same money could be used for tax breaks and public spending projects at home.

The Little England stance was adopted by the Liberal Party and embraced by its rising star Gladstone (1809-1898), a social reformer who opposed many of Britain's military adventures in the second half of the 19th century and was particularly incensed by the behaviour of Britain's colonial administrations towards naitive populations. Gladstone, though devoutly religious, did not accept the need to impose British religious and cultural traditions on people in the colonies.

The Little Englander movemement is particularly associated with opposition to the Second Boer War (1899–1902). For example, Arthur Ponsonby wrote of the Liberal leader Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman's opposition to the Boer War: "The impression one got of him from the Press in those days was… that he was an unpatriotic Little Englander"

In a nutshell then, Little Englanders were opposed to political or cultural colonialism and therefore were true believers in diversity.

In other words, the Little Englander movement was a left-of-centre, "progressive" movement of its day.


RELATED POSTS:

Quitaly? Will Italy follow Britain out of the EU?

With a referendum in Italy, ostensibly on constitutional reforms but perceived as a referendum on the leadership of the ruling elite, looming in November and the anti - globalisation, pro sovereignty Five Star Party growing in popularity all the time. Should the constitutional changes be voted down, and the against campaign is showing a comfortable lead in opinion polls at the moment, it will put a Quitaly in-out referendum, similar to the so called Brexit vote that kick off the process of Britain leaving the European Union, at the top of the agenda.


Is Brexit A Harbinger Of Doom For The 'Experts'
The Brexit vote, the decision by a democratic majority in Britain to leave the European Union has sent shockwaves around the world. Not only does the EU now face a tsunami of departures, the usurpation of democracy by 'experts' ( technocrats ) has been challenged and exposed as a sham.

Dutch Referendum This Week Shows why We Should Leave The EU.

Few of you were aware probably that there is an EU referendum vote in The Netherlands this week. As usual with anything negative about the EU barely a word has been printed in the topic in mainstream media and the silence from our notionally unbiased national broadcaster The Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) has been deafening.

French, Belgians, Dutch, Italians Follow Britain in Euroskepticism

Europeans want us British to lead them out of Europe. Don't be fooled by project fear, the European Union (aka the Euronazi Federal Superstate) is falling apart. There will not be chaos if we leave, there will be chaos if we stay.

Head Of European Institute: Brexit Better For Everyone

Brexit would be the best result of Britain's in / out referendum for both Britain and the EU i a Belgian professor who heads up the European Institute at the London School of Economics (LSE) has said.

Johnson’s article lines up his reasons why Britain must exit on June 23rd. It’s time to be brave

OK, I know a lot of you think Boris is most accurately described by a word many people find offensive, but he’s put together a very good argument here on why we must leave the EU. Published in part here under ‘fair use’ terms and conditions, in the public interest ...

Cameron’s EU Package: Not A Deal But A Few Turns In The Spin Machine
As we and almost everybody else predicted, David Cameron's deal to improve Britain's relationship with the EU is worthless. It changes nmothing, and can be vetoed once we have voted to stay in.

Cameron Plays Deal Or No Deal In Europe

David Cameron, who was apparently up all night trying to make other European leaders understand why his country needs a better deal in order to poersuade the prople it is a good idea stay in the EU. Unless Cameron gets what will enable him to sell the idea of surrendering national sovereignty to a Federal European Superstate ruled by a committee of unelected bureaucrats in to the British public he will not campaign for the UK to remain in the bloc

EU Refuses to Block Eurozone Integration to Reach Agreement With UK

Austrian Chancellor Werner Faymann said at the E?U summit on British membership terms that the European Union wants to reach an agreement with the United Kingdom, but it is not prepared to compromise the banking union (financial integration) or the further integration of monetary union (UK being forced to abandon the pound join the Euro?) to achieve this goal.

Cameron's EU Deal Worthless. It Can Be Vetoed In European Parliament?
Opinion polls show Britain is evenly divided on the question of whether to leave or remain in the EU, though it has been suggested up to 10 million other voters, many of them women, have yet to make a decision. How they cast their vote will shape the future of the world’s fifth largest economy and the EU itself. But what is really at stake is more important than economics ...

Obama's intervention in UK politics triggers angry backlash
Angry Britons have launched a petition calling for U.S. President Barack Obama to be prevented from speaking in the UK parliament on Britain's forthcoming referendum on European Union (EU) membership.

Europe posts menu
Brexit posts menu

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Brexit: Another Honest Opinion Of The EU

On the day that UK Prime Minister David Cameron lost the plot completely over the EU 'Brexit' Referendum by accusing people intending to vote LEAVE of being unpatriotic, a member of another site where I promote myself another site left this articulate and passionate comment explaining very clearly why she will vote OUT in the EU referendum:

from Rowena: To be honest, I see a vote for out as a vote FOR Europe. The EU, as both Remain and Leave campaigns are happy to declare, and as millions of fellow Europeans agree, is in serious need of reform. Yet somehow a remain vote will help this happen? I don't buy it. Not when it seems patently obvious that the Eurocrats in charge don't want reform; they want more of the same. Even the monthly move of the European parliament from Brussels to Strasbourg, which costs €100m+ annually and is widely regarded by EU employees themselves as ridiculous, can't be changed.

The only thing I can see having a chance of causing real reform is a real shock to the EU status quo. Brexit. Even if that reform is, ultimately, of the break it up and start from scratch variety.

I'm not even going to go into the inherent racism of our current migration system, where the likelihood of any more of my Malaysian family being able to live and work here, even for a short while, is close to zero, no matter how many skills they might have that could be of serious benefit to our economy.

Just look at those European countries who are seriously suffering now. Massive youth unemployment. Unable to devalue their currencies in order to kick start a boost in trade. Falling birth rates as people are scared to have kids that they can't afford. What is the EU proposing to do in order to help these countries? There doesn't appear to be a plan.

I do think that our economy is likely to suffer in the short term. Markets hate uncertainty and it's going to take a while and some serious wrangling to sort out trade agreements, especially with some terribly affronted and petty bureaucrats. But we need to look longer term if we are seriously to consider what we want for future generations.

And us leaving may provide the impetus for others to leave - others who, I assume, would be only too happy to form agreements with us for trade, migration, security and other issues.

Why is the EU seen as the only way for European countries to collaborate? Perhaps because it holds too much power over individual countries. How can this change?

Revolution is messy. Scary. Expensive. Uncertain. And, ultimately, principled.

I don't see the virtue in going down with a sinking ship, especially when I don't believe it to be the best way to save fellow European passengers.

I love Europe. I'm proud to be European. I'm voting out.

Absolutely right. A lot of lefties and globalists are supporting 'Remain' because diversity

But it is neither racist nor Xenophobic to oppose mass migration and the deliberate destruction of our national culture. I am anti EU, anti mass immigration and anti globalisation, but I love the European nations I have spent time in and their people and cultures. And because I enjoy the DIVERSITY, I want Britain to stay British ( warts and all) and the French, Germans, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese, Danes and Swedes and Belgians to stay as they are too. Where's the effing diversity in living in a pan European federal superstate whose Nazi founders aim was to abolish national identity and imposed a synthesised monoculture?


RELATED POSTS:


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Why Won’t The Panama Papers Lefty Leakers Expose EU or American Establishment Figures?

Soros the Puppeteer (Image: Syrian Free Press)

EU Financial Services Chief Jonathan Hill is set to make a statement to the European Parliament on the highly topical subject of 'tax havens' today.

Hill is Britain’s most senior Commissioner and a close political ally of Prime Minister David Cameron who is under the cosh because of his family's involvement in an offshore fund, the existence of which, though known of before, has been highlighted by the leaking of the Panama Papers.

"This is a carefully thought through but ambitious proposal for more transparency on tax," Hill said in a statement ahead of the plan’s release, "While our proposal … is not of course focused principally on the response to the Panama Papers, there is an important connection between our continuing work on tax transparency and tax havens that we are building into the proposal," he added.

He's talking bollocks of course, a quick look at the details of what is the statement will contain reveals it has little to do with Panama but is mostly concerned with Jermeny Corbyn's hobby horse of choice, greedy multinational corporations who dodge paying their tax on profits in the various countries where they make their money, by using accounting structures that are perfectly legal whether we like it or not.

Those who draft laws containing loopholes so big even the Titanic could get through them unscathed should not castigate individuals and corporations that exploit the loopholes, instead the incompetent (or perhaps well greased, financially) buggers should do their jobs properly.

But we find it strange that the Soros-funded Panama Papers leak has scarcely mentioned a single EU apparatchik or American Republican or Democrat figure, focusing instead on non EU member state Iceland, and indeed Russian President Vladimir Putin? Coincidence, or are Eurocrats and US political hacks all magically above board with their tax affairs? Having read up on the lengths to which Hillary Clinton has gone to avoid revealing how much she was paid for a series of speeches to Wall Street Bankers, and knowing something of Donald Trump's track record in business, we think not.

Even the US business magaxine Forbes questions this ommission. Could there be some collateral damage in the papers in the conveniently partial leak of these documents?

It is very significant that rather than doing a Wikileaks style data dump, the lefty leakers, Goerge Soros front organisations the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists has chosen to decide for us what it is in our interests to know about.

Where’s the transparency from the partner organisations of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists – the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), the Guardian, and Sueddeutsche Zeitung? (Anyone notice what these three have in common? Hint: They’re not exactly right wing, anti-EU outlets). Indeed Sueddeutsche Zeitung has already said it won’t publish all the files, arguing that not all are of public interest.

David Cameron has staked so much on keeping Britain in the EU that not only does his career rest on the success of the Remain campaign but if Bratain votes Leave his hopes of a well paid sinecure with one of the supra national bureaucracies. At the moment, thanks to the Labour party's obsession with the fact that Cameron's Dear Old Mum used a ploy that is older than David Cameron or even me to (legally) avoid paying death taxes on her estate, he is looking shifty and mendacious. (He is shifty and mendacious but we could have trapped him on a bigger issue than this, surely).

EU leaders are now busily trying to look as if they preside over a strong regulatory authority respondin to an issue of great public concern, in accordance with the views of the British prime minister. Funny that they have suddenly got all hyper over Pamama's tax haven status when they have tolerated Luxembourg, a far bigger tax haven than Pamama and a founder member of the EU for many decades. And let's not forget the special arrangements London offers foreigners who are shy about revealing their full income to tax collectors in their home nations. What are Dodgy Dave, his mate George Soros and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists about exposing the tax dodging that goes on in those financial centres?



RELATED POSTS:

As UK National Socialist Leader Jeremy Corbyn Corbyn makes 'socialist case' for EU ...

As Jeremy Corbyn goes over to the dark side and tries to pretend the EU is a democratic, socialist organisation, George Soros reveals his plan to marginalise educated Europeans by flooding europe with ignorant, illiterate third world migrants to provide cheap and easily controlled Labour for industry

Soros Sponsored "Democracy Spring" Launches Program Of Civil Disobedience
Britain's Choice: Democracy Or Eurocracy
Yes, the Panama Papers Could Really End Hillary Clinton’s Campaign
Giant Leak of Offshore Financial Records Exposes Global Array of Crime and Corruption
Panama Papers: British Elite Linked to Corruption, yet Media Only Focuses on Putin


Elsewhere:
All Our Topic Calalogues at The Greenteeth Labyrinth
[ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Castrating Project Fear: Former-UK Army Chief Shoots Down Claims of Brexit Impact on NATO

We told you all when 'Dave's deal' was exposed as a sham that the campaign being led by Prime Minister David Cameron, to keep us in the EU (at the cost of our national sovereignty and our British identity) the Euro - sell -outs next move would be a propaganda war, predicting all sorts of horrors Britain would be exposed to if we left. So do you want vto believe this scaremongering bollocks and vote for a future of serfdom as a province of the Euronazi Empire?

 As the great philosopher Cantona once said, "He who forecasts all perils will never sail the seas".

 The EU council meets to discuss security concerns. You really think this bunch of limp wristed fairies will keep us ssafe when the denizens of Ragnarok, some really nasty pieces of work created by the very unpleasant sounding  by Snorri Sturluson burst out of the past to reclaim their mortal realm?

Well we're a seafaring nation, our ancestors travelled the great oceans in 40 foot rowing boats, ate whales and we did not built our empires (yes there have been several) by being the kind of snivelling cowards who hide in the broom cupboard and hope Nanny State will scare off the dragons. Our Celtic, Saxon and Danish  forebears (and a lot of them looked like bears and smelled worse) sailed into unknown waters and faced whatever monsters waited there. So why are so many people being taken in by shite like this.

Claims that the EU and the NATO military alliance could unravel with a potential British exit from the bloc have been rubbished by former British army Commander Colonel Richard Kemp, who says a Brexit from the EU could in fact benefit the UK's national security.

Reacting to claims from the chief of the US Army in Europe, Lieutenant-General Frederick "Ben" Hodges, who said that a Brexit would set a dangerous precedent during a time of increased international uncertainty, Colonel Kemp says that warnings over the EU and NATO disintegrating are not realistic.

"I think clearly the leadership of the EU and our own leaders don't agree with general Hodges that the EU is likely to unravel, because if they did I think… we would have seen a much greater effort by EU leaders to help us [the UK] renegotiate our relationship with the EU in the way that this country wants it, and the way that the prime minister tried to achieve," he told the BBC.

"And the second issue is that if the EU unravels, if the other 27 members of the EU can't hold themselves together coherently without the UK, then you do have to ask questions about the whole future of the EU, whether we're in or out of it."

The comments come after US Army Lieutenant-General Hodges said he was "worried" that a potential Brexit from the EU would create division within the bloc, and ultimately "undermine" NATO efforts at countering what Hodges believes to be Russian aggression.


Coming only a day after Russia withdrew most of its military personnel from Syria after kicking the gonads of the planet's who most dangerous terrorist states, USA and Turkey (both NATO members incidentally) it looks a tad stupid to try to brand Russia the warmongers. The USA provided ISIS with weapons and ammo and trained their men, while Turkey bought oil from the terrorists in exchange for dollars and military hardware.

Arguing that Britain was the second strongest member of the military alliance, Kemp said:

"I don't think that EU membership affects our position within NATO, and I don't think that the fact that one country of the European bloc is on a separate basis is going to significantly affect the NATO alliance."

 The former UK commander also rejected claims that it was essential for the EU to remain unified in light of current security issues facing Europe.

He's right, NATO existed before the EU was formed and through the years the 'Common Market' as it was originally known, was no more than a free trade area. The idea of economic and political integration of the six member states was not discussed. But NATO kept us safe throughout the Cold War years, although Russia never actually posed a threat.

RELATED POSTS:

Britain's Choice: Democracy Or Eurocracy

Democracy in the European Union: The people = one vote, the bureaucracy = millions of votes - because, and I quote, "The people are not intelligent enough to understand complex issues". As we have commented before, it is not just a large section of British public opinion that want's to get our country out of Europe. Last week voters in The Netherlands voted by a big majority against the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, which would be a step towards ...

French, Belgians, Dutch, Italians Follow Britain in Euroskepticism
Europeans want us British to lead them out of Europe. Don't be fooled by project fear, the European Union (aka the Euronazi Federal Superstate) is falling apart. There will not be chaos if we leave, there will be chaos if we stay.

Brexit: Britain's future in or out of EU?
Should Britain leave the EU and or remain and surrender even more of our national sovereighty to the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels. The campaign to keep us in the EU, led by Prime Minister David Cameron, has become know as Project Fear, the Europhile having only scaremongering arument to back their case. At the moment, due to the immigrant crisis caused by the Shengen Zone open borders area and 'open doors' immigration policy,

Why Should Obama Be Given A Platform From Which To Lecture Britian
Although it seems Sidi Barack Hussein Obama, the wannabe God - Emperor of the world and President Of The Entire Universe and everything Else Besides is still planning to visit Britain in late April to tell us all of HIS vision for Britain's future as a province of the US State of Greater Germany with Europe, British voters are distincylt undwerwhelmed by the prospect

EU Membership Vote in UK to Paralyze Decision Making
After Yugoslavia NATO changed from a mutual defence alliance to an organisation for military aggression.
European Lawmakers Debate Brexit Amid Fears of Domino Effect

Russia's Surprise Withdrawal From Syria? "If We Don't Go Away, We Can't Come back Again."

Propaganda War: US Officials Working to Keep Russia, Europe at Odds

Total Opacity Of 'The Most Transparent Administration Ever'

Turkey 'Blackmailing Europe Over Migrant Crisis'

Britain’s Terror Chief Warns Of Likely Islamic State Terror Attacks

EU Sacrifices Kurds To Turkey's Imperial Ambition For Erdogan Help With Migrants

David Cameron denies migrant crisis is a 'giant David Icke conspiracy' to keep us in the EU.

Support For EU / US Sanctions On Russia Declining In Central Europe

Fear and Panic: EU Defence Budgets Boom Amid ‘Russian Threat’ Paranoia

NATO Rhetoric About Russian Threat is 'Absurd'

Brexit: Britain's future in or out of EU?

Should Britain leave the EU and or remain and surrender even more of our national sovereighty to the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels. The campaign to keep us in the EU, led by Prime Minister David Cameron, has become know as Project Fear, the Europhile having only scaremongering argument to back their case. At the moment, due to the immigrant crisis caused by the Shengen Zone open borders area and 'open doors' immigration policy ...


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

David Cameron denies migrant crisis is a 'giant David Icke conspiracy' to keep us in the EU.

David Icke replies that Cameron is a slimy, duplicitous lizard who is totally committed to the Illuminati's New World Order conspiracy. Game, set and match to Icke.

 

 Image source: garybarker.co.uk

As Labour MP Kate Hoey, Conservative Liam Fox, Former SNP Deputy Leader Jim Sillars, several current cabinet ministers and a host of businessmen exposed the lies and empty threats behind the "Remain campaign's scaremongering David Cameron today denied launching a "giant David Icke-style conspiracy" to convince voters to stay in the EU.

The Prime Minister's bordering - on - irrational defence of the scaremongering came as French President Francois Hollande warned of "consequences" if the UK decides to quit the 28-nation bloc at June's referendum. (Whatever consquences the French president thinks may be in store for Britain, they cannot be as bad as the consequences of the Hollande's Presidency have been for France

French economy minister Emmanuel Macron earlier suggested Britain quitting the EU could lead to Paris ripping up a 2003 deal which allows UK border guards to be stationed in Calais.

Thousands of migrants live in makeshift camps near the French port before trying to reach the UK.

But Mr Macron said of possible Brexit : "The day this relationship unravels, migrants will no longer be in Calais."

Asked if No 10 was trying to stitch-up the referendum with doomsday warnings from foreign governments and big business, Mr Cameron insisted: “When you have ministers in other governments warning about potential consequences that might happen, that would be injurious to the UK - I would say listen to those things."

Cameron is of course desperate to kerp us in the EU, he is a committed supporter of global government and the EU bureaucracy's dream of creating a Federal European Superstate is a big step towards fulfillment of that goal. So is Cameron playing for the New World Order or is it just another conspiracy theory. here's David Icke with the answer (scroll past the embed for my thoughts):

It can surely be taken as a sign that Cameron and his supporters sense they are losing the argument, that a "Remain" vote is not the foregone conclusion the Europhiles believed it would be when they granted us a referendum as a ploy to kill off UKIP. Since then the migrant crisis, the EU ruling bureaucracy's blind devotion to the warmongers of Washington as they push for war with Russia, and the continuing assaults on democracy and free speech by European national leaders, primarily Merkel and Hollande, combined with the ongoing economic crisis (coming soon to a nation near you if you happen to live in Italy) has made even more people that the EU’s project is part of a plan to create a meritocratic global government (The New World Order?) and UKIP are scoring even higher in opinion polls.

 David Icke lambasts the Prime Minister's desperate attempts to score cheap points by sneering at Icke's eccentricity and replies with his version of what the EU amounts to. We’re pressing a nerve, Icke says with absolute accuracy. The Establishment are panicking as from Greece and Slovakia to Ireland people are turning against the bureaucratic dictatorship that has grown like a tumor in Brussels. Is there a conspiracy to end democracy and create a tyrannical global government?

People who suggest that say 'join up the dots', a phrase the sneerers have taken to ridiculing.

I say there is no need to join up the dots, if you've at least half a brain the big picture should be STARING YOU IN THE FUCKING FACE.

... and if you though it was just Britain ...>>

RELATED POSTS:

Globalization: The False Narrative and The Death Of Western Steel Industry

In popular perception, the downfall of the steel industry in Britain, Europe and the USA symbolizes the decline of manufacturing industry in the developed world more clearly than any other of the past half century's economic trends. Over the past few months in Britain two of the last remainings blast furnace steel manufacturing plant, Redcar in North East England and Port Talbot in South Wales have been in the news, both were threatened with closure, in both cases that would have had dire consequences for the local economies. Similar stories have been played out in Germany, France, Sweden, Italy and, most drastically in the USA where the area dubbed 'the rust belt ...

Britain's Choice: Democracy Or Eurocracy
Democracy in the European Union: The people = one vote, the bureaucracy = millions of votes - because, and I quote, "The people are not intelligent enough to understand complex issues". As we have commented before, it is not just a large section of British public opinion that want's to get our country out of Europe. Last week voters in The Netherlands voted by a big majority against the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, which would be a step towards ...

French, Belgians, Dutch, Italians Follow Britain in Euroskepticism
Europeans want us British to lead them out of Europe. Don't be fooled by project fear, the European Union (aka the Euronazi Federal Superstate) is falling apart. There will not be chaos if we leave, there will be chaos if we stay.

Why Should Obama Be Given A Platform From Which To Lecture Britian
Although it seems Sidi Barack Hussein Obama, the wannabe God - Emperor of the world and President Of The Entire Universe and everything Else Besides is still planning to visit Britain in late April to tell us all of HIS vision for Britain's future as a province of the US State of Greater Germany with Europe, British voters are distincylt undwerwhelmed by the prospect

EU Judges Could Throw Out Dave’s Deal, Say Independent Researchers
Now we learn that not only does Cameron’s give us no new terms and conditions at all, only clever wordplay, his agreement with the European Union (EU) could be thrown out by European judges, according to independent research by the House of Commons library.

“Peddling Hyperbole” Business Boss Bollocks Camerons For Brexit Scaremongering

Setting out his personal view, Longwoth said in his speech that “the very best place for the UK to be is in a reformed EU” but “I have come to the conclusion that the EU is incapable of meaningful reform, at least in the foreseeable future”.

Dutch Call for Major Reforms to EU Amid Rising Pressure to Break Brussels
The EU is in need of fundamental reforms because it is seen as too bureaucratic and lacking opportunity, according the Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, who heads the rotating presidency of the EU, as he faces calls for his own nation to hold an In-Out referendum on EU membership.

Spain Faces Constitutional Crisis: Podemos Spurns Coalition Deal With Pro - EU Parties

Hungary's Orban Blasts 'Dying Europe'

Hollande Is Finished - So Is France

German Politician Predicts White Germans Will Be A Minority. Faces Calls to Quit.

Erika Steinbach, human rights spokesperson for Angela Merkel's CDU party, has been criticized after she posted a picture that appears to predict that in 14 years' time, white people will be in a minority in Germany. Steinbach faces criticism after she tweeted a picture with the caption 'Germany 2030' that depicts a crowd of dark-skinned people curiously asking a single white child where she is from.

Why Are Governments Scared Of Truth? France Begins Crackdown on Conspiracy Theories

We reported several weeks ago that the French government was planning a clampdown on conspiray theories by shutting down certain dissident websites. Since then we have learned the French government have shown they are prepared to go even further in attacking citizens right of free speech

Europe's Immigration Crisis (October / November / December 2015)

Brexit: Britain's future in or out of EU?

Should Britain leave the EU and or remain and surrender even more of our national sovereighty to the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels. The campaign to keep us in the EU, led by Prime Minister David Cameron, has become know as Project Fear, the Europhile having only scaremongering argument to back their case. At the moment, due to the immigrant crisis caused by the Shengen Zone open borders area and 'open doors' immigration policy ...
After The Brexit The Frexit;1 in 3 French Voters Want Out Of The EU
EU Membership Vote in UK to Paralyze Decision Making
Europe index of posts

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Control Freak Cameron Wants to Vet Foreign Leaders’ Speeches To Curtail Free Speech On Brexit

The UK's traitor and war criminal Prime Minister David Cameron has asked world leaders to advise him of any comments they plan to make on the issue of Britain’s future membership of the European Union (EU). Cameron wants all such comments vetted by public relations experts (aka propagandists) to make sure they do not undermine his campaign to prevent British voters choosing to leave the increasingly fascistic EU.

With the vote still over three months away Cameron's increasingly desperate pro-EU cronies have already abandoned rational argument (because they have no good reasons for staying in to offer us) in favour of scaremongering.

Biggest lie so far was the scare story that Britain will be safer in the EU and more vulnerable top our enemies on our own. To understand how irrational this is, you only have to look at the migrant crisis in the Schengen zone to understand that the EU is trying to fill Europe with our enemies while the few nations that might poise a threat (e.g. North Korea,) are so far away they do not matter. Western reporters based in Russia reported that when Putin heard EU Commission President Jean-Claude (Brandy-for-breakast-please) Juncker had proposed forming a European Army to neutralise the threat from Russia he laughed so much he nearly shat.

It is NATO not the EU that guarantees our security, and while USA dominated NATO is in trouble for meddling in the domestic politics of middle eastern and east European countries, nobody is suggesting we should leave.

In a bid to gain control over what the British public hear, read and are able to talk about ahead of June’s referendum, aides to David Cameron have asked that foreign leaders consult them before speaking on Brexit in case they inadvertently boost the “Leave” campaign. This seems rather contradictory in view of Cameron's plan to invite Barack Obama to speak to both Houses of Parliament on the importance to the USA of Britain staying in the EU (Washington hopes to maintain influence over the EU through 'the special relationship' which as we all know only works one way, for example Obama has repeatedly expressed his support for Argentina's totally unfounded claim to The Falkland Islands.

It is telling (and a sad reflection on the state of democracy in the developed world) that I could not find anything about Obama's plan to invite himself to speak to the British Parliament about the importance to US geopolitical ambitions of Britain remaining in the EU. Being unable to recall where I had first send the story reported I had to flag myself to the various watch lists I am on in order to find this at The Guardian (a newspaper which still thinks Obama's shit smells of perfume and fully supports the idea of the wannabe God - King of the entire universe and everything else besides telling OUR elected representatives in OUR sovereign Parliament what to do is a jolly good idea because diversity.

The plan to control the dialogue to an extent Josf Goebbels could only dream of was exposed by one of Mr Cameron’s closest advisors at a lunch last week when he told gathered diplomats from other EU nations they had already made a similar request to the White House(this was after an informal intervention, widely reported by the pro - Euronaziism BBC and press backfired, triggering a surge in opinion polls in favour of OUT).

“The people need to be aware that there’s an impact in the U.K. debate about what they’re saying in their own countries,” Downing Street adviser Daniel Korski said, according to Politico Europe. “If a leader stands up and says something to their own parliament — it won’t just play in their own domestic media, it will make it to the U.K.” he added.

David Cameron needs to be aware that UK voters have worked our he is a lying, spinning, snivelling, sycophantic, testicularly deficient, shit sucking backstabber who would sell his own kids (especially the one Boris Johnson begat with Sam Cam) down the river for a guaranteed seat on the post - federalisation gravy train.

Also, despite spending months attempting to negotiate a new deal for Britain in the EU, the Prime Minister will barely mention the deal at all during the campaign and instead focus on more general arguments about how the UK is supposedly “stronger, safer and better off” in the EU.

There are already signs that interventions by foreign leaders pleading with Britain to stay in the EU are backfiring. A petition calling on US President Barack Obama to stay out of the debate has now gathered over 15,000 signatures following reports he was planning a “big, public reach-out” to tell Brits to vote against Brexit.

John Kerry had already caused controversy by saying America had a “profound interest” in a “strong UK staying inside a strong European Union”.

Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg responded: "The intervention of patronising foreign potentates such as Kerry… can only help the Leave campaign.

"They speak to their national interest not ours so will antagonise the freedom loving British voter."

RELATED POSTS:

Brexit: Britain's future in or out of EU?

Should Britain leave the EU and or remain and surrender even more of our national sovereighty to the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels. The campaign to keep us in the EU, led by Prime Minister David Cameron, has become know as Project Fear, the Europhile having only scaremongering arument to back their case. At the moment, due to the immigrant crisis caused by the Shengen Zone open borders area and 'open doors' immigration policy,

Servergate: 'Immune' Hillary IT-Staffer Reportedly A "Devastating Witness" - FBI
We reported a little while ago, in our series of posts chronicling the downfall of Hillary Clinton after the story of how, while Secretary Of State, she made use of personal IT equipment to handle top secret government material. The story broke just as Hillary's campaign ran into stormy waters when Bernie Sanders, originally written off as a fringe candidate began to gain momentum ...

EU Judges Could Throw Out Dave’s Deal, Say Independent Researchers
Now we learn that not only does Cameron’s give us no new terms and conditions at all, only clever wordplay, his agreement with the European Union (EU) could be thrown out by European judges, according to independent research by the House of Commons library.

“Peddling Hyperbole” Business Boss Bollocks Camerons For Brexit Scaremongering

Setting out his personal view, Longwoth said in his speech that “the very best place for the UK to be is in a reformed EU” but “I have come to the conclusion that the EU is incapable of meaningful reform, at least in the foreseeable future”.

Former UK Defence Sec BLASTS Obama On Pro-EU Comments: ‘When Mexico Overrules Your Supreme Court, Give Us Advice’
Farage joins Conservative and Labour MPs in launching Grassroots Out campaign

Europe index of posts

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Cameron's EU Deal As Worthless As Neville Chamberlain's 'Peace In Our Time.'?

What has the EU done for us? (Image Source)

Opinion polls show Britain is evenly divided on the question of whether to leave or remain in the EU, though it has been suggested up to 10 million other voters, many of them women, have yet to make a decision. How they cast their vote will shape the future of the world’s fifth largest economy and the EU itself.Should we regard polls as a reliable pointer after last years General Election and the Scottish Referendum?

Fears over privacy, raise by internet hacking and activist sites such as Wikileaks and general mistrust of the media have made many people reluctant to take part in polls, one polling organisation I read of had to call 22,000 people in order to select a representative panel of 2000 for a telephone poll.

The current situation in the EU polling as David Cameron desperately tries today to win concessions that will make staying in the EU acceptable to supporters of the Conservative Party he leads is that Britain has long received a “poor man’s offering” from what she views as a German and French-dominated bloc. Some even blames the unrealistic EU’s emissions rules for forcing the beloved Land Rover Defender 4×4 out of production.

Cameron’s plans to appease sceptical voters by cutting the benefits paid to EU migrants appealed to undecided voters  but looks to be a non starter among EU leaders who must approve the deal. European Parliment President Martin Schulz, who last year said that public opinion does not matter and EU bureaucrats will do as they please regardless of any votes, has stated that any deal offered to Cameron today cannot be legally binding.

Fair warning it seems that the EU will stab us in the back should we vote to leave.

The 'Leave' campaigns are not faring any better. Talk less about immigration and give more detail on whether Britain would be better or worse off outside the EU, many people in areas not much affected by mass immigration are saying.

Around one in five British voters tell pollsters they have yet to make up their minds. Many are middle-aged women who support Cameron’s Conservatives and live outside London and Scotland, two of Britain’s most pro-European areas.

If Cameron is to keep Britain in the bloc it joined in 1973, he will need to secure the vote of millions of people in rural areas and the old industrial towns of the north and midlands.

The game changer, should voters wake up to it, is that as UKIP leader Nigel Farage revealed, whatever deal Cameron wins over the next few days will be a fraud. The Prime Minister will present it to the nation as a done deal before the actual vote and should we vote to leave it will be binding on us.

Any changes to the terms of our membership however must be approved by the European Parliament and MEPs will certainly veto it, as the Parliament itself and its voting system (Qualified Majority) are heavily biased in favour of those nations that support ever greater integration until member states no longer exist as sovereign nations but only as administrative regions in a Federal European Superstate.

The rest of Europe is watching warily – Britain is the EU’s second largest economy, one of only to net contributors to EU funds, and one of its top two military powers.



RELATED POSTS:

Why Should Obama Be Given A Platform From Which To Lecture Britian

Although it seems Sidi Barack Hussein Obama, the wannabe God - Emperor of the world and President Of The Entire Universe and everything Else Besides is still planning to visit Britain in late April to tell us all of HIS vision for Britain's future as a province of the US State of Greater Germany with Europe, British voters are distincylt undwerwhelmed by the prospect

“Peddling Hyperbole” Business Boss Bollocks Camerons For Brexit Scaremongering
Setting out his personal view, Longwoth said in his speech that “the very best place for the UK to be is in a reformed EU” but “I have come to the conclusion that the EU is incapable of meaningful reform, at least in the foreseeable future”.

£1 Billion Migrant Bill:Remain Campaign Rattled As Welfare Spending Soars
The UK welfare system is expected to pay out more than £1 billion to unemployed European Union (EU) migrants, government data has revealed. The findings will come as a major blow for the campaign led by David Cameron and supported by most of the Labour party ...

EU HoldsBack New Regulation For Fear Of Strengthening Brexit Case
The unelected leaders of the EU in Brussels are smothering discussion of new pan – European laws that would impact the United Kingdom and all other member states, increasing the amount of money they have to contribute to the EU budget and transferring yet more sovereignty to Brussels ...

Cameron Plays Deal Or No Deal In Europe
David Cameron, who was apparently up all night trying to make other European leaders understand why his country needs a better deal in order to poersuade the prople it is a good idea stay in the EU. Unless Cameron gets what will enable him to sell the idea of surrendering national sovereignty to a Federal European Superstate ruled by a committee of unelected bureaucrats in to the British public he will not campaign for the UK to remain in the bloc.

READ MORE ON: Britain >> EU >> Europe >> Immigration >> Military >>UKIP >> economy

Brexit: Britain's future in or out of EU?
Should Britain leave the EU and or remain and surrender even more of our national sovereighty to the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels. The campaign to keep us in the EU, led by Prime Minister David Cameron, has become know as Project Fear, the Europhile having only scaremongering argument to back their case. At the moment, due to the immigrant crisis caused by the Shengen Zone open borders area and 'open doors' immigration policy ...
Black Racists Slam Lack of ‘Diversity’ in Dictionary of People who Shaped Britain
After The Brexit The Frexit;1 in 3 French Voters Want Out Of The EU
EU Membership Vote in UK to Paralyze Decision Making
Opposition From EU Members Sinks Brussels' Refugee Quotas Plan
'We Got Duped': Ukraine Billionaire Slams EU Free Trade 'Fraud
France: Left and Right Unite In Desperation To Keep Power
European Union and Google Get Ready To Rumble
US Trade Representative says America has no interest in a trade deal with Britain alone, urging it to remain in the EU
Euronazi Leaders Admit The Voters Are Irrelevant.
New EU Tax Laws Force Thousands of Businesses to Close in Just Six Months
E U Exploits Human Misery To Advance Political Agenda

The German EU Ubermacht
Merke's Refugee Quotas dividing europe
Euronazi Superstate?
European dictator Schulz
E U boss defends lack of transparency
Europe In Chaos
Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Authorsden blog ]

Litvinenko Inquiry: Russian ambassador calls findings 'gross provocation' by Britain.

Alexander Litvinenko died of polonium poisoning in a London hospital in 2006 (Image source)

Former High Court judge Sir Robert Owen today deliverd his findings on the 2006 murder of former KGB spy Alexander Litvinenko, 43, who died after ingesting radioative Polonium 210, according to final the report of an inquiry into the affair.

The Russian ambassador to the UK has called the report a whitewash which covers up the incompetence of British police and security forces in investigating the crime and and a gross provocation of Russia by the British / US alliance (he would say that, wouldn't he/)

Owen’s report, the result of a a six-month public inquiry, accused the Kremlin of ordering the assassination of Mr Litvinenko in London and using prime suspects Andrey Lugovoy and Dmitry Kovtun to carry it out.

However, the UK will not impose any economic sanctions on President Vladimir Putin’s regime, not only does to report offer no concrete evidence to back up its allegations, the Kremlin already dismissing the inquiry findings before they have been published.

Senior Foreign Office diplomats have lobbied David Cameron, the Prime Minister, not to take further action because Anglo-Russian relations are vital in the fight against Islamic State in Iraq and Levant (Isil) and the removal of Syrian president Bashar al Assad. (Russian cooperation against ISIS is a reality, that Putin's support in removing Assad might be forthcoming is just propaganda from the Obama Administration. Obama's insistence that there can be no negotiation until Assad is removed from power is the main obstacle blocking the path to peace in Syria.

So we see that the report, far from being an independent judicial review of the case, is just a manoeuvre aimed at embarrassing The Kremlin.

Sir Robert Owen reached a number of key findings in his 18-month inquiry into the death of former KGB spy Alexander Litvinenko. Here they are:

I am sure that Mr Litvinenko did not ingest the polonium 210 either by accident or to commit suicide. I am sure, rather, that he was deliberately poisoned by others.

I am sure that Mr Lugovoy and Mr Kovtun placed the polonium 210 in the teapot at the Pine Bar on 1 November 2006. I am also sure they did this with the intention of poisoning Mr Litvinenko.

I am sure that the two men had made an earlier attempt to poison Mr Litvinenko, also using polonium 210, at the Erinys meeting on 16 October 2006.

I am sure that Mr Lugovoy and Mr Kovtun knew that they were using a deadly poison (as opposed, for example, to a truth drug or a sleeping draught), and that they intended to kill Mr Litvinenko. I do not believe, however, that they knew precisely what the chemical that they were handling was, or the nature of all its properties.

I am sure that Mr Lugovoy and Mr Kovtun were acting on behalf of others when they poisoned Mr Litvinenko.

When Mr Lugovoy poisoned Mr Litvinenko, it is probable that he did so under the direction of the FSB. I would add that I regard that as a strong probability. I have found that Mr Kovtun also took part in the poisoning. I conclude therefore that he was also acting under FSB direction, possibly indirectly through Mr Lugovoy but probably to his knowledge.
10.16

The FSB operation to kill Mr Litvinenko was probably approved by Mr Patrushev and also by President Putin.

Political hacks and media luvvies in the UK were quick to start screeching for action against putin but when we examine the report's findings, every statement is hedged with qualifying term, 'probably', 'possibly', 'perhaps' and 'may have' appear to be the most frequently used words in the document. In fact the report even hedges its betes on stuff that has been known for years.

Just about the only new material offered is the idea that hostility between Vladimir Putin and Litvinenko stemmed from threats litvinenko made to expose Putin's paedophile activities with young boys. This allegation seems to have been part of a personal vendetta by Litvinenk against Putin. A trawl of the 'dark web' shows the only reports of it all refer to a document published by Litvinnko. This does not prove Putin's innocence of course, nut beither does it confirm his guilt.

So what are we to make of The Owen Report's accusation that Russia eliminated a man who may have been nothing more than a seditionist with a grudge against the President?

A look back over a few decades of recent history shows our own security services are not exactly above suspicion when it comes to the mysterious but convenient deaths of people who could seriously embarrass the government. All governments do it.

And the faux - outrage over unsubstantiated allegations of paedophilia are a tad hypocritical coming from the British political and media establishment. I hear Leon Brittan and Greville Janner were spotted drinking Victory Gin in The Chestnut Tree Cafe a couple of days ago. (for those not well read, that's a reference to George Orwell's '1984', not a conspiracy theory).

The biggest mistake made by Britain and the USA in the era of Blair and Bush was to introduce a pious moralism into foreign affairs. They abandoned the principles of realpolitik on which Western diplomacy had been based since WW2. The House and Downing Street quickly got into trouble and have stayed there ever since, because diplomatic relations with foreign powers are now dominated by the desire to appease politically correct elements in domestic politics. Foreign policy should be conducted by pragmatists who are mainly concerned about protecting the interests of their nations.

RELATED POSTS:


Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Authorsden blog ]