Sunday, September 20, 2015

What Game In Putin Playing In Syria? A Smarter One Than Obama and Kerry

UK war leader Winston Churchill said in 1939: “I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest." 

In branding ISIS, rather than Assad as public enemy No. 1 for the west, Putin has it right. It is the Americans who are the mystery inside an enigma now, simply because Obama and his billionaire liberal global - government supporting cronies are acting not in but against the interests of the USA and democratic Europe.

What Vladimir Putin is doing in Syria makes far more sense than what Barack Obama and the European powers (the FUKUS axis) have done, which was always going to destablise the middle east as was intended.

 Russians transport planes are flying troops and military hardware to an air base near the Syrian coastal city of Latakia to create a supply chain that can provide a steady flow of weapons and munitions to the Syrian army.

Syrian President Bashar Assad, an ally of Russia, has lost half his country to ISIS and the Nusra Front, a branch of al-Qaida, a fighting force that, as we now know, was put together by an alliance of right wing Islamic fundamentalists states backed by hardware and advice supplied by the Pentagon with the approval of the Obama administration.

Putin fears that if Assad falls, Russia’s toehold in Syria and the Mediterranean will be lost, ISIS and al-Qaida will be in Damascus, and Islamic terrorism will have achieved its greatest victory. Is he wrong? Obviously not as the US agenda since 1945 has been to isolate Russia (pretty stupid reasoning as Russia has a long border with its main military ally, China.).

And who do we Americans think will wind up in Damascus if Assad falls?
A collapse of Assad's secular, Shia Muslim regime would result in a takeover of Syria by an Islamic Fundamentalist theocracy, the massacre of thousands of Alawite Shiites and Syrian Christians, and the flight of millions more refugees into Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey and on to Europe.

Putin wants to prevent that. Don’t we? Why then are we spurning his offer to work with us?

Are our leasders still so pissed off over the way when they helped to dump the democratically elected pro-Russian regime in Kiev, Putin countered by annexing Crimea? Or is there another reason? If we look past the outrage of US Liberals when an audience member at a Donald Trump for President political rally shouted out that Obama is a closet Muslim and Trump failed to reprimand him, to the times during his 2008 campaign and before when Obama spoke (with his own lips) about the importance to hom of "my Muslim faith" and identified himself as a non American (a Kenyan), we must wonder just whose side Obama is really on.

Understandably, there is going to be friction between the great military powers (and despite having been surpassed by both China and Russia, the US government still believes it is militarily invincible) the US, Europe and Russia have a mutual interest in seeing ISIS degraded and defeated. Vladimir Putin understands this, Basshir al Assad undertands it. Barack Hussein Obama does not appear to.

If we  in the west cam impress upon our leaders that their job is to protect our national interest, rather thansupporting Obama's president-of-the-entire-universe-and-everything-else-besides bong dreams with a reflexive Russophobia knee jerk that passes for thought in the think tanks, we should be able to see our way clear to collaborate in Syria.

Putin, Friend Or Foe In Syria



Russian troops already engaged in battle against ISIS around Homs

Military and intelligence sources report that on Wednesday, September 16, Russian R-166-0.5 (ultra) high-frequency signals (HF/VHF) vehicles were spotted on Highway 4, which links Homs and Aleppo. These vehicles, called “mobile war rooms” by the IDF and Western armies, were accompanied by BTR-82 troop carriers transporting Russian marines ...

Syria opposition in Russia for talks on on Moscow - Damascus anti-IS coalitionSyria opposition in Russia for talks on on Moscow - Damascus anti-IS coalition
Syrian politicians opposed to the Assad regime, but against Islamic fundamentalist groups will be in Moscow this week to take part in talks on a Russian plan for a new anti-jihad coalition that would see Syrian President Bashar al-Assad continue as leader of his country. Given the implacable hostility betwee Syrian opposition groups, don't expect any agreements

While we watch Unkraine and Turkey The War Goes On In Syria
With mainstream media focused on ISIS and Ukraine amid, fears of an excalation of local problems into a war between East, West and Islam, we are in danger of forgetting nasty little civil conflicts like the one between forces loyal to the secular dictator Assad and the Al Nusra rebels who want to replace a secular dictatorship with an even more ruthless theocracy.

US Foreign Policy has Boosted Expansion of Terrorism, Putin Says
Russia’s president Putin has become more harsh in his criticisms of US foreign policy over the past few years, from the moment France, the UK and USA used the excuse of staging a 'humanitarian mission to prevent genocide in Libya' to wage a bombing campain on that country with the aim of bringing down the Gaddafi regime, relations between the western powers and the Russia / China alliance have been going downhill fast ...

American Department of Defence Admits Supporting ISIS In Syria
Rumours have been rife for almost a year that ISIS/ISIL/ whatever you want to call them, the Islamist rebel group who have taken control of large areas of Syria and Iraq with the intention of setting up a new Islamic Caliphate, were actually set up by United Staes CIA agents with the aim of overthrowing secular Muslim dictators and helping the US ally Saudi Arabia impose theocratic rule throughout the Arab lands. A new leak proves that once again the 'conspiracy theorists' were right.

Syrian Rebels Say West Is Already Aiding Thier Uprising.

As the troubles stirred up in Syria by the meddling of the American idiot President Barack Hussein Obama and fuelled by the west's determination to intervene and effect regime change in another middle eastern nation escalate into civil war, the rebels show they are as unfit a government in waiting as those fanatical mobsters the western powers have catapulted into power in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia. We conclude that Obama wants World War 3. ...

First Libya. next Syrian then The World for The Emperor Obama?

Led by The All Conquering Emperor Obama, jingoistic calls for military invervention are gaining volume if not support. Well OK we know the great peacemaker hopes a middle east war will save his Presidency as Iraq saved Bush's but just as more than half of Libyans supported Gadaffi so, according to polls conducted by western firms, more than half of all Syrians support Assad. The only justification for war then is Obama's need to inflate his ego.

Should Western Leaders Be Forming Alliances With Barbarians Who Behead A Prisoner With A Pocket Knife?

We need to be asking our western leaders, Barack Hussein Obama, David Cameron and Francoise Hollande WTF they think they are doing sending sophisticated weapons to a bunch of primitive bastards in Syria who behead prisoners with a pocket knife. Or perhaps who they are working for, because they are as sure as shit stinks not working for the people who elected them.

So Much For Progress On Syria

After recent meetings with Russian leader Vladimir Putin, both USA Secretary of State John (Lurch) Kerry and UK Prime Minister David Cameron returned claiming they were more optimistic about replacing the regime of the Dictator Assad with a western style

Even the United Nations Knows Syrian Rebels Used Chemical Weapons So Why Is Obama Still Accusing Assad

Obama's latest war is bogged down in Syria, in spite of the USA being supported by usual suspects, the United Kingdom and France the phalanx of Syrian allies which inclueds Russia, Iran and China looks a bit too formidable to persuade the limp wristed one it is safe to invade or start bombing. So all he has is a war of words, and he's losing that.

Global Nuclear War Seems Inevitable Now

The Daily Stirrer has been warning for long enough our current crop of genocidal idiots political leaders were steering a course that made war inevitable. well now the first shosts have been fired, a couple of limited nuclear strikes on Syria by Israel probably with American backing. Head for the hills everyone.

So You Still Think It's A Good Idea To Get Involved In Syria?
As Barack Obama ramps up the war rhetoric in a desperate bid to involve America in the Syrian Conflict and (he vainly hopes) thus save his failed Presdiency and David Cameron keeps his tongue firmly inserted in Obama's are, it's good to know somebody is in touch with reality.

No comments: