EU facing food crisis as Super El Nino Hits Harvest

 

 

by Xavier Connolly, 20 August 2026  

A huge slump in crop yields will lead to higher grocery bills for consumers and more inflation, economists have warned, as Europe's hot dry summer looks set to drag on into the autumn. All this comes on top of the European Union's efforts to put farmers out of business in pursuit of their loonytoons net zero ambitions

Damaged corn in a field, San Daniele Po, Italy, June 23, 2026. ©  Piero Cruciatti/Anadolu via Getty Images

Farmers' organisations and GovernmentAgriculture departments across the Europe have warned of sharp drops in yields after  the continent has been hit by successive heatwaves this summer. Economists have said the losses are likely to push food prices higher in the coming months and will make many small farms, already hit by authoritarian EU measures, unable to make a profit from producing food.

June and July were among the hottest and dryest on record in western Europe, according to the EU’s Copernicus Climate Change Service, which warned of a “continued risk of heatwaves affecting much of Europe” through August and into September.

In France, one of the EU’s largest grain producers, groundwater reserves  are severely depleted across much of the country by early August that crop yields are expected to be significantly lower, according to the national geological survey.

In an extraordinary early forecast, Coceral, the industry body representing the cereals, oilseeds, rice and olive oil sectors, cut its estimates for grain crops in European countries, including the UK, to 286.6 million tonnes. This is around 9 million tonnes lower than its June estimate of 295.5 million tonnes and almost ten per cent down ob the 310 million tonnes harvested in 2025. 

The outlook for maize has deteriorated further, with Coceral warning that heat stress is now affecting pollination in key growing regions. Further losses may be realised, as additional hot weather is forecast across other parts of the EU during the critical late summer growing period. These figures all point to food shortages and price inflation in the coming winter.

Tom Lancaster, land, food and farming analyst at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU) said: “The June heatwave and drought came at a terrible time for European cereal farmers, hitting crop development and reducing yields across the continent. This will hit farmers in the pockets and undermining European food security at the same time. 
 
But while the problem is obviously serious, far too many 'experts' are simply blaming 'climate change' without doing any research, even though numerous scientists have now broken ranks and said climate change is natural and there is no crisis. If so call climate change has caused this summer's drought and the resultant impact of water shortages on food production, what caused the one 50 years ago when global warming was not yet a thing.

The long, hot Summer of 1976 happened in the middle of an unusually cold decade, supposedly leading climate scientists of the day to warn of an imminent  new ice-age. How do the Warmageddonists  explain that?

FROM THE ARCHIVE: 

 

 

 

Spain's Solar Power Boom Goes Bust and Busts The National Grid

 by Arthur Foxake, 9 July 2026

Spain’s solar boom is running into a harsh reality: too much sunshine has created an energy glut, crashing prices and spooking investors, writes Hans van Leeuwen in the Telegraph.The article lays bare the insane voodoo-economics underlying all this Net Zero/Green energy nonsense.

In Spain, solar panels make much more sense than in the northern latitudes of UK with our cloudy skies and loooooong winter nights. So much sense that they’re producing too much energy, causing the price electricity companies pay producers to drop drastically. What happens then? Sell the excess energy to someone else – the French, or us – lowering prices elsewhere? 

Nope, the grid and interconnectors can’t take the surplus energy, last year a sunny spell in summer overloaded transformers on the national distribution grid and knocked out electricity supply to homes and businesses over a large part of the country. Continue covering thousands of square miles of productive agricultural land with panels that produce electricity nobody wants and Store it? Nope: no-one bothered to think about storage technology (or rather the lack of it). Provide the energy to Ramon and Luz in the house down the road, at a zero price? Nope, not allowed: because the whole push is wrapped in a bonkers guaranteed-price straitjacket.

So, instead: switch off the solar plant.  Yes switch them off because the gas and nuclear power stations must be kept running in order to level the loading on the grid when supplies from intermittent sources suddenly fluctuate.  These fabulous solutions to pollution, supposedly providing cheap energy, have to be switched off to keep the price high. For years this blog has been saying Net Zero is a scam built on the Climate Catastrophe hoax.

It’s tempting to read this as “greedy investors gaming a  badly thought out system, traducing good intentions”; that is certainly our problem in Britain, particularly net zero crazy Scotland where energy producers are paid more for NOT producing electricity than they earn from current fed into the grid, and there may be some element of it in Spain.

But whether it’s the evil Capitalists putting up the money, or government doing it directly (and the generation/transmission complex is a textbook case of potential market failure), someone has to pay for the construction and maintenance of these expensive, brand-new solar plants and they are not cheap to build and maintain. Perhaps this prioritising theory over reality is why green power has failed so miserably.

It seems to me that a guaranteed future price is one of the  most counter productive ways of raising the money. As your friendly local free-market economist will tell you, it suppresses an important signal.

Some signal is getting through nevertheless, and investment in solar in Spain is drying up. What’s wrong with that? Well, it’s only wrong because Spain has to expand solar, according to Book of Net Zero 1:1 – even if the market signals (and the underlying realities they reflect) don’t make it worthwhile. Build more solar plants, and switch them (and the existing ones) off more often.

The logic of the Net Zero lobby is totally insane.

FROM THE ARCHIVE: 

Scientists says Nuclear Is The Way Forward For Clean Energy – Do Ursidae Defecate In Sylvan Landscapes?

 

Climate Scientists' Mathematical Models Of Reality Wrong Again…New Study Shows Jet Stream Strengthening, Not Weakening
recent research  by Samantha Hallam et al published in the journal Climate Dynamics looks at the seasonal variations over decades in Northern Hemisphere jet stream latitude and speed over land for the period 1871–2011. The authors report that they found no evidence of weakening of the sort climate alarmists have been warning about for the past three decades.

Shock for The Green Blob - Rewilding is to blame for Mediterranean forest fires
Or at least, to be acccurate, rewilding is partially to blame for Mediterranean forest fires. Which is darkly amusing as that man most insistent upon rewilding, George Monbiot, is trying to tell us that it’s all about climate change.

Official Advice - Prepare For Blackouts This Winter
The UK government is putting plans together for days of organised blackouts this winter, in what they call a "reasonable worst-case scenario" for energy shortages, according to reports in manstream media. Naturally they are blaming this on the embargo on importing gas from Russia but in reality Britain has never imported any more than a small amout of its gas from Russia. The real reason politicians and energy company CEOs are panicking is entirely due to their obession with obtaining all our energy from intermittent sources like wind and sunshine ...

UK Households Are Paying Wind Turbine Owners To Not Generate Electricity
On another near windless day here in the United Kingdom, Boggart Blog came across a very interesting piece if news. According to figures published by the business and management consultancy LCP, british taxpayers have been paying operators of wind turbines farms for the time their windmills were NOT generating electricity increased to record levels last year ...

Net Zero Is A Dangerous Fantasy, But Scientists Believe In Fairies It Seems
With oil and gas prices rocketing and the highly propted sustainable energy sources performing way befow expectations the energy crisis currently gripping Europe (with worse to come as food shortages start to bite, polticians still seem more intent on pandering to the green lobby and chasing the dream of a fossil fuel free world rather securing the energy and food supplies needed by the people they serve.

New UN Report on Climate Change – Nothing New, Nothing True
The latest United Nations (“UN”) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) report, published this week, once again, in scaremongering tone and the language of the panic stricken, claims that the planet is in peril (we are facing climate disaster, the clock is at one minute to midnight, we must take urgent action to destroy civilisation if we are to save the planet, the usual over - dramatised guff designed to spread fear and panic,) basically the same claim as they have been making at least twice a month for the past 20 years.

We need energy security – not Net Zero
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted a major rethink in the West. We have suddenly found ourselves vulnerable not just to rising prices in oil and gas, but also to inflation in other commodities – such as food and fertiliser. Of all these problems, the security of our energy supply has most exercised minds.

Net Zero Gone With The Wind - Boris Johnson Plans Seven New Nuclear Plants And Shelves Wind Expansion
Reports in mainstream media suggest Boris Johnson has done a U turn on his recently announced massive expansion of wind powered generating capacity. Sources in Westminster claim Boris has shelved his masterplan for a giant, floating wind farm in The North Sea and the government will reconsider plans to double or even treble the number of wind turbines in the countryside and approve plans for up to seven new nuclear reactors instead.

Climate Change Research Paper Censored by The British Hydrological Society For Telling The Truth
The Daily Sceptic today published an article by retired research scientist James Dent, whose specialist field was hydrology and meteorology. Mr. Dent was involved in research projects aiemd at understanding the factors influencing climate, and their effects on environments, [ ... ] he was the World Meteorology Organisation Chief Technical Advisor to the Flood Forecasting and Warning Centre in Bangladesh, a low lying nation especially prone to flooding ....

Freak Weather Around The World Begs Questions
With Britain and other parts of northern Europe basking in unseasonably warm temperatures which are forecast to last for a few days, while parts of the USA gring to a halt under a blanket of snow dumped by freak storms are, accoring to climate scarmongers, a signal that irreversible warming had arrived, it is perhaps timely for a hot topic from ten years ago, geoengineering came under the microscope again. This report from Global Intel Hub seems a good way to kick off the debate. ... Continue reading >>>

The True Cost Of The Green Energy Boom Is Now Being Realized
For four decades we have been fed a constant stream of propaganda assuring us that green energy was the only way forward if we wanted to secure supplies of the energy essential to a modern society while preventing the environmental catastrophes that would be the inevitable consequence of climate change caused by the Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emitted by human industrial, commercial and social activity. ... Continue reading >>>

Electricity cuts and power crisis predicted for Britain’s New Year Holiday
Shapps carefully omits to mention that the government’s only contingency plan for providing the power needed to meet peaks of demand (a sudden cold snap for example) is to spark up the thousands of diesel generators the earth loving politicians have concealed in goods containers on compounds sited around the country. Yes you read that right, diesel generators ...

Now Even ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann Admits The ‘Pause’ In Global Warming Is Real
“It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims,” the paper in Nature Climate Change says.

German Scientist Confims Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has confirmed what those of us dubbed 'climate deniers' have been telling you for years ...

It Looks As If Carbon Credits Scam Has INCREASED CO2 Emissions
As the climate change scare becomes more and more exposed for the money making fraud it always was, they green weirdie beardie, rope sandal wearing tree huggers get more hysterical and stupid in their arguments that we must all return to medieval lifestyles, the billionaires like Al Gore who hope to profit from it keep flogging the dead horse and the angrier and more vicious the left wing hate mobs become in their witch hunts.

EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]

The Disintegration Of The Imminent Climate Catastrophe Psyop

 

Earlier this year President Trump delighted his fans and outraged his opponents by pulling the USA and all its money out of the United Nations Intergoernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Globalists were quick to complain that without American money the climate scaremongering project would be bankrupt.

Trump signed a presidential memorandum in January that pulled the United States from the climate pact and 65 other international organizations and treaties that “no longer serve American interests.” About half of those are United Nations organizations.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement, “As this list begins to demonstrate, what started as a pragmatic framework of international organizations for peace and cooperation has morphed into a sprawling architecture of global governance, often dominated by progressive ideology and detached from national interests,” .

The US withdrawal from on climate cooperation comes as the United States’ main rival on the world stage, China, has come to dominate the clean energy technologies of the future. At the same time, many of the United States’ most powerful allies, including Australia, Britain and the European Union, are also advancing their ambitions to reduce emissions of planet-heating greenhouse gases and ramp up renewable energies. 

Five months later the credibility of the IPCC has been dealt an equally damaging blow with recently-published research showing that 42% of its climate scenarios rely on improbable rises in future temperature that even the UN-funded body believes are of “low likelihood”. The research notes the IPCC admission of the improbability of its scaremongering predictions is “deeply buried” in the full Sixth Assessment Reports (AR6), and is “unlikely to be read by the policy makers”. The authors point out that significant and important sections of the full IPCC work emphasise these improbable claims, “potentially invalidating those sections of the report”.

Climate and emissions outline SSP5-8.5 assumes a rise of around 5°C by the end of the century. That was always somewhat detached from reality and has long been dealt a death blow, given that global warming ran out of steam about 25 years ago.

A recent New York Post (NYP) article, titled “Billions have been wasted on UN’s climate change lies,” describes how vast amounts of Dollars, Pounds, Euros and other major currencies have been spent worldwide attempting to slow or stop the world from experiencing the extreme climate change as forecast by the flawed, but widely used RCP 8.5 computer model projections. The NYP is absolutely correct. The future climate conditions described by the RCP 8.5 high-end emissions scenario, and subsequently cited in hundreds of climate science research papers warning of likely disastrous outcomes, were never going to happen, and all the investment into climate policy has been a total waste.

RCP 8.5 has officially been retired from consideration by official climate researchers at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Opinion writer Jonathan Lesser writes that the IPCC “is responsible for the “climate catastrophe” pseudo science and “the world is burning" predictions that environmentalists, academics and many politicians have promoted to force high-cost, coercive energy policies on the developed nations, which “relied on academics whose careers depended on using RCP 8.5 and several other worst-case scenarios to predict everything from the demise of French wines and the end of pasta to aliens destroying the earth. (No, really.)”

Over the past decade, Wattsupwiththat, The Heartland Institute and Climate Realism have published dozens of articles refuting studies slavishly promoted by various media outlets that relied heavily on computer-modeled emissions scenarios like RCP 8.5 and SSP5-8.5. The stories referenced by Lesser here are familiar; the supposed destruction of French wine (or overproduction!), pasta, and aliens of a different kind, all have been covered and much more.

RCP 8.5 was used to say Gila monsters would be decimated by climate change, that climate change would spread lethal fungal outbreaks around the world, that climate change would cause a dramatic uptick in deaths from sedentary lifestyles, and The Daily Mail went so far as to create AI generated apocalyptic images of the world’s future all based on RCP 8.5 projections.

Scientists have been moving away from promoting RCP 8.5 as the business-as-usual scenario for a while now. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change  abandoned it years ago, yet it has still been regularly used as a realistic high end emissions scenario in hundreds of papers published by prestigious journals like Nature. It never was realistic. It was always implausible and likely impossible, even assuming a rapid, large, and sustained increase in coal consumption – a scenario that would require five times more coal than we actually have reserves of.

Climate scientist Roger Pielke Jr. explains in a Substack post, “A scenario requiring five times proven coal reserves is not plausible by any standard,” and that the scenario also required an increase in the use of coal-to-liquids instead of petroleum and that other technologies would stagnate. None of this was realistic, even at the time the scenario was first created.

Unfortunately many people too busy with work and family life to investigate issues are of the opinion that what comes from the IPCC is “Science”. Those people take the view that if all scientists are saying something (i.e. The science is settled,) then it must be true so  who are they to question these knowledable academics. So they mostly just accept it all.

In fact the opposite is true, we all have a right and a duty to question authority, and the very use of the phrase, "The science is settled," by climate scientists shows they are motivated more by politics than pure scientific inquiry. 

What these people promote isn’t science at all. It is “Official Narrative”. It is computer modelling full of assumptions that don’t match what is actually happening in the real world, and our governments, by attaching a 'science' label to this propaganda are using false authority of “science” to spread irrational fears about the climate, in order to coerce public support for authoritarian, globalist policy like NET ZERO and punitive taxation of fuel consumption. 

Those policies are harmful to our prosperity and well being. They always talk of the risks of using fossil fuels without ever mentioning the risks of NOT using them. Life expectancy has doubled because of those fuels, and there are over a billion people who don’t have them sitting burning dung for heating and cooking dying young from preventable diseases and of back breaking labour. 

Wake up people. Globalist Eco Socialism is NOT science. You are being played for fools. 

 FROM THE ARCHIVE:
 

 

 

The World's Biggest Nations Now Do Not Give A Phlying Phuck About CO2 Emissions

 

 

THE main reason why, despite countless scientific warnings from countles pseudo - scientists about dangerous consequences of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gas (GHG) emitted into the atmosphere by human activities and the fearmongering of politicians who insist that catastrophe is imminent if we do not abandon 'fossil fuels' (they mean hydrocarbons,) and reach 'net zero' CO2 emissions by tomorrown lunchtime, emissions continue to increase. Though it was often stated that ' The Science is settled,' to deflect criticim of the flawed research used by climate catastrophists, a growing number of reputable scientists are now saying climate change is natural and there is no crisis.  The fact that the warnings and predictions of doom ineffetual rantings of politicians and eco - warriors and the bleterings of 'climate scientists have never been borne out by observable evidence is rarely mentioned. Yet it’s been obvious for several years. It is this:

Most countries outside Western Europe, North America and Australasia either do not give a flying fuck about the impact of CO2 emissions on the climate or regard the issue as a priority, or regard economic growth, energy security, border security and feeding the population a greater priority.

These countries, comprising about 84 per cent of humanity, are today the source of about 77 per cent of emissions; (88 per cent if the United States, which has now joined their ranks, is included.)

Therefore, unless something happens very soon to persuade them to change their policies radically – and there’s no serious evidence to suggest such an event might be imminent – there’s no realistic prospect of the implementation of the urgent and substantial cuts in CO2 and bovine flatus (cow fart) emissions called for by many Western scientists and politicians. So great is the existential threat from CO2 emissions according to these people, that is caused upwards of 50,000 of them to zoom off to the small Brazilian city of Belem in 1500 private jet aeroplanes and various othrer types of CO2 emitting transport to hold their 30th totally ineffectual meeting (COP30) about it.

Currently there exists a 'policy' based on the alleged 'Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effect'. This effect is claimed to be responsible for the approximately 30°C (!) temperature gradient in Troposphere. (Really? 0.04% CO2 has 30°C effect? 😕) although over the past two or three years that Net Zero or Climate catastrophe narrative has started to fall apart.

This claimed 'Effect', takes no account of atmospheric pressure, first measured by Evangelista Torricelli. Using Torricelli's invention of the mercury barometer we can account for the temperature gradient in the Troposphere as entirely due to the 'pressure gradient'.

Earth's surface temperature, claimed to be enhanced by atmospheric CO2, is, in fact, augmented by the surface pressure of its atmosphere. That is also true on Venus. Venus has a surface pressure of 92 bar (1,330 psi) - 92 times that on Earth!
The Venus atmosphere is 96.5 % CO2, however, it is only the (surface) pressure that augments the Sun's temperature, just as on Earth.
Climate Change has nothing to do with CO2! (There's a nice slogan for a 'demo'!)

This so-called 'CO2 Greenhouse Effect' was an early error that failed to take into account the relationship between pressure & temperature - the basis of thermodynamics, the science that has driven the progress of the World economy since the invention of the steam engine.

Do we really want to allow some unscientific mumbo jumbo, chanted by activists in the UN, the EU, the UK HoP, or pseudo - scientific mumbo jumbo based on computerised mathematical models designed by amateurs who have no format training in computer programming or data handling to throw away the enormous  benefits of 300 years scientific progress because of their totally imaginary 'CO2 Greenhouse Effect'? Coincidentally all the predictions of catastrophe from these models have so far proved to be totally wrong.

What is never mentioned anywhere by either side of the climate debate is the actual composition of so-called " Greenhouse Gases".
The climate zealots bang on about GHGs and how they will kill us all as if CO2 were as lethal as cyanide gas. But between ranting about the evils of 'fossil fuels' and gluing their arses to major roads to gridlock thousands of CO2 emittingcars and goods vehicles, the Net Zero nutter never find time to explain exactly what GHGs really are.
 

CO2, the bete noir of lftist activism, is just 0.042% of atmosphere. That's 420 parts per million.
The most common gas in Earth's atmosphere - of which there are staggering 3500+ gases - is nitrogen, which comprises 78% of atmosphere, or, 780,000 parts per million.
The second most common gas is oxygen - 21%, or 210,000 ppm.
Third comes argon ( which most folk will never have heard of unless they are involved in welding stainless steel ) at 0.9% - or, 9000 ppm.
Three gases - 99.9% of atmosphere.
All the other 3500+ gases in the atmosphere make up the remaining 0.1% .
CO2 is actually less then 1/20th of 1% of atmosphere. Does that minute quantity of gas, which plants MUST have in order to obtain nutrients, seem to you like it will end life on Earth ???
As for GHGs in general, the most common GHG, which comprises 97% of all GHGs in the atmosphere, is, in fact - H2O. As water vapour. Or, CLOUDS as they are commonly called. Clouds trap heat generated by solar radiation and prevent it from escaping out into space. Without clouds, there would be no life on Earth because the mean temperature would be MINUS 15DEG C. It is below freezing in deserts at night despite temperatures being in the high 40s C during the day, because there are no clouds to trap the heat.
Like everything to do with the climate debate, the green zealots lie and obfuscate in order to promote their globalist agenda.

In "Fake Invisible Catastrophies And Threats Of Doom " by Dr. Patrick Moore an original member of Greenpeace and former President of Greenpeace, Canada  that the ideal CO2 level in Earth's atmosphere should be 875 ppm in order to promote optimum plant growth in order to feed as many folk as possible. It's somewhat ironic that the climate zealots are wanting us to abandon milk and dairy and take up a planet-based diet but at the same time are trying to stop the production of the very gas - CO2 - which could give us the plant growth that would make their dream come true. Never underestimate the ignorance of a Net Zero zealot. 

FROM THE ARCHIVE:
 

 

Scientists says Nuclear Is The Way Forward For Clean Energy – Do Ursidae Defecate In Sylvan Landscapes?

 

Climate Scientists' Mathematical Models Of Reality Wrong Again…New Study Shows Jet Stream Strengthening, Not Weakening
recent research  by Samantha Hallam et al published in the journal Climate Dynamics looks at the seasonal variations over decades in Northern Hemisphere jet stream latitude and speed over land for the period 1871–2011. The authors report that they found no evidence of weakening of the sort climate alarmists have been warning about for the past three decades.

Shock for The Green Blob - Rewilding is to blame for Mediterranean forest fires
Or at least, to be acccurate, rewilding is partially to blame for Mediterranean forest fires. Which is darkly amusing as that man most insistent upon rewilding, George Monbiot, is trying to tell us that it’s all about climate change.

Official Advice - Prepare For Blackouts This Winter
The UK government is putting plans together for days of organised blackouts this winter, in what they call a "reasonable worst-case scenario" for energy shortages, according to reports in manstream media. Naturally they are blaming this on the embargo on importing gas from Russia but in reality Britain has never imported any more than a small amout of its gas from Russia. The real reason politicians and energy company CEOs are panicking is entirely due to their obession with obtaining all our energy from intermittent sources like wind and sunshine ...

UK Households Are Paying Wind Turbine Owners To Not Generate Electricity
On another near windless day here in the United Kingdom, Boggart Blog came across a very interesting piece if news. According to figures published by the business and management consultancy LCP, british taxpayers have been paying operators of wind turbines farms for the time their windmills were NOT generating electricity increased to record levels last year ...

Net Zero Is A Dangerous Fantasy, But Scientists Believe In Fairies It Seems
With oil and gas prices rocketing and the highly propted sustainable energy sources performing way befow expectations the energy crisis currently gripping Europe (with worse to come as food shortages start to bite, polticians still seem more intent on pandering to the green lobby and chasing the dream of a fossil fuel free world rather securing the energy and food supplies needed by the people they serve.

New UN Report on Climate Change – Nothing New, Nothing True
The latest United Nations (“UN”) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) report, published this week, once again, in scaremongering tone and the language of the panic stricken, claims that the planet is in peril (we are facing climate disaster, the clock is at one minute to midnight, we must take urgent action to destroy civilisation if we are to save the planet, the usual over - dramatised guff designed to spread fear and panic,) basically the same claim as they have been making at least twice a month for the past 20 years.

We need energy security – not Net Zero
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted a major rethink in the West. We have suddenly found ourselves vulnerable not just to rising prices in oil and gas, but also to inflation in other commodities – such as food and fertiliser. Of all these problems, the security of our energy supply has most exercised minds.

Net Zero Gone With The Wind - Boris Johnson Plans Seven New Nuclear Plants And Shelves Wind Expansion
Reports in mainstream media suggest Boris Johnson has done a U turn on his recently announced massive expansion of wind powered generating capacity. Sources in Westminster claim Boris has shelved his masterplan for a giant, floating wind farm in The North Sea and the government will reconsider plans to double or even treble the number of wind turbines in the countryside and approve plans for up to seven new nuclear reactors instead.

Climate Change Research Paper Censored by The British Hydrological Society For Telling The Truth
The Daily Sceptic today published an article by retired research scientist James Dent, whose specialist field was hydrology and meteorology. Mr. Dent was involved in research projects aiemd at understanding the factors influencing climate, and their effects on environments, [ ... ] he was the World Meteorology Organisation Chief Technical Advisor to the Flood Forecasting and Warning Centre in Bangladesh, a low lying nation especially prone to flooding ....

Freak Weather Around The World Begs Questions
With Britain and other parts of northern Europe basking in unseasonably warm temperatures which are forecast to last for a few days, while parts of the USA gring to a halt under a blanket of snow dumped by freak storms are, accoring to climate scarmongers, a signal that irreversible warming had arrived, it is perhaps timely for a hot topic from ten years ago, geoengineering came under the microscope again. This report from Global Intel Hub seems a good way to kick off the debate. ... Continue reading >>>

The True Cost Of The Green Energy Boom Is Now Being Realized
For four decades we have been fed a constant stream of propaganda assuring us that green energy was the only way forward if we wanted to secure supplies of the energy essential to a modern society while preventing the environmental catastrophes that would be the inevitable consequence of climate change caused by the Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emitted by human industrial, commercial and social activity. ... Continue reading >>>

Electricity cuts and power crisis predicted for Britain’s New Year Holiday
Shapps carefully omits to mention that the government’s only contingency plan for providing the power needed to meet peaks of demand (a sudden cold snap for example) is to spark up the thousands of diesel generators the earth loving politicians have concealed in goods containers on compounds sited around the country. Yes you read that right, diesel generators ...

Now Even ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann Admits The ‘Pause’ In Global Warming Is Real
“It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims,” the paper in Nature Climate Change says.

German Scientist Confims Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has confirmed what those of us dubbed 'climate deniers' have been telling you for years ...

It Looks As If Carbon Credits Scam Has INCREASED CO2 Emissions
As the climate change scare becomes more and more exposed for the money making fraud it always was, they green weirdie beardie, rope sandal wearing tree huggers get more hysterical and stupid in their arguments that we must all return to medieval lifestyles, the billionaires like Al Gore who hope to profit from it keep flogging the dead horse and the angrier and more vicious the left wing hate mobs become in their witch hunts.

EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]

More CO2 Hysteria As The Private Jet Brigade Gather In Brazil For Another Save The Planet Virtue Signalling Jamboree

 

 

Over the next two weeks upwards of 30,000 freeloaders and moochers of the global elite will fly by private jet to Belem in Brazil for the latest United Nations IPCC climate conference. COP30 will see the three favourite climate scares resurrected and relentlessly broadcast to promote the rapidly fading Net Zero fantasy. These sacred cows are: breaching a 1.5°C global ‘threshold’ leading to runaway temperatures; human-caused tipping points producing unimaginable natural disasters; and attribution of single-event bad weather to the use of natural hydrocarbons. The 1.5°C figure is a meaningless number , the latest in a series invented by politicians and activists to befuddle unsteady minds; tipping points are climate model codswallop; and ditto attribution crystal ball-gazing. 

None are backed up by credible scientific evidence and observation. Which of course is why political elites have trashed the scientific process of inquiry, banned and cancelled any dissenting discussion and declared the matter ‘settled’. Mathematical models can always be manipulated to give the required answer, real data can be checked and debunked or verified by independent investigators. Luckily for the climate catastrophe grifters mainstream news organisation like The BBC will loyaly broadcast the lies and propaganda.

The foundation of the scam is temperature. The world is said to be warming dramatically, leading to tipping points and worsening extreme weather. Changes are said to be occurring at unprecedented rates and are caused primarily by humans increasing atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide. In fact the temperature rise is small, about 1°C over 200 years

The obsession with a trace gas and its ability to raise temperatures to catastrophic levels has been shown time and time again to be rubbish, but interestingly it is always referred to as CO2- constantly avoiding the word Carbon- as most intelligent people known all life is Carbon based.

At 425ppm, CO2 is slowly creeping back to a level that will protect all carbon based life, and that is 1000+ppm, it had dropped to under 190ppm- 150ppm is DEATH as plant based life dies, animals then die and hard on its heels, mankind dies.

Climate catastrophes that Eco Zealots have predicted have consistently failed to actually happen anywhere on the planet……. predictions from 1850 onwards, not one has happened……are they just waiting around or has someone been stretching facts aka lying in order to build a income stream of unlimited wealth being transferred from the majority to a minority all in the name of Climate Change.

In a world where climate change dominates headlines and shapes international policy, Dr. Tim Ball’s book, “Human Caused Global Warming: The Biggest Deception in History,” dares to challenge the prevailing narrative. Ball, a seasoned climatologist, presents a meticulously researched argument that questions the very foundations of anthropogenic global warming, igniting a fierce debate that resonates with both scientists and policymakers.

Ball’s journey from a believer in the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) findings to a vocal sceptic is at the heart of his book’s compelling narrative. The IPCC, once seen as a paragon of scientific consensus, is portrayed by Ball as a vehicle for political agendas rather than an impartial arbiter of climate science. He argues that the organization’s reports often prioritize political expediency over scientific rigor, a claim that has sparked intense controversy within the scientific community.

The Climategate scandal, which erupted in 2009 with the leak of thousands of emails from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, serves as a pivotal moment in Ball’s investigation. The emails revealed a disturbing pattern of data manipulation and efforts to suppress dissenting views, casting a shadow over the integrity of climate research. Ball uses this scandal to underscore his belief that the global warming narrative is not as scientifically robust as it appears. 

In another book presenting a sceptical view of climate change scaremongering,  “Global Warming: A Guide to the Science,” Willie Soon and his co-authors disclose that over 100 scientific studies show CO2 has negligible influence on global temperatures, contradicting mainstream climate alarmism. Historical data reveals that CO2 levels follow temperature changes, not the other way around.

They argue that primary driver of Earth’s greenhouse effect is water vapor and clouds, not CO2. Soon and his co - authors claim that even if we accept the claim about Carbon Dioxide  absorbing radiation, CO2’s net warming effect is far less catastrophic than the mathematical models used in prference to empirical data predict.

Rising CO2 levels recorded over recent decades have in fact led to global “greening,” enhanced photosynthesis, improved drought resistance in plants and increased crop yields – benefits ignored by climate activists. Computer models used to justify climate policies not only use 'adjusted data' rather than real data but also fail to account for natural variability, solar influences and ocean dynamics. The infamous “hockey stick” graph, once regarded as incontrovertible truth by the climate science mob, was debunked for cherry-picking data and mathematical errors.

Policies like carbon taxes, energy restrictions and food controls are tools for political control, economic manipulation and population reduction – not environmental protection. The climate agenda is a pretext for  United Nations technocratic tyranny, not science.

The debate over global warming has long been dominated by political agendas, sensationalist media narratives and an alliance of corporate and globalist interests pushing centralized control under the guise of environmentalism. However, a closer examination of the science reveals a far more nuanced reality – one that challenges the mainstream narrative of carbon dioxide (CO2) as the primary driver of catastrophic climate change, with thousands of respected and well - credentialed scientists openly opposing the catastrophic global warning narrative. 

FROM THE ARCHIVE:  

 

Scientists say Nuclear Is The Way Forward For Clean Energy – Do Ursidae Defecate In Sylvan Landscapes?

 

Climate Scientists' Mathematical Models Of Reality Wrong Again…New Study Shows Jet Stream Strengthening, Not Weakening
recent research  by Samantha Hallam et al published in the journal Climate Dynamics looks at the seasonal variations over decades in Northern Hemisphere jet stream latitude and speed over land for the period 1871–2011. The authors report that they found no evidence of weakening of the sort climate alarmists have been warning about for the past three decades.

Shock for The Green Blob - Rewilding is to blame for Mediterranean forest fires
Or at least, to be acccurate, rewilding is partially to blame for Mediterranean forest fires. Which is darkly amusing as that man most insistent upon rewilding, George Monbiot, is trying to tell us that it’s all about climate change.

Official Advice - Prepare For Blackouts This Winter
The UK government is putting plans together for days of organised blackouts this winter, in what they call a "reasonable worst-case scenario" for energy shortages, according to reports in manstream media. Naturally they are blaming this on the embargo on importing gas from Russia but in reality Britain has never imported any more than a small amout of its gas from Russia. The real reason politicians and energy company CEOs are panicking is entirely due to their obession with obtaining all our energy from intermittent sources like wind and sunshine ...

UK Households Are Paying Wind Turbine Owners To Not Generate Electricity
On another near windless day here in the United Kingdom, Boggart Blog came across a very interesting piece if news. According to figures published by the business and management consultancy LCP, british taxpayers have been paying operators of wind turbines farms for the time their windmills were NOT generating electricity increased to record levels last year ...

Net Zero Is A Dangerous Fantasy, But Scientists Believe In Fairies It Seems
With oil and gas prices rocketing and the highly propted sustainable energy sources performing way befow expectations the energy crisis currently gripping Europe (with worse to come as food shortages start to bite, polticians still seem more intent on pandering to the green lobby and chasing the dream of a fossil fuel free world rather securing the energy and food supplies needed by the people they serve.

New UN Report on Climate Change – Nothing New, Nothing True
The latest United Nations (“UN”) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) report, published this week, once again, in scaremongering tone and the language of the panic stricken, claims that the planet is in peril (we are facing climate disaster, the clock is at one minute to midnight, we must take urgent action to destroy civilisation if we are to save the planet, the usual over - dramatised guff designed to spread fear and panic,) basically the same claim as they have been making at least twice a month for the past 20 years.

We need energy security – not Net Zero
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted a major rethink in the West. We have suddenly found ourselves vulnerable not just to rising prices in oil and gas, but also to inflation in other commodities – such as food and fertiliser. Of all these problems, the security of our energy supply has most exercised minds.

Net Zero Gone With The Wind - Boris Johnson Plans Seven New Nuclear Plants And Shelves Wind Expansion
Reports in mainstream media suggest Boris Johnson has done a U turn on his recently announced massive expansion of wind powered generating capacity. Sources in Westminster claim Boris has shelved his masterplan for a giant, floating wind farm in The North Sea and the government will reconsider plans to double or even treble the number of wind turbines in the countryside and approve plans for up to seven new nuclear reactors instead.

Climate Change Research Paper Censored by The British Hydrological Society For Telling The Truth
The Daily Sceptic today published an article by retired research scientist James Dent, whose specialist field was hydrology and meteorology. Mr. Dent was involved in research projects aiemd at understanding the factors influencing climate, and their effects on environments, [ ... ] he was the World Meteorology Organisation Chief Technical Advisor to the Flood Forecasting and Warning Centre in Bangladesh, a low lying nation especially prone to flooding ....

Freak Weather Around The World Begs Questions
With Britain and other parts of northern Europe basking in unseasonably warm temperatures which are forecast to last for a few days, while parts of the USA gring to a halt under a blanket of snow dumped by freak storms are, accoring to climate scarmongers, a signal that irreversible warming had arrived, it is perhaps timely for a hot topic from ten years ago, geoengineering came under the microscope again. This report from Global Intel Hub seems a good way to kick off the debate. ... Continue reading >>>

The True Cost Of The Green Energy Boom Is Now Being Realized
For four decades we have been fed a constant stream of propaganda assuring us that green energy was the only way forward if we wanted to secure supplies of the energy essential to a modern society while preventing the environmental catastrophes that would be the inevitable consequence of climate change caused by the Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emitted by human industrial, commercial and social activity. ... Continue reading >>>

Electricity cuts and power crisis predicted for Britain’s New Year Holiday
Shapps carefully omits to mention that the government’s only contingency plan for providing the power needed to meet peaks of demand (a sudden cold snap for example) is to spark up the thousands of diesel generators the earth loving politicians have concealed in goods containers on compounds sited around the country. Yes you read that right, diesel generators ...

Now Even ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann Admits The ‘Pause’ In Global Warming Is Real
“It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims,” the paper in Nature Climate Change says.

German Scientist Confims Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has confirmed what those of us dubbed 'climate deniers' have been telling you for years ...

It Looks As If Carbon Credits Scam Has INCREASED CO2 Emissions
As the climate change scare becomes more and more exposed for the money making fraud it always was, they green weirdie beardie, rope sandal wearing tree huggers get more hysterical and stupid in their arguments that we must all return to medieval lifestyles, the billionaires like Al Gore who hope to profit from it keep flogging the dead horse and the angrier and more vicious the left wing hate mobs become in their witch hunts.

EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]

Climate Pseudo - science Catastrophe Predictions Proved Wrong Again

 

 

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer will attend the COP30 climate summit in Brazil in November to accelerate Britain's efforts on pursuing net zero and driving green growth, his spokesperson said on Monday.

"The prime minister will attend the COP30 climate summit to be held in Belem, Brazil next month, despite reports previously suggesting he would skip the meeting, the location of which is controversial as a large slice of Brazilian rain forest has been destroyed to accommodate it. This turnaround has surprised mainstream media but Sir Slimer changed his mind because net zero is the economic opportunity of the 21st century," his spokesperson said.

Downing Street confirmed on Monday that Sir Keir would attend the summit in Belem, near the mouth of the Amazon river. "We're restoring the UK as a global leader on climate action and green growth, and you can expect to see the PM driving forward that agenda at the COP30 summit," the Downing Street press release gushed. The number or prominent politicians and scientists who have questioned the climate change narrative is never mentioned of course.

We Boggart Bloggers are of the opinion that Slimer's change of mind is really because with a triple Tsunami of brown smelly stuff about to hit Britain's biggest array of wind turbines from three different directions; stalling the grooming gangs inquiry, the failure of the government's flagship Net Zero policies, and pulling the plug on a court case that woud expose China's malign influence in matters of national scurity, our snivelling wimp of a leader would rather be 9000 miles away helping to lay the foundations for global technoloical tyranny. 

Or perhaps Starmer, ever the opportunist who misses the opportunity has been swayed by hysterical claims from the climate catastrophe lobby citing new research which shows a vast increase in the number of wildfires around the world and feels this is a crisis he understands and in which he can play the role of world statesman. 

Unfortunately the wildfire hysteria was wrong, just the usual scaremongering based on mathematical models rather than reality and probably inspired by the failure of Net Zero policies. In genuine research  data set after data set shows that the world burns ever less in terms of burned area. Disrupting this unhelpful reality, a splashy paper in Nature last year finally found a worrying narrative: “extreme wildfire events” had more than doubled globally over the past two decades. Using satellite data from 2003 to 2023, the authors clustered fire hotspots and tallied their “fire radiative power” – a proxy for intensity. Predictably, this ignited a bonfire of the vanities for politicians and the media. From The New York Times to CBS News the headlines blared warnings of a planet ablaze, seeing fiercer fires as proof that we are hurtling toward a global inferno. 

Analysis shows that extreme fire is down by 35 per cent over the same period. The fires are burning less intensely, and we already knew that less area is getting burned as time goes by – but this contradicts the extreme climate script, so as with the redent delaration by 1900 scientists that there is no climate crisis, we heard crickets from major media outlets.

Perhaps Starmer sees hilself as the charismatic leader who, by deploying his lawyerly skill of changing the truth by twisting the meaning of words, can save the planet from a greener and more prosperous future thanks to a modest increase in atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. 

But while the Prime Minister is clocking up more air miles and dodging the flak for his governments abject failure there is an destructive apocalypse happening every single day somewhere in the British countryside as Mad Ed Miliband , the minister for Net Zero destroys our economy, living standards, food producing land and historic landscapes by covering over thousands of acres with millions of poisonous solar panels bearing long term heavy metal components and to build solar energy plants that produce very little power (and none at all during the hours of darkness when we still need electricity,) and has driven our energy bills to the highest in the world. 

 Please, please write to you MP and your Local Council, to resist by all means 'pressures' from central Labour government, block roads, dump dung on the Town Hall steps,lie down in front of the bulldozers, do anything you can to stop approvals of all renewable energy plants beginning tomorrow until the promises of abundant cheap energy are fulfilled or more likely proved false, and their long term harm to the environment is revealed. 

And furthermore we must keep Starmer away from all international summits of world leaders because the man is so pathetically desperate for approval from powerful tyrants like China's Chairman Xi he's likely to return and announce that he has sold the nation to China and in future we will rent it back from them for a sum set at 105% of GDP annually.

 FROM THE ARCHIVE: 

 

2025 To Be Warmest Year Ever? No, It's Just More Statistical Jiggery Pokery From The Green Lobby

 

THE UK Met Office, fond of repeating itself as ever has announced that this yeaer is set to be the warmest on record and that for the previous warmest yeasr on record, 2024 the mean global temperature was 1.53 ± 0.08°C above the 1850-1900 pre-industrial average.

In that statement the number of the year is probably the only  piece of true data. Claiming that we can measure the mean temperature of the entire earth and its oceans for a whole year to that level of accuracy is questionable, surely. And what, exactly, is that ‘pre-industrial’ average? How was it measured? Even if we accept tht the industrial ersa becan in 1850 (it actually began about 100 years earlier. In 1709 Abraham Darby demondtrated the firt coke fuelled blast furnace and in 1712 Thomas Newcomen invented the first steam engine for use in mining. Withinin a few decades these technologies were in widespread use and had inspied many other industrial asdvances. So the start of the era canot be specificaly defined but industrialisation was widespread by 1850.

Another highly suspect point about Met Office figures: Actual temperatures are never quoted, we are given only anomalies. Annual figures are always related to the average of global temperatures during that critical 1850-1900 pre-industrial period. We are never given the actual global mean temperature, something around 15C, because that would not be sufficiently worrying. We also never see screaming headlines assuring us that many respected scientists disagree with the CO2 hypothesis and dismiss the climate change scare as a scam.

When it comes to discussions about climate, any change is always attributed to CO2 generated by burning fossil fuels - despite CO2 being less than 1/20th of 1% of atmosphere currently and is essential for the continuance of all life forms.. No other factors are mentioned that affect our climate/planet - nor is the fact that measurements of atmospheric CO2 which satisfy exacting modern scientific requirements were only first taken in 1958. Any measurements before that date must be considered suspect at least, if not dismissed totally as inaccurate. Ice-core and deep geological samples show CO2 was at 2000 ppm for most of the past 600 million years, and has been as high as 9000 ppm. And temperatures were much lower than today during many of these periods. To draw attention to these points would not serve the Net Zero / Climate Catastrophe narratives so you will not see or hear much about them in  mainstream media.

Thus it is demonstrated that the entire case for climate catastrophe is based on statistical jiggery pokery.

Global temperatures do fluctuate over very long periods of time. Some time ago mainstream media featured a story about an archaeological dig in Northern Greenland and analysis of fossils showed the temperature there 2.6 million years ago - before the onset of the current ice-age - was 19 deg C HOTTER than today. And yes, we ARE in an ice-age - large ice-sheets in the polar regions prove this. These sheets haven't always been there - fossils discovered near the North Pole show animals such as camels and sloths once lived there. That should be considered in the context of tectonic plate movement of course. But even at a sped of four or five centimetres a year a landmass can cover a fair distance in a million years.

When it comes to global temperature variations we must also consider planetary movements. The Earth rotates on it's axis once in 24 hrs - a speed of 1000 mph. The Earth orbits the Sun once in 365.25 days - a speed of 66,000 mph. The Earth's orbit is not circular, nor is it regular. The orbit is elongated - an elipse - and at the furthest distance from the Sun in summer ( northern hemisphere ) this is called "aphelion". 

When the Earth is closest to the Sun in winter ( northern hemisphere ) this is called " perihelion". The Earth is tilted on it's axis at an angle that varies between 21 deg and 24 deg from the vertical over 44000 yrs. This tilt is what gives us seasons. This does change - a process called " the precession of the equinoxes" which is caused by the Sun's gravitational pull on the Earth causes the Earth to be forced "backwards" against the direction of rotation ( anti-clockwise). Over 26500 yrs, the Earth completes once full rotation "backwards". 

During this process, the Earth changes the way it faces the Sun - so that half-way through the precessionary cycle, summer and winter " change places". The summer solstice in the northern hemisphere will be in December and the winter solstice in June. This means, because of the way the Earth faces the Sun, northern hemisphere winters will be VERY cold and summers will be North-African HOT. 

In addition to all this, the gravitational effects of other planets - mainly Saturn and Jupiter - plus our moon, Luna, and the Sun itself, all exert a "push and pull" on Earth's orbit around the Sun - the path of orbit can vary by as much as 5 million kms. And if we move nearer to the Sun, the Earth gets hotter. Simples, as they say. They there are variations in the Sun's output - solar maximums and minimums - more heat or less heat in other words.

All these things affect Earth's temperature and climate and must be considered when it comes to discussing "change". 

So as the MET Office does not consider any of these factors we may as well stop worrying because nobody really knows what is going on, but on a global scale even small changes take centuries.

FROM THE ARCHIVE:

  

The Collapse Of Net Zero And The Climate Catastrophe Scam Is Gaining Momentum,Gas Oil and Coal Are Staging A Comeback

 

Accoring to former UK Prime Minister Theresa May, tying the government and by default the long suffering taxpayers of this country into a legally binding commitment to achieve 'net zero' by 2050 was one of the crowning achievements of her time in office. Well let's be honest, the Maybot screwed up every contemporary policy action so there were no other achievements with which anyone who cared thirty years in the future could compare. Ironically 6 years down the line May's Net Zero 'crowning achievement' has come to look like by far the biggest cock up of her disaster strewn three years in office.

After $£€billions of taxpaters money has been spaffed on crackpot science and whacko technology, the effort to find the Holy Grail of Green political activism, a technology that will give us endless supplies of free, clean, energy, the Net Zero scam has finally run its course.

The case for wind power goes up in flames (Picture: BBC News ) 

The Tide Is Turning Decisively Against Net Zero 

 by Tilak Doshi, posted on Substack 6 September 2025

In the belief that atmospheric CO₂ is the control knob of ‘dangerous’ impending climate change, Net Zero emerged in the 2010s as the global rallying cry to ‘save the planet’. By the time the Paris Agreement was concluded in 2015, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) established the arbitrary 1.5°C limit on global temperature increase and established the ‘Net Zero by 2050’ policy target for developed countries around the globe.

But a spate of recent headlines suggests that the ‘Net Zero by 2050’ policy is falling apart. There is a growing realisation across advanced economies that the grandiose project of achieving ‘Net Zero by 2050’ is collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions. What was once heralded as a consensus across the political class, corporate boardrooms and multilateral agencies now looks increasingly like an edifice of ideology built on a vaporous, oxymoronic ‘consensus science‘. The rising tide of empirical reality — the costs of intermittent renewables, the geopolitical consequences of energy insecurity and the sheer scale of power demand growth from artificial intelligence infrastructure — has swept away the carefully constructed narrative of inevitability around the so-called energy transition.

Yet, as David Blackmon reminds us in his well-subscribed Energy Transition Absurdities Substack blog, “climate alarmism is demoralised but it is far from dead”. It would seem that no amount of evidence on prohibitive system costs of intermittent renewable energy and their adverse impact on energy prices can convince diehard climate doomsters otherwise.

In the belief that atmospheric CO2 is the control knob of ‘dangerous’ impending climate change, Net Zero emerged in the 2010s as the global rallying cry to ‘save the planet’. By the time the Paris Agreement was concluded in 2015, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) established the arbitrary 1.5°C limit on global temperature increase and established the ‘Net Zero by 2050’ policy target for developed countries around the globe. But a spate of recent headlines suggests that the ‘Net Zero by 2050’ policy is falling apart. 

There is a growing realisation across advanced economies that the grandiose project of achieving ‘Net Zero by 2050’ is collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions. What was once heralded as a consensus across the political class, corporate boardrooms and multilateral agencies now looks increasingly like an edifice of ideology built on a vaporous, oxymoronic ‘consensus science‘. 

The rising tide of empirical reality — the costs of intermittent renewables, the geopolitical consequences of energy insecurity and the sheer scale of power demand growth from artificial intelligence infrastructure — has swept away the carefully constructed narrative of inevitability around the so-called energy transition. Yet, as David Blackmon reminds us in his well-subscribed Energy Transition Absurdities Substack blog, “climate alarmism is demoralised but it is far from dead”. It would seem that no amount of evidence on prohibitive system costs of intermittent renewable energy and their adverse impact on energy prices can convince diehard climate doomsters otherwise." target="_blank">Read in full (long article)

 FROM THE ARCHIVE:

 

 

Scientists says Nuclear Is The Way Forward For Clean Energy – Do Ursidae Defecate In Sylvan Landscapes?

 

Climate Scientists' Mathematical Models Of Reality Wrong Again…New Study Shows Jet Stream Strengthening, Not Weakening
recent research  by Samantha Hallam et al published in the journal Climate Dynamics looks at the seasonal variations over decades in Northern Hemisphere jet stream latitude and speed over land for the period 1871–2011. The authors report that they found no evidence of weakening of the sort climate alarmists have been warning about for the past three decades.

Shock for The Green Blob - Rewilding is to blame for Mediterranean forest fires
Or at least, to be acccurate, rewilding is partially to blame for Mediterranean forest fires. Which is darkly amusing as that man most insistent upon rewilding, George Monbiot, is trying to tell us that it’s all about climate change.

Official Advice - Prepare For Blackouts This Winter
The UK government is putting plans together for days of organised blackouts this winter, in what they call a "reasonable worst-case scenario" for energy shortages, according to reports in manstream media. Naturally they are blaming this on the embargo on importing gas from Russia but in reality Britain has never imported any more than a small amout of its gas from Russia. The real reason politicians and energy company CEOs are panicking is entirely due to their obession with obtaining all our energy from intermittent sources like wind and sunshine ...

UK Households Are Paying Wind Turbine Owners To Not Generate Electricity
On another near windless day here in the United Kingdom, Boggart Blog came across a very interesting piece if news. According to figures published by the business and management consultancy LCP, british taxpayers have been paying operators of wind turbines farms for the time their windmills were NOT generating electricity increased to record levels last year ...

Net Zero Is A Dangerous Fantasy, But Scientists Believe In Fairies It Seems
With oil and gas prices rocketing and the highly propted sustainable energy sources performing way befow expectations the energy crisis currently gripping Europe (with worse to come as food shortages start to bite, polticians still seem more intent on pandering to the green lobby and chasing the dream of a fossil fuel free world rather securing the energy and food supplies needed by the people they serve.

New UN Report on Climate Change – Nothing New, Nothing True
The latest United Nations (“UN”) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) report, published this week, once again, in scaremongering tone and the language of the panic stricken, claims that the planet is in peril (we are facing climate disaster, the clock is at one minute to midnight, we must take urgent action to destroy civilisation if we are to save the planet, the usual over - dramatised guff designed to spread fear and panic,) basically the same claim as they have been making at least twice a month for the past 20 years.

We need energy security – not Net Zero
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted a major rethink in the West. We have suddenly found ourselves vulnerable not just to rising prices in oil and gas, but also to inflation in other commodities – such as food and fertiliser. Of all these problems, the security of our energy supply has most exercised minds.

Net Zero Gone With The Wind - Boris Johnson Plans Seven New Nuclear Plants And Shelves Wind Expansion
Reports in mainstream media suggest Boris Johnson has done a U turn on his recently announced massive expansion of wind powered generating capacity. Sources in Westminster claim Boris has shelved his masterplan for a giant, floating wind farm in The North Sea and the government will reconsider plans to double or even treble the number of wind turbines in the countryside and approve plans for up to seven new nuclear reactors instead.

Climate Change Research Paper Censored by The British Hydrological Society For Telling The Truth
The Daily Sceptic today published an article by retired research scientist James Dent, whose specialist field was hydrology and meteorology. Mr. Dent was involved in research projects aiemd at understanding the factors influencing climate, and their effects on environments, [ ... ] he was the World Meteorology Organisation Chief Technical Advisor to the Flood Forecasting and Warning Centre in Bangladesh, a low lying nation especially prone to flooding ....

Freak Weather Around The World Begs Questions
With Britain and other parts of northern Europe basking in unseasonably warm temperatures which are forecast to last for a few days, while parts of the USA gring to a halt under a blanket of snow dumped by freak storms are, accoring to climate scarmongers, a signal that irreversible warming had arrived, it is perhaps timely for a hot topic from ten years ago, geoengineering came under the microscope again. This report from Global Intel Hub seems a good way to kick off the debate. ... Continue reading >>>

The True Cost Of The Green Energy Boom Is Now Being Realized
For four decades we have been fed a constant stream of propaganda assuring us that green energy was the only way forward if we wanted to secure supplies of the energy essential to a modern society while preventing the environmental catastrophes that would be the inevitable consequence of climate change caused by the Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emitted by human industrial, commercial and social activity. ... Continue reading >>>

Electricity cuts and power crisis predicted for Britain’s New Year Holiday
Shapps carefully omits to mention that the government’s only contingency plan for providing the power needed to meet peaks of demand (a sudden cold snap for example) is to spark up the thousands of diesel generators the earth loving politicians have concealed in goods containers on compounds sited around the country. Yes you read that right, diesel generators ...

Now Even ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann Admits The ‘Pause’ In Global Warming Is Real
“It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims,” the paper in Nature Climate Change says.

German Scientist Confims Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has confirmed what those of us dubbed 'climate deniers' have been telling you for years ...

It Looks As If Carbon Credits Scam Has INCREASED CO2 Emissions
As the climate change scare becomes more and more exposed for the money making fraud it always was, they green weirdie beardie, rope sandal wearing tree huggers get more hysterical and stupid in their arguments that we must all return to medieval lifestyles, the billionaires like Al Gore who hope to profit from it keep flogging the dead horse and the angrier and more vicious the left wing hate mobs become in their witch hunts.

EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]