Tuesday, September 24, 2024

Left Of Labour - The Real Threat To SStarmer's Government

 

Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn joined four other independents elected in July forming a new parliamentary bloc, The Independent Alliance, which is the fifth biggest block in parliament

Corbyn, who  lost the party whip remained a party member after allegations that he had failed to control anti semitism in the party in 2020 continued to sit inthe House of Commons but when.it was clear he would never be permitted to stand as a Labour candidate again, sure of a devoted following among the Trotskyite faction of the party he decided to oppose the globalist, technocratic leadership of Sir Keir Starmer, and as Sunak stood in a rain lashed Downing Street and announced that he had asked King Charles to dissolve parliament, Corbyn made his move. A dew days later the populare MP for Islington announced he would run in his constituency as an independent. He aimed to embarrass the party he had been loyal to since first joining in 1965.

Mainsteam media had tried to spin the move to oust Corbyn after the 2019 election defeat as being driven by the desire to break with his socialist politics. Indeed, it was the first in a series of moves that the leadership undertook to neuter the party’s Left which dominated among constituency activists. 

Later came a batch of deselections of MPs who opposed SStarmer's authoritarian style of leadership. Faiza Shaheen, Lloyd Russell-Moyle and Sam Tarry lost consituency votes with the controversial “Anonyvoter” system being deployed, which led to allegations of voting 'irregularities; to replaced as candidates by SStarmer loyalists who had little personal connection with the seats they would represent.  And yet, in the election itself, confounding precedent, Corbyn and several others were elected  as independents, defeating the party they had previously represented. The battle for Labour, and the future of the British Left, had begun.

Now fully expelled for standing against their candidadte, Corbyn looks as if he will be more dangerous for Starmer that if he had been allowed to run as a Labour candidate and decome a disruptive influence inside it. He now sits under his own flag, alongside four more outsiders who refused to toe the party line, all of them returned to Parliament by their opposition to austerity and opposition to Israel’s war in Gaza. And while their election campaigns weren’t coordinated, these five independents are now getting organised, announcing a formal Independent Alliance earlier this month. Alongside the four Green members it is is the largest gathering of “Left of Labour” MPs in history. What was initially an inchoate rejection of Starmer across a few seats of seats is becoming a national movement.

Worse still for Labour, this all began during what was supposed to be the pinnacle of Starmer’s appeal. Yet within three months of forming a government, one recent poll has Labour as low as 29%. Six-in-ten voters now say the Prime Minister can’t be trusted. most remarkably of all, Starmer is less popular than Rishi Sunak.

Not that the Conservatives will benefit from Labour’s deepening woes. Despite his penchant for freebie designer glasses, the public still views Starmer more favourably than leader wannabes Kemi Badenoch, Robert Jenrick and James Cleverly. More broadly, the electorate remains more critical of the Tories than Labour. All those years of ineptitude haven’t been forgotten overnight.

In a two-party system,  with its dysfunctional First-Past_The-Post electoral system all that matters is being slightly less despised than the other guys. But Britain is no longer a two-party system, something Labour ignores at its peril. With the Lib Dems, the country now has its largest third party for a century — business has even started paying attention to them — and the SNP are looking to hit back under stable leadership. Elsewhere, the Greens and Reform are now truly national players. It wasn’t just Carla Denyer saying Labour should scrap the two-child benefit cap, but Nigel Farage too. Despite having more than 400 seats, the optics are that Labour is not only at odds with the country, but that electoral alternatives are increasingly conspicuous.

Yet the biggest problem for Starmer arguably remains his former comrade in Islington North, with Corbyn and his fellow independents a lightning rod for what was the Labour Left. The potential repercussions of The Prime Ministers' zero-tolerance approach on dissent can already be seen. Last month, Labour suspended seven MPs after they voted in favour of an SNP amendment to scrap the two-child benefit cap. A day later, Corbyn and his band of merry men signed a joint letter in support of those rebels, saying they looked forward to working together — and that they represented an alternative to the two establishment parties. The subtext was obvious: leave Labour and sit with us.

But as Starmer’s difficult inheritance becomes clearer, there will be increasing dissent within the party as to how he approaches various challenges. Those who disagree with the party line are already considering other options — including the Independent Alliance. In August, Labour announced its membership had fallen below 400,000 for the first time in a decade. For the party’s Right — anti-democratic fixers by disposition — that is considered a good thing.


A wider recognition of Starmer’s authoritarian style among Labour MPs will test his disciplinary approach.

Duffield, hardly on the party’s Left, has already said she owes more to her constituents than the PM. This is dangerous ground for Starmer, who needs his big majority if he wants to address difficult challenges like the housing crisis. Some will stand up to Starmer — playing a game of political chicken in the knowledge there is an alternative with Corbyn. Meanwhile other, less courageous MPs, will pretend that abstention is somehow an act of defiance (more than 50 Labour MPs abstained on the Winter Fuel Allowance Bill). But that will prove bad politics — with a poor voting record manna for independent challengers at the next general election. Had Jess Philips not defied the party whip on calling for a ceasefire, for instance, she would most probably have lost her seat.

My bet is that a new party won’t happen, even with Corbyn open to the possibility. The strength of the five independents is that they are masters of what they don’t say: their platform of opposition to war, support for public services and criticism of Israel is overwhelmingly popular with the median Labour voter. Having a more detailed programme, where they’re liable to disagree among themselves over things such as LTNs or biodiversity, comes with too many downsides.

 ****

You only have to look at what happened to Rosie Duffield, one of Labour’s own, to see how cruel the party can be to dissenters. It has been heartening to see her standing her ground and with the support of her constituency party and the citizens of Canterbury, making bully buy SStarmer and his sidekicks look foolish. One of the interesting things to note is that the majority left appear to be like sheep desperate not to stand out from the flock and won’t speak up against the technocratic bullies or far left fanatics in their ranks. It’s pathetic.

The asprct of leftist thinking I have always found ditateful is the way policy makers do not even try to hide  resentment of what they lack and spite towards those who have it. Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, Hitler, Mussolini, Castro, Pol Pot, Mao, Khomeini , Sayyid Qutb and Abul Mawdudi were all lower middle class people with above average intelligence and education but felt they were entitled to more than they had. They all despised the genuine hard working and skilled working class, considered manual labour beneath them. These pseudo intellectuals hated the honest artisans and labourers Marx smeared with the appleation 'The Proleteriat,' an ineducable, unthinking mass of identical beings with low intelligence and low aspirations.

The expansion of commerce and industry since the Industrial Revolution has created a large group of lower middle class clerks/ journalists of above average intelligence and education but below average physical robustness and resilience because they do not undertake hard manual labour and physical sports. This group provides most of the revolutionaries from the French Revolution onwards
They were able to convince criminals from the proletariat, especially slum proletariat that they could indulge in their liking of killing, torturing and raping to serve a higher moral purpose. Namely overthrow of existing order and revolutionaries as new leaders. Orwell’s Animal Farm with pigs as new leaders and sheepdogs as guard dogs- SS, Gestapo, KGB, Statsi, Red Guard, Iranian Revolutionary Guards, ISIS , etc.

Birds of a feather flock together. Resentment and spite causes left wing intellectuals and political extremists to be naturally attracted to each other. But Jeremy Corbyn, whatevr his faults (and he has many) was always a democrat and has never sough the approval of either technocrats or thugs.


 

 

 

 

 

LEFT'S HATE POLITICS AND HYPOCRISY:

Anyone Who Fancies A Bet Will Be Put On A Register, Just Like Sex Offenders.
In another signal that Boris Johnson's government has sold out to globalist ambitions and is lurching headlong towards fascism, The Information Commissioner’s Office has announced that as part of their pursuit of a Single View of the Customer (SVoC), they plan to create a database in which all “behavioural data” of people who enjoy a bet ...

The Orwellian Vaccine Passport Agenda Relies On The Lie Of The "Social Contract"
There is a fundamental question that needs to be asked when examining the vaccine passport issue, and what I find is that almost no one in the mainstream is tackling it directly. The question is this: "Is it legally and morally acceptable to constrict the rights and economic access of people in order to force them to submit to an experimental “vaccine”, or any other medical procedure for that matter?"

Political Europe Suppressed Under Washington´s Thumb Is Waking Up
In the aftermath of the downing of the Malaysian airliner in Ukraine, the Western media followed Washington’s lead and manipulated reports in order to make Europeans believe that Russia and Russian-supported separatists in eastern Ukraine were responsible for downing the airliner. In Germany, the press was an extension of Washington’s propaganda machine despite the lack of evidence from both Washington and Kiev to support their irresponsible claims

What Would The Future Look Like Without The Propaganda Happy Pills The arrogance, hubris and contempt for morality displayed by our ruling classes is gobsmacking. Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat politicians seem to think they are untouchable, above the norms and ethics that apply to ordinary mortals and that they are able to rewrite the laws of nature on a whim. We are not just talking about politicians here, but bankers and business leaders, the legal, medical and education professions, public servants, academics and senior police officers.

The Authoritarian Left And The Threat To Personal Liberty
Ian reflects on his political position, has he realy moved from near anarchist left to reactionary right on the political spectrum, or have authoritarians hijacked the language of liberal and libertarian philosophy and perverted it to serve a neo fascist, big government agenda?

Will Anti European Union Feeling Lead To More Integration
Many people who are part of the media luvvieocracy seem to think the anti EU surge revealed in elections to the European Parliament earlier this week will lead to an intensification of the EU ruling bureaucray push for the integration of the 28 European Union member states into a single federal superstate. A more realistic view is that many who voted for the stus quo were not so much supportive of the pan - European project as fearful of what will happen when the EU falls apart

How Can Mainstream Politics Respond To The Anti EU Surge Across Europe? As the hysteria intensifies following the enormoust anti EU swing in elections for the European Parliament, we look at what options are available to the mostly pro EU, pro federalisation leaders of the main European Union nations, that will not result in the citizens if Europe becoming further alienated from the political and technocratic classes.

When Lefties Tell You They Are Liberals Look For The Nazi In The Closet
The left have always been quick to shout Nazi whenever a conservative or libertarian was getting the better of the argument. but socialism is the parent of fascism and the authoritarianism of modern liberals and 'proressives'is far closer to the politics of Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and Mao Tse Tung than either Benjamin Disraeli or Margaret Thatcher ever were.

Free Speech: Reporters Without Borders unblocks access to censored websites
It is surprising in view of what we now know about the collaboration between internet technology corporations and government security agencies that many people still think og the internet as a bastion of freedom. This page shows how easy it is for governments and corporations to censor web content.

British Democracy In Terminal Decline - Voting Is Redundant And Civil Liberties Are So Last Year
When did democracy go out of fashion. I don't remember voting on whether we wanted to give up our civil liberties or be ruled by a dictatorship of unelected bureaucrats from Brussels, but that is where we are heading, along with the other free nations of Europe. And the USA, so-called land of the free is further along the road to fascism than Europe.

Another EU Wannabe Declares War On Free Speech A very dangerous and worrying trend, which has been gathering momentum for some time, has entered a new dimension in recent weeks. Political and business leaders around the world are blatantly calling for the censorship on reporting and discussing news in terms that are 'unhelpful' to their aims and ambitions along with further restrictions on free speech.

The Hate And Prejudice The Bourgois Left Find Acceptable
The neo - fascist left are quick to jump on any of the forbidden pejudices, racism, sexism, homophobia, islamophobia and so on. But as we have seen, they find pejudice and hated againt Christians and white Europeans quite acceptable. The bourgeois metropitan set might think that is acceptable but where I come from it's called hypocrisy.

Human Rights - A Straitjacket On Liberty.
We are in a fight to retain our right to free speech in the face of an onslaught of politically correct tyranny. While a speech Barack Obama made in Cairo is celebrated even though it brought back the spectre of medieval Sharia law to secular Muslims, the word liberal is hajacked by authoritarians who ride the political bandwagon and offer doublespeak, ambiguity and weasel words.. We hear much about equality and being fair but see little of either and no common sense.

Internet Trolls - Are They Contractors Paid To Suppress Open Discussion Of Sensitive Subjects?.
Everyone who likes to follow online debates on sensitive or controversial topics will have encountered trolls. but are these people really just angry and obsessive, excesssively self righteous individuals. Or is there anyting in th claims that they are employed by contractors to suppress open discussion and discredit points of view which do not support government or corporate interests.

The Wisdom Of Crowds
Beautiful Children (with no love in their eyes)
Labour's racist future
Labour agenda not so different from Nazis
The Rotherham paedophile scandal defines Labour hypocrisy
The authoritarian tide from the left
Let's class hate is an anachronism
Millie Tant: the stereotype Labour activis
[ Liberal bigots] ... [ liberal extremism ] ... [ Intolerance of the left ] ... [ authoritarianism of the left ] ... [ illiberal liberals ]

No comments: