
Pcture: www.mortapresvaccination
With rumours circulating about the WHO and various global health charities running rehearsals for how they will respond to the next pandemic (which probably means they've developed the vaccine and now only have to genetically engineer the pathogen to go with it,) we should remind ourselves that five years after the rollout of COVID vaccines began and with nearly 50,000 reports of potentially fatal cardiac adverse events following the rollout of AstraZeneca’s covid vaccine, the
UK’s medicines regulator continued to assure the public that the
vaccine was safe and effective an FOI request has revealed.
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
received 48,472 cardiac event reports in 2021 alone but made no attempt
to suspend the jab, denying a causal link. The data from a freedom of information (FOI) request shows that almost half the reports were received in the first three months after the rollout.
By late March 2021, 23,914 cardiovascular events had already been
reported in the 18 years-plus age group. (MHRA data also shows 11,600
children received first doses plus 10,000 second doses resulting in 248
Yellow Cards giving a reporting rate of 1-in-47.)
According to MHRA data, in addition to heart issues they received
6,175 reports of blood-clotting events during the same period. The
number of heart-related reports was roughly 685 per cent higher than the number of blood-clot reports received by the MHRA.
Vaxzevria, the vaccine’s brand name, became known as the ‘clot shot’
on social media as it caused vaccine-induced immune thrombotic
thrombocytopenia (VITT). Potentially fatal blood clots could form in the
brain, abdomen, lungs or large veins, usually 5-30 days after the first
vaccination. But we were still told the shot was 'safe and effective,' and those of us who did some research on the history of MRNA gene editing tehniques and on the true nature of the SARS-Cov2' virus were dismissed as conspiracy theorists, cranks, anti - science nutters and granny killers.
Fve years later as the COVID narrative unravels with the vaccine from Astra Zeneca having beeen proved 100% ineffective and dangerous to many people, the deeper truth is now staring o come out.
In October 2019, shortly before the COVID outbreak, Bill Gates and
other influencial individuals began planning how to censor vaccine
safety advocates from social media during a table-top simulation of a
worldwide pandemic, known as Event 201.
Gates’ co-conspirators
included representatives from the World Bank, the World Economic Forum,
Bloomberg/Johns Hopkins University Populations Center, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, various media powerhouses, the Chinese
government, a former Central Intelligence Agency director, the Big Pharma cartel, and the
finance and biosecurity industries.
The participants primarily
focused on planning industry-centric, fear-mongering, police-state
strategies for managing an imaginary global coronavirus contagion
culminating in mass censorship of social media.
The participants
discussed mechanisms for controlling “disinformation” and
“misinformation,” by flooding the media with propaganda, imposing
penalties for spreading falsehoods and discrediting the anti-vaccination
movement.
Jane Halton, of Australia’s ANZ Bank, one of the
authors of Australia’s oppressive “no jab, no pay” policy, assured the
participants that Gates Foundation is creating algorithms “to sift
through information on these social media platforms” to protect the
public from dangerous thoughts and information.
George Gao, the
director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control, worries about how to
suppress “rumors” that the virus is laboratory generated: “People
believe, ‘This is man made’ and some pharmaceutical company made the
virus.”
Chen Huang, an Apple research scientist, Google scholar
and the world’s leading expert on tracking and tracing and facial
recognition technology, role-plays the newscaster reporting on
government countermeasures.
He blames riots on anti-vaccine
activists and predicts that Twitter and Facebook will cooperate in
“deleting a disturbing number of accounts dedicated to spreading
misinformation about the outbreak” and to implement “internet shutdowns …
to quell panic.”
Dr. Tara Kirk Sell, a senior scholar at
Bloomberg School of Health’s Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security,
worries that pharmaceutical companies are being accused of introducing
the virus so they can make money on drugs and vaccines:
“We have
seen public faith in their products plummet.” She notes with alarm that
“Unrest, due to false rumors and divisive messaging, is rising and is
exacerbating spread of the disease as levels of trust fall and people
stop cooperating with response efforts. This is a massive problem, one
that threatens governments and trusted institutions.”
Sell reminds
her fellow collaborators that “We know that social media is now the
primary way that many people get their news, so interruptions to these
platforms could curb the spread of misinformation.”
There are many
ways, Sell advises, for government and industry allies to accomplish
this objective: “Some governments have taken control of national access
to the Internet. Others are censoring websites and social media content
and a small number have shut down Internet access completely to prevent
the spread of misinformation. Penalties have been put in place for
spreading harmful falsehoods, including arrests.”
Stephen Redd,
then chief of the Public Health Service, had the notion that
governments should mine social media data to identify people with
negative beliefs: “I think with the social media platforms, there’s an
opportunity to understand who it is that’s susceptible … to
misinformation, so I think there’s an opportunity to collect data from
that communication mechanism.”
Adrian Thomas of Johnson &
Johnson announces “We are doing clinical trials in new antiretrovirals
and vaccines.” He recommends a strategy to address the problems to these
companies when rumors were spreading that their products “are causing
deaths and so patients are not taking them anymore.” He suggests, “Maybe
we’re making the mistake of reporting and counting all the fatalities
and infections.”
Kevin McAleese, communications officer for
Gates-funded agricultural projects, observes that: “To me, it is clear
countries need to make strong efforts to manage both mis- and
disinformation. We know social media companies are working around the
clock to combat these disinformation campaigns.
So maybe the conspiracy theorists were right all along and the pandemic was a hoax, a psyop staged by globalist and corporate interests for profit and political advantage.
As it happens, the latest DOJ batch of
Epstein files reveal that by the time the world encountered COVID-19,
the financial, philanthropic, and institutional machinery to manage—and
profit from—a pandemic was already firmly in place.
While
the Epstein files have reignited scrutiny around specific
relationships, their deeper significance lies in how they intersect with
a much longer and largely unexamined timeline. Public records,
institutional initiatives, and financial instruments indicate that the
conceptual foundations of pandemic preparedness as a managed financial
and security category began to take shape in the late 1990s and early
2000s, as philanthropic capital, global health governance, and risk
finance increasingly converged. Following the 2008 financial crisis,
this framework rapidly accelerated—expanding through reinsurance
markets, parametric triggers, donor-advised funding structures, and
global simulations—years before COVID-19 made the architecture visible
to the public.
Now who can say the vaccine sceptic are cranks and nutters.
FROM THE ARCHIVE:
It is not 3 European nations, it is the whole of Europe under the EU, as well as Canada, Australia that have done this. It was also America, until Trump sealed southern border, but illegal immigrants still flood through northern border. This is a global plan to destabilise the West. So is the war on farmers, helped along by the war on industry and economies by the insanity of netzero based on the climate hoax. Censorship was always part of the plan, hence all the advanced digital infrastructure already in place from companies like Palantir (shaping up to be the next career - threatening scandal for Starmer & Co.), Google, Apple etc. While left wing and extreme leftwing ideas have helped this war along, clearly seen in Starmer's approach, we can also see in Britain that the Conservatives laid all of this in place. ie, the uniparty is a product of following these same edicts, the ideology of the UN, the WEF, the WHO, the Trilateral Commission, the EU commission, are woven into State goals and legislation. This is why if we don't vote Reform we are lost. Reform is way more than politics, it is a chance of revolution to win the war against this movement to destroy the nation state/
In the UK, where free speech is already on life support, the UK Technology Secretary, has said the Government will give its “full backing” should the British communications watchdog decide to block access to the X in the UK and accused those opposing the measures of allying with “those who think the creation and publication of sexually manipulated images of women and children is acceptable”.