The Smoking Gun
Leaks Expose Corrupt State Department Deals
The Smoking Gun
While the liberal media were focused on some very trivial, slightly crude utterances spoken by Donald Trump years ago,
The Intercept finally released excerpts from the speeches Hillary Clinton was paid a total of millions of dollars for making to Wall Street Bankers.
We don't intend to publish the full list here, they are online at the Wikileaks site, a few choice morsels are enough to prove Hillary is totally owned by big finance and if she becomes president will govern in their interests rather than the interests of the American people.
Touching on her view of developing financial regulations, Clinton declared to a crowd of Goldman Sachs bankers that in order to “figure out what works,” the “people that know the industry better than anybody are the people who work in the industry.”
At the Goldman Sachs Builders and Innovators Summit, Clinton responded to a question from chief executive Lloyd Blankfein, who quipped that you “go to Washington” to “make a small fortune.” Clinton agreed with the comment and complained about ethics rules that require officials to divest from certain assets before entering government. “There is such a bias against people who have led successful and/or complicated lives,” Clinton said.
At a speech for Morgan Stanley on April 18, 2013, Clinton praised the Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction plan — which would reduce corporate tax rates while raising the Social Security age. “But Simpson-Bowles — and I know you heard from Erskine earlier today — put forth the right framework. Namely, we have to restrain spending, we have to have adequate revenues, and we have to incentivize growth. It’s a three-part formula,” she said.
Clinton also told a housing trade group in 2013 that on certain issues, she has “a public and a private position.” “If everybody’s watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least,” said Clinton. “So, you need both a public and a private position.”
Any reasonable person would assume the contents of these snippets would be enough to scupper any chance Hillary Clinton had of becoming president but don't forget this is the United States Democratic Party, probably the most corrupt and undemocratic political organisation in the developed world, we are dealing with. There have already been numerous leaks of information that would have destroyed not only a candidate but their party too, had the party involved been any other than the US Democrats. Only a few weeks ago we reported a dump of hacked emails between Hillary Clinton and her PA and alleged lover Huma Abedin that show both were complicit in many illegal acts some relating to the selling of influence while Clinton was a member of the Obama administration.
This document dump also contained proof that Clinton was actively involved in the electoral fraud that robbed Bernie Sanders of the Democratic Party presidential nomination.
Judicial Watch organisation dropped the bombshell that were the United States Democratic Party not such a corrupt, lawless and undemocratic organisation, would certainly end Hillary Clinton’s campaign on Monday when they released 725 pages of new State Department documents that include damning exchanges with her top aide Huma Abedin.
The emails confirm that Abedin gave influential Clinton Foundation donors special, expedited access to the then-Secretary of State. In most cases, the donors that were given this preferential treatment were handed it at the specific request of Clinton Foundation executive Douglas Band.
Wikileaks and the new contender, DC Leaks have promised to publish more documents relating to Hillary Clinton's criminality and her husband's long career as a rapist and sex abuser before the election which is still a month away.
Back to top
Image Source: David Icke.com
While the liberal media were focused on some very trivial, slightly crude utterances spoken by Donald Trump years ago,
The Intercept finally released excerpts from the speeches Hillary Clinton was paid a total of millions of dollars for making to Wall Street Bankers.
We don't intend to publish the full list here, they are online at the Wikileaks site, a few choice morsels are enough to prove Hillary is totally owned by big finance and if she becomes president will govern in their interests rather than the interests of the American people.
Touching on her view of developing financial regulations, Clinton declared to a crowd of Goldman Sachs bankers that in order to “figure out what works,” the “people that know the industry better than anybody are the people who work in the industry.”
At the Goldman Sachs Builders and Innovators Summit, Clinton responded to a question from chief executive Lloyd Blankfein, who quipped that you “go to Washington” to “make a small fortune.” Clinton agreed with the comment and complained about ethics rules that require officials to divest from certain assets before entering government. “There is such a bias against people who have led successful and/or complicated lives,” Clinton said.
At a speech for Morgan Stanley on April 18, 2013, Clinton praised the Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction plan — which would reduce corporate tax rates while raising the Social Security age. “But Simpson-Bowles — and I know you heard from Erskine earlier today — put forth the right framework. Namely, we have to restrain spending, we have to have adequate revenues, and we have to incentivize growth. It’s a three-part formula,” she said.
Clinton also told a housing trade group in 2013 that on certain issues, she has “a public and a private position.” “If everybody’s watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least,” said Clinton. “So, you need both a public and a private position.”
Any reasonable person would assume the contents of these snippets would be enough to scupper any chance Hillary Clinton had of becoming president but don't forget this is the United States Democratic Party, probably the most corrupt and undemocratic political organisation in the developed world, we are dealing with. There have already been numerous leaks of information that would have destroyed not only a candidate but their party too, had the party involved been any other than the US Democrats. Only a few weeks ago we reported a dump of hacked emails between Hillary Clinton and her PA and alleged lover Huma Abedin that show both were complicit in many illegal acts some relating to the selling of influence while Clinton was a member of the Obama administration.
This document dump also contained proof that Clinton was actively involved in the electoral fraud that robbed Bernie Sanders of the Democratic Party presidential nomination.
Judicial Watch organisation dropped the bombshell that were the United States Democratic Party not such a corrupt, lawless and undemocratic organisation, would certainly end Hillary Clinton’s campaign on Monday when they released 725 pages of new State Department documents that include damning exchanges with her top aide Huma Abedin.
The emails confirm that Abedin gave influential Clinton Foundation donors special, expedited access to the then-Secretary of State. In most cases, the donors that were given this preferential treatment were handed it at the specific request of Clinton Foundation executive Douglas Band.
Wikileaks and the new contender, DC Leaks have promised to publish more documents relating to Hillary Clinton's criminality and her husband's long career as a rapist and sex abuser before the election which is still a month away.
Back to top
Latest Hillary Email Scandal Reveals State Department "Favors" To Clinton Foundation
via Zero Hedge
In the latest installment over Hillary Clinton's email scandal, conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch released 296 pages of new emails from Hillary's personal server, most of which were not handed over as part of the 30,000 emails originally provided to the FBI. The emails were provided to Judicial Watch pursuant to a FOIA request. These new emails, among other things, demonstrate how the Clinton Foundation and it's top donors sought favors from the State Department within 3 months of Hillary taking the Secretary of State position.
According to an article in the Wall Street Journal:
“That the Clinton Foundation was calling in favors barely 3 months into Hillary Clinton’s tenure at the State Department is deeply troubling, and it is yet another reminder of the conflicts of interest and unethical wheeling and dealing she’d bring to the White House,” said Michael Short, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, in a statement Tuesday.
The first request for a "favor" came in April 2009, just 3 months after Hillary was confirmed as Secretary of State on January 21, 2009. The request came from Doug Band, a long-time adviser to Bill Clinton who helped him setup the Clinton Foundation after his Presidency. Per the email exchange, Mr. Band reached out the State Department to ask a "favor" on behalf of a person who the Clinton Foundation had recently setup with a trip to Haiti which he found "eye-opening" (the name of the person seeking the favor was redacted from the email exchange). Yes, well trading taxpayer dollars intended for earthquake relief in exchange for lucrative gold mining contracts from the Haitian government can be quite "eye-opening" indeed (see our post "Clinton Cash: "Devastating" Documentary Reveals How Clintons Went From "Dead Broke" To Mega Wealthy").
In an exchange from April 2009, a longtime aide to Mr. Clinton told three of Mrs. Clinton’s top advisers that it was “important to take care of” a particular person, whose name has been redacted from the document. That person had written the aide, Doug Band, under the subject line “A favor…” to thank him for the “opportunity to go on the Haiti trip,” which the person called “eye-opening.” Mr. Band was a chief adviser in helping Mr. Clinton launch the Clinton Foundation after leaving the White House.
Another request came from Gilbert Chagoury, a long-time associate of the Clintons with a checkered past. Chagoury is known for his ties to Nigeria’s military dictator, Sani Abacha, who was instrumental in helping him secure some lucrative construction contracts in the mid-90s. In 2003, Chagoury helped organize a trip to the Caribbean where former President Bill Clinton was "paid" $100,000 for a speech. Chagoury has also made bribes contributions to the Clinton Foundation of between $1-$5 million. Per the Wall Street Journal:
“We need Gilbert Chagoury to speak to the substance person re Lebanon,” Mr. Band wrote in April 2009. “As you know, he’s key guy there and to us and is loved in Lebanon. Very imp.”
Mr. Chagoury, a Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire, has donated between $1 million and $5 million to the foundation, according to its disclosures.
Ms. Abedin responded with the name of the State Department official, Jeff Feltman, who had served as a U.S. ambassador to Lebanon before becoming U.S. assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs. “I’m sure he knows him,” she wrote. “I’ll talk to Jeff.”
Fifteen minutes later, Mr. Band shot back: “Better if you call him. Now preferable. This is very important.”
In yet another email, Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills wrote to Hillary to inform her that the NSA was working on a modified blackberry that could be used for personal emails while working in restricted State Department offices. Even though Clinton thought this was "good news" she continued to just use her personal server anyway. Per the AP:
In another email, Clinton's chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, informed her that National Security Agency and State Department officials discussed an attempt to develop a modified blackberry for Clinton that might be used when she worked in a restricted State Department office that did not allow private phones.
So why were these emails not included in the original disclosure to the FBI? Could it be possible that Hillary believes that using her position as Secretary of State to setup meetings between former U.S. Ambassadors and shady international businessmen is somehow "personal" in nature? Makes you wonder what else was excluded from the FBI disclosures that was purely "personal." Guess we'll just have to elect her to find out if we can trust her.
Back to top
No comments:
Post a Comment