Showing posts with label scientists. Show all posts

Saturday, April 04, 2026

In A Crazy War When The Best Option Is Retreat The Choice Will Always Be Escalate

People are asking how we got into this crazy war that now threatens to spiral out of control and affect us all materially even if our homelands are ot directly involved in the fighting.

The narative peddled by the American / Israeli lobby to the Gulf Cooperation Couci (GCC) states and Iraqi government (as confessed by that Iraqi MP) was based on the premise that Iran would fall within 3 days, after they killed Khamenei, there’d be a regime change, various rebels and pro-westerners would take over – basically it’d be a cakewalk like Venezuela. That’s how they got the Gulf States on board with the plan to attack Iran.

Simply put, it was a failure of deterrence by Iran. Iran was too soft and was seen as weak by its enemies. To succeed in deterrence, getting nukes would be one method. Shutting up reformists who kept messaging they want to surrender would be another. In fact Iran need never have had a problem getting nukes, in the 1980s I worked for several years in the UK nuclear industry, and in the organisation that employed me (as a computer specialist) we had a number of Iranian scientists who had been working in britain and decided to stay when the Ayatollahs took over.

These guys were highly regarded by their British, French and American colleagues ,and I ;earned in conversation with senior managers that having them on board was regared as a major success by our governments. The Iranias were ahead of us in nuclear research, perhaps because they focused on practicalities rather than getting bogged down in Science - Fiction inspired theories. There were plenty of equally talented scientists who did not get out of Iran, and maybe did not want to. But they had their own nuclear research facilities, their oil provided the money to fund research and they had the people to develop nuclear weapons, directed energy beam weapons and much more.

So why did Iran not develop these technologies for defence purposes when, for almost 50 years western gvernments had been demonising the theocratic,authoritarian regime? We can only speculate, but while we know Iran has been a major sponsor of terrorism, acts of violence and destruction are attributable nly to the terrorist groups rather than Iran itself.

The scenarios incorporated into the propaganda narative justifying recent attacks on Iran, arms race, Iran going nuclear, threat to western interests, developing an aerial dfence shield etc doesn’t matter. Other than the fact that despite the claims made for 'renewables' by green loons, the world still runs on hydrocarbons, there are no valid reasons why western governments have been fearful of Iran.

As for asymmetrical attacks? Same idea. Failure of deterrence, Iran's regime could have closed the Strait of Hormuz whenever it wished, but they didn't. So the US government is not deterred, they convince themselves Iran is too scared of US military power to hold the global economy to ransome. But Washington gambled that Iran would not close the Strait of Hormuz and strangle their own economy, and the Ayatollahs called their bluff.

A planned vote at the UN Security Council on a draft resolution authorizing the “use of force” in the Strait of Hormuz has been abruptly postponed, exposing deep divisions among major powers over how to respond to complications arising from the imposed war on Iran.

The draft, submitted by Bahrain and backed by the United States in UNSC, would further escalate the US-Israeli war on Iran. However, the delay, officially attributed to the Good Friday holiday, comes despite the predetermined voting day, raising questions about underlying political disagreements.

China has warned that authorizing such measures risks further escalation, while Russia has denounced the text as “biased”, signaling potential obstacles to its authorization.

Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron dismissed the idea of a military operation in the strait as unrealistic, cautioning that it would be prolonged and expose global shipping to greater danger.Other NATO members feel the same.

With no new vote date announced and veto threats looming, the future of the resolution remains uncertain, highlighting the growing complexity the US has created at a critical global energy chokepoint.”

FROM THE ARCHIVE:

Tuesday, January 13, 2026

UK Rebel MP Exposes The Corruption Of Science By United Nations Climate Chance Panel (IPCC)

This was posted on the Facebook page of posted by Andrew Bridgen a former UK Member of Parliament who was suspended and later expelled in 2023 after highlighting the inefficiency of COVID vaccines. He fought the 2024 General election as an Independent, but in a result that defied trends to an extent that has aroused suspicion lost his seat while other, independent candidades especiallty those who hsd been expellled from their parties for challenging the orthodoxy on COVID vaccines, Brexit, Climate Change, the Grooming Gang scandal, and Free Speech.

From Andrew Bridgen's Facebook

These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.

Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.

Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”

Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”

Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”

Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”

Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”

Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”

Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”

Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”

Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”

Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”

Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”

Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”

Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”

Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”

Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”

https://principia-scientific.com/46-statements-by-ipcc.../

https://x.com/i/status/2010802055347085461

Andrew Bridgen on X:

https://x.com/ABridgen?t=ACw4w1ItzOOogpRv7b0_Cg&s=09

Andrew Bridgen on Facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/share/1CA1PZ1jqL/

We Boggart Bloggers sincerely hope Mr. Bridgen can find a way back into parliament and once more become a thorn in the side of people like Keir Starmer, Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak, Rachel Reeves and Ed Davey. We need MPs who are on the side of the people rather than representing the vested interests of individuals and organisation that fund their parties.

FROM THE ARCHIVE:

Saturday, November 08, 2025

More CO2 Hysteria As The Private Jet Brigade Gather In Brazil For Another Save The Planet Virtue Signalling Jamboree

Over the next two weeks upwards of 30,000 freeloaders and moochers of the global elite will fly by private jet to Belem in Brazil for the latest United Nations IPCC climate conference. COP30 will see the three favourite climate scares resurrected and relentlessly broadcast to promote the rapidly fading Net Zero fantasy. These sacred cows are: breaching a 1.5°C global ‘threshold’ leading to runaway temperatures; human-caused tipping points producing unimaginable natural disasters; and attribution of single-event bad weather to the use of natural hydrocarbons. The 1.5°C figure is a meaningless number , the latest in a series invented by politicians and activists to befuddle unsteady minds; tipping points are climate model codswallop; and ditto attribution crystal ball-gazing.

None are backed up by credible scientific evidence and observation. Which of course is why political elites have trashed the scientific process of inquiry, banned and cancelled any dissenting discussion and declared the matter ‘settled’. Mathematical models can always be manipulated to give the required answer, real data can be checked and debunked or verified by independent investigators. Luckily for the climate catastrophe grifters mainstream news organisation like The BBC will loyaly broadcast the lies and propaganda.

The foundation of the scam is temperature. The world is said to be warming dramatically, leading to tipping points and worsening extreme weather. Changes are said to be occurring at unprecedented rates and are caused primarily by humans increasing atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide. In fact the temperature rise is small, about 1°C over 200 years

The obsession with a trace gas and its ability to raise temperatures to catastrophic levels has been shown time and time again to be rubbish, but interestingly it is always referred to as CO2- constantly avoiding the word Carbon- as most intelligent people known all life is Carbon based.

At 425ppm, CO2 is slowly creeping back to a level that will protect all carbon based life, and that is 1000+ppm, it had dropped to under 190ppm- 150ppm is DEATH as plant based life dies, animals then die and hard on its heels, mankind dies.

Climate catastrophes that Eco Zealots have predicted have consistently failed to actually happen anywhere on the planet……. predictions from 1850 onwards, not one has happened……are they just waiting around or has someone been stretching facts aka lying in order to build a income stream of unlimited wealth being transferred from the majority to a minority all in the name of Climate Change.

In a world where climate change dominates headlines and shapes international policy, Dr. Tim Ball’s book, “Human Caused Global Warming: The Biggest Deception in History,” dares to challenge the prevailing narrative. Ball, a seasoned climatologist, presents a meticulously researched argument that questions the very foundations of anthropogenic global warming, igniting a fierce debate that resonates with both scientists and policymakers.

Ball’s journey from a believer in the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) findings to a vocal sceptic is at the heart of his book’s compelling narrative. The IPCC, once seen as a paragon of scientific consensus, is portrayed by Ball as a vehicle for political agendas rather than an impartial arbiter of climate science. He argues that the organization’s reports often prioritize political expediency over scientific rigor, a claim that has sparked intense controversy within the scientific community.

The Climategate scandal, which erupted in 2009 with the leak of thousands of emails from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, serves as a pivotal moment in Ball’s investigation. The emails revealed a disturbing pattern of data manipulation and efforts to suppress dissenting views, casting a shadow over the integrity of climate research. Ball uses this scandal to underscore his belief that the global warming narrative is not as scientifically robust as it appears.

In another book presenting a sceptical view of climate change scaremongering, “Global Warming: A Guide to the Science,” Willie Soon and his co-authors disclose that over 100 scientific studies show CO2 has negligible influence on global temperatures, contradicting mainstream climate alarmism. Historical data reveals that CO2 levels follow temperature changes, not the other way around.

They argue that primary driver of Earth’s greenhouse effect is water vapor and clouds, not CO2. Soon and his co - authors claim that even if we accept the claim about Carbon Dioxide absorbing radiation, CO2’s net warming effect is far less catastrophic than the mathematical models used in prference to empirical data predict.

Rising CO2 levels recorded over recent decades have in fact led to global “greening,” enhanced photosynthesis, improved drought resistance in plants and increased crop yields – benefits ignored by climate activists. Computer models used to justify climate policies not only use 'adjusted data' rather than real data but also fail to account for natural variability, solar influences and ocean dynamics. The infamous “hockey stick” graph, once regarded as incontrovertible truth by the climate science mob, was debunked for cherry-picking data and mathematical errors.

Policies like carbon taxes, energy restrictions and food controls are tools for political control, economic manipulation and population reduction – not environmental protection. The climate agenda is a pretext for United Nations technocratic tyranny, not science.

The debate over global warming has long been dominated by political agendas, sensationalist media narratives and an alliance of corporate and globalist interests pushing centralized control under the guise of environmentalism. However, a closer examination of the science reveals a far more nuanced reality – one that challenges the mainstream narrative of carbon dioxide (CO2) as the primary driver of catastrophic climate change, with thousands of respected and well - credentialed scientists openly opposing the catastrophic global warning narrative.

FROM THE ARCHIVE:

Scientists say Nuclear Is The Way Forward For Clean Energy – Do Ursidae Defecate In Sylvan Landscapes?

Climate Scientists' Mathematical Models Of Reality Wrong Again…New Study Shows Jet Stream Strengthening, Not Weakening
recent research by Samantha Hallam et al published in the journal Climate Dynamics looks at the seasonal variations over decades in Northern Hemisphere jet stream latitude and speed over land for the period 1871–2011. The authors report that they found no evidence of weakening of the sort climate alarmists have been warning about for the past three decades.

Shock for The Green Blob - Rewilding is to blame for Mediterranean forest fires
Or at least, to be acccurate, rewilding is partially to blame for Mediterranean forest fires. Which is darkly amusing as that man most insistent upon rewilding, George Monbiot, is trying to tell us that it’s all about climate change.

Official Advice - Prepare For Blackouts This Winter
The UK government is putting plans together for days of organised blackouts this winter, in what they call a "reasonable worst-case scenario" for energy shortages, according to reports in manstream media. Naturally they are blaming this on the embargo on importing gas from Russia but in reality Britain has never imported any more than a small amout of its gas from Russia. The real reason politicians and energy company CEOs are panicking is entirely due to their obession with obtaining all our energy from intermittent sources like wind and sunshine ...

UK Households Are Paying Wind Turbine Owners To Not Generate Electricity
On another near windless day here in the United Kingdom, Boggart Blog came across a very interesting piece if news. According to figures published by the business and management consultancy LCP, british taxpayers have been paying operators of wind turbines farms for the time their windmills were NOT generating electricity increased to record levels last year ...

Net Zero Is A Dangerous Fantasy, But Scientists Believe In Fairies It Seems
With oil and gas prices rocketing and the highly propted sustainable energy sources performing way befow expectations the energy crisis currently gripping Europe (with worse to come as food shortages start to bite, polticians still seem more intent on pandering to the green lobby and chasing the dream of a fossil fuel free world rather securing the energy and food supplies needed by the people they serve.

New UN Report on Climate Change – Nothing New, Nothing True
The latest United Nations (“UN”) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) report, published this week, once again, in scaremongering tone and the language of the panic stricken, claims that the planet is in peril (we are facing climate disaster, the clock is at one minute to midnight, we must take urgent action to destroy civilisation if we are to save the planet, the usual over - dramatised guff designed to spread fear and panic,) basically the same claim as they have been making at least twice a month for the past 20 years.

We need energy security – not Net Zero
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted a major rethink in the West. We have suddenly found ourselves vulnerable not just to rising prices in oil and gas, but also to inflation in other commodities – such as food and fertiliser. Of all these problems, the security of our energy supply has most exercised minds.

Net Zero Gone With The Wind - Boris Johnson Plans Seven New Nuclear Plants And Shelves Wind Expansion
Reports in mainstream media suggest Boris Johnson has done a U turn on his recently announced massive expansion of wind powered generating capacity. Sources in Westminster claim Boris has shelved his masterplan for a giant, floating wind farm in The North Sea and the government will reconsider plans to double or even treble the number of wind turbines in the countryside and approve plans for up to seven new nuclear reactors instead.

Climate Change Research Paper Censored by The British Hydrological Society For Telling The Truth
The Daily Sceptic today published an article by retired research scientist James Dent, whose specialist field was hydrology and meteorology. Mr. Dent was involved in research projects aiemd at understanding the factors influencing climate, and their effects on environments, [ ... ] he was the World Meteorology Organisation Chief Technical Advisor to the Flood Forecasting and Warning Centre in Bangladesh, a low lying nation especially prone to flooding ....

Freak Weather Around The World Begs Questions
With Britain and other parts of northern Europe basking in unseasonably warm temperatures which are forecast to last for a few days, while parts of the USA gring to a halt under a blanket of snow dumped by freak storms are, accoring to climate scarmongers, a signal that irreversible warming had arrived, it is perhaps timely for a hot topic from ten years ago, geoengineering came under the microscope again. This report from Global Intel Hub seems a good way to kick off the debate. ... Continue reading >>>

The True Cost Of The Green Energy Boom Is Now Being Realized
For four decades we have been fed a constant stream of propaganda assuring us that green energy was the only way forward if we wanted to secure supplies of the energy essential to a modern society while preventing the environmental catastrophes that would be the inevitable consequence of climate change caused by the Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emitted by human industrial, commercial and social activity. ... Continue reading >>>

Electricity cuts and power crisis predicted for Britain’s New Year Holiday
Shapps carefully omits to mention that the government’s only contingency plan for providing the power needed to meet peaks of demand (a sudden cold snap for example) is to spark up the thousands of diesel generators the earth loving politicians have concealed in goods containers on compounds sited around the country. Yes you read that right, diesel generators ...

Now Even ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann Admits The ‘Pause’ In Global Warming Is Real
“It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims,” the paper in Nature Climate Change says.

German Scientist Confims Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has confirmed what those of us dubbed 'climate deniers' have been telling you for years ...

It Looks As If Carbon Credits Scam Has INCREASED CO2 Emissions
As the climate change scare becomes more and more exposed for the money making fraud it always was, they green weirdie beardie, rope sandal wearing tree huggers get more hysterical and stupid in their arguments that we must all return to medieval lifestyles, the billionaires like Al Gore who hope to profit from it keep flogging the dead horse and the angrier and more vicious the left wing hate mobs become in their witch hunts.

EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]

Sunday, September 28, 2025

2025 To Be Warmest Year Ever? No, It's Just More Statistical Jiggery Pokery From The Green Lobby

THE UK Met Office, fond of repeating itself as ever has announced that this yeaer is set to be the warmest on record and that for the previous warmest yeasr on record, 2024 the mean global temperature was 1.53 ± 0.08°C above the 1850-1900 pre-industrial average.

In that statement the number of the year is probably the only piece of true data. Claiming that we can measure the mean temperature of the entire earth and its oceans for a whole year to that level of accuracy is questionable, surely. And what, exactly, is that ‘pre-industrial’ average? How was it measured? Even if we accept tht the industrial ersa becan in 1850 (it actually began about 100 years earlier. In 1709 Abraham Darby demondtrated the firt coke fuelled blast furnace and in 1712 Thomas Newcomen invented the first steam engine for use in mining. Withinin a few decades these technologies were in widespread use and had inspied many other industrial asdvances. So the start of the era canot be specificaly defined but industrialisation was widespread by 1850.

Another highly suspect point about Met Office figures: Actual temperatures are never quoted, we are given only anomalies. Annual figures are always related to the average of global temperatures during that critical 1850-1900 pre-industrial period. We are never given the actual global mean temperature, something around 15C, because that would not be sufficiently worrying. We also never see screaming headlines assuring us that many respected scientists disagree with the CO2 hypothesis and dismiss the climate change scare as a scam.

When it comes to discussions about climate, any change is always attributed to CO2 generated by burning fossil fuels - despite CO2 being less than 1/20th of 1% of atmosphere currently and is essential for the continuance of all life forms.. No other factors are mentioned that affect our climate/planet - nor is the fact that measurements of atmospheric CO2 which satisfy exacting modern scientific requirements were only first taken in 1958. Any measurements before that date must be considered suspect at least, if not dismissed totally as inaccurate. Ice-core and deep geological samples show CO2 was at 2000 ppm for most of the past 600 million years, and has been as high as 9000 ppm. And temperatures were much lower than today during many of these periods. To draw attention to these points would not serve the Net Zero / Climate Catastrophe narratives so you will not see or hear much about them in mainstream media.

Thus it is demonstrated that the entire case for climate catastrophe is based on statistical jiggery pokery.

Global temperatures do fluctuate over very long periods of time. Some time ago mainstream media featured a story about an archaeological dig in Northern Greenland and analysis of fossils showed the temperature there 2.6 million years ago - before the onset of the current ice-age - was 19 deg C HOTTER than today. And yes, we ARE in an ice-age - large ice-sheets in the polar regions prove this. These sheets haven't always been there - fossils discovered near the North Pole show animals such as camels and sloths once lived there. That should be considered in the context of tectonic plate movement of course. But even at a sped of four or five centimetres a year a landmass can cover a fair distance in a million years.

When it comes to global temperature variations we must also consider planetary movements. The Earth rotates on it's axis once in 24 hrs - a speed of 1000 mph. The Earth orbits the Sun once in 365.25 days - a speed of 66,000 mph. The Earth's orbit is not circular, nor is it regular. The orbit is elongated - an elipse - and at the furthest distance from the Sun in summer ( northern hemisphere ) this is called "aphelion".

When the Earth is closest to the Sun in winter ( northern hemisphere ) this is called " perihelion". The Earth is tilted on it's axis at an angle that varies between 21 deg and 24 deg from the vertical over 44000 yrs. This tilt is what gives us seasons. This does change - a process called " the precession of the equinoxes" which is caused by the Sun's gravitational pull on the Earth causes the Earth to be forced "backwards" against the direction of rotation ( anti-clockwise). Over 26500 yrs, the Earth completes once full rotation "backwards".

During this process, the Earth changes the way it faces the Sun - so that half-way through the precessionary cycle, summer and winter " change places". The summer solstice in the northern hemisphere will be in December and the winter solstice in June. This means, because of the way the Earth faces the Sun, northern hemisphere winters will be VERY cold and summers will be North-African HOT.

In addition to all this, the gravitational effects of other planets - mainly Saturn and Jupiter - plus our moon, Luna, and the Sun itself, all exert a "push and pull" on Earth's orbit around the Sun - the path of orbit can vary by as much as 5 million kms. And if we move nearer to the Sun, the Earth gets hotter. Simples, as they say. They there are variations in the Sun's output - solar maximums and minimums - more heat or less heat in other words.

All these things affect Earth's temperature and climate and must be considered when it comes to discussing "change".

So as the MET Office does not consider any of these factors we may as well stop worrying because nobody really knows what is going on, but on a global scale even small changes take centuries.

FROM THE ARCHIVE:

Tuesday, September 02, 2025

New Peer Reviewed Research Paper Claims COVID Vaccines ‘Unleashed Profound Harm’

by Arthur Foxake, 2 September 2025

Close on the heels of a scandal in The Netherlands where attempts by unidentified agencies to prevent a court case that could expose the huge Covid vaccines fraud from going ahead we learn that a new peer-reviewed study published in an American medical journal suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 virus responsible for COVID-19 shows signs of deliberate genetic engineering and that these features, including the spike protein also found in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, are responsible for widespread health harms globally.

The study, authored by 11 scientific and legal experts, was published in the fall edition of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

The authors content that the man-made features of SARS-CoV-2 and the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are probably the outcome of controversial gain-of-function research, in violation of the United Nations’ Biological Weapons Convention.

Gain-of-function research, which artificially increases the transmissibility or virulence of viruses, is frequently used in the development of vaccines.

According to the paper, the spread of COVID-19 in 2020, followed by the incredibly rapid development of mRNA vaccines and their rollout in 2021 resulted in unprecedented profound harms to human health, ranging from “autoimmune diseases and cardiovascular catastrophes to pregnancy complications and aggressive cancers.” This blog reported at the time that before the vaccines were released the makers acknowledged that they would not confer immunity on perople who accepted the shot, and also that previous efforts to develop mRNA vaccines were abandoned beacuse of safety issues with the gene editing technology.

“Far from benign, these vaccines have unleashed profound harm, disrupting nearly every system of the human body and contributing to unprecedented levels of morbidity and mortality,” the paper states.

Dr. Andrew Zywiec, principal physician at Zywiec & Porter, is the paper’s lead author. He said the paper reveals a “pattern of harm too consistent, too pervasive to be dismissed as chance.”

So, all those unfortunte coincidences when people fell ill and died shortly after receiving their first, second or third shot. were not coincidental at all then?

According to the paper, the SARS-Cov2 virus “displays multiple genomic features indicative of laboratory manipulation,” including its furin cleavage site, which “enhances infectivity” and which is “absent in SARS-like viruses found in nature.”

Again this was reported in Original Boggart Blog and Boggart Abroad at the time. It has also been iterated my many respected scientists.

Several other features of the SARS-CoV-2 virus which causes Covid “enhance immunological evasion and aerosol transmissibility,” making the virus “unusually durable … and five times more stable in air” than other respiratory viruses according to the research.

“These combined traits, along with the virus’s mutation patterns, are strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 could not have evolved naturally,” the paper states.

The paper also cites two peer-reviewed medical journal articles authored by military scientists stating that SARS-CoV-2 contained “evidence of manipulation” that makes the virus an “attractive pathogen” due to its features, which resemble those of a biological weapon.

Once again we Bogart Bloggers have to say: "WE TOLD YOU SO".

FROM THE ARCHIVE:

Cancer expert says U.K. seeing spike in “non-covid deaths,” nobody willing to call out vaccine elephant in the room
Excess mortality in the United Kingdom is off the charts, and yet nobody is willing to call out Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” as the culprit. Cancer expert and Prof. Carl Heneghan describes the current situation in Great Britain as a “national scandal.” A shocking 9,300 more people than usual have died in the U.K. over the past several months, and officials are blaming everything else except the injections. Continue reading >>>

In A Fit Of Honesty Italian Institute Of Health Reduces Official COVID Death Toll By 97%
Italian newspaper Il Tempo has published a shock report, claiming that the country's Institute has reduced the official figure for the number of people who have died from COVID from 130,000 to under 4,000. This may surprise many people who bought into the "killer virus" narrative and unleashed torrents of pure hatred on those of us who declined vaccination, having studied the figure for reported "COVID related deaths," and the methodology used to arrive at that figure ... Continue reading >>>

A newly published study from researchers in Sweden reveals that the immunity to COVID gained from vaccination, is dissipated by natural biological processes within months. Immunity, although it would be more honestly called temporary respite, from Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) injections is short term at best, and completely gone within months, this confirming the doubts raised by vaccine sceptics (or Conspiracy Theorists as mainstream media likes to call us Continue reading >>>

Surge in Emergency Hospital Admissions from Vaccinated People Suffering Acute Organ FailureThe USA's taxpayer funded broadcaster National Public Radio (NPR) is claiming to be mystified by a siginficant increase in hospital emergency admissions across the United States but does not find the fact that these medical emergencies are all among people already vaccinated against COVID-19 and also all due to people experiencing symptoms consistent with the acknowledged side effects of the vaccines.
Continue reading >>>

Analyst Reports ‘Hundreds of Thousands’ of COVID Vaccine Injury Reports Backlogged in VAERSThe latest episode of “Doctors and Scientists” on CHD.TV, features regular host Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., interviewing Jessica Rose, Ph.D., a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) analyst and computational biologist who specializes in biomathematics and molecular research. OK, I know this publication does not have much time for mathematical modelling, but that is because so much of it is obviously rigged to support propaganda narratives. We will always give an honest scientist a fair hearing even if we do not agree with their contribution to debate.
Continue reading >>>

Boris’ Government Trying To Bypass Parliament, Introduce Vaccine Passports By Back Door
We warned you this authoritarian government would not let the idea of vaccine passports go and here they are, reported by Summit News (well you didn't expect to see it in mainstream media did you?} tyring to bring in their wretched "Papers Please" legislation by the back door.

Vaccine shocker From Germany: "Out of ten autopsies, five deaths would be “very probably” linked to vaccines
A shocking report from respected German scientists claims out of 10 autopsies carried out on people who tested positive for COVID, five of the deaths were somehow linked to vaccines and the many observed side effects that occur soon after beople have been injected with COVID vaccine.

https://edbutt.blogspot.com/2021/08/why-well-informed-young-say-no-to-jab.html
Minutes of a US Food & Drug Administration advisory committee meeting titled, “Vaccines and Related Biological Products,” presented online on October 22, 2020, included a 27 slide powerpoint presentation by Steve Anderson, PhD, MPP Director, Office of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Slide 16 of his presentation included a “DRAFT Working list of possible adverse event outcomes” associated with the imminent rollout of COVID-19 vaccines

Leaked Documents suggest Moderna created its Coronavirus Vaccine BEFORE Covid-19 was known to exist
A confidentiality agreement shows potential coronavirus vaccine candidates were transferred from Moderna to the University of North Carolina in 2019, nineteen days prior to the emergence of the alleged Covid-19 causing virus in Wuhan, China.And now further evidence suggests the American pharmaceutical and biotechnology company that has made billions through the sale of said experimental injection, is actually responsible for creating the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

COVID cover-up: UK media refuses to report that 4 of 5 coronavirus deaths over the past month occurred in the vaccinatedEarlier this evening Prime Minister Boris Johnson, in a broadcast to the nation, implored British citizens to continue doing what they’ve been told to do throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately everything the government has told us to do: Stay at home, Work from home, Wear masks, wash your hands every twenty seconds, do not touch anything, Shun your friends and relatives especially if they are sick, Get a vaccine, Get a second, vaccine, Get a booster vaccine, ... etc, etc, etc,

Covid Vaccine Refusers 'Thrive On Attention' Says Prime Attention Seeker And Chief Clown Boris JohnsonIronic isn't it that the one person guilty of telling more lies and spreading more misinformation about COVID throughout the pandemic, our so - called Prime Minister and according to observable evidence, the chief idiot Boris Johnson launched another attack on 'anti - vaxxers' today, saying they “thrive on the attention”? This outrageous farrago of lies and calumnies spewed at people who have simply chosen not to be injected with a shot of toxic shite that does not immunise anybody against anything
Continue reading >>>

We have menioned the name of the eminent doctore Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D. in these pages before. Indeed, Dr. Bhakdi has been one of the most prominent criticts of the "science led" responses to the COVID pandemic from day one and has consistently warned against the mRNA vaccines rolled out around the world, citing the scientifically sound reasons this technique for modifying DNA has in the past been studied and abandoned because of the unpredictable side effects. ... Continue reading >>>

Vaccines Do Not Stop COVID-19 Spread As Governments Claim: Legal Advocacy Group

Vaccines are less effective effective in stopping the spread of COVID-19 that governments have claimed, an analysis of government narratives carried out by a constitutional rights group shows. The report was published Tuesday by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, found that claims made by governments promising vaccination will reduce or stop the spread of COVID-19 are not supported by either medical science or empirical evidence
Continue reading >>>

Throughout history there have been sports players who suffered from multiple conditions who have “collapsed” on the field during practice and during live games. However, a recent article from the German newspaper, Berliner Zeitung has highlighted an “unusually large” increase in the number of these collapses recently, leading to much speculation. Continue reading >>>

The Betrayal Of Humanity By The Corrupt Medical Professions
From day one, back in March 2020 when the pandemic was declared, this blog has been questioning the fake statistics, highlighting the distortion of statistics to serve the scaremongering narratives of the elites and exposing the lies and dishonesty of politicians, sciencetitis (sic) and, surprisingly perhaps if you are of a credulous nature, doctors and the medical professions. ... Continue reading >>>

Critics Batter The Fake Science Used To Justify The Lockdown As Boris Waffles
Regular readers may recall this blog was among the first to expose the fact that the pandemic model predicting 500,000 COVID – 19 deaths if the entire nation was not placed under indefinite house arrest was based on a deeply flawed mathematical model of the pandemic built by a “scientist” at Imperial College, London, a college heavily reliant on funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation. You may also recall we have reported on the determination of psychopathic megalomaniac Gates to insert himself into this phoney crisis

The Coronavirus Response Is The Biggest Assault On Freedom Since World War 2
Things have gone so far beyond what can be considered a rational response to an outbreak of a highly contagious but for most people relatively minor illness that I am starting to believe even the conspiracy theories I know I made up myself. Boggart Bloggers predicted weeks ago the current outbreak of coronavirus would see a massive hyping of the threat level leading up to an assault on our freedoms ...

Scientist who convinced Boris lockdown was the only way to beat coronavirus criticised many times for flawed research

The scientist whose mathematical models of how the coronavirus would spread in the UK and the wildly exaggerated estimates of how many deaths might result from the epidemic reportedly led to the decision to implement a countrywide lockdown and trash the economy has been criticised in the past for flawed research.

Has The World Health Organisation Been Helping Chinese Coronavirus Cover Up
Many people suspected as far back as January, when stories about an epidemic of a new virus began to leak out of China that we were not and would not be told the whole story. The virus infecting thousands of Chinese in the large inland city of Wuhan was, we learned, a strain of corona virus, the genre that infects us with the common cold, influenza and a host of other infections of varying seriousness.

Coronavirus deaths: Are The Authorities Deceiving Us?Yesterday we reported that a Canadian outfit had carried out an analysis of China’s response to Coronavirus and concluded that while politicians and academics (aka “scientists” or “experts”) are heaping praise on the way the regime in Beijing has contained and controlled its epidemic, the Chinese have actually been lying, the epidemc is still raging and numbers of infections and deaths from COVID – 19 are far higher than reported,

Is This The Smoking Gun That Proves China Has Lied About The Coronavirus Outbreak
With the number of confirmed cases of, and deaths from coronavirus in Italy, a nation of 63 million people having now surpassed the number of infections officially admitted by the government of China, a nation of 1.4 billion and the nation where the news strain of coronavirus, COVID – 19 was first observed, it was obvious to the realists among us that the Chinese government’s claims to have contained the virus were deeply suspect and further claims that the outbreak were under control were as reliable as reported sightings of The Tooth Fairy ...

As We Predicted The Coronavirus bill Is The Biggest Assault On Freedom Since World War 2
Things have gone so far beyond what can be considered a rational response to an outbreak of a highly contagious but for most people relatively minor illness that I am starting to believe even the conspiracy theories I know I made up myself. Along with my fellow Boggart Bloggers I predicted weeks ago the current outbreak of the so - called coronavirus would see a massive hyping of the threat level leading up to an assault on our freedoms. And that is exactly what we have seen happening over the past week.

[ Coronavirus fear and panic psyop ] ... [ Health tyranny ] ... [ Covid Science Corrupt ] ... [ Covid vaccine fascism ] ... [ Covid vaccine harm ] ... [ Corona virus statistics and lies ] ... [ Health menu ]

EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ]

Tuesday, July 01, 2025

1900 Scientists Say There Is No Climate Crisis - The Hoax Exposed?

Millions of people around the world are living in fear, convinced that climate change is about to destroy us. Years of being brainwashed by the constant stream of propaganda pumped out by mainstream media they believe there is a climate emergency. For decades we have been told by the United Nations that Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from human activity are alone responsible for disastrous warming if the earths atmosphere. In 2018, a UN IPCC report even warned that ‘we have 12 years to save the Earth’, thus sending millions of people worldwide into a frenzy.

However, many scientists dispute with the UN-promoted man-made climate change theory, while more and more people worldwide are waking up to the knowledge that the whole 'climate catastrophe' narrative is an elaborate hoax aimed at eventually creating a global government. The full facts (which would fill several large volumes were I to list them,) tell a very different story, of a political agenda, corporate greed, the corruption of science and the censoring of thousands of competent and respected esearchers who have challenged the official narrative all in the service of a gigantic scam by power hungry politicians and greedy corporate businesses.

In a recent lecture, Nobel Laureate physicist John Clauser exposed how the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) models and analyses, which are relied upon by politicians and activists to support claims of a ‘climate crisis’, do not meet basic standards of scientific enquiry. Clauser received his Nobel prize in 2022 for the observational measurement of quantum entanglement and understands well the problem of distinguishing a physical signal from background noise.

Clauser shows that, when corrected for the IPCC’s error prone arithmetic and statistics, the observational data do not support statistical evidence from computer modelling purporting to showthe power imbalance claimed to be responsible for global warming. Furthermore, the outputs of climate models are at variance with the observational record. Clauser discusses the roles of convection, clouds and their variability in providing a negative feedback mechanism, and proposes that this acts as a thermostat that stabilises surface temperatures. Clauser’s conclusion is that claims of a ‘climate crisis’ lack scientific substance and that Net Zero policies are an unnecessary hindrance.

Clauser’s talk is available on YouTube.

The Irish Climate Science Forum (ICSF) website is a valuable resource for Warmageddon sceptics founded by Jim O’Brien and responsible for a lot of excellent work in highlighting the scientific flaws in the UN climate narrative. The ICSF provides a comprehensive lecture series from renowned international scientists providing much evidence, analysis, and data that contradicts the UN assertions. The lectures are available at: https://www.icsf.ie/lecture-series

The ICSF scientific view coincides with those of the Climate Intelligence (CLINTEL) foundation that operates in the fields of climate change and climate policy. CLINTEL was founded in 2019 by emeritus professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and science journalist Marcel Crok. Based on this common conviction, 20 Irish scientists and several ICSF members have co-signed the CLINTEL World Climate Declaration “There is No Climate Emergency” (see https://clintel.org/ireland/).

The reality is that the climate has always been changing, the climate changes naturally and slowly in its own cycle, and CO2 emissions (and methane from livestock, the cow fart scare) are not dominant factors in climate change. In essence, therefore, the incessant UN, government, and corporate-media-produced climate hysteria in relation to CO2 emissions (and also methane from cow farts) has no scientific basis. It appears to me the UN narrative is yet another example of fake science being used to drive an ulterior agenda, see also the book Godless Fake Science.

The claim that Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is a dangerous pollutant is totally ridiculous, as has been repeated probably millions of times by people who bother to check facts, Carbon Dioxide is a trace atmospheric gas that is essential to the survival of all life on earth. The Carbon Dioxide narrative is a distraction created possibly for the purpose of diverting our attention from the ‘real’ pollution, the toxic shite that is dumped in our environment and fed into our bodies by big business, globalist politics and corrupt academic institutions. The reality is that CO2 is a vital component in the diet of plants. During daylight hours, by means of a process known as photosynthesis, plants use solar energy to absorb Carbon Dioxide and extract the Carbon atoms which they turn into vegetable matter. Pure, breathable oxygen is released back into the atmosphere. This is basic biology, learned at school, usually between the ages of 10 and 13 by school children in the developed nations. Yet so many people who claim to be 'climate scientists' appear to be ignorant of it.

Unfortunately, many misinformed environmentalists and ignorant climate scientists are driving around in electric cars, the battery production for which has caused vast amounts of ‘real’ pollution via the industrial mining and processing of rare earth metals, and the consequent pollution to land, air and water systems. See also this article. Note that the UN does not focus on the thousands of real pollutants that corporate industrial globalisation creates.

A very simple quote from climatologist Judith Curry: “Sure, all things being equal CO2 may cause a little warming, but all things in Earth’s climate are not equal”.

How many ordinary people have head of John Clauser or other people like him, and how many will ever read an article like this, let alone the type of studies to be found by following the links? I suggest a tiny percentage only will do that. This means they will only be hearing the alarmist version of reality as presented on mainstream media (BBC, SKY News, CNN, The Daily Mail, Washington Post etc.)

There is a little story in a book by Stephen Einhorn called “Climate Change, What they rarely teach you in College.”According to Jewish folklore, The Lord sent two Angels down with a sack full of foolish souls to be evenly distributed over Earth, but they tripped and fell spiling them in a little Polish town called Chelm.

Soon a heated argument started in the town about what was more important, the Sun or the Moon. After careful consideration the Chief Rabbi decided the Moon was more important because it shone light at night when people needed it and not during the day when there as already plenty of light. It therefore quickly became settled that the Moon was more important. In fact there was a “consensus” and those who disagreed were classed as “Moon Deniers”.

There is something very similar happening today and many people getting their information from mainstream TV News are like the people of Chelm. They don’t look at facts and empirical science. They listen to , and believe Authority.

FROM THE ARCHIVE:

Scientists says Nuclear Is The Way Forward For Clean Energy – Do Ursidae Defecate In Sylvan Landscapes?

Wednesday, June 25, 2025

Global Temperatures, Impossible Targets and Scientific Follies

Various supranational agengies and Qangos including the United Nations IPCC, World Economic Forum, NASA, World Meteorological Organisation, Friends of the Earth various governmental and academic groups advising on climate change (global warming,) tell us that: ‘The 1.5-degree Celsius warming threshold is considered critical, as it is the point at which the impacts of climate change are expected to become increasingly severe.’

However it has been obvious for some years nowthat there’s no realistic prospect of humanity keeping global temperatures below the Paris Agreement target of 1.5ºC above pre-industrial levels – or indeed below the somewhat less precise target of ‘well below’ 2ºC. Both of these realities, although scientifically verifiable, are widely ignored by propagandists and mainstreeam media. So what is likely to happen if the global mean temperature rises by more. And more worrying, what will happen if some of the nuttier ideas of the clinate lobby, like spraying chemicals in the upper atmosphere to shut out the sun, are ever implemented.Here are a few simple facts about the great Global Warming hoax (all scientifically verifiable):

The 1.5ºC target:

In its 2018 Special Report, the United Nations IPCC recommended that, to achieve the Paris Agreement’s 1.5ºC target, global emissions should ‘decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030’. In 2010 global CO₂ emissions were 34.0 gigatonnes (Gt). Therefore they’d have to come down to 18.7 Gt by 2030 to meet the target. But, just three countries (China, the US and India) already exceed that(by 2.2 Gt) and all are likely to increase their emissions over the next five years – as are over 100 other countries. Therefore, if the IPCC has got it right, it’s clear that the Paris Agreement’s 1.5ºC target will be substantially exceeded.

The Science:

There is no genuine scientific evidence that a higher atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) will trigger the claimed dangerous climatic warming. It is simply an endlessly repeated assertion based only on output from mathematical models of the climate.. The much acclaimed models, run on computer software writteny by incompetent amateurs, are worse than useless, as they mislead the unwary and gullible. (As a former Information Systems progessional I am always astounded at the way 'scientists' assume they can write better programs that people who have been doing the job for over twenty years.)

Well estsablished principles of Physics indicate that whilst CO2 is a greenhouse gas it is a very weak one and its effect soon reduces to zero, each additional succeeding increment of CO2 having a reduced warming effect in comparison to the earlier addition. Most of the energy of the wavelengths that could be absorbed by CO2 have already been absorbed by water vapour, which is by far the more powerful greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. It is largely water and its vapour, in te upper layers of the atmosphere, which keep this planet warm, forming a protective 'blanket' encircling the earth.

From the evidence obtained by paleo - Geology, which allows us to to study the climates of earlier ages, it is clear that there is not even a convincing correlation between atmospheric CO2 concentration and the global mean temperature.

Eminent scientists, Physicists and Geologists, free from the constraints of government funding, or being employed by companies competing for government contracts, are able to explain how this great deception is being maintained. Amongst the physicists who dissent from 'the climate consensus', Prof. Happer, of Princeton, is the best for producing good videos. Australian professor Ian Plimer is a leading authoity on paleo - geology.

What we never hear about through the MS media are the beneficial effects of the slight increase in atmospheric CO2 from our industrial emissions. Most green plants respond by increasing their growth rates, which helps to boost our crop production. An additional benefit is revealed by two decades of satellite photography, showing that the semiarid regions, like the Sahel of W. Australia are greening. This is because more CO2 allows plants to reduce the number of the tiny holes in on their leaves, through which they 'breathe' in the gas, but which through they also lose water.

The above is a very simple summary of the flaws in the so-called science of' 'CO2 = Climate Change', That assumption is not just wrong, it is a total pseudoscientific fraud.

It is a scientific fact that a planet's surface temperature is completely independent of the gaseous composition of its atmosphere, only the surface pressure exerted by the atmosphere does that.
There is plenty of evidence, in addition to the known theory of compressed gases which is, of course, what a planetary atmosphere is.

It is just the same for stars like our Sun which, of course, doesn't have a solid surface.

The 'Net Zero' policy has no scientific basis in fact and will be impossibl to achieve within the promised timescales, and very likely forever without a huge depopulation event. It has the same validity of similar pseudoscientific 'cults' that have had, let me be frank, the aim of eliminating a particular race. Net Zero is, of course, not in any obvious way, to do with race. But it has exactly the same aim as the genocidal policies of certain political and religious groups both past and present: to control and dominate.

The same methods are employed, the 'cult that may not be questioned', the need for all to sign up to believe the mantra that we, the people, are the 'evil ones'. We must sacrifice our wonderful life, fueled using hydrocarbons that give us the ability to 'bestride the world', something that was said (by Shakespeare!) to belong to Caesar alone!

They climate change scaremongers and Net Zero fanatics don't give a toss about Earth's many climates, all they want is you (and me!) under their thumb. And if it destroys the world's economy in the process - so be it!

FROM THE ARCHIVES:

UK Government Belatedly Discovers The Uselessness Of Sustainables In Relation To Energy Security
The policy that Boris Johnson's Premiership will be remembered for is nor 'getting Brexit done,' but the government's disastrous pledge to make Great Britain the first developed nation to achieve a 'net zero' national energy system. The neglect and running down of traditional energy systems (coal, gas, nuclear,) along with flushing money down the toilet by investing in intermitternt power sources (wind, solar,) rather than Putin's war in Ukraine is responsible for the current crisis.

1,200 Scientists and Professionals Go Public With: “There is No Climate Emergency”
As it happens the narrative promoting the risible idea that "The Science Is Settled," and a few other trains of misinformation to keep ramping up the fear level among the general public have been rocked by the publication of The World Climate Declaration (WCD) a study and report signed by over 1,100 scientists and professionals. The authors, meteorologists, physicists, biologists, naturalists and well qualified people drawn from a host of other professions and academic disciplines and from all around the world conclude there is no climate emergency.

Latest Bill Gates Insanity: Injecting Sulfur Into the Atmosphere Will Cause EnvironmentalDisaster
A study published in November by the University of Pennsylvania exposes the insanity of projects such as spraying particles of sulphur compounds into the stratosphere, self - anointed vaccime messiah Bill Gates' latest scheme to “save” the planet with "geoengineering" According to the mathematical modellers Gates pays hansomely to provide him with "scientific" data to persuade politicians to spend taxpayers money on projects run by companies his "charitable foundation" has invested in. Far from saving the planet this latest idiocy is actually destroying environments. Continue reading >>>

Climate: The Science, The Lies, The Malfeasance and The Deep State
Climate change hoax COLLAPSES as new science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on global temperatures We have previously highlighted this report from Finland which exposes the great flaw in "the science" of global warming. The link at the end of this extract takes you to a much more complete account of the research project which, not for the first time debunks the fake science on which the politically - motivate climate change scare.
Continue reading >>>

Forget The Hype About COP26 Saving The Planet, Here's The Reality
As mainstream media heaps praise on the delegates to the COP 26 climate conference because they have managed to agree to save the planet by repeating the same meaningless pledges and setting the same impossible targets as every previous climate conference in the past 20 years has, Boggart Blog brings you a message from a former colleague in Denmark, who tells us of the true condequences of 'gree' policy making in Europe's greenest nation.br> Continue reading >>>

Proof That The Alarmist Claptrap You Are Hearing And Seeing At COP26 Climate Conference Is A Load Of Bollocks
The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places, the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consul Ifft, at Bergen, Norway. Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions in the Arctic zone. Expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met with as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm ... Continue reading >>>

Germany Burns Net Zero Pledges And Fires Up Coal Generating Plants Ahead Of Winter Peak Electricity Season
On Wednesday this week Germany's coalition government approved putting coal power plants back online until the end of March 2024 to ensure energy security when natural gas supplies cannot meet demand. Though Germany has for at least a decade vied with Britain to claim leadership of Europe's ill - advised push for net zero, the Berlin government has been forced into this move

Will Germany be the first to ditch its net zero commitments?
Things are not going well in Germany’s bid to reach net zero by 2045, five years earlier even than Britain’s own unrealistic target. For months, the German government has been trying to devise a way to save its heavy industry from high energy prices which are sending production fleeing to Asia. Last year, chemicals giant BASF announced that it would invest in a new £10 billion plant in China, due to the cost of energy.

Another Setback For UK's Net Zero Green Dreams As Cost Rise Faster Than China's CO2 Emissions
The UK ruling elite's dreams suffered another setback today when Swedish energy company Vattenfall announced work on the Norfolk Boreas offshore wind farm is to be suspended. The reasons given are spiralling costs, uncertainty in supply lines and the economic reality that offshore wind farms are hideously expensive to operate as well as being enormously damaging to the marine environment.

Implosion of Germany's Green Party Threatens To Destabilse EU
With the defeat of Donald Trump in the 2020 US election, the far left parties in Liberal Democracies celebrated the defeat of the far right. At around the same time it appeared that Germany's AfD party, Italy's Lega and and the Sweden Democrats had been discredited and surges in their popularity had been halted by negative propaganda campaigns while Germany's Green Party were at the height of their popularity and were hailed as Europe's great hope for a clean, net zero, woke, gay and trans friendly future.

Common Sense Prevails: Germany Is Dismantling Wind Turbines To Make Room For Coal Mining
We have learned vial a piece in OilPrice.com that turbines at a wind farm in western Germany are being dismantled to allow for the expansion of open cast coal mining operations at an adjacent site. The propsal to increase output at the Garzweiler open-pit lignite coal mine has been described as a “paradoxical” situation given that in recent years the German government has been pushing ahead with the closure of coal and nuclear generating plant to appease its nutty but powerful Green party ... Continue reading >>>

Majority of Conservative Voters want Net Zero Plan Halted
Despite sycophantic support from the party elites, recent polling has found that the majority of Conservative Party voters want the government’s Net Zero agenda halted. The Conservative Party base has had enough of their party’s sycophantic support for climate crazy policies, with recent polling suggesting that a significant majority of individuals who vote for the party want the government’s current Net Zero regime halted. ...

The Truth About Coal And The Lies Of The Elite
So much for all the COP 26 banter late last year. Let me remind you. The elites all flew in on their private jets and promptly told us we’re all (royal we) getting off fossil fuels and killing coal.So how’s that turning out? The usage of coal is now at record highs:

[ Climate change ] ... [ Climate alarmists cheating ] ... [ Climate deception ] ... [ Climate lies ] ... [ Green dreams ] ... [ Green energy delusion ] ... [ Net zero reality ] ... [ Death of Democracy ]