posted by Arthur Foxake
Last Sunday (27-09-26) in the early hours of the morning, police were called to the countryside outside RAF Fairford, a US-run air base Gloucestershire Police received first report of three suspicious white vans travelling towards RAF Fairford.
At 1 a.m. a farmer from the neighbouring village of Whelford, is passing near RAF Fairford, is driving home from a party when she comes across three vans blocking the path to her farm. Turning around, she later reports seeing “a large group of hooded and masked men” at a nearby junction before they quickly disperse.
After a failed attempt to contact the Ministry of Defence police, the anonymous farmer phones 999 to alert Gloucestershire Police. Upon arriving at the scene, the plods discovered three white vans and five so far unnamed young men were arrested. Bomb disposal units were called in.
That sounds like the set-up for a fairly cut-and-dry false flag, doesn’t it?
But it gets weirder.
A few hours later, as Britain is sitting down to breakfast Gloucestershire Police declare a major incident. A 400m security cordon is established around the vans and Army bomb disposal units are deployed. More than 80 households in Whelford are evacuated. Reports claimed the men were small time crooks who were on a mission to steal fuel rather that fifth columnists planning to carry out a terrorist atrocity.
By mid afternoon Counter-terrorism policing announce they are now leading the investigation. The five men are also arrested on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act. US President Donald Trump says suspects had been “under view for a long time”, claiming they had been looking to cause “big damage” to the US-operated facility.
At around 4 p.m. on Monday September 28 police announce that the five men arrested over the RAF Fairford incident a 24-year-old from Camden, north London, three men aged 23, 24 and 25 from Westminster, central London, and one aged 24 from Willesden, north-west London all mysteriously described as 'British nationals' rather than simply British. Police say they are keeping an open mind about foreign interference, saying one possibility could be proxies “either knowingly or unknowingly working on behalf of a foreign state”.
Trump praises British Police but says suspects had been “under view for a long time”, claiming they had been looking to cause “big damage” to the US-operated facility at RAF Fairford and that he is “surprised” five suspects were released on bail. In comments in the Oval Office, he adds: “I will tell you, I would have said ‘Don’t let them have bail’.”
Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the “hand of a foreign actor” appeared to have been at play on Sunday but claims he is limited in what more he can say.
The whole thing starts off OK but ends up making no sense at all.
If you’re resident in Central London, why drive all the way to Gloucestershire to steal diesel fuel? Isn’t there anywhere closer? How about former RAF Northolt, now a private airstrip mostly utilised by executive jets? Are we saying that security for billionaires is tighter than for military jets on bombing raids to Iran??
Are we also saying that security at US air bases is so lax that a bunch of incompetent wannabe dicheads could just drive onto a military base and steal fuel, before driving off again? No need to register your arrival at the front gate (even big Pharma sites 20 years ago in Alderley Edge and Dartford made you pass two security desks before meeting real humans)?? Were they just going to use wire cutters to make a hole in the fence big enough to drive white vans through?
Where did the knowledge of location of whatever targets they were targeting come from? The plae is so remote even my brother who lives in Gloucestershire does not knoe exactly where it is. Does the USA post detailed plans of RAF Fairford on the internet to help terrorists treat it like a pinic destination?
If these guys were on a ‘watch list’as Trump and Rubio suggested, wouldn’t watching them involve following them out of London and tailing them down the M4 if they hired three white vans to go joyriding in? I mean: you just give suspected terrorists free rein to travel all over the country, no questions asked, no surveillance initiated? At the very least, track them with CCTV and have local polds getting curious when they pitched up outside Fairford.
In spite of all this the suspects were released on bail, which poses another question: how did they get back to London, as their white vans have not yet been released back to them? Do the police arrange taxis for five suspected terrorists??
And was the evidence against these was so lacking that the police couldn’t even get search warrants for their HMOs in Central London?? How about internet search records and mobile phone history? Why is it not reported that any of these things have been or are being done.
The whole narrative has an aura of gaslight.
FROM THE ARCHIVE:
