Last May Germany’s most popular newspaper, Bild, issued a public apology for its coverage of the Covid pandemic which was “like poison” and “made you feel like you were a mortal danger to society.”
In fact the pandemic coverage by Bild and other German news media had been very similar to that seen in the rest of the EU's member states as well as USA, UK, Canada and Australia, a constant barrage of scarmongering reports exaggerating the risk level of COVID-19 to reasonably healthy people under the age of 75 and demonising those who declined vaccination or questioned the very questionable efficacy of the vaccines. In other words German media had, like news media throughout the developed world stuck closely to the official narratives of governments and the World Health Organisation throughout the pandemic.
Later in the year Neues Deutschland published a privately commissioned study on journalistic reporting during the Covid era titled ‘One-sided, uncritical, close to the government?’. The authors described at length and in strongly critical terms the “very clear result of the present study” that the reporting was “at the same time close to and uncritical of the government”.
The authors complained that media reporting was only critical of government in the sense that while praising governments for tough measures to protect the public, reporters and columnists often did not consider the measures (which mostly consisted of attacks on personal freedom and basic human rights,) were not tough enough. They even persisted in this line when the measures such as lockdowns and mask mandates proved totally ineffective.
On 4 April this year (2022,) the German Ethics Council has released a 161-page draft report ‘Vulnerability and Resilience in Crisis – Ethical, Criteria for decisions in a pandemic’ which sharply criticises “mass media’s” lack of critical reporting and failure to hold politicians to account.
“Obvious undesirable developments were hardly addressed with the necessary clarity by a journalism that saw itself as ‘constructive’ or ‘sensitive to the common good’ … Reporting by mass media that is too affirmative or one-sided pleadingly fails to stimulate the formation of opinions … Criticism is not only legitimate, it is necessary,” the draft report states.
The report is in German, however The Daily Expose provide an English translation by Google translate, Click to Download the .pdf document.
How COVID Corrupted Science
Politicians who criticised AstraZeneca vaccine 'probably killed hundreds of thousands', says Oxford scientist in an outburst that reveals how the science acedemy have been totally owned by corporate money and thus have been guilty of lying, scaremongering, fabricating evidence, publishing fake statisics and spreadsing misinformation. And the politicians who told us to 'trust The Science' are just as guilty. ... Continue reading >>>
COVID cover-up: UK media refuses to report that 4 of 5 coronavirus deaths over the past month occurred in the vaccinatedEarlier this evening Prime Minister Boris Johnson, in a broadcast to the nation, implored British citizens to continue doing what they’ve been told to do throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately everything the government has told us to do: Stay at home, Work from home, Wear masks, wash your hands every twenty seconds, do not touch anything, Shun your friends and relatives especially if they are sick, Get a vaccine, Get a second, vaccine, Get a booster vaccine, ... etc, etc, etc,
Continue reading >>>
A few weeks ago this blog reported a Swedish study which showed that natural immunity provides much better protection against infection by the SARS2-COV virus which causes COVID (COrona VIrus Disease,) than the Pfizer vaccine which is currently hyped as the most effective on the market, though it is no more effective than the others at provinding immunity. The more responsible voices in mainstream media that actually reported the story described by the news as “a bit of a bombshell”.
Vaccines Do Not Stop COVID-19 Spread As Governments Claim: Legal Advocacy Group
Vaccines are less effective effective in stopping the spread of COVID-19 that governments have claimed, an analysis of government narratives carried out by a constitutional rights group shows. The report was published Tuesday by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, found that claims made by governments promising vaccination will reduce or stop the spread of COVID-19 are not supported by either medical science or empirical evidence
Continue reading >>>
The Betrayal Of Humanity By The Corrupt Medical Professions
From day one, back in March 2020 when the pandemic was declared, this blog has been questioning the fake statistics, highlighting the distortion of statistics to serve the scaremongering narratives of the elites and exposing the lies and dishonesty of politicians, sciencetitis (sic) and, surprisingly perhaps if you are of a credulous nature, doctors and the medical professions. ... Continue reading >>>
No comments:
Post a Comment