MENUClick on any link in the menu to skip to that item, at the bottom of each story the 'return to Menu link will bring you back here
[ Ivermectin shows ‘antiviral effect’ against COVID, Japanese company says ] ... [ Lockdowns found to have NO EFFECT on public health, meaning all the so-called “science” was nothing but fraud ] ... [ Shocking analysis finds that Covid-19 Vaccine Death-Rates are much higher than what is being officially reported ] ... The ‘Science’ of Manipulation: Researchers Craft Messages of Guilt, Shame to Foster Vaccine Compliance ] ... [ Evidence of Manipulation of Disease and Injury Data in US Military Database Suggests Fraud and Cover Up ] ... [ CDC FINALLY Admits Natural Immunity is SUPERIOR to Vaccines ] ...Coronavirus: EU Wants To Keep Vaccine Passports In Place For Another ENTIRE YEAR
[ ] ... [ Mainstream media colluding with FDA, CDC to cover up skyrocketing deaths from China virus vaccines [ The Suppressed History Of How Pandemics Are Created ] ... [Johns Hopkins Study: 99% of All Covid Prior Infections Resulted in ‘Natural Immunity’ That Lasted at Least 650 Days
]Ivermectin shows ‘antiviral effect’ against COVID, Japanese company says
Source: Reuters via Minds.com
Test tube with Corona virus name label is seen in this illustration taken on January 29, 2020. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic Test tube with Corona virus name label is seen in this illustration taken on January 29, 2020. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com TOKYO, Jan 31 (Reuters) - Japanese trading and pharmaceuticals company Kowa Co Ltd (7807.T) on Monday said that anti-parasite drug ivermectin showed an "antiviral effect" against Omicron and other coronavirus variants in joint non-clinical research. The company, which has been working with Tokyo's Kitasato University on testing the drug as a potential treatment for COVID-19, did not provide further details. The original Reuters story misstated that ivermectin was "effective" against Omicron in Phase III clinical trials, which are conducted in humans. Clinical trials are ongoing, but promotion of ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment has generated controversy. Prominent vaccine sceptic Joe Rogan, whose podcast on Spotify has prompted protests by singers Joni Mitchell and Neil Young, has long stirred controversy with his views on the pandemic, government mandates and COVID-19 vaccines. ... Continue reading >>>Return to MENU
Explore:
How COVID Corrupted Science
Politicians who criticised AstraZeneca vaccine 'probably killed hundreds of thousands', says Oxford scientist in an outburst that reveals how the science acedemy have been totally owned by corporate money and thus have been guilty of lying, scaremongering, fabricating evidence, publishing fake statisics and spreadsing misinformation. And the politicians who told us to 'trust The Science' are just as guilty.
Lockdowns found to have NO EFFECT on public health, meaning all the so-called “science” was nothing but fraud
by Ethan Huff, News Target
Three researchers who analyzed 24 different studies on the subject found that the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) lockdowns did absolutely nothing to stop the spread.
Led by Steve Hanke, co-founder of The Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health and the Study of Business Enterprise, the research first involved looking at an astounding 18,590 different studies from which the final 24 were selected.
From there, the team determined that lockdowns both in the United States and Europe pared the mortality rate from the Fauci Flu by 0.2 percent on average, which is statistically meaningless.
Similarly, shelter-in-place orders were found to reduce mortality by about 2.9 percent, which is also statistically meaningless when accounting for margins of error.
“While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted,” the researchers wrote.
“In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.”
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Latest Posts ]
Shocking analysis finds that Covid-19 Vaccine Death-Rates are much higher than what is being officially reported
from The Daily Expose
Shocking mortality data from Germany, Austria, Israel, England: thousands of post-vaccine non-Covid deaths covered up – miscategorized as unvaccinated deaths…”extremely alarming situation”
“Thousands are dying of the vaccine daily without us even being aware of it.”
University of Regensberg Professor Christof Kuhbandner uncovered what he calls an extremely alarming situation, one where thousands and thousands of vaccine deaths are being hidden in the statistics.
England report sets off alarms
According to this Austrian report broadcast by servus.tv, Prof. Kuhbandner happened to come across a recent study in the journal ResearchGate, where the authors examined the UK ONS vaccine mortality surveillance report.
Although at first glance the all-cause mortality appeared far lower in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated, on closer inspection they found fundamental inconsistencies and anomalies in the data and that there had been a “systemic miscategorization of deaths between the different categories of unvaccinated and vaccinated” among other factors.
For the period of calendar weeks 1-38, 2021, Figures 8 and 9 show strong peaks in non-Covid mortality for the unvaccinated 60-69 and 70-79 age groups while the mortality among the vaccinated stayed steady.
At first glance, this would suggest that the vaccines were functioning well in England and Wales. But the ending is not a happy one.
Return to MENU
EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Latest Posts ]
The ‘Science’ of Manipulation: Researchers Craft Messages of Guilt, Shame to Foster Vaccine Compliance
from Children's Health Defender
There’s an entire field of research dedicated to developing messaging designed to persuade “vaccine-hesitant” individuals to get the COVID-19 vaccine — and none of it has anything to do with facts.
There’s an entire field of research dedicated to developing messaging designed to persuade “vaccine-hesitant” individuals to get the COVID-19 vaccine.
None of the messaging examined by researchers involves conveying factual evidence that supports the claims — widely disseminated by Big Pharma, Big Media and public health agencies — that the vaccines are “safe” and “effective.”
Researchers last month published the results of a clinical trial involving two survey experiments on how to manufacture consent for COVID vaccines.
The Yale-sponsored study, “Persuasive messaging to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake intentions,” examined how different persuasive messages affected 1) intentions to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, 2) willingness to persuade friends and relatives to get the vaccine, 3) fear of those who have not been vaccinated, and 4) social judgment of people who choose not to vaccinate.
According to the study’s authors:
“Given the considerable amount of skepticism about the safety and efficacy of a COVID-19 vaccine, it has become increasingly important to understand how public health communication can play a role in increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake.”
The paper did not address the underlying reasons someone might have concerns about the safety or efficacy of COVID vaccines but focused instead exclusively on how to persuade them to get the vaccine.
“We conducted two pre-registered experiments to study how different persuasive messages affect intentions to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, willingness to persuade friends and relatives to receive one, and negative judgments of people who choose not to vaccinate.
“In the first experiment, we tested the efficacy of a large number of messages against an untreated control condition … In Experiment 2, we retested the most effective messages from Experiment 1 on a nationally representative sample of American adults.”
The messages tested by the researchers have been woven into mainstream media narratives and public health campaigns throughout the world. But the study completion date for part 1 was July 8, 2020, which means all of these messages were created prior to the release of any science to support them.
Continue reading >>>[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Latest Posts ]
Evidence of Manipulation of Disease and Injury Data in US Military Database Suggests Fraud and Cover Up
On 3 February, Dr. Robert Malone posted a link on his website to an Excel file containing details of the Defence Medical Epidemiology Database (“DMED”) data that had been doctored – a file showing results of data queried by analysts looking for changes to data that may be indicative of data fraud.
Several world-renowned doctors and medical experts spoke during a panel discussion titled ‘Covid-19: A Second Opinion‘ in Washington D.C. on 24 January 2022, hosted by US Senator Ron Johnson.
During the event, attorney Thomas Renz presented Department of Defence (“DoD”) medical billing data from the DMED. Renz exposed the disturbing truth about what is happening to the health of US service members since the rollout of the Covid injection a year ago.
The Exposé is now heavily censored by Google, Facebook, Twitter and PayPal. Let’s not lose touch, subscribe today to receive the latest news from The Exposé in your inbox…
Renz also revealed he had three whistle-blowers from the DoD who had data mined DMED and found massive increases in year over year vaccine injuries. The whistle-blowers also declared the data had been manipulated and altered after they found the original discovery in August.
On Tuesday, Sen. Johnson sent a letter to DoD Secretary Lloyd Austin to confirm Renz’s presentation. Amongst others, the letter stated:
“Renz also informed me that some DMED data showing registered diagnoses of myocarditis had been removed from the database. Following the allegation that DMED data had been doctored, I immediately wrote to you on January 24 requesting that you preserve all records referring, relating, or reported to DMED.Return to MENU
EXPOLRE [Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Latest Posts ]
CDC FINALLY Admits Natural Immunity is SUPERIOR to Vaccines
from SHTFplan
This article was originally published by Ramon Tomey at Natural News.
After several months, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) finally admitted that natural immunity is more effective against the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) than vaccines. This contradicts its earlier claim that immunity induced by the COVID-19 vaccines is better.
The public health agency made this admission in the Jan. 28, 2022 edition of its Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), initially published last Jan. 19. It showed that natural immunity was at least three times as effective as COVID-19 vaccines in preventing people from being infected and hospitalized. The CDC’s findings applied to the B16172 delta variant known to cause breakthrough infections.
“Before delta became the predominant variant in June [2021], case rates were higher among persons who survived a previous infection than persons who were vaccinated alone. By early October, persons who survived a previous infection had lower case rates than [vaccinated] persons,” said the MMWR.
The report also noted that natural immunity was higher during the delta variant’s predominant period. It cited the delta strain’s ability to evade immunity and waning vaccine immunity over time as the reasons for this.
Despite studies revealing vax passes have NO IMPACT on reducing infection rates, and despite multiple European countries SCRAPPING restrictions
Return to MENUCoronavirus: EU Wants To Keep Vaccine Passports In Place For Another ENTIRE YEAR
from Summit News
Despite studies revealing vax passes have NO IMPACT on reducing infection rates, and despite multiple European countries SCRAPPING restrictions
The unelected bureaucrat governors of the EU in the European Commission have proposed keeping the bloc’s COVID vaccine passport system in place for another entire year, despite the fact that many member countries are ramping down restrictions.
In a notice on its website, the Commission states “Today the European Commission is proposing to extend the EU Digital COVID Certificate by a year, until 30 June 2023.”
It continues, “The COVID-19 virus continues to be prevalent in Europe and at this stage it is not possible to determine the impact of a possible increase in infections in the second half of 2022 or of the emergence of new variants.”
“Extending the Regulation will ensure that travellers can continue using their EU Digital COVID Certificate when travelling in the EU where Member States maintain certain public health measures,” the statements adds.
It continues, “The Commission is adopting the proposal today to make sure the European Parliament and the Council can conclude the legislative procedure in time before the current Regulation expires.”
The move comes even as several countries, including Denmark, Norway, Italy, Sweden, France, in addition to non-EU countries such as Switzerland and England move to scrap restrictions including the vaccine passes.
The European Commission admits in its statement that it is up to the individual countries whether they carry on using the EU COVID vaccine passport scheme.
“The domestic use of EU Digital COVID Certificates remains a matter for Member States to decide, the statement notes, adding “The EU legislation on the EU Digital COVID Certificate neither prescribes nor prohibits the domestic use of EU Digital COVID Certificate (such as for access to events or restaurants).”
It also notes that “At the same time, where a Member State establishes a system of COVID-19 certificate for domestic purposes, it should continue to ensure that the EU Digital COVID Certificate is also fully accepted for those purposes. Beyond that, the Commission also encourages Member States to align their domestic validity periods with the validity period set at EU level for the purpose of travel.”
As we reported in November, despite vaccine passport schemes and high vaccination rates in many of the countries affected, COVID cases across Europe continued to surge as winter kicked in.
In addition, a recent investigation by experts in Spain concluded that vaccine passports have no significant impact on reducing COVID-19 infection rates.
The findings are similar to evidence found by the UK government that vaccine passports could actually increase Covid rates in the country.
The Spanish study noted that the only positives of such a scheme are that it “warns people that there is still danger from the pandemic and encourages vaccination uptake among the reticent.”
In other words, although vaccine passports have no discernible impact on their stated goal – reducing the spread of COVID-19 – they do succeed in keeping people fearful and compliant.
That conclusion dovetails with a recent admission by French Minister of Health Olivier Véran that the vaccine passports are “a disguised form of vaccination obligation,” but are “more effective.
Return to MENU
EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Latest Posts ]
Lockdowns, school closures reduced covid mortality by just 0.2% at best, study finds
from News target
A meta-analysis put together by economists has revealed that all of the draconian Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) restrictions put into place in spring 2020 – including stay-at-home orders, compulsory masks and social distancing – did pretty much nothing to reduce mortality.
At best, deaths dropped by around 0.2 percent due to all the tyranny, though this figure is so small and inconsequential that it amounts to a mortality reduction of zero percent, statistically speaking.
On the flip side, lockdowns, face muzzles and anti-social restrictions greatly harmed people, both economically and socially. All of these measures, the economists found, were “ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument” in the future.
Led by a professor at Johns Hopkins University (JHU), the research also looked at border closures, which reduced mortality by just 0.1 percent, or basically zero once again.
In order to answer their research question, the economists looked at 18,590 global studies into lockdowns. From this, they whittled it down to just 24 studies that helped provide the clarity they were looking to find ... Continue reading >>>EXPLORE: [Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Latest Posts ]
Mainstream media colluding with FDA, CDC to cover up skyrocketing deaths from China virus vaccines
from OANN
More doctors are coming forward with evidence that vaccines against the China virus are actually causing significant side effects, including death. One America’s Pearson Sharp has more.
Watch video >>>
Return to MENU
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Latest Posts ]
The Suppressed History Of How Pandemics Are Created
from Great Game India
When American journalist Celia Farber courageously published, in Harper’s Magazine (March 2006) the article “Out of control—AIDS and the corruption of medical science,” some readers probably attempted to reassure themselves that this “corruption” was an isolated case. This is very far from the truth. It is only the tip of the iceberg. Corruption of research is a widespread phenomenon currently found in many major, supposedly contagious health problems.
Scientific research on viruses (or prions in the case of BSE) slipped
onto the wrong track following basically the same systematic pathway.
This pathway always includes several key steps: inventing the risk of a
disastrous epidemic, incriminating an elusive pathogen, ignoring
alternative toxic causes, manipulating epidemiology with non-verifiable
numbers to maximize the false perception of an imminent catastrophe, and
promising salvation with vaccines. This guarantees large financial
returns. But how is it possible to achieve all of this? Simply by
relying on the most
powerful activator of human decision making process, i.e. FEAR!
Continue reading >>>
Return to MENU
EXPOLRE: [Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Latest Posts ]
Johns Hopkins Study: 99% of All Covid Prior Infections Resulted in ‘Natural Immunity’ That Lasted at Least 650 Days
from Humans Are Free
Johns Hopkins university this week dropped a quiet bombshell of a study that went widely ignored in the mainstream media [as always!].
Dr. Marty Makary, spearheading a team at Johns Hopkins to do the work that the CDC and NIH refuse to do, showed that 99% of unvaccinated people known to have Covid infections had robust “natural immunity” that did not diminish for at least 650 days.
Results
Of 1580 individuals invited to undergo serologic testing, 816 (52%)
did so between September 24, 2021, and November 5, 2021. Participants
had a mean age of 48.0 years, 421 (52%) were women, and 669 (82%) were
White (Table). Fourteen percent reported routine mask use in public.
Anti-RBD and anti-N antibody presence/absence were correlated (95%;
Cohen κ=0.908).
Return to MENU
EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Latest Posts ]
No comments:
Post a Comment