I love the cirumlocution. Terminal Sedation "My client did not murder Mr. Victim, M'lud, he merely terminally sedatet the man by hitting him in the face with a shovel."
France's Parliament yesterday held the first stage of a debate on a bill aimed at allowing doctors to keep sedate terminally ill patients with increasing does of drugs until death comes, amid national debate about whether to legalize euthanasia.
The proposed bill — backed by the Socialist government — stops short of recommending lethal injections and avoids the terms euthanasia or assisted suicide. Well terminal sedation is so much more user friendly.
Prime minister Manuel Valls praised "a reform that proclaims the right to die peacefully, in dignity and without suffering," in a speech at France's lower house of Parliament.
The measure would give people "the right to deep, continuous sedation until death" but only when their condition is life-threatening in the short term. Give a patient enough sedative of course and their condition will in the short term become life threatening.
It would also force doctors to follow end-of-life instructions whether they are expressed by the patients themselves or written in advance, if they are no longer able to express their will.
Doctors may withhold treatment from patients with "green lifestyle issues."
by Xavier Connolly
A few weeks ago an item on the BMA's website linked to the "Doctors against climate change" group of the doctors' trade union. This body of medico-environmental socialist - utopians stated:
"The Earth's climate is rapidly approaching a threshold beyond which
there are likely to be major and irreversible changes. As a member of
the Climate and Health Council we support the call for healthcare
professionals across the world to take action to limit climate change."
At first this seemed like the kind of left wing bullshit pseudo -
liberal, crypto - fascist political activists fart out all the time.
These people get so much taxpayers' money thrown at them, it appears it
can afford to waste big chunks of it on propaganda campaigns in support
of the left's rapidly growing herd of sacred cows.
It turns out however, that some
Stalinist bullies General
Practicioners actually try to implement such dictatorial nonsense. Now
stepping daintily round the global warming argument (because if you
don't know by now it was a scam you are FUBAR and I haven't time to
waste on dogmatists) we must ask WTF are these doctors up to? Like most
of you , I suspect, Boggart Blog has always thought a GPs job is to
treat people's ailments, not impose oligarchic collectivist political
agendas on them. Climate change campaigning should be left to tree
hugging weirdie beardies.
A body whose members are paid by us taxpayers for supposedly making
us better, have no business spending our money on saving polar bears or
worrying about rainforests. And they should certainly not be harrassing
little old ladies. Remember the furore when Gideon (George) Osborne was
accused of harassing little old ladies hmm? Evil Nazi posh - boy, the
left called him. So why no outcry when a bunch of Khmer
Rouge
sympathisers who work as GPs start picking on that same protected
species?
Mrs Avril Mulcahy (83), it is reported in today's Daily Telegraph, Mail, Express, Liverpool Echo and Currant Bun (
Ask Jeeeves search results)
has been struck off her Family Doctor's list, "in order to mitigate her
green travelling issues". The practice, where Mrs Mulcahy has been a
patient for 30 years, sent her a letter:
"Our greatest concern is for your health and convenience but also
taking into consideration green travelling issues. Re: Carbon footprints
and winter weather conditions, we feel it would be advisable for
patients to register at surgeries nearer to where they live. We would be
very grateful if you could make the necessary arrangements to
re-register at another practice".
Note that "but" in the first sentence, which reverses intent of
first clause. The practice's "greatest concern" is for Mrs Mulcahy's
welfare, "but" it isn't, actually, because we are lefties and our
primary concern as always is advancing our control freak agenda." These
self righteous twunts are more concerned about her "carbon footprint"
and her selfish, politically incorrect desire to carry on doing what she
has done for three decades through her few remaining years than about
her health.
Why not tell her to move out of her comfortable home and check into a
concentration camp for geriatrics
sheltered community when the envionmentally friendly accommodation
features no heating or hot water and no facilities for preparing hot
food or brewing up. This could be justified by saying "Our greatest
concern is for your comfort and well being
BUT our
egotheistic self righteousness demands that we stomp on your
environmentally irresponsible lifestyle. Don't you care about the planet
you child murdering old cow?"
Wouldn't it be nice to hear that doctors concerned about the effects
of CO2 on the planet, instead of bullying old ladies were working on an
anti flatulence pill because fart gas is mostly CO2. Or they could just
shut the fuck up because all their whining and carping is just useless
hot air.
RELATED POSTS:
Truth Murderering Greens
Evidence that all the green movement are insane
Green Cars Genius Or Geekery Gone Mad
Not all scientists are fascistic atheists
New World Order and economic sustainability
Polypill, probably the health fascists worst idea yet
Age Timebomb
Age index
All of this is completely Illegal under common Law THE ONLY LAW In fact Legislation in contradiction of Common Law is logically Illegal, as its BREAKING the existing Law and any Legislation which is in line with common Law, is completely redundant, why do you need a piece of legislation when the common Law crime already exists to prosecute them ?
Well the answer is simple lets take for example some company poisoning a river, politicians would have you believe the act of poisoning isn’t a crime under common Law (it most certainly is) and that we need them to come to our rescue, the second thing they achieve is lessening the sentence for their mates who own these poisoning companies, instead of a 15 year jail sentence, the new sentence is a small percentage of their profits and a hearty slap on the wrist.
There is not a single wrong doing which cant be dealt with the correct application of Common Law, for those still on the left right hamster wheel (which is not many here thankfully) For the left companies damaging Public property and poisoning rivers, those are crimes under common Law and for those on the right Mass immigration would be considered theft of public land and trespass. You don’t need legislation its nothing more than the public declaration of the criminality of politicians.
FROM THE ARCHIVE:
EXPLORE
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ]