THE main reason why, despite countless scientific warnings from countles pseudo - scientists about dangerous consequences of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gas (GHG) emitted into the atmosphere by human activities and the fearmongering of politicians who insist that catastrophe is imminent if we do not abandon 'fossil fuels' (they mean hydrocarbons,) and reach 'net zero' CO2 emissions by tomorrown lunchtime, emissions continue to increase. Though it was often stated that ' The Science is settled,' to deflect criticim of the flawed research used by climate catastrophists, a growing number of reputable scientists are now saying climate change is natural and there is no crisis. The fact that the warnings and predictions of doom ineffetual rantings of politicians and eco - warriors and the bleterings of 'climate scientists have never been borne out by observable evidence is rarely mentioned. Yet it’s been obvious for several years. It is this:
Most countries outside Western Europe, North America and Australasia either do not give a flying fuck about the impact of CO2 emissions on the climate or regard the issue as a priority, or regard economic growth, energy security, border security and feeding the population a greater priority.
These countries, comprising about 84 per cent of humanity, are today the source of about 77 per cent of emissions; (88 per cent if the United States, which has now joined their ranks, is included.)
Therefore, unless something happens very soon to persuade them to change their policies radically – and there’s no serious evidence to suggest such an event might be imminent – there’s no realistic prospect of the implementation of the urgent and substantial cuts in CO2 and bovine flatus (cow fart) emissions called for by many Western scientists and politicians. So great is the existential threat from CO2 emissions according to these people, that is caused upwards of 50,000 of them to zoom off to the small Brazilian city of Belem in 1500 private jet aeroplanes and various othrer types of CO2 emitting transport to hold their 30th totally ineffectual meeting (COP30) about it.
Currently there exists a 'policy' based on the alleged 'Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effect'. This effect is claimed to be responsible for the approximately 30°C (!) temperature gradient in Troposphere. (Really? 0.04% CO2 has 30°C effect? 😕) although over the past two or three years that Net Zero or Climate catastrophe narrative has started to fall apart.
This claimed 'Effect', takes no account of atmospheric pressure, first measured by Evangelista Torricelli. Using Torricelli's invention of the mercury barometer we can account for the temperature gradient in the Troposphere as entirely due to the 'pressure gradient'.
Earth's
surface temperature, claimed to be enhanced by atmospheric CO2, is, in
fact, augmented by the surface pressure of its atmosphere. That is also
true on Venus. Venus has a surface pressure of 92 bar (1,330 psi) - 92
times that on Earth!
The Venus atmosphere is 96.5 % CO2, however, it
is only the (surface) pressure that augments the Sun's temperature,
just as on Earth.
Climate Change has nothing to do with CO2! (There's a nice slogan for a 'demo'!)
This so-called 'CO2 Greenhouse Effect' was an early error that failed to take into account the relationship between pressure & temperature - the basis of thermodynamics, the science that has driven the progress of the World economy since the invention of the steam engine.
Do we really want to allow some unscientific mumbo jumbo, chanted by activists in the UN, the EU, the UK HoP, or pseudo - scientific mumbo jumbo based on computerised mathematical models designed by amateurs who have no format training in computer programming or data handling to throw away the enormous benefits of 300 years scientific progress because of their totally imaginary 'CO2 Greenhouse Effect'? Coincidentally all the predictions of catastrophe from these models have so far proved to be totally wrong.
What is never mentioned anywhere by either side of the climate debate is
the actual composition of so-called " Greenhouse Gases".
The
climate zealots bang on about GHGs and how they will kill us all as if
CO2 were as lethal as cyanide gas. But between ranting about the evils of 'fossil fuels' and gluing their arses to major roads to gridlock thousands of CO2 emittingcars and goods vehicles, the Net Zero nutter never find time to explain exactly what GHGs really are.
CO2, the bete noir of lftist activism, is just 0.042% of atmosphere. That's 420 parts per million.
The
most common gas in Earth's atmosphere - of which there are staggering
3500+ gases - is nitrogen, which comprises 78% of atmosphere, or,
780,000 parts per million.
The second most common gas is oxygen - 21%, or 210,000 ppm.
Third
comes argon ( which most folk will never have heard of unless they are
involved in welding stainless steel ) at 0.9% - or, 9000 ppm.
Three gases - 99.9% of atmosphere.
All the other 3500+ gases in the atmosphere make up the remaining 0.1% .
CO2
is actually less then 1/20th of 1% of atmosphere. Does that minute
quantity of gas, which plants MUST have in order to obtain nutrients,
seem to you like it will end life on Earth ???
As for GHGs in
general, the most common GHG, which comprises 97% of all GHGs in the
atmosphere, is, in fact - H2O. As water vapour. Or, CLOUDS as they are
commonly called. Clouds trap heat generated by solar radiation and
prevent it from escaping out into space. Without clouds, there would be
no life on Earth because the mean temperature would be MINUS 15DEG C. It
is below freezing in deserts at night despite temperatures being in the
high 40s C during the day, because there are no clouds to trap the
heat.
Like everything to do with the climate debate, the green
zealots lie and obfuscate in order to promote their globalist agenda.
In "Fake Invisible Catastrophies And Threats Of Doom " by Dr. Patrick Moore an original member of Greenpeace and former President of Greenpeace, Canada that the ideal CO2 level in Earth's atmosphere should be 875 ppm in order to promote optimum plant growth in order to feed as many folk as possible. It's somewhat ironic that the climate zealots are wanting us to abandon milk and dairy and take up a planet-based diet but at the same time are trying to stop the production of the very gas - CO2 - which could give us the plant growth that would make their dream come true. Never underestimate the ignorance of a Net Zero zealot.
FROM THE ARCHIVE:
Scientists says Nuclear Is The Way Forward For Clean Energy – Do Ursidae Defecate In Sylvan Landscapes?
Climate Scientists' Mathematical Models Of Reality Wrong Again…New Study Shows Jet Stream Strengthening, Not Weakening
recent research by Samantha Hallam et al published in the journal Climate Dynamics looks at the seasonal variations over decades in Northern Hemisphere jet stream
latitude and speed over land for the period 1871–2011. The authors report that they found no evidence of weakening of the sort climate alarmists have been warning about for the past three decades.
Shock for The Green Blob - Rewilding is to blame for Mediterranean forest fires
Or at least, to be acccurate, rewilding is partially to blame for Mediterranean forest fires. Which is darkly amusing as that man most insistent upon rewilding, George Monbiot, is trying to tell us that it’s all about climate change.
The UK government is putting plans together for days of organised blackouts this winter, in what they call a "reasonable worst-case scenario" for energy shortages, according to reports in manstream media. Naturally they are blaming this on the embargo on importing gas from Russia but in reality Britain has never imported any more than a small amout of its gas from Russia. The real reason politicians and energy company CEOs are panicking is entirely due to their obession with obtaining all our energy from intermittent sources like wind and sunshine ...
UK Households Are Paying Wind Turbine Owners To Not Generate Electricity
On another near windless day here in the United Kingdom, Boggart Blog came across a very interesting piece if news. According to figures published by the business and management consultancy LCP, british taxpayers have been paying operators of wind turbines farms for the time their windmills were NOT generating electricity increased to record levels last year ...
Net Zero Is A Dangerous Fantasy, But Scientists Believe In Fairies It Seems
With oil and gas prices rocketing and the highly propted sustainable energy sources performing way befow expectations the energy crisis currently gripping Europe (with worse to come as food shortages start to bite, polticians still seem more intent on pandering to the green lobby and chasing the dream of a fossil fuel free world rather securing the energy and food supplies needed by the people they serve.
New UN Report on Climate Change – Nothing New, Nothing True
The latest United Nations (“UN”) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) report, published this week, once again, in scaremongering tone and the language of the panic stricken, claims that the planet is in peril (we are facing climate disaster, the clock is at one minute to midnight, we must take urgent action to destroy civilisation if we are to save the planet, the usual over - dramatised guff designed to spread fear and panic,) basically the same claim as they have been making at least twice a month for the past 20 years.
We need energy security – not Net Zero
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted a major rethink in the West. We have suddenly found ourselves vulnerable not just to rising prices in oil and gas, but also to inflation in other commodities – such as food and fertiliser. Of all these problems, the security of our energy supply has most exercised minds.
Net Zero Gone With The Wind - Boris Johnson Plans Seven New Nuclear Plants And Shelves Wind Expansion
Reports in mainstream media suggest Boris Johnson has done a U turn on his recently announced massive expansion of wind powered generating capacity. Sources in Westminster claim Boris has shelved his masterplan for a giant, floating wind farm in The North Sea and the government will reconsider plans to double or even treble the number of wind turbines in the countryside and approve plans for up to seven new nuclear reactors instead.
Climate Change Research Paper Censored by The British Hydrological Society For Telling The Truth
The Daily Sceptic today published an article by retired research scientist James Dent, whose specialist field was hydrology and meteorology. Mr. Dent was involved in research projects aiemd at understanding the factors influencing climate, and their effects on environments, [ ... ] he was the World Meteorology Organisation Chief Technical Advisor to the Flood Forecasting and Warning Centre in Bangladesh, a low lying nation especially prone to flooding ....
Freak Weather Around The World Begs Questions
With Britain and other parts of northern Europe basking in unseasonably warm temperatures which are forecast to last for a few days, while parts of the USA gring to a halt under a blanket of snow dumped by freak storms are, accoring to climate scarmongers, a signal that irreversible warming had arrived, it is perhaps timely for a hot topic from ten years ago, geoengineering came under the microscope again. This report from Global Intel Hub seems a good way to kick off the debate. ... Continue reading >>>
The True Cost Of The Green Energy Boom Is Now Being Realized
For four decades we have been fed a constant stream of propaganda assuring us that green energy was the only way forward if we wanted to secure supplies of the energy essential to a modern society while preventing the environmental catastrophes that would be the inevitable consequence of climate change caused by the Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emitted by human industrial, commercial and social activity. ... Continue reading >>>
Electricity cuts and power crisis predicted for Britain’s New Year Holiday
Shapps carefully omits to mention that the government’s only contingency plan for providing the power needed to meet peaks of demand (a sudden cold snap for example) is to spark up the thousands of diesel generators the earth loving politicians have concealed in goods containers on compounds sited around the country. Yes you read that right, diesel generators ...
Now Even ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann Admits The ‘Pause’ In Global Warming Is Real
“It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims,” the paper in Nature Climate Change says.
German Scientist Confims Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has confirmed what those of us dubbed 'climate deniers' have been telling you for years ...
It Looks As If Carbon Credits Scam Has INCREASED CO2 Emissions
As the climate change scare becomes more and more exposed for the money making fraud it always was, they green weirdie beardie, rope sandal wearing tree huggers get more hysterical and stupid in their arguments that we must all return to medieval lifestyles, the billionaires like Al Gore who hope to profit from it keep flogging the dead horse and the angrier and more vicious the left wing hate mobs become in their witch hunts.
EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]
Why do some European leaders, including Starmer, seem to want to perpetuate and risk an escalation in the war in Ukraine? Given that few European nations, including the UK, have the military capability of conducting any kind of sustained operations, it would seem rather foolish. The arrogance of these lesders blinds them to Europe's political shift to the right, Starmer is trying to impress his EU chums, Macron is a failed president trying to look important and Merz is a clow who allows the minority party in hisd ruling coalition to dictate his government's policy.
The war in Ukraine is not about Russian expansionism into Europe, alleged threats to Latvia, Estonia and Poland were all fake news, Putin's plan to recreate the Soviet Union is just rhetoric to justify dragging people towards a potential war that we should not be involved in. Nothing to do with us. Much blame lies with Obama then Biden, and the corrupt regime of the crook Zelensky and his cronies in Ukraine. With the number of Ukrainians going to great lengths to avoid defending their own country, why should our British professional soldiers and in future possibly conscripts be put at risk of death or injury?
A couple of years ago, Putin said “The West is willing to fight to the last Ukrainian.”.
The question we should be asking is why are our governments, of both ,ain parties over the past thirty years so eager to get us involved in other peoples' wars?