Hillary's Wars

HILLARY’S WARS (Pt. 2): Wikileaks Proves Syria about Iran & Israel

The following article by David Haggith was first published on The Great Recession Blog and is republished here under FAIR USE terms in the public interest, and with full acknowledgements to Mr. Haggith:

Hillary’s War in Syria is another expensive American adventure in nation building as the US inserts itself into the Syrian Civil War ostensibly to restrain the United States’ sworn enemy ISIS (or “ISIL” as the Obama Admin. prefers). Obama’s manner of fighting this war consistently shows a different objective — regime change. While that’s clear to everyone, Wikileaks’ exposure of Hillary Clinton’s emails makes it clear that US intrusion in the Syrian Civil War is really all about Iran and Israel.

Both the US and Russia want to defeat ISIS, but only the US wants to make sure Syria’s President Bashar Assad is overthrown. The United State’s ulterior motive of regime change is the reason it is ineffective against ISIS — because it wants ISIS to do its dirty work — and is the reason for the stalemate last week between Russia and the United States that resulted in a significant move back to cold-war status. I think everyone has generally observed that the US-Russian disagreement is not about how to fight ISIS but about regime change in Syria. What many might not know yet is how last week’s eruption with Russia goes back to Hillary Clinton during her time as Secretary of State.

Wikileaks archive of Clinton emails shows this is Hillary’s War with Syria

The Syrian Civil War began in 2011 — the middle of Hillary Clinton’s term as US Secretary of State. Unmarked NATO war planes began arriving in Turkey that same year, delivering weapons absconded from Libya where America participated in another war for regime change. The planes also transported volunteer Libyan soldiers. (In my view, a mission clearly outside of NATO’s charter, which was to form an alliance under which all members would fight to protect any individual member if it was attacked, not to transform the world. No one in Syria was attacking any NATO member.) By December of 2011, the CIA and US special ops also began providing communication support to Syrian forces seeking to topple Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Having advised President Obama to enter the Libyan Civil War, Hillary Clinton assured the press at the start of the Syrian Civil War that the United States would not similarly involve itself in that conflict. However, some documents exposed recently by Wikileaks show that Hillary’s advice to the president to enter the US into Libya’s Civil War came with a clear and intentional connection to topple the Assad regime:

In one document labeled “CONFIDENTIAL,” Sidney Blumenthal, a former aide to President Bill Clinton and long-time confidante to Hillary Clinton, wrote the following to Hillary:

Assad’ s gestures at reform are delusional attempts to recreate the pattern of his own recent past when he gained a modicum of respect from the West. Likely the most important event that could alter the Syrian equation would be the fall of Qaddafi, providing an example of a successful rebellion. (Wikileaks)

Prior to the fall of Qaddafi in Libya, Clinton was being advised to overthrow Qaddafi in order to effect change in Syria. Blumenthal then quotes an article by David W. Lesch, whom he says is “the U.S. expert with the closest relationship with Bashar al- Assad”:

One game-changer [in Syria] could be the fall of Col. Moammar Gadhafi in Libya…. If Gadhafi falls within the next few months, there will be another model for regime change: that of limited but targeted military support from the West combined with an identifiable rebellion. Not that this can be easily applied in Syria. It hasn’t even been easily applied in Libya, and Syria would be a much harder nut to crack.Furthermore, the Syrian opposition is far from united or being able to establish a Benghazi-like refuge from which to launch a rebellion and to which aid can be sent. But if there is regime change in Libya … it would give the Syrian regime something to really think about…. The Syrian regime does not want, nor can it probably survive, long-term international pressure or isolation, but it is used to sanctions…. Success for the rebels in Libya might change that.

US involvement in Libya began at Hillary’s urging shortly after Hillary received this advice from her confidante Sidney Blumenthal. Note that the advice that the overthrow of Qaddafi needed to be connected with “an identifiable rebellion” in Syria means that it needs to be connected with civil war in Syria. US involvement in Libya was, of course, coordinated out of Benghazi, as the advice to Hillary suggested.

Once the fall of Qaddafi was a fait accompli, Hillary’s State Department advocated the overthrow of Bashar Assad as a critical component for calming Israel so that President Barrack Obama could accomplish his legacy nuclear pact with Iran without Israel blowing Iran up before the deal was sealed.

The next document obtained by Wikileaks in its acquisition of Clinton’s emails is not advice to Hillary but subsequent advice from Hillary’s state department to the White House:

Negotiations to limit Iran’s nuclear program will not solve Israel’s security dilemma. Nor will they stop Iran from improving the crucial part of any nuclear weapons program…. Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are….. It is the strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security … through its proxies in Lebanon, like Hezbollah, that are sustained, armed and trained by Iran via Syria. The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel’s leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests…. Defense Minister Ehud Barak argued that “the toppling down of Assad will be a major blow to the radical axis, major blow to Iran….” Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly. Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted. Right now, it is the combination of Iran’s strategic alliance with Syria and the steady progress in Iran’s nuclear enrichment program that has led Israeli leaders to contemplate a surprise attack — if necessary over the objections of Washington. With Assad gone, and Iran no longer able to threaten Israel through its, proxies, it is possible that the United States and Israel can agree on red lines for when Iran’s program has crossed an unacceptable threshold. In short, the White House can ease the tension that has developed with Israel over Iran by doing the right thing in Syria…. Only the threat or use of force will change the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad’s mind….  (Wikileaks)

(Note if you look it up that the Wikileaks document shows dates that refer to when the document was unclassified, not when written. The date of the State Department’s creation of this document can be determined by its content: “the talks between the world’s major powers and Iran that began in Istanbul this April and will continue in Baghdad in May.” The switch from past tense to future tense dates the document sometime between April, 2012, which is when the talks began in Istanbul, and May, 2012, when they continued in Baghdad.)

That same document provides evidence the connection between Hillary’s War in Libya and the next war in Syria clearly became a part the Department of State’s strategy under Hillary: (Note how it states that Libya was an easier case, following the wording in the advice Hillary had been given by Blumenthal about overthrowing Qaddafi as a way to make regime change in Syria more accomplishable.)

The Obama administration has been understandably wary of engaging in an air operation in Syria like the one conducted in Libya. Libya was an easier case…. Other than the laudable purpose of saving Libyan civilians from likely attacks by Qaddafi’s regime, the Libyan operation had no long-lasting consequences for the region. Syria is harder. But success in Syria would be a transformative event for the Middle East…. using territory in Turkey and possibly Jordan, U.S. diplomats and Pentagon officials can start strengthening the opposition. It will take time…. The second step is to develop international support for a coalition air operation.Russia will never support such a mission, so there is no point operating through the UN Security Council. Some argue that U.S. involvement risks a wider war with Russia. But the Kosovo example shows otherwise. In that case, Russia had genuine ethnic and political ties to the Serbs, which don’t exist between Russia and Syria, and even then Russia did little more than complain.

According to this massively revealing document pillaged from Hillary Clinton’s email archives, Obama needed to bring down Assad’s regime in order to calm Israel into accepting the eventual nuclear agreement he was working out with Iran. So, US involvement in the Syrian Civil War is even less about Assad than it is about Iran and Israel — at least in the State Department’s strategizing.

Connect the dots: First, Hillary counseled the president to establish regime change in Libya, the easiest target for such change. Then, with that success weighing on Assad’s fears, the State Department advised seeking regime change in Syria, emphasizing to the president that overthrowing the Assad regime would be essential to his establishment of a nuclear agreement with Iran. The theory was that Assad’s newfound fears from the regime change in Libya coupled with US empowered opposition in his own country, would get him to step down. Underlying the whole plan for regime change in Syria is the motive of weakening Iran, calming Israel and transforming the entire Middle East.

So, Libya was the first hit in a planned one-two punch to Assad that would, in the scheming and collective mind of Hillary’s state department, transform the Middle East. Gaining the presidency right now would put Hillary in office just in time to be the one to see through and reap the benefit of being the president who transformed the Middle East. When it becomes a big success she can tell all about how it was her plan from the beginning and how she saw it through to the end during her presidency.

Where does ISIS/ISIL fit into Hillary’s Wars in Libya and Syria?

If you read the full document, you may be struck as I was by how there is no mention at allof concerns about ISIS/ISIL as a reason to engage in regime change in Syria. That leads me to believe concerns about ISIS were secondary at best in the State Departments advice for US engagement in Syria. Perhaps they were not much more than the necessary cover story for such engagement because many US citizens were already sick and tired of hearing about “regime change.” Regime change was supposed to be the stuff of George Bush, not the center ambition of Hillary’s reset.

The Wikileaks copy of the document from Hillary Clinton’s email archives closes with the clearly ambitious and optimistic goal of resetting all of the Middle East:

Victory may not come quickly or easily, but it will come. And the payoff will be substantial. Iran would be strategically isolated, unable to exert its influence in the Middle East. The resulting regime in Syria will see the United States as a friend, not an enemy. Washington would gain substantial recognition as fighting for the people in the Arab world, not the corrupt regimes. For Israel, the rationale for a bolt from the blue attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities would be eased. And a new Syrian regime might well be open to early action on the frozen peace talks with Israel…. America can and should help them.

Wow! How much does the State Departments advice sound like the optimistic statements of George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld that the US would be greeted as liberators in Iraq once the war was over (other than the the more realistic allowance that success in Syria will take a good deal of time and not be accomplished in a hundred days)?

Whether or not Hillary’s War in Libya is scaring Bashar Assad or inspiring his opponents, it did also nicely provide arms for the follow-on war in Syria. The tidy thing about that arrangement is that it might not be seen as US armaments that were attacking Assad directly, especially if the area arrived with Libyan fighters.

Unfortunately, there were unintended negative consequences as so often happens with US-backed regime changes. The US Joint Chiefs of Staff in 2013 assessed that Turkey had effectively transformed the secret US arms program that was shipping through Turkey from supporting “moderate rebels” (whatever a “moderate rebel” is) into supporting all elements of the Syrian opposition, including al-Nusra and ISIS.

As a result (?), The United States began direct involvement in the Syrian Civil War in September, 2014, by sending jets and Tomahawk missiles under its own command (as opposed to NATO’s) to destroy ISIS targets. The need to actually take US planes in to fight ISIS in the Syrian Civil War became a great concern as soon as it appeared US support of Assad’s opposition actually empowered ISIS. Since the Obama administration had claimed that Bush’s War turned Iraq into an incubator for ISIS, it could hardly let Obama’s covert attempt at regime change in Syria wind up empowering ISIS with US arms via Turkey.

The State Department document recommended an air operation in Syria to overthrow Assad, but it turned out that the US also needed to terminate what was happening with ISIS. Fighting ISIS (without mentioning that we had supplied them with weapons) was a much easier sell than air strikes to create regime change.

Have no fear, though, Hillary already has it all figured out, as the State Department document assures, that a regime friendly toward the US will fill the vacuum in Syria, not one constructed from ISIS. We can only hope that prediction turns out better than Clinton’s prediction that Russia would never get directly involved in the Syrian conflict just because the US was supplying Assad’s opponents.

In conclusion

The State Department document above reveals that regime change in Syria was the primary objective in a masterplan that goes as far back as the Libyan Civil War … just as much as regime-change was the overt objective in Iraq.

The fact that things were not turning out so well in the Iraqi-ISIS incubator meant that the US had to make its efforts in Syria look more about ISIS than about regime change. Even George Bush needed support for his regime-change goal in Iraq, which he found in the notion that he war in Iraq was largely about fighting al Qaeda in Iraq and getting rid of enriched uranium and weapons of mass destruction, not just about liberating the people from a dictator. He could never have sold regime-change as his primary goal, though it was.

This explains why US efforts against ISIS have appeared ineffective. The US has an ulterior motive that is at odds with destroying ISIS. ISIS is useful to the US for the time being because ISIS wants to destroy Bashar Assad as badly as the US does, though with a completely different intended outcome, which is that ISIS rules the Middle East.

The US appears to be running a strategy that is willing to use ISIS where it can to be successful in deposing Assad, but clearly the US does not want to strengthen ISIS to where it becomes the eventual new regime. That final result would completely counter Hillary’s rosy goals of a transformed Middle East that becomes a region that is friendly to the US and safer for Israel.

It’s hard to justify a war directly against Assad, but if ISIS does it, it is completely easy later on to justify a war against ISIS. The US just has to make sure ISIS doesn’t get the upper hand against all of the rest of Assad’s opponents so that they wind up being the ones to fill the power vacuum when Assad is deposed.

That conflict of interests explains why Russia has repeatedly ridiculed the US for being unable to separate the “moderate rebels” it seeks to back (in their attack against Assad) from terrorist groups (like ISIS and al Qaeda) that are also attacking Assad. Operating with mixed motives makes Obama appear inept compared to Putin, whose two motives of protecting Assad and killing ISIS are not in conflict with each other.

While Hillary’s goals might seem (to some) to be worth the means she is taking to get there, these regime changes never turn out that rosy. As shown in the first article of this series, this strategy has already cost the US its nuclear disarmament agreement with Russia and has put the US on the edge of a hot war with Russia. Allowing ISIS to have as much victory against Assad as the US feels is safe in order to try to keep the United States’ hands clean of directly overthrowing Assad is a dangerous strategy. Empowering the enemy of our enemy to fight a war has usually backfired on the US. I find it hard to think of a situation where that strategy hasn’t gone bad for the US and everyone else or where nation-building has worked out well in the last fifty years.

The US would be a safer place and the world a better place if the US stopped trying to reform the world in its image — a grand globalist goal it scarcely can afford any longer.

 

 

EU Panic Grows As Quitaly Fears Spread

Quitaly? Will Italy follow Britain out of the EU?

With a referendum in Italy, ostensibly on constitutional reforms but perceived as a referendum on the leadership of the ruling elite, looming in November and the anti - globalisation,  pro sovereignty Five Star Party growing in popularity all the time, their latest boost coming earlier this week when Mayor of Rome Virginia Raggi binned the previous city authority's proposed bid to host the 2024 Olympics, saying that solving everyday problems such as garbage disposal and homelessness must take priority over vanity projects. 

Should the constitutional changes be voted down, and the against campaign is showing a comfortable lead in opinion polls at the moment, it will put a Quitaly in-out referendum, similar to the so called Brexit vote that kick off the process of Britain leaving the European Union, at the top of the agenda. 

This blog, along with many other commentators, including mainstream media publications have predicted since the creation of the single currency system which in 2001 saw seventeen member of the 28 member Union adopt the Euro as their common currency EU. Until the last five years however, all the talk in the EU's Brussels headquarters and the European Parliament in Strasbourg was of closer economic and political integration. So what's changed you might well ask. What is it that has turned things around and made the unthinkable into the inevitable?
 
The European Union has evolved, or devolved to be accurate, from a simple a free trade pact among a few countries to a giant, dysfunctional, overreaching bureaucracy. I say 'devolved' because as a free trade club, the European Economic Community seemed a benign and positive thing. The truth is from the start, from its inception as the Common Market, the EU was intended to eventually become a single, federal superstate based on the ideas of Adolf Hitler's Nazis and a few other deeply unpleasant global view thinkers.

Free trade is an excellent idea of course. However, you don't need to legislate or regulate free trade, that’s almost a contradiction in terms. A free trade pact between different governments is unnecessary for free trade. An individual country interested in prosperity and freedom only needs to eliminate all import and export duties, all import and export quotas, and all subsidies be they for boosting exports or protecting domestic industry. When a country has duties or quotas or uses subsidies as a form of protectionism, it is not interested in free trade, only in boosting its own economy at the expense of others. Businesses should trade with whoever they want for their own advantage.

The Eurocrats, unelected bureaucrats who first inflitrated the management structure of the EU (we will refer to 'the EU' rather than using the various designations that have been used over the life of the organisation. , instead, created a trade treaty the size of the Tokyo  telephone book, regulating everything to the most minute detail. The problem with the European Union is the ruling bureaucrats claim it is about free trade, but really it’s about somebody’s arbitrary idea of “fair trade,” which amounts to regulating everything. In addition and constraining member states to trade only with those nations that comply with the labyrinthine rules and regulations dictated by Brussels bureaucrats. Brussels has become another highly stratified bureaucracy on top of all the national layers local layers for of bureaucracy the average European business to deal with.
The European Union in Brussels is composed of a class of bureaucrats that are extremely well paid, have tremendous benefits, and have their own self-referencing little culture. They’re exactly the same kind of people that live within the Washington, D.C. beltway, London's Westminster Village and in the United Nations Plaza in New York. They believe in the infallibility of 'experts', the omnicience of managerialism and the supremacy of statistics.

The EU was built upon a foundation of sand, a belief that statistics and psychology could manipulate people into cultural conformity and social regimentation. Global view thinkers, such as eugenics advocate Richard Coudenhove - Kalergi believe the lower strata of society, the masses, were not capable of thinking for themselves. Thus the 'European Project doomed to failure from the very start, the idea that all would become subservient to collectivist ideology was idiotic because the Swedes and the Sicilians are as different from each other as the Poles and the Irish. There are linguistic, religious, and cultural differences, and big differences in the standard of living and shared aspirations. 

Artificial political constructs can never last because they must marginalise the masses. The EU is great for the “elites” in Brussels, but has restricted the freedoms of average citizens, most visibly in recent years, in the cause of accommodating huge numbers of unskilled, uneducated and culturally inflexible third world immigrants who demand their host nation changes to assimilate their cultural and social mores.

Meanwhile internal pressures are acting to drive member states apart politically. Tying the currency used by the weakest economies of the Union to the German industrial powerhouse was a folly as great as pitting a donkey against a thoroughbred racehorse in a race. In Spain, the Basques and the Catalans, angry at the way their regional and ethnic cultures have been eroded by E U rules want to split off, in the UK, the Scots want to make the United Kingdom quite a bit less united, and in Quitaly there has been talk of the indistrialised northern states separating from the agrarian south. It is necessary remember that before Garibaldi created the modern nation, Italy a geographical area comprising scores of city states, dukedoms and principalities, all speakin local dialect variations of the Italian language. The same was true of Germany only united by Bismarck in 187O.

Citizens of Venice voted by a large majority to separate from Italy a couple of years ago. In the South Tyrol region, where 70% of the people speak German, a strong independence movement as sprung up. There are separatist movements in Corsica and a half dozen other departments in France. Even in Belgium, the home of the EU, the chances are that French speaking Wallonia and Flemish Flanders will separate sooner rather than later.

The chances are better in the future that the remaining countries in Europe are going to fall apart as opposed to being compressed together artificially by the often touted policy of 'ever closer integration' proposed by its accredited founder Jean monnet, and the aforementioned Coudenhove - Kalergi.

And as globalists like to describe themselves as liberal and progressive, from a philosophical point of view, the target should not be a single world government which only benefits the “elite” but many small individual governments of culturally, economically and socially coherent mini - states. That would be much more in line with the classical liberal principles of individual freedom personal development that an all powerful, hierarchic bureaucracy forcing conformity and social engineering on people.

Brexit will be the pebble that starts the avalanche, other countries will begin to move towards leaving the EU. Italy looks like being the next at the moment. All of the Italian banks are truly and totally bankrupt at this point and while Italian banks were never the most stable, the current situation is due entirely to the national enconomy being tied to the Euro. The only possible way to save Italy is to get rid of the euro and leave the EU.




RELATED POSTS:

If You Look At How Fast Global Trade Is Unravelling, You'll Get Dizzy

Governments constantly make positive noises about the health of their economies although most people who are in work have felt no improvement on the position they were in after the crash of 2008. Wages are stangnant, employment has reduced somewhat (see below) and while the banks are printing money and the super rich are widening the gap between themselves and ordinary people faster than ever, the real situation is frightening.

Democracy Murdered In France

I'm hearing very disturbing news from the French regional elections, predicting that the Front National, comfortable winners in last week's first round of regional elections, hasve been routed in all regions. For that to happen, and to happen through a massive increase in turnout, suggests electoral fraud on a hughe scale. Or has France joined Britain in adopting the Islamic version of democracy, which is one man one vote, one Imam one thousand votes.

Who Runs America, The White House Or The Shadow Government?

Reports of President Barack Obama’s meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin at the G20 summit over the weekend do not look right in the context of yet another blitz of provocative rhetoric from The Pentagon and the Department of Defence towards Moscow. In view of the USA's constant push towards all out war with Russia, one has to ask who is in control: Obama or the generals?

Trump catches attention of CFR, Bilderberg, Trilateral

Donald Trump is portrayed as a clown by mainstream media and his combover is the silliest I have ever seen. Still, he's a billionaie so I don't suppose he gives a flying fuck what The Daily Stirrer thinks of him. Not that we think he is all bad, anyone who attacks Obama's global naziism trade deals, TTIP and TPP mush have some good points.

How Mainstream Media And The Major Political Parties Are Making Sure Voters Do not Hear The Voices Of Politics' Most Powerful Critics

As the General Election campaign starts to heat up, we try to shift focus away from the squabbling between Conservative and Labour about who can make the most promises they have no intention of keeping and to the real issues concerning jobs, social breakdown , mass immigration, and loss of national sovereignty.

US Presidents Of The Past warned Against Secret, Shadow Government.
By now it should be obvious that peacemake, joybringer and putative aquatic pedestrian Barack Hussein Obama was never really in charge of the US Government. Whatever Obama said would happen, all the American government's policies ensured the opposit would happen. The embedded article thows some light on how the US government really works

The American Political System Is "Not A Democracy Or Constitutional Republic" - Thiel
The state of democracy in the USA has become a hot topic of conversation in American business circles in recent years. While President Barack Hussein Obama, not so much a man as an ego on long skinny legs, has increasingly been inclined to rule by executive order in the manner of a despot or tyrant, even Obama's fiercest critics have to admit the American electoral system seems increasingly capable of delivering only political paralysis ...

Multi-Cultural England: Are You Feeling The Progressive Diversity.

As racial and sectarian tension increase on the streets of britain while politicians gear up for the election campaign, we take a look at the state of Britain today, Imigrant child abuse gangs, Clerics of alient faiths dictating moral strictures, and everywhere we look, foreigners being given provieged status. Is it any wonder the voters are angry?

Even The BIS Is Shocked At How Broken Markets Have Become.

If the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) the bank where banks and governments do business is worried about the state of the markets, we are in bigger trouble than anyone is letting on.

What Would George Orwell Think Of The Screeching Left's Horror At Plans To Shrink The State.
In part one of his classic social commentary, The Road To Wigan Pier, George Orwell wrote of the grinding poverty and appalling living conditions endured by people in industrial areas. The second part, which is more revevant to the 21st Century is a rant against the superiority of the upper class 'Fabian' socialists who have hijacked the Labour movement and whose Paternal Liberalism is in almost all ways more repugnant that the uncaring attitude of the old elite.

France’s President Hollande Says 'Non' To Obama’s Demand for Corporate Global Oligarchy
The embattled French President has become the first national leader to state categorically his country will not sign the Trans Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership being pushed by the USA's Obama Administration. Hollande's government is already the most unporular France has ever had and the President know to give away French sovereignty to US Corporate businesses would be political suicide.

Brexit: Britain and Europe
Labour MP Kate Hoey makes case for Brexit
Brexit: Killing of pro - EU MP a hoax?
Brexit: Why does Sturgeon think Scotland can dictate to the rest of Britain
Brexit: Case for remain was based on snobbery
Bexit vote: harninger of death for the era of experts
Brexit: Soros bets on REMAIN, against Deutsche Bank

New World Order

Living With The Conspiracy


Well We Have Been Warning You: European SUPERSTATE plan unveiled: EU nations 'to be merged into one' post-Brexit
Whining Brexit 'REMAIN' Supporters Too Dumb To Know They Were Duped Into Supporting Megarich Capitalists
BREXIT vs. GREXIT – The Truth About The European Union And How It Treats Members
EU Membership Vote in UK to Paralyze Decision Making
Greece's route out of Europe
Greece Drowns In Debt: ECB Plans For Grexit - Its SHTF Time
NEIN! Germany's Bild Comdemns Latest Greek Can Kicking Exercise
People Are Waking Up To The Fact That The European Union Is On The Fast Track To Fascism
Top Derivatives Analyst Warns The Controllers Are Ready to SHUT DOWN The Financial System
China and Russia Challenge US Dominated IMF
False Economy
Debt: The Developed World Has Lost Touch With Economic Reality
Believe The Phoney Narrative Or Be Branded a Conspiracy Theorist
The True Debt Disaster America Faces - Only A Fraction Of Government Debt Is Known To The Public


Eurozone To Fail? George Soros Bets €100m AGAINST Deutsche Bank
BREXIT vs. GREXIT – The Truth About The European Union And How It Treats Members

Well We Have Been Warning You: European SUPERSTATE plan unveiled: EU nations 'to be merged into one' post-Brexit


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Pussy Grabber versus Lying, Money Grubbing Traitor For US President?

by Ian R Thorpe, 12 October, 2016

Yesterday, too late for this British based blog to pick up, Wikileaks released by far the most devastating leak of the campaign. In any nation but a tyranny or a failed state this would end the campaign of one candidate. This act of treason this betray of three hundred million people, is in complete violation of US electoral law and proves (yet again) that as president, Hillary Clinton would put the financial enrichment of her family and her elitist cronies before anything remotely related to the interests of the American people. This makes Trump’s dirty talk video, that US liberals have been in hysterics about, look like an episode of The Teletubbies.

Even though the media, Democrat politicians and even some Republicans turned on Trump when he said Obama and Hillary Clinton, who as Secretary of State at the time, issued the orders to equip an Islamic extremist group for the purpose of effecting regime change in Syria, calling Hillary the ‘founder’ of ISIS he was telling the truth. In fact US sponsorship of terrorist groups in the middle east goes back much further than the Obama - Clinton era as this Information Clearing House article shows. As is now generally known and fully documented, the Clinton campaign and the ever supine left leaning mainstream media have never stopped attacking him for it. This shows Hillary Clinton's campaign manager are working from the Josef Goebbels manual of propaganda and opinion making. Tell the lie big enough and repeat it often enough and it will become the truth.

Thanks to yesterdays leak however, those politically partisan war - worshippers in the media are forced to eat humble pie because the latest batch of leaked emails demonstrates that Hillary Clinton, in her own words, admitted to funding and equipping ISIS and provided training and technical support for their terrorist fighters. John Podesta, now Hillary’s campaign chair, but a counsellor and special adviser to President Obama at the time, was the recipient of the 2014 email which was released today.

The media is yet to report on this (but don't hold your breath), but even though Wikileaks has a track record of never once releasing info that proved to be false, expect furious denials from The White House, a lot of Op Eds in the New York Times and Washington Post about right wing conspiracy theories and how Donald Trump is working for Vladimir Putin and a statement from SNOPES, the left wing opinion checker group that risibly labels itself a fact checker, to the effect that they have Googles "Is Hillary A Traitor" and the answer was, "No, she's a woman and a liberal and on both counts is prved incapable of wrongdoing."

But why would The Saudi’s brag about funding 20% of Hillary’s Presidential campaign, and that along with Qatar, are among the largest donors to the CLINTON FOUNDATION if it is not true. They have nothing to gain from Trump becoming president, but are probably seething at having thrown fortunes at the Clinton Foundation and Michelle and Barry's retirement fund only to be left down completely by a buch of abject incompetents.

It has not been a mystery for at least a year that ISIS, a gag bag army of rag head human organ noshers, head amputators, vagina mutilators and general paskudniaks has flourished under the Obama administration? The United States has created armed and funded the terrorists via its Al Qaeda State allies. When you know this it allows you see the situation in Syria (and Libya, Yemen, Afghanistan, Iraq and Ukraine in a different light. As I have been saying since 2013, Russia and Iran (supported by Kurdish militias) are the ones fighting ISIS. Once you know we in the west are fighting Russia, and at the same time arming ISIS, it is easy to understand why ISIS are still in the game.

Clinton’s campaign and the Clinton Foundation are literally funded by the SAME PEOPLE who collaborated in supplying ISIS with arms and ammunition and killing hundreds of thousands of innocents in the Middle East, and hundreds in Europe.

As far as Barack Obama's and Hillary Clinton's role in aiding enemies of the USA, what they have done is blatant TREASON. Both should be put on trial and held accountable for crimes against humanity and Treason against the United States of America.

We know the media will do all in their power to bury this story so it is up to us to use alternative media, social media, word of mouth, window stickers and anything else to make sure the knows under Barack Obama and the Democratic Party the USA has become the terrorist state and the main warmonger. It is sad that a candidate as poor as Donald trump is the alternative to Hillary, but remember Hillary is only in the election because the Democratic Party whose name makes mock of democracy, cheated Bernie Sanders out of the nomination that should rightfully have been his.

Assange promised his latest batch of leaks would lead to the indictment of Hillary, and it looks like he was not kidding. The email proves Hillary knew and was complicit in the funding and arming of ISIS by western ‘allies’ Saudi Arabia and Qatar and was actually the prime mover in orchestrating the regime change coalition against Assad. This will not actually lead to her indictment of course, as far as her supporters are concerned the fact that she has a vagina exonerates her from blame for any of her crimes, but it should make voters realise their choice on november 8 is not between Trump and Clinton, it is between Trump and Global War.


RELATED POSTS:
A Special, Brand Boosting Song For The New President

America Is Lost: Rigged election, Rigged Media, Rigged Candidate says Assange
To paraphrase Mark Twain, reports of Julian Assange's death were greatly exaggerated. After his web feed was cut by staff at the Ecuadorian Embassy earlier this week Assange's usual stream of tweets, leaks and posts was stilled. The web, being the web, went mad with conspiracy theories but Wikileaks themselves did not comment on the wilder speculation. Well Julian is back on Hillary's case, and this time it's more personal than ever.

Will Selective Moral Outrage Of The Left Help Plunge World Into Nuclear War

As liberals (or progressives) and feminists continue to freak out about an audio tape of Donald Trump making some coarse (but true I can assure you) remarks about how women respond differently to wealthy men than to ordinary guys (I wasn't that wealthy but had good cashflow) the thing that stands out about the rather theatrical outrage of these screeching feminists is the selectivity of their moral outrage.

FBI Drops Hints They Are Ready to INDICT Hillary Clinton
Sources close to the FBI investigation into Democratic Party presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's offences relating to national security when she was Secretary of State say the Feds are ready to indict the frontrunner in the nomination process on charges relating to classified information.
Yes, the Panama Papers Could Really End Hillary Clinton’s Campaign
We've been chronicling the downfall of Hillary Clinton, from her seemingly unassailable position as the anointed successor to Barack Obama, whose path to first the Democratic Party nomination and then the Presidency itself had been carefully planned and all obstacles removed. The fixers and deal makers had reckoned without two factors however, Bernie Sanders and Mrs. Clinton's poor image with voters, a result of her spoiled little rich girl arrogance and the incompetence she showed in office as Secretary of State.
Obama's price for saving Daves seat on the EU Gravy train
America being destroyed by neo - liberalism

America global hegemony
Failure of American leadership
Washington flatulence creates American trump

Eye - Cathching Headline To Counter Hysteria Over Trump's Pussy Tapes

AS PROMISED, WIKILEAKS JUST DROPPED THE BIG BOMB ON HILLARY – The SMOKING GUN IS OUT!

Leaked Podesta Emails Show Bernie Sanders Was Right About Hillary's Ties To Wall Street

Hacker Dumps Thousands Of Emails From Close Clinton Insider, Reveals Hillary's New Email Address
They, Your Husband's Victims That Is, Have Names, Hillary

Can we take the new corruption investigation into the Clinton Foundation seriously

Haiti President Blows Whistle On Clinton: "Hillary Tried To Bribe Me!"

How Much Does It Cost To Buy A US Ambassadorship

Julian Assange Confirms Sanders Was Threatened By Clinton Campaign Thugs
"Clinton Foundation Is Charity Fraud Of Epic Proportions", Analyst Charges In Stunning Takedown
Are Sites That Criticise Hillbillary Clinton Are Being blocked By Google?
If This Does Not Disqualify Hillary For The Presidency, It's Hard To Know What Will
Hillary and the Clinton Foundation: Exemplars of America’s Political Rot
The Difference In Voting For Hillbillary or Trump Is One Promises War With Russia, (the other is named Donald)
Wiki Leak Found Email Linking Obama, Clinton To ISIS


Wikileaks Drops Hillary Email Bomb That Could End Her Campaign but FB Censored It
Servergate: Hillary Clinton, Arrogant, Ignorant or both?
Servergate: 'Immune' Hillary IT-Staffer Reportedly A "Devastating Witness" - FBI
Undemocratic Democrats – Nearly 10% Of Democratic Party Superdelegates Are Corporate Lobbyists
Hillary Should Be Terrified After Judge Grants Staffer Immunity On Email Scandal
More Evidence That Hillary Clinton Leaked Secrets damaging To The USA

The Birth Of Cultural Marxism
Ever wondered when and where the idiotic pseudo -philosophies of hippys and the idiotic and divisive politically correct dogmas of the modern left were born. The Social justice Warriors (aka 'liberals' or progressives' though they are really neither of these things but instead are moralistic authoritarians who hate free speech and personal liberty and support censorship, government control of media and criminalisation of dissent.

Clinton E-mails Show When Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton Allowed George Soros To Dictate Foreign Policy

A set of e-mail messages included in the latest batch of Hillary Clinton documents released by Wikileaks (the September 2015 State Department dump) show that while Secretary of State of the United States, Mrs. Clinton received direct orders on U.S. foreign policy from the Hungarian-American billionaire George Soros, who has made a fortune out of manipulating markets (and trashed the economies of several third world countries in the process.)

Obama's Legacy Is "Unbridled Abuse Of Executive Power, Completely Outside The Rule Of Law"
Two new congressional reports conclude senior military officials skewed information about the war to make it look like it was going better. The unanswered question is why.

Rand Paul PROVED Why Hillary Should Be In PRISON.

Whatever political colour they paint themselves, the establishment stick together and whenever the peasants are revolting by exposing the scandals of elitist lawlessness they close ranks and cover up the most heinous crimes. It is therefore newsworthy when a member of the establishment attacks another, as US Senator Rand Paul has done, accusing Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton of crimes including perjury, fraud, theft, corruption, conspiracy.

Democracy Murdered In France

I'm hearing very disturbing news from the French regional elections, predicting that the Front National, comfortable winners in last week's first round of regional elections, hasve been routed in all regions. For that to happen, and to happen through a massive increase in turnout, suggests electoral fraud on a hughe scale. Or has France joined Britain in adopting the Islamic version of democracy, which is one man one vote, one Imam one thousand votes.

Who Runs America, The White House Or The Shadow Government?

Reports of President Barack Obama’s meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin at the G20 summit over the weekend do not look right in the context of yet another blitz of provocative rhetoric from The Pentagon and the Department of Defence towards Moscow. In view of the USA's constant push towards all out war with Russia, one has to ask who is in control: Obama or the generals?

Trump catches attention of CFR, Bilderberg, Trilateral

Donald Trump is portrayed as a clown by mainstream media and his combover is the silliest I have ever seen. Still, he's a billionaie so I don't suppose he gives a flying fuck what The Daily Stirrer thinks of him. Not that we think he is all bad, anyone who attacks Obama's global naziism trade deals, TTIP and TPP mush have some good points.

How Mainstream Media And The Major Political Parties Are Making Sure Voters Do not Hear The Voices Of Politics' Most Powerful Critics

As the General Election campaign starts to heat up, we try to shift focus away from the squabbling between Conservative and Labour about who can make the most promises they have no intention of keeping and to the real issues concerning jobs, social breakdown , mass immigration, and loss of national sovereignty.

US Presidents Of The Past warned Against Secret, Shadow Government.
By now it should be obvious that peacemake, joybringer and putative aquatic pedestrian Barack Hussein Obama was never really in charge of the US Government. Whatever Obama said would happen, all the American government's policies ensured the opposit would happen. The embedded article thows some light on how the US government really works

The American Political System Is "Not A Democracy Or Constitutional Republic" - Thiel
The state of democracy in the USA has become a hot topic of conversation in American business circles in recent years. While President Barack Hussein Obama, not so much a man as an ego on long skinny legs, has increasingly been inclined to rule by executive order in the manner of a despot or tyrant, even Obama's fiercest critics have to admit the American electoral system seems increasingly capable of delivering only political paralysis ...

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

You Think Trump's Pussy Tape Was Offensive - Here's Offensive For You

Several people have picked me up on an article which attacked the emotionally retarded neo - fascist 'liberal' screechers who have been getting their knickers in a twist about how offensive Donald Trump's locker room language about women is. What a bunch of hypocrites, as Trump said, the things Bill Clinton DID to women and that Hillary defended by attacking, smearing and trying to discredit the victims of her husband's sexual incontinence. But Hillary's own catalogue of crime ought to have been enough to see them both in jail years ago.

Lefties, liberals, socialists, whatever these self righteous bigots style themselves, are known for their double standards of course, expecting to be able to hold their opponents to much higher standards than they impose on themselves. So if you want a true measure of how offensive Donald Trump's words were, try this:

Hillary Laughed At Me And Blamed Me For Getting Raped

from The Federalist

When Kathy Shelton was 12 years old, she was raped by Thomas Alfred Taylor, a 41-year-old man who served less than a year in prison after Hillary Clinton got him off the rape charge on a legal technicality.
In 1975, Clinton was Taylor’s court-appointed lawyer and has since laughed about getting him off and even intimated that she thought he was guilty, which can be heard in audio recordings obtained and published by The Washington Free Beacon.

‘It was a fascinating case, it was a very interesting case,’ Clinton says in the recording. ‘This guy was accused of raping a 12-year-old. Course he claimed that he didn’t, and all this stuff’ . . . ‘I had him take a polygraph, which he passed – which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs,’ she added with a laugh. Clinton can also be heard laughing at several points when discussing the crime lab’s accidental destruction of DNA evidence that tied Taylor to the crime.

Now, Shelton has taken to Twitter to make Clinton face her actions.

Read all >>>




In documents recently leaked by Wikileaks and DC Leaks Hillary Clinton Confesses in a speech to Goldman Sachs executives (not that she needs to confess, the company she keeps is damning enough,) that she has different personas, one for when she is talking to fellow elitists and one for when she is addressing the public.

Further leaks show that her public persona is the more dishonest and unpleasant hypocrite. But remember, this is a woman who is so false she can stand on a podium and tell her audience she supports poor people while wearing a outfit that costs more than many poor people could earn in a year. Not that there are any poor people in the audience at a Clinton gig. They can't afford the $1000 price it costs to get in.
 


RELATED POSTS:

America Is Lost: Rigged election, Rigged Media, Rigged Candidate says Assange
To paraphrase Mark Twain, reports of Julian Assange's death were greatly exaggerated. After his web feed was cut by staff at the Ecuadorian Embassy earlier this week Assange's usual stream of tweets, leaks and posts was stilled. The web, being the web, went mad with conspiracy theories but Wikileaks themselves did not comment on the wilder speculation. Well Julian is back on Hillary's case, and this time it's more personal than ever.

Will Selective Moral Outrage Of The Left Help Plunge World Into Nuclear War
As liberals (or progressives) and feminists continue to freak out about an audio tape of Donald Trump making some coarse (but true I can assure you) remarks about how women respond differently to wealthy men than to ordinary guys (I wasn't that wealthy but had good cashflow) the thing that stands out about the rather theatrical outrage of these screeching feminists is the selectivity of their moral outrage.

A Special, Brand Boosting Song For The New President


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

While We Have Been Distracted By Trump Hysteria, Obama Has Been Easing The West Towards War With Russia ...

Clinton and Trump - not best friends (Image source: inquirer)

While mainstream media in the developed nations has been in a collective meltdown over two trivial non stories, Donald Trump's not very offensive mention of 'grabbing a woman's pussy' and the alleged robbery at gunpoint of famous - for - being - famous reality TV star Kim Kardashian, which now loooks like an insurance scam, most people have been blissfully unaware of the really big news story that has unfolded over the past week.

President Barack Hussein Obama and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, having effectively ceded not only the middle east but eastern Europe as well to Putin through their complete ineptitude that has seen the USA convene, fund, arm, and train the most effective anti western terrorist group ever, ISIS, for the purpose of overthrowing the Assad regime in Syria and now with Assad still in power after four years of bloody and destructive civil war, as the Syrian army reinforced by Iranian ground troops and back by Russian air support, stand on the brink of victory, the Obama and his anointed successor Hillary Clinton are pushing harder than ever for a shooting war with Russia.

The Russians just moved ballistic missiles into Kaliningrad (Koenigsberg): Picture - (Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko, AP)

In the second debate of the presidential election campaign on Sunday (9 October) Democratic Party Candidate Hillary Clinton launched an astonishing and undemocratic attack on Russia, blaming President Vladimir Putin personally for the hacking of her server and leaks of damaging material. Clinton says Putin wants Trump to win and accuses the Russia of 'war crimes' in Syria. Clinton went on the offensive during the combative head-to-head showdown, apparently seething after she fell victim to leaks which she attributed to Russian hackers, without offering anything to substantiate her claim.

In her strongest attack on Russia yet, Clinton rebuked the country for its bombing of Aleppo, home to some 250,000 people (although the US backed rebels have been shelling residential areas in the government held part of the city for several years) and alleged crimes against humanity. Apparently in Clinton's view opposing the US bid for global hegemony is a crime against humanity.

"There is a determined effort by the Russian air force to destroy Aleppo in order to eliminate the last of the Syrian rebels who are really holding out against the Assad regime," she told the audience at the televised debate.

With blatant dishonesty Clinton said, "Russia hasn't paid any attention to ISIS. They're interested in keeping Assad in power." The second part of that is right, Assad has always been a Russian ally but to say Russia has ignored ISIS shows how far out of touch with reality this war worshipping death junkie is. Russia has defeated ISIS and the equally evil gang of human organ noshing head amputators, Al Nusra Front (Obama's beloved 'moderate rebels'.) She went on. 'I do support the effort to investigate for crimes - war crimes - committed by the Syrians and the Russians, and try to hold them accountable,' she told the crowd. Not a mention of the war crimes, the mass executions, mas rapes, taking of young women as sex slaves and slaughter of Syrian Jews, Christians, Alawite (Shi'ite) and Yazidi Muslims and ethnic Kurds by moderate rebels then? She also alleged that Russia wanted to see Trump in power rather than her.
"But I want to emphasize that what is at stake here is the ambitions and the aggressiveness of Russia," she said. Actually what is at stake is the success or failure of US Geopolitical ambitions.

Now, Mrs. Clinton is a bigger fool than she looks if she thinks a US versus Russia shoot up would be and easy victory for the Americans. Russia, even under the incompetent Soviet regimes was a formidable enemy and now has a far more advanced range of military hardware than the USA (although Uncle Sam is decades ahead on equal rights for gay soldiers). The Democrats (who once under Obama drew a "red line" against Assad, then immediately folded) and only last week promised a military incursion to save ISIS in Aleppo and remove Assad, and again folded when Putin said, "Come and have a go if you think you're hard enough, now see the Syrian multi-party war primarily as an excuse to import more Syrian highly trained ISIS fighters and terrorist bombers refugees" into the United States in order to destabilize the country under the guise of "humanitarianism." The power of a single heartrending propaganda photo -- whether it's this one or this one -- is amazing, but the foreign policy of great nations should not be based on sentimentality.

Vladimir Putin and his inner circle view Barack Obama with utter contempt. To the hard men in Moscow the diffident, somewhat effeminate, reputedly intellectual (although we have seen little evidence of that) president is a weakling, and the living embodiment of everything they despise about the postmodern West. Here the Kremlin mirrors most Russians, who find Obama a weak, childish and contemptible man. This is nothing new. I’ve read remarkable put-downs of the US president, from the words of highly educated Russians. Some of their comments have been earthy enough to make Donald Trump blush (they've obviously head the story that the young Obama worked as an arse prostitute to fund his drug habit), insulting, and nowhere near politically correct.

Today’s news from the middle eastern front is an Estonian report that the Russian military is sending Iskander-M missiles to Kaliningrad (a Russian enclave on the Baltic coast between Poland and Lithuania.

The Iskander-M system, called SS-26 by NATO, is the replacement of the Scud missile of American Gulf War memory. It has a range of 300 miles and can carry either a conventional or a nuclear warhead. An Iskander-M based in Kaliningrad can strike targets deep in Poland and across the whole Baltic region. Make no mistake, this is primarily an offensive weapons system.

Of course it is. As noted in the passage above, the Kremlin regards Obama as a clown, and expresses itself in the crudest possible racial terms. Having reclaimed Crimea and effectively annexed chunks of the Ukraine, the Russians have recently paused in order to consider their next moves: take Kiev, or Finlandise the Baltic states, or both?

RELATED POSTS:

Will Selective Moral Outrage Of The Left Help Plunge World Into Nuclear War

As liberals (or progressives) and feminists continue to freak out about an audio tape of Donald Trump making some coarse (but true I can assure you) remarks about how women respond differently to wealthy men than to ordinary guys (I wasn't that wealthy but had good cashflow) the thing that stands out about the rather theatrical outrage of these screeching feminists is the selectivity of their moral outrage.

‘I’m back from Syria. The media are lying to you.’ Eva Bartlett
Eva Bartlett is a Canadian activist/freelance journalist. Eva has lived cumulative 3 years in Gaza, spent time in Lebanon and visited Syria 3 times since April 2014. Anti-zionist, anti-imperialist, pro-justice. Find out more about Eva’s trips to Syria on her Websites: InGaza and Syria Solidarity Movement or watch the embedded video from YouTube at the web page linked above ...

To Join Obama's Proxy War Against Russia In Syria Would Be Cameron's Greatest Folly
A look at our prospects should tway - boy Cameron succeed in obtaining parliament's approval for his wish to join Obama's coalition ofg dodgy political opportunists in their attempt to overthrow Syria's President Assad. Given that Putin has said many times, Assad stays, our outdated war planes don't stand an ice cube in hell's chance against Russian S34s and Growler Surface to Air missiules (SAMs). And that's without factoring in China's pledge to support it's allies Putin and Assad.

U.S. Government Moves To Exploit Paris Terror Attacks To Abolish Privacy
Never ones to miss an opportunity to advance their fascistc agenda, the US government is trying to exploit fears generated by the Paris Muslim terror attacks.

Afghan troops defect to Taliban in Helmand
According to news sources in Pakistan, up to sixty five Afghan soldiers, trained and armed by US and European military advisers, have defected to the resurgent Taliban, taking their weapons and equipment with them. Another 88 are reported to have been killed in heavy fighting between Taliban irregulars and government forces in the southern province of Helmand.

Paris Horror Demonstrates Limits On Tolerance And Need For Border Controls
As the lawless criminal scum imported by Merkel in her efforts to suck up to Obama threaten to turn Germany into a third world human cespit, it seems public opinion in European is waking up.

Russia's Upper Hand In Syria Forces USA To Negotiate On Assad's Future
Why is John Kerry suddenly so eager to talk to anyone and everyone about Syria now when the war between Assad and the US sponsored Sunni Jihad has been dragging on for four and a half years? Are members of the Obama administration worried that the joint Russian / Iranian campaign in the air and on land has been too successful against ISIS and exposed as a sham the efforts of the USA and it's allies to 'defeat ...

Russia Takes Over The Mid-East: Moscow Gets Green Light For Strikes In Iraq, Sets Up Alliance With Jordan
Not long ago we were reporting on the way moves in the war against ISIS had shifted the global power balance from west to east, with Putin's decisive and efficiently executed moves to drive the Islamic State forces out of Syria and Obama's failure to repond in any intelligent way demonstrating to the world that the USA had surrendered its role as the dominant military power.

Regime Change As American As Thanksgiving
US President Barack Obama is someone to almost pity. For he has the unenviable task of standing before the nations of the world and blether the self — righteous lies of western propagandists, as he did again, during recent his address to the UN General Assembly.

Russian Warships Launch Missile Attack On Syrian Targets, Clearing Way For Iran Ground Invasion
In was always going to happen once the Russian air force had softened up ISIS and Al Qaeda positions in Syria. With the opposition on the run (and unconfirmable reports suggesting thousands of ISIS irregulars are desterting) thanks to five days of air bombardment from some of the most advanced strike aircraft in the world, we predicted Iran would ...

All Bombs Kill But Obama Only Denounces Russia's And Syria's Bombs
The U.S. government has dropped hundreds of thousands of tons of bombs on Iraq alone in the last dozen years – and even hailed the start of the bombing campaign in 2003 as “shock and awe” – but now has coyly and repeatedly decried the Syrian government’s supposed use of crude “barrel bombs.”

Russia's action against ISIS in Syria outwits Obama Again
Europe’s intensifying migrant crisis and Russia’s increased military support for President Assad’s regime in Syria, including the establishment of a Russian military Syrian headquarters at Latakia have focused the attention of world media and those of us who like to be aware what is going on to dangerous situation now emerging from Syria’s protracted civil war.

Assad Says Europe Is Responsible For Refugee Crisis: "If You're Worried About Them, Stop Supporting Terrorists"
As the tide of refugees fleeing Syria’s bloody civil war, swelled by African economic migrants masquerading as Syrians continues to tear the European Union (EU) apart, and as Brussels struggles to formulate a coherent policy for handling the crisis as member states go their own way with measures to close border crossing points, divert migrants to other member nations, or ...

Why Assad is Winning: Victory For Secular Ruler In Syria Will Transform the Middle East.
While mainstream media continue to spin the Washington lie that US sponsored rebels are about to topple the Assad regime in Syria (the story they have been telling us for three years, an examination of the news feeds that mainstream news publisher and broadcasters use, which are free from Washington's propaganda spin reveal a different story.

While we watch Unkraine and Turkey The War Goes On In Syria
With mainstream media focused on ISIS and Ukraine amid, fears of an excalation of local problems into a war between East, West and Islam, we are in danger of forgetting nasty little civil conflicts like the one between forces loyal to the secular dictator Assad and the Al Nusra rebels who want to replace a secular dictatorship with an even more ruthless theocracy.

Another American Foreign Policy Embarrassment As Department of Defence Admits Supporting ISIS In Syria
News of how leaked documents prove the US Central intelligence Agency set up ISIS for the purpose of destabilizing the middle east is all over the internet, yet mainstream media continue to ignore it ...

War For The middle East - Why Islamic State Is Winning
The Obama Administration, and in particular The State Department which under the leadership of John (57) Kerry looks after foreign policy has all in all had a nightmare few months since the turn of the year. The unlikely (and unholy) Saudi Arabian - Israeli alliance in cahoots with U.S. neocons and military / industrial complex corporations have pressured the President into escalating U.S. aggression toward the secular government of Bashar Al Assad in Syria.

World War Three? Kiev Reinvades Donbass, Deliberate Provocation Trashed Minsk Agreement
When America wants to provoke Russia it uses proxies, a rabble in Libya, Islamic fundamentalists in Syria and Iraq and neo - Nazi thugs in Ukraine. So far Russia has resisted the urge to kick Obama in the balls, but sooner or later the Russia - China - Iran alliance will respond.

Stupidity Of America's Lust For War With Russia
We have reported many times on the American attempts to provoke Russia's leader Vladimir Putin in the hope that Putin will then fire the first shot in the war the USA so desperately needs to revive its failed economy, unify its dysfunctional society and restore is to the position of dominant global superpower ...

US Special Forces caught red-handed in Syria
How long ago did we tell you the USA had military personnel on the ground in Syria. Evidence about the activities of U.S. special forces in the Syrian town Ayn al-Arab a.k.a. Kobani has emerged in the last few days. U.S. Troops are guiding airstrikes as part of their support for ...

A Special, Brand Boosting Song For The New President


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Polish Leader Kaczynski Says European Union Must Change Or Disband

Press Agencies Agence france Presse (AFP) and Reuters reporting  that Jaroslaw Kaczynski leader of Poland’s ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party, speaking in an interview published on Monday by German Newspaper Die Welt said The European Union will collapse if it fails to reform.

With EU political leaders and bureaucrats bitterly

divided over how the political crisis caused by Britain's vote to leave the EU should be dealt with and differences widening on defence, economic and immigration

After more than a half century of calls for closer integration leading eventually to the abolition on member states and the creation of a federal superstate, many commentators now fear the former free trade bloc that has increasingly become a political entity risks disinegration.

“The continent is changing rapidly and, as I see it, not for the better,” Kaczynski was quoted as saying in German newspaper Die Welt.

"The rise of populist parties across the continent, such as the Alternative for Germany, the National Front in France and anti-European parties in the Netherlands among others could cause the EU as it is to burst," he said.


“Either we reform the EU or it collapses.”


Kaczynski’s Law and Justice party is a nationalistic , and has divided opinion with its movement that shook EU federalists when it completely ousted the previous pro - EU conservative government from Poland's parliament at the last election. Like all anti - EU, pro - national - sovereignty parties it is often described at extreme right wing by its critics although it is in no way authoritarian, has a classical liberal social outlook and it's EU policy  is built on the consolidation of power in the elected governments of member states.


Eastern European countries like Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia – known collectively as the Visegrad group, have demanded that the extension of powers vested in the unelected bureaucrats of the European Commission be reined in as a consequence of Britain’s vote to leave the bloc.


Kaczynksi said Poland had put forward in unofficial talks suggestions on how to change the EU’s treaties to strengthen nation states.

RELATED POSTS:

After Brexit European Union Moves To Abolish Free Speech!

While European citizens are increasingly at risk of arrest for "hate speech" and "xenophobic remarks" (both terms for which there is no legal definition in any state of Europe,) the law does not apply equally to all Europeans, the ruling elites it sems can say what they like about whom they dislike.

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Eye - Cathching Headline To Counter Hysteria Over Trump's Pussy Tapes

If Trump Were Sexually Interested In Men, It Would Be Politically Incorrect To Say Anything Negative About It

https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=12623227#allposts

Donald Trump with beauty pageant participants (image source: NYT)

Eye Catching (and accurate) Headline For And Article That Is Well Worth Reading (and should be manadatory reading for the war - loving, hypocritical 'liberal' bigots who want to put in The White House candidate who has promised war (and that would be nuclear war) with Russia and by association China.

I know Donald Trump is an unattractive candidate but read the article and if you are thinking of voting for Hillary Clinton take on board the thought that by voting for Clinton you are voting for a war nobody can win .

So don't let eyewash distract you from the real issue here. The thought of President Trump might horrify you, but victory for him would at least offer a break from the political dupoly that controls Washington and the influence of neocon hawks and the military / industrial complex, and a chance to rebuild a true constitutional republic based on REPRESENTATIVE democracy.

A Clinton victory would mean more war, destruction, death; but this time round it will not be confined to Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Afghanistan and Ukraine. It would be coming to east and west coast USA and gradually creeping further inland.

Remember between now and November, a vote for Trump is a vote for locker room banter, a vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote for war.

Paul Craig Roberts on the hysterical response to Donald Trump's dirty talk 

Here's a teaser:

"The presstitute media are doing everything that propagandists can do to anoint Hillary to the Oval Office. 

The main issue facing the electorate is whether the next administration will lead us into military conflict with Russia and by implication with China, not Trump’s sexual interest in women. The conflict would be thermo-nuclear. Trump is in the oligarchs’ crosshairs, because Trump disavows conflict with Russia.

A subsidiary issue is that Trump, unlike Hillary, is not owned by the oligarchs. If Trump were able to form a government that reflects this difference, there would be hope for peace and for Washington to turn its attention from service to the One Percent to service to the 99 Percent."

RELATED POSTS:

Will Selective Moral Outrage Of The Left Help Plunge World Into Nuclear War

As liberals (or progressives) and feminists continue to freak out about an audio tape of Donald Trump making some coarse (but true I can assure you) remarks about how women respond differently to wealthy men than to ordinary guys (I wasn't that wealthy but had good cashflow) the thing that stands out about the rather theatrical outrage of these screeching feminists is the selectivity of their moral outrage.

Eye - Cathching Headline To Counter Hysteria Over Trump's Pussy Tapes

AS PROMISED, WIKILEAKS JUST DROPPED THE BIG BOMB ON HILLARY – The SMOKING GUN IS OUT!

Leaked Podesta Emails Show Bernie Sanders Was Right About Hillary's Ties To Wall Street

Hacker Dumps Thousands Of Emails From Close Clinton Insider, Reveals Hillary's New Email Address
They, Your Husband's Victims That Is, Have Names, Hillary

Can we take the new corruption investigation into the Clinton Foundation seriously

Haiti President Blows Whistle On Clinton: "Hillary Tried To Bribe Me!"

How Much Does It Cost To Buy A US Ambassadorship

Julian Assange Confirms Sanders Was Threatened By Clinton Campaign Thugs
"Clinton Foundation Is Charity Fraud Of Epic Proportions", Analyst Charges In Stunning Takedown
Are Sites That Criticise Hillbillary Clinton Are Being blocked By Google?
If This Does Not Disqualify Hillary For The Presidency, It's Hard To Know What Will
Hillary and the Clinton Foundation: Exemplars of America’s Political Rot
The Difference In Voting For Hillbillary or Trump Is One Promises War With Russia, (the other is named Donald)
Wiki Leak Found Email Linking Obama, Clinton To ISIS

FBI Drops Hints They Are Ready to INDICT Hillary Clinton

Sources close to the FBI investigation into Democratic Party presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's offences relating to national security when she was Secretary of State say the Feds are ready to indict the frontrunner in the nomination process on charges relating to classified information.

Yes, the Panama Papers Could Really End Hillary Clinton’s Campaign
We've been chronicling the downfall of Hillary Clinton, from her seemingly unassailable position as the anointed successor to Barack Obama, whose path to first the Democratic Party nomination and then the Presidency itself had been carefully planned and all obstacles removed. The fixers and deal makers had reckoned without two factors however, Bernie Sanders and Mrs. Clinton's poor image with voters, a result of her spoiled little rich girl arrogance and the incompetence she showed in office as Secretary of State.
Obama's price for saving Daves seat on the EU Gravy train
America being destroyed by neo - liberalism

America global hegemony
Failure of American leadership
Washington flatulence creates American trump
Wikileaks Drops Hillary Email Bomb That Could End Her Campaign but FB Censored It
Servergate: Hillary Clinton, Arrogant, Ignorant or both?
Servergate: 'Immune' Hillary IT-Staffer Reportedly A "Devastating Witness" - FBI
Undemocratic Democrats – Nearly 10% Of Democratic Party Superdelegates Are Corporate Lobbyists
Hillary Should Be Terrified After Judge Grants Staffer Immunity On Email Scandal
More Evidence That Hillary Clinton Leaked Secrets damaging To The USA

The Birth Of Cultural Marxism
Ever wondered when and where the idiotic pseudo -philosophies of hippys and the idiotic and divisive politically correct dogmas of the modern left were born. The Social justice Warriors (aka 'liberals' or progressives' though they are really neither of these things but instead are moralistic authoritarians who hate free speech and personal liberty and support censorship, government control of media and criminalisation of dissent.

Clinton E-mails Show When Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton Allowed George Soros To Dictate Foreign Policy

A set of e-mail messages included in the latest batch of Hillary Clinton documents released by Wikileaks (the September 2015 State Department dump) show that while Secretary of State of the United States, Mrs. Clinton received direct orders on U.S. foreign policy from the Hungarian-American billionaire George Soros, who has made a fortune out of manipulating markets (and trashed the economies of several third world countries in the process.)

Obama's Legacy Is "Unbridled Abuse Of Executive Power, Completely Outside The Rule Of Law"
Two new congressional reports conclude senior military officials skewed information about the war to make it look like it was going better. The unanswered question is why.

Rand Paul PROVED Why Hillary Should Be In PRISON.

Whatever political colour they paint themselves, the establishment stick together and whenever the peasants are revolting by exposing the scandals of elitist lawlessness they close ranks and cover up the most heinous crimes. It is therefore newsworthy when a member of the establishment attacks another, as US Senator Rand Paul has done, accusing Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton of crimes including perjury, fraud, theft, corruption, conspiracy.

Democracy Murdered In France

I'm hearing very disturbing news from the French regional elections, predicting that the Front National, comfortable winners in last week's first round of regional elections, hasve been routed in all regions. For that to happen, and to happen through a massive increase in turnout, suggests electoral fraud on a hughe scale. Or has France joined Britain in adopting the Islamic version of democracy, which is one man one vote, one Imam one thousand votes.

Who Runs America, The White House Or The Shadow Government?

Reports of President Barack Obama’s meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin at the G20 summit over the weekend do not look right in the context of yet another blitz of provocative rhetoric from The Pentagon and the Department of Defence towards Moscow. In view of the USA's constant push towards all out war with Russia, one has to ask who is in control: Obama or the generals?

Trump catches attention of CFR, Bilderberg, Trilateral

Donald Trump is portrayed as a clown by mainstream media and his combover is the silliest I have ever seen. Still, he's a billionaie so I don't suppose he gives a flying fuck what The Daily Stirrer thinks of him. Not that we think he is all bad, anyone who attacks Obama's global naziism trade deals, TTIP and TPP mush have some good points.

How Mainstream Media And The Major Political Parties Are Making Sure Voters Do not Hear The Voices Of Politics' Most Powerful Critics

As the General Election campaign starts to heat up, we try to shift focus away from the squabbling between Conservative and Labour about who can make the most promises they have no intention of keeping and to the real issues concerning jobs, social breakdown , mass immigration, and loss of national sovereignty.

US Presidents Of The Past warned Against Secret, Shadow Government.
By now it should be obvious that peacemake, joybringer and putative aquatic pedestrian Barack Hussein Obama was never really in charge of the US Government. Whatever Obama said would happen, all the American government's policies ensured the opposit would happen. The embedded article thows some light on how the US government really works

The American Political System Is "Not A Democracy Or Constitutional Republic" - Thiel
The state of democracy in the USA has become a hot topic of conversation in American business circles in recent years. While President Barack Hussein Obama, not so much a man as an ego on long skinny legs, has increasingly been inclined to rule by executive order in the manner of a despot or tyrant, even Obama's fiercest critics have to admit the American electoral system seems increasingly capable of delivering only political paralysis ...

Adolf Hitler, His Part In Our Downfall

FREE E-BOOK FOR .pdf & Kindle dowload

A thirty five thousand word book on the authoroitarian, undemocratic, bureaucratic dictatorship that is the European Union. Following the outburst of left wing hate politics following Boris Johnson's reminder that the EU has its roots in Hitler's Naziism, which as any intelligent person is aware is both true and very well documented. My blog colleagues and I decided to assemble this collection of our articles (with some long extracts quoted from public domain and creative commons sources) to help people misled by the REMAIN campaign into thinking the arguments are solely economic.

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ...  [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]