President Zelensky’s warmongering speech to the UK Parliament yesterday unequivocally and unashamedly made the case for starting World War 3 in order to polish the oversized ego of this little clown with the piano playing penis when he demanded that Nato-grade fighter jets to be sent to Ukraine.
In what is starting to feel like a repeat of the recent tank saga, what seemed impossible is taking on an unassailable momentum. As then, Britain is leading the West towards the inevitable self - immolation of nuclear conflict with Russia.
Should we commit to sending jets it will take Ukraine months to receive
them, but will immediately be seen as an intolerable provocation by Russia, which alread has its military forces or a war footing. OK say the war hawks in Washington, London, Paris, Berlin and Brussels will say this is going to be a long war, and saying we will send them
will be a huge blow to Russian morale. They have saidame about every incremental increase in volume and sophictication of military hardware donated to the neo - Nazi nutters in Kiev and yet the Russian war machine grinds on.
Last month it was battle grade heavy tanks that Zelensky demanded and was promised, though it will me months before any are delivered and more months before the Ukies are trained to use them. Tanks, say the military bureaucrats are the first half of the winning equation, and fighter jets the second half.
F16 Fighter (source: the defensepost.com)
Though they may be few in number, the British Typhoon fighters would inevitably unlock a much larger number of European Typhoons or F-16s, as the British tank did with European tanks. It’s true that as things stand we have very few fighters to spare. The general idea however is that with air support for their donated tanks the Ukies will be able to rout Russian ground forces. Nice theory but it overlooks the fact that Russia has modern, highly advanced aircraft technology in the MIG35s and Sukhoi Su57s both of which designs are less than five years old, more than capable of taking on the 30 year old Typhoon Eurofighters and 45 year old F16s.
Aside from the fact that military aircraft technology development in the west has lagged behind that of Russia and China, the idea that sending these ageing aircraft to Ukraine will guarantee a quick and total victory over Russia is quite literally pie in the sky. Even
experienced pilots cannot just ‘type convert’ onto modern generation
jets like Typhoon. Without questioning Ukrainian pilots’ capabilities (although it would not be unfair to do so,) there does not exist the capability to train people from such a flying
background onto a completely different combat platform. It doesn’t
really help that they have fighter experience. They are going to have to
‘unlearn’ so much that will be counter-intuitive to the operation of
these jets. Nobody has ever tried a rapid type conversion programme such
as this, there is no syllabus, no standards written, no instructor
training system. Forget that the RAF has not even the capacity to train
its own fast jet pilots right now. Don’t even start on maintenancen training for engineers, logistics support, third line maintenance, battle damage
repair, armourer training…. It’s not even worth considering unless the
US leads. They are the only people with the resources and infrastructure
to even know where to start so talk of the UK leading is bollocks. Forget Sunak's virtue signalling and the follow-my-leader games of other European leaders, nobody has thought this through properly.
Sukhoi Su57 (source: defencetalk.com)
MIG35 (source: alphacoders.com)
More
importantly, the donations would signal the most significant
demonstration to Putin that as far as NATO is concerned this is no local war but a concerted attempt by the USA and its allies to destroy Russia. The
Russians still believe if they can stick the war out as long enough,
they will crack the western will to keep supporting Ukraine. Recent reports warn that
the Russians are apparently preparing 500,000 conscripts to throw into the melee for a spring assault intended to break the will
of the Ukrainians. If that fails and The Kremlin knows that Western
jets are on the way, that could be enough to push Russia into lanuching unrestrained aerial warfare, sending in wave after wave of heavy bombers to destroy the entire country.One thing is certain, Russia will not give in, knowing any withdrawal now would result in the fast tracking of Ukraine into NATO
One of the underlying principles of the United Nations is that no distant military power is allowed to place its military on your border, unless of course you are America or NATO.By allowing Ukraine to join NATO, Russia would ensure that the whole of its long border with Ukraine would be garrisoned by American, British and European troops backed by long range missiles, all type of military aircraft and a whole range of high tech military gadgetry.
The former head of the CIA claims America has exercised a proxy war against Russia for years, that NATO has been training and arming the Ukraine military for a decade. Evidence indicates America has insisted on allowing Ukraine entry to NATO , effectively leading to an anti Russian state armed to the teeth with advanced western weapons along the Russian border. The existential threat this posed to Russia was repeatedly ignored by Washington resulting in the invasion taking place.
We now face a conflict in which neither Russia nor America can afford to lose, defeating Russia on the battlefield risks forcing Russia to consider deploying nuclear weapons, any Russian victory would be seen as a defeat for the Biden administration. As for Ukraine, the ultra natiobalist neo - Nazis are in control demanding total victory and the destruction of the Russian state.
Instead of diffusing the conflict America and its allies are hell bent on escalation, happy to wallow in the platitudes voiced by Zelensky while serving his every demand.
I hope for all our sakes the red button is never pressed , should it happen what then ?
RELATED:
Who Blew Up The Nordstream Pipeline
So whodunnit? Sabotage of undersea gas pipe will escalate tension and move the world closer to nuclear war, but who is behind it, Russia in a bid to put more presure on Europe, Ukraine in an attempt to drag NATO into direct action, or the USA using a CIA false flag event to advance its own agenda.
Has Putin Has Pushed Europe Into Economic Depression, Hyperrinflation and Currency Collapse?
Though it was entirely predictable and indeed had been expected for some time, the news over the weekend that the Nord Stream 1 pipeline which feeds gas from Russia to northern Europe via The Baltic route had been shut down completely by The Kremlin in retaliation for the continued financial and military support given by NATO and EU member states to Ukraine in the conflict with Russia. The European Commission, governing body of the EU, immediately put the community on something close to a war footing, ...
Continue reading >>>
Do We Have A Winter Of Civil Disobedience Ahead?
As many people in Britain slap on the apres sun gloop in the wake of what passes for a heatwave in these cool cloudy climes, our inept politicians caught with their pants down by unusual weather as usual have heard that that winter is coming and are making plans for a coldwave.
We are in the grip of an energy crisis at the height of summer. Last week, it was reported that the UK government is laying down plans for a “reasonable worst-case scenario” including blackouts for industry and even households. And this is as energy prices spiral out of control to new records every day.
Is Russia Selling Its Oil To The World Through An Obscure Egyptian Port?
As this blog predicted when NATO and EU member states shot themselves in the foot by reacting to Russia's invasion of Ukraine with sanctions that prevented Russia from selling oil, gas and vital raw materials to the countries that needed them most, the NATO and EU member states, the Russians have had no problems finding alternative customers for their gas and oil and no problem getting oil into the world's commodity markets through the back door.
Are US Supplied Long Range Missiles Really Winning The War For Ukraine?
Since very soon after the start of the war between Russia and Ukraine western powers, USA, UK, EU and NATO have been doing everything possible to prolong and escalate the war. The latest move is to provide the Ukrainian military with long range HIMARS missile. Mainstream media are claiming this has tilted the balance in Ukraine's favour. But for what? To prolong the slaughter? ...
As the war in Ukraine grinds on and Russia steps up its economic war against the west and in particular The European Union, claims made recently by the idiotically 'woke' leaders of Europe's main economic and military powers that the West has a once-in-a–generation chance to severely weaken Russia’s capabilities, both militarily and geopolitically, look increasingly hollow. Putin's critics have cited 'Western unity' as one of the main reasons why Russia will be economically destroyed and politically humiliated when the Ukraine's military finally claim victory.
European Union Is Again Close To A Meltdown As Eurozone Economy Collapses
Once more we return to the political instability and economic fragility of the European Union as the conflict in Ukraine combined with loonytoons Climate Change mitigation policies, the failure of 'sustainables' to meet ever increasing demand for electricity, fod shortages and rampant price inflation put economic and social pressure on governments of member states ...
Russian Long Range Missile Test Fuels Nuclear War Fears As NATO Pushed Ukraine To Escalate Conflict
Russia tested its latest intercontinental ballistic missile yeserday, the Satan II has a range of 10,000 miles and can devastate an area of 250,000 square kilometers according to military experts. Bizarrely commentators in mainsteam and online news services portrayed this as a sign of weakness by Russia, though the same people cheered when Joe (Dementiaman) Biden threratened a nuclear response if Russia crossed his 'red lines' in Ukraine ...
We The Good Guys Versus They The Bad Guys Reporting Does Not Make Sense For The Ukraine Crisis
Mainstream media reporting of the conflict in Ukraine has disappointed. Perhaps I was naive to suppose that lessons might have been learned from the hits their print sales and online traffic rates took as a result of their handling the COVID pandemic But instead of focusing on the most obviously newsworthy aspect of the build up to and escalation of the war, Russia’s view of NATO expansion into Ukraine and even further to Georgia and Kazakhstan, news reports have simply demonised Russia and portrayed Ukraine as the good guys.
Boris and Biden Can't Blame Ukraine War For Energy Crisis
With typical arrogance and condescension towards the people who elected them Boris Johnson, Joe Biden and their respectiive presstitutes are trying to spin the energy crisis Europe and North America are currently facing as somehow being linked to the conflict in Ukraine and therfore blame is being attactched to Russia and Vladimir Putin. Do they really think we are stupid enough to believe such unmitigated bollocks? ...
Europe's Depleted Gas Storage Might Not Get Refilled Ahead Of Next Winter
While mainstream news reporting of the conflict in Ukraine continues to pump out a torrent of anri - Russia, pro - war propaganda the catastropic effects of this war that could so easily have been avoided are not mentioned. Well why would warmongering governments admit they have inflicted an energy crisis, food shortages and soaring living costs on their people for no good reason ...
Status Report On That War Thing In Ukraine: Nordstream to Bakhmut, electricity and water
In the wake of attacks on the on the Stream pipelines, that effectively halted the flow of natural gas which German industry, commerce, agriculture and society relies on, and the terrorist attack on the Kerch Bridge, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken gloated that the attacks were a “tremendous opportunity” to weaken Moscow [...] And shortly after news of the Nord Stream sabotage broke on mainstream media, gas supply companies in the USA were offering to supply Europe with shipments of Liquid Natural Gas carried by supertanker to be sold to European nations at vastly inflated prices.
EU Vows To Retaliate if Nord Stream Gas Pipeline Blasts Were Sabotage - But against whom, the USA?
Yesterday's shocking news that the Nord Stream 1 & 2 gas poipelines between Russia and Germany immediately triggered speculation about who is responsible, but as the facts emerge the knee jerk blaming of Russia has failed to convince because the attack bears all the halllmarks of a false flag event engineered by the usual suspects ...
As the war in Ukraine grinds on and Russia steps up its economic war against the west and in particular The European Union, claims made recently by the idiotically 'woke' leaders of Europe's main economic and military powers that the West has a once-in-a–generation chance to severely weaken Russia’s capabilities, both militarily and geopolitically, look increasingly hollow. Putin's critics have cited 'Western unity' as one of the main reasons why Russia will be economically destroyed and politically humiliated when the Ukraine's military finally claim victory.
European Union Is Again Close To A Meltdown As Eurozone Economy Collapses
Once more we return to the political instability and economic fragility of the European Union as the conflict in Ukraine combined with loonytoons Climate Change mitigation policies, the failure of 'sustainables' to meet ever increasing demand for electricity, fod shortages and rampant price inflation put economic and social pressure on governments of member states ...
We The Good Guys Versus They The Bad Guys Reporting Does Not Make Sense For The Ukraine Crisis
Mainstream media reporting of the conflict in Ukraine has disappointed. Perhaps I was naive to suppose that lessons might have been learned from the hits their print sales and online traffic rates took as a result of their handling the COVID pandemic But instead of focusing on the most obviously newsworthy aspect of the build up to and escalation of the war, Russia’s view of NATO expansion into Ukraine and even further to Georgia and Kazakhstan, news reports have simply demonised Russia and portrayed Ukraine as the good guys.
EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Latest Posts ]
If a ceasefire is declared," it is safe to assume the west will delay agreement in order to buy time to properly prepare Ukraine for the coming onslaught. However if the most recent Russian attacks are an indication, Russia’s objectives as a prelude to “ceasefure” are the following:
– Mariopol (done)
– Land bridge to Crimea (almost done)
– Liberate Lugansk and Donetsk (almost done)
– Industrialised areas in East and seaports (with exception of Odessa, done)
– Wipe out Azov (done)
– Encirclement and destruction of the key Ukrainian military units (not a given, but 60% done)
If the Russians do reach a point where they offer a ceasefire it will be from a position of strength rather than weakness, and it doesn’t matter what the West does in the rest of Ukraine once the above objectives are achieved. They would as as keen on “occupying” them as South Korea or India would be on taking over North Korea and Pakistan respectively. I
If anything the loss of Luhansk, Donbas and the land corridor to Crimea would leave the West commited to sinking money in the corrupt, deindustrialsed, backward rump that would be left.
For instance, all those Ukrainian “refuges?” Good luck sending them back. They didn’t run because of the war, they ran because it’s Ukraine and since the 'coup' engineered by Washington and the NATO allies in 2014 it has been run by a Russophobic right wing government whose principal objective has been to provoke The Kremlin rather than to strengthen Ukraine economically and socially for the benefit of its people.
In fact the conflict in Ukraine is just a sideshow compared to the real conflict, and I say tht with the untmost sympathy for the people of Ukraine who have suffered bravely and stoically throughout the conflict. The true conflict is the economic war being waged betwee the USA and western democracies on one side against Russia, China and their allies on the other. Over the past twenty years Russia and China have assiduously worked to gain control of many essential resources (lithium and rare earth metals for the batteries used in electric vehicles and all types of high tech gadgets for example,) necessary to maintain economic development and prosperity. The governments of many western nations, obsessed with virtue signalling and pandring to the green lobby have also, foolishly, alowed their countries to become dependent on Russia for oil, gas and commodities such as fertilizer, grain and cooking oil and on China for a wide range of manufacured goods. The Ukraine conflict is a major contributor to crises in energy and food supplies and the spiralling cost of living. The Western Alliance doesn’t make very much money compared to what it borrows and prints. The USA just hit 133% debt to GDP. Historically, any country in the last 500 years that hit this level is effectively bankrupt and is in for a some very severe austerity.China and many countries are no longer buying our bonds and selling bonds is how governments raise money to fund their debt. Revenues from exports cannot be increased because thanks to thirty yers of gloalism there are no hard industries left to manufacture goods for export.
These are reasons why the west is pouring military aid in the form of high tech weapons into Ukraine. Economically Russia and Chinahold all the aces and are moving to replace the US$ as global reserve currency. This would completely shift the balance of economic power east. Thus the NATO powers must prolong the war and plan to eventually invade Russia and later China; in order to take out the competition so that "the Great Reset" can go ahead inimpeded.
Ultimately, our civilisation is near bankruptcy. It would be bankrupt if nations weren’t able to print more money. That priviledge is also being lost now that more and more nations are moving away from the petro-dollar, ironically a process exacerbated by NATO / UN sanctions on Russia.
Meanwhile, Russia and China both have compartively low debt to GDP and big mountains of gold. When the debt driven economies reset, asset values are likely to crash, and tho lower 80% income groups will lose all their net worth as hyperinflation sets in (it already has in some deeply indebted, economically weak, third world nations.) We are set for a repeat of what happened in Germany in the 1930s, but on a wider scale and with a more lazy, aloof, and deluded elite in chage of the global economy.