Inauguration crowd size lies: The Hypocrisy Of Mainstream Media Is Infinite When They Can Publish Shite Like This

We'll get to when credible reporting of The  President exactly and when and how mainstream media killed serious journalism in a minute. First you need to take a really deep whiff of the shite. This shovelful is from Washington Post.

The traditional way of reporting on a president is dead. And Trump’s press secretary killed it

The presidency is not a reality show, but President Trump on his first full day in office made clear that he’s still obsessed with being what he once proudly called “a ratings machine.”

He cares enough about it to send his press secretary, Sean Spicer, out to brazenly lie to the media in his first official briefing.

“This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration — period — both in person and around the globe,” Spicer said. And he added a scolding about widespread reports that differ from his evidence-free assessment: “These attempts to lessen the enthusiasm of the inauguration are shameful and wrong.”

The mash up on which comparisons were based. Left wing media claimed the pictures were taken at the same time of day but eight years apart. The time quoted was actually the time the composite image was created. Tracking down the original images was a pain but when I did, the file headers told a different story

Crowd size experts estimate Trump’s audience at far fewer than the million or more that Trump is claiming, and at far less than the size of the following day’s women’s march, which the new president has said little about. And side-by-side photographs showed the contrast between the comparatively thin gathering for Trump’s inauguration and the record-setting one in 2009 for former president Barack Obama’s first. Well OK, but are these the same crowd size experts who claimed over a hundred thousand had turned out to see Obama when he visited Berlin, when eye witnesses said they doubted there were even ten thousand?