Heart and circulatory system deaths in the UK have spiked by more than 500 a week, a major research project has revealed. 'Experts' are blaming the sudden increase on “extreme disruption” to the NHS caused by the pandemic. So its nothing to do with all the blood clots and inflammation of heart tissue cases that have been linked to certain aspects of the response to pandemic then? (Sorry to be coy but we've only just got off the shit list and had our first decent month in over three years for page views. Don't want to upset the auto - moderator again so soon.
The study of government data identified almost 100,000 extra deaths among people with cardiovascular disease (CVD) since spring 2020.
An NHS representative told the media that the increase was caused by disruption to heart care and increasing ambulance delays for heart attack and stroke victims had left Britain “in the grip of a heart and stroke care emergency”.
The British Heart Foundation (BHF) analysis of data from the Government’s Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID) revealed an extra 96,540 deaths of patients with heart conditions since February 2020.
While excess cardiovascular deaths in the first year of the pandemic were linked to coronavirus infections, heart deaths have remained high since Covid deaths fell. But once people have been vaccinated they stay vaccinated and are prone to being affected by the known adverse reactions. On the other hand, when unvaccinated people come into contact with COVID their auto - immune system deals with it and it is gone, leaving the person with lasting natural immunity.
Earlier this year news organisations in the USA were reporting
"data from the American Heart Association highlights the major impact COVID-19 had on cardiovascular health and death rates during the first year of the pandemic.At least 928,741 Americans died from cardiovascular disease-related causes in 2020, the annual statistical report revealed. That represents the largest one-year increase since 2015 and tops the previous high of 910,000 deaths recorded in 2003, according to the American Heart Association.
"This is our first real evidence based on the impact of the early years of the pandemic," Dr. Connie Tsao, chair of the Statistical Update writing group and assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, said.
It's something genuine virologists (as opposed to those empoloyed by the Big Pharma cartel,) had predicted.
"This was not surprising," Dr. Michelle Albert, unpaid president of the American Heart Association and chair in cardiology and professor of medicine at the University of California at San Francisco ABC News.
COVID-19 had both direct and indirect impacts on the increased rates of cardiovascular disease-related deaths, experts said.
Other causes are being cited to explain away the increse in all-causes deaths since the COVID hoax pandemic too. A lot of media attention has been given to cancer deaths, which have been elevated in recent months. This is clearly something to be concerned about, and likely to get worse. However, cancer deaths are only a small portion of the recent excess deaths, with 900 registered above average since the start of September 2022. In that time there have been around 11,000 excess deaths in total, meaning cancer deaths account for around 8 per cent of the excess deaths in the final quarter of the year.
Another of the scapegoats offered has been disruption in the healthcare services in the aftermath of COVID. Well the long term effects of lockdowns are still having a devastating effect on many lives and all those cancelled appointments and deferred treatments have certainly been responsibe for some deaths. But the elephant in the room, the thing that in spite of its huge, looming presence nobody in mainstream media, the academic community and the political establishment is willing to talk about is the extent to which the experimental, improperly tested mRNA vaccines, with their track record over several decades of failure and causing catastrophic side effects, are responsible for the accelerating death rate.
Numerous analyses of excess deaths by UKcolumn news and other alt_media investigstive organisations have attributed the excess deaths mainly to the lock down measures, I know from personal experience that seriously ill patients were transferred from hospital and placed them in care homes. In some cases entire hospital wards were cleared to make way for the surge of COVID patients that never arrived. Many of these frail and vulnerable relocated people died. A whistleblower who works on admissions at a large hospital, posted in an anonymous drop box that the hospital hadn't received a single patient with COVID, they all arrived with run of the mill conditions such as cuts and broken bones, and had been forced to have the PCR test for COVID and then when they tested positive, (the PCR test which was never intended to be used as a diagnostic tool gives over 80% false positives when used in that application,) whether they had symptoms or not they were carted off to a COVID ward and counted as a COVID case.
if you check the leaflet that comes with any prescription drug, the list of known side effects for practically all of them lists "flu
like symptoms" as a side effect, Arsenic poisoning also has "flu
like symptoms" Flu like symptoms is how your body deals with poisons
The symptoms for many minor and potentially serious infections are Identical so apart from a PCR test for Influenza A or B, (the same PCR test the creator Kary Mullis said should never be used as a diagnostic tool), how do they know it's not poisoning ? how does anyone who self diagnoses as having the flu or a doctors lazy dismissive diagnosis of flu, know they haven't been poisoned instead ? Think about it, doctors rarely test for any of those other potential causes do they.
Also how many people with no symptoms get tested for influenza? Probably none. Whats the betting there would be a high rate of false positives rate were we all tested for COVID when we felt a bit achy, had a high temperasture or were slightly snotty.
The high rate of people who test positive but develop no symptoms is dismissed as 'immunity from previous infections,' but the workings of the immune system are at best poorly understood so 'previous infections' is a convenient hypothesis (and it is little more than a hypothesis) to claim that a 1% correlation between the presence of an RNA sequence they claim is a virus, and the symptoms of the disease is adequate proof the virus causes those symptoms. Again the big questions are not asked, that being: 'based on the current medical understanding of the immune system how can one have natural immunity to a completely new virus and 'why, if we were told in 2020 that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were not to be prescribed in any circumstances and that there were no therapies aainst COVID and no natural immunity therefore immunity could only be gained through vaccination.