The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant. - Maximilien Robespierre.

Showing posts with label libertarian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label libertarian. Show all posts

Saturday, October 16, 2021

Mussolini Lives: Merging State and Corporate Power Is Not ‘Libertarian’

 Years ago I fell foul of Liberals by suggesting it is possible to be a liberal and a libertarian.
"You're a idiot," the libbies screeched (they always start screeching when faces with something that challenges their certainties,) "libertarians are far right nut jobs who want to abolish government so they can do as they like."

Apart from proving that in spite of their assumptions of intellectual superiority these people do not know the difference between liberalism, libertarianism and anarchy this only proved these intolerant people are not as liberal as they like to think they are.

In fact these liberals were not liberal at all, they support big government by the centralised state, high taxes and maximum intervention in the minutiae of individual lives. And they also believe in increased colaboration between the state and corporate business for the benefit of the rich and control of the working classes. Which is exactly the political philosophy proposed by Italian Fascist leader Benito Mussolini in the 1930s.

I could have written at length again on the same topic but somebody else already has.

Merging State and Corporate Power Is Not ‘Libertarian’

Friday, Oct 15, 2021 - 12:37

by Ben Bartee via The Daily Bell

“Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.”

-Benito Mussolini

Like a child with spaghetti, the US corporate state made a mess of libertarian ideology.

Other Western political cultures do not recognize the exceedingly awkward and cowardly simplistic US version of corporate libertarianism, which goes something like:

  • Public domain bad; private domain good
  • Competition bad; monopoly good
  • Government bad; corporations good

Unlike some ideologies, libertarianism need not necessarily deal in the black and white. As humans gifted with free thought and the capacity for reason, we should be also capable of nuance. Each of these propositions can be true in any given context:

  • The corporation can be an effective organizational structure for facilitating efficient economic relations between willing partners

AND/OR

  • Left unchecked, the corporate machine will merge with the state into a rent-seeking, anti-libertarian foe to human prosperity

… In short, the corporation, like fire, makes for a useful tool and a dangerous enemy.

The executives of any given corporation are tasked with maximizing profit above all. Public executives, in fact, have a legally enforceable fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit as their primary function. In and of itself, this is a morality-free imperative, neither inherently right or wrong; it is only the nature of the beast.

What does a corporate entity have to say of human liberty? Nothing – not now, not ever. Profiteering is the ethos, nothing more.

If maximal profits are to be made in a free society, so be it; if maximum fortune is to be mined from a sea of enslaved zombies, just as well – it’s all the same to the shareholders.

Given those machinations, what happens when the corporation becomes the state? When the profit-seeking imperative of corporate enterprise merges with the control-seeking imperative of government?

Here, in 2021, the interests of the state and corporations converge – so that it doesn’t matter which entity forces the adoption of “vaccine passports”:

“At least 17 [US] companies or nonprofits are developing websites or apps that might be used by sporting venues, restaurants and other businesses seeking to keep their customers and employees safe, according to… the executive director of the Health Innovation Alliance, a broad coalition of health providers, tech companies, employers and insurers.”

Ask yourself: if you can’t work, send your kids to school, fly on an airplane, cross borders, or even potentially shop at grocery stores without a “vaccine passport” (as CNN recently suggested), does it matter whether the state or a private corporation develops the app and runs the program?

The end result is the same: a dystopian hellscape void of any meaningful human freedom. ... Continue reading >>>

 

RELATED:

 

Corporatism Is Fascism, Democracy Is Dead
The line between corporate business and government is now so blurred it is bareley visible, if fact you could be forgiven for thinking a shuttle bus service runs between Corporate HQ and the government's offices, executives jump the divide so easily. But it this cosy relationship between global corporations, international bureaucracies and national government healthy for business or democracy?

In A Corporatist System Of Government, Corporate Censorship Is State Censorship
Last year, representatives of Facebook, Twitter, and Google were instructed on the US Senate floor that it is their responsibility to “quell information rebellions” and adopt a “mission statement” expressing their commitment to “prevent the fomenting of discord.”
“Civil wars don’t start with gunshots, they start with words,” the representatives were told. “America’s war with itself has already begun ...

Cashless Society omnibus post
Ban On Private Transactions

Anti-Trump Fascists Plan "Democracy Spring"
Following their apparently delusional belief in the "success" of Tuesday night's violent protests, anti-Trump groups are plotting "Democracy Spring" threatening "drama in Washington" with the "largest civil disobedience action [in the USA] of the century."

France's FN Win Regional Elections First Round. Now The Cheating Starts
We want to avoid the usual hyperbole on this story, but victory for France’s Front National in the first round of regional elections on Sunday (6 December, 2015), in which the anti EU party led by Marine Le Pen lead the vote in six of France's thirteen regions, will shake up the political landscape not only in France but throughout Europe and possibly further afield.

Corporate Capitalism Has Replaced Democracy In Western Nations.
Although this is about the UK General Election in 2015 it has much wider relevance, concerning what is happening in the democratic societies of the developed nation. For that reason this look at how corporate capitalism is usurping democracy and individual freedom will also be relevant long after that election in May 2025.

Reasons To Believe Are Wearing Thin: The Benefit Of The Doubt Is Cracking

Everything The Science Whores Told You About Eating Fat Was A Lie.
We have been telling you so for years, but at last the world seems to be cathing up with The Daily Stirrer. Another independent study confirms that the scientists ('A sack of rogues bought and paid for with corporate gods' to paraphrase Burns) have been lying about the health risks of eating saturated fat. It's process vegetable fat, created in laboratories by scientists and other synthesized foods that damage human health.

Thursday, September 15, 2016

Now YouTube are censoring videos critical of the establishment.

A few days ago, after examining evidence offered by certain bloggers who defend net neutrality we reported that allegations against Google of blocking access to sites that criticise Hillary Clinton's presidential election campaign or raise questions bout the candidate's very obvious health problems is is pretty irrevocable. Since then a reader mailed us an item on how YouTube are censoring videos whose content is critical of government or does not follow the government line on controversial issues such as tion.climate change or illegal immigration

Earlier this month, YouTube, was accused of censoring users who post political content. The site's management, and owners, Google, claim what is happening is not censorship but 'demonetisation' of content not suitable to be associated with advertising.

Claiming videos had been barred from making money through the company’s ad services, well esablished YouTube hosts like Philip DeFranco spoke out against the policy, claiming over “a dozen of his videos had been flagged as inappropriate for advertising, including one dinged for ‘graphic content or excessive strong language." Now while that, of itself, does not constitute censorship, if we are talking about net neutrality and freedom of expression it quickly becomes clear that the videos being censored are conservative, Christian or libertarian, while videos that are pure propaganda for a progressive liberal, politically correct, globalist agenda are being accepted even when they are full of untruths and misrepresentation. 

In a video entitled “YouTube Is Shutting Down My Channel and I’m Not Sure What To Do,” DeFranco called YouTube’s policy “censorship with a different name,” since users touching on what the company considers to be controversial subjects end up losing money. “If you do this on the regular, and you have no advertising,” DeFranco added, “it’s not sustainable.”

While YouTube has already confirmed its policy regarding what it considers unfit for monetization hasn’t changed, the issue might lie elsewhere now that the company seems more efficient in enforcing its own rules. As a matter of fact, the content policy changed in 2012, when YouTube first introduced its “ad-friendly” guidelines.

But while an algorithm is allegedly used to spot and “de-monetize” videos that break the company’s rules, many continue to accuse the company, currently owned by Google, of having “vague” descriptions of what its leadership considers ad-friendly.

YouTube rolled out its monetization tool in 2006, when ads consisted of videos that would pop up at the bottom of the user’s screen. If the user did not click on it, it would roll for about ten seconds before going away. But as ad executives pressured YouTube to “to do a better job at promoting its creators,” the relationship with its advertisers changed. As better and even more intrusive ads were added to YouTube videos, the company allegedly became more concerned with the content.

Those who are affected often complain about copyright claims, but some complain about another type of targeting — one that involves power players.

On this site we carry some ads but not with any serious intention of making money, they serve as separators between sections of content more than anything. Even so we have noticed our traffic take a serious dive since we started reporting on Hillary Clinton's health issues.

The irony is that while this blog scores very moderately for traffic and is really most useful for getting new content indexed quickly, extended versions of most posts appearing here are posted on our main site which is indexed by search engines in China, India, Russia and around the world. And we don't mind people using our content, it is trying to get ideas out that matter, not pulling in money. So a very big chunk of the global population that cannot be controlled by Google have the opportunity to read our content.







RELATED POSTS:


Judge Denies Attempt To Block Obama's Transfer Of Internet Oversight To UN


October 2016: In a last ditch effort to block Obama's plan to allow the US Commerce Department to hand over oversight of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to a multi-stakeholder community - which includes the technical community, businesses, civil society and foreign governments - 4 state attorneys went to a Texas federal court alleging that the transition, in the absence of congressional approval, amounts to an illegal forfeiture of U.S. government property. Confirming once more that under Obama's Presidency the judiciary and legal system have been totally politicised, their case was thrown out on a technicality.

Fact Checker Snopes Lie About Obama ‘Birther’ Smear.
Yesterday US Presidential candidate Donald Trump said that President Barack Obama was born in the U.S., and by doing so he “finished a birther controversy” which he said was started by Hillary Clinton in 2008. “Hillary Clinton and her campaign of 2008 started the birther controversy. I finished it, I finished it. You know what I mean," he told a campaign event audience.

Free speech threat
Importance of free speech
Free speech censored
Free speech being abolished?
Threat to the free press
Free Speech murdered - omnibus
Germany begins internet censorship
Robot censors for internet?
University censorship
Surveillance society: cellphone fascism

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Sunday, June 05, 2016

Did Billionaire Thiel Save Free Speech On The Web

Extremist Libertarian billionaire Peter Thiel, one of the founders of Internet Hawaladar Pay Pal has now set himself up as a champion of free speech on the web while Internet giants Google (via YouTube), Facebook, Twitter and Microsoft. Not only did Thiel put up the cash for Hulk Hogan’s lawsuit against Gawker media, one of the worst offenders for denying opponents of its political the right to express an opinion, it turns out he has been quietly pouring millions into legal efforts against the left wing media organisations that try to suppress ideas they disapprove of, by branding people racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, and 'right wing nut jobs' guilty of 'hate speech' (as defined by Gawker contributors) for years.

Thiel describes his actions as philanthropy, a description that many of Gawker’s victims would no doubt share. The leftie nut job site made a habit of egregious, unecessary hate campaigns of everyone from former Alaska governor Sarah Palin to Conde Naste CFO David Geithner, brother of an Obama Treasury Secretary.

Naturally, 'progressive' (aka rabid neo Nazi and neo - fascist) web journalists aren’t taking news of Thiel’s secret war well. They think it’s a threat to press freedom. “Even Gawker haters should fear the strategy Peter Thiel is using to destroy Gawker” worried Vox, another progressive blogging empire whose political stances often mirrored Gawker’s. WIRED worried about chilling effects.

“As a libertarian, Thiel should support free speech,” complained Salon.

It’s a specious line of argument from supremely sensitive journalists upset that, with Gawker’s decline, the golden age of left-wing public shaming is over. They clearly think free speech is something only people who support left wing ideas have a right to, and that 'hate speech' is something only people who disagree with them can be accused of. Anybody who has been writing on the web for a while will be aware that most of the hate in fact comes from the left. Look at the hate attacks on Sarah Palin, Donald Trump, my Facebook friend Pam Geller, anyone who expresses revervations about same sex marriage or the elevation of transgender freaks to privileged caste status, or people who support immigration controls. It isn't just angry hater, it is irrational hate.

Thiel does not pose a threat to free speech, he is ending one. Only those who live in the left-wing alternative reality bubble as left wing jornalists and political activists could possibly think otherwise.



RELATED POSTS:


Judge Denies Attempt To Block Obama's Transfer Of Internet Oversight To UN


October 2016: In a last ditch effort to block Obama's plan to allow the US Commerce Department to hand over oversight of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to a multi-stakeholder community - which includes the technical community, businesses, civil society and foreign governments - 4 state attorneys went to a Texas federal court alleging that the transition, in the absence of congressional approval, amounts to an illegal forfeiture of U.S. government property. Confirming once more that under Obama's Presidency the judiciary and legal system have been totally politicised, their case was thrown out on a technicality.

Only Whites Can Be Racist? Google Rewrites Dictionary As Well As History
if we look at the Huffington Post article that 'establishes beyond reasonable doubt' it is not possible to be racist to a white person, we find the "credible" sources quoted in defense of their controversial conclusion on reverse racism is actually one black supremacist, the auteur of the 2014 film, "Dear White People." The racist hatred of whites portrayed in the film is palpable.


Shock, Horror! Millennials Safe Space Violated As Facebook Algo Accident Exposes Them To Diverse Ideas
Late last month (August 2016,) the Zuckerbugger's zoons put an algorithm in charge of the Facebook “trending” feature, to select the most popular topics, articles and keywords on the web in a narrow timeframe and with due respect for the 'safe space' of millenials who can be traumatised if they encounter microaggrrrrressions in the form of controversial ideas or unorthodox opinions ...

Google, Facebook, Amazon: algorithms will soon rule our lives so we'd better understand how they work

One of the most interesting announcements in last week's Budget – well, for me at least, as someone who has no savings and doesn’t play bingo or drink much – was the new Alan Turing Institute: £220 million of government support will be invested into "big data and algorithm" research.

White House Official Cozied Up to Google Before Antitrust Lawsuit Was Shelved
As The Federal Trade Commission considered whether to charge Google with violating antitrust laws in January 2013, the Obama White House, which as we have reported previously has a mutually beneficial relationship with the world domination freaks who run Google was watching closely, and apparently was eager to protect the interests of Obama's friends.

The Greenteeth Defending Free Speech Catalogue
Events in recent years have shown us democracy is a sham. From the USA where big money owns the political system through the European Union where the bureaucrats of the European Commission in Brussels openly express contempt for the elected governments of member states and clearly state that the faux - democratic European Parliament is irrelevant, and the wishes of member states are not considered, it is up to the bureaucrats and experts to do what is right for Europe, WE THE PEOPLE are fighting a war like none we have fought before as the political, financial and academic elites try to disempower the masses. Only through our right of Free Speech can we expose the corruption and self interest at the heart of the system and hold to account the people who would create a global, authoritarian government.
The Greenteeth Defending Free Speech Catalogue

Deep State Control:Free Speech Is Under Attack And Journalism Is Dead

What has happened to the news. At one time the news press referred to itself as 'the fourth estate', a reference to the three estates of the nation, the government, The Monarchy and the church The news and commpent journals assigned to themselves the task of objectively and impartilly holding the others to account by investigating the background to events and reporting the facts. No more it seems.


Free Speech Is Under Attack And Journalism Is Dead

Free speech threat
Importance of free speech
Free speech attacked
Media murdering democracy
Google threat to democracy
Google becoming the ministry of truth
Facebook Nazis
Internet censored?
Internet dystopia
Intellectuals and the masses

Six-Figure Fines for failing to use the right transgender Gender Pronouns?
Sweden's War On Children's Books
Free Speech Under Attack Online
How Facebook, Instagram, Google, and Twitter Use Censorship to Kill Free Speech
Fascism Comes To USA: Attorney General Says: We’ve ‘Discussed’ Prosecuting Climate Change Deniers
The Self Righteous Minority That Threaten Free Speech
The Anger Of The Masses Is Rising
Former Head Of UK Equalities Commission Admits He Was Wrong To Believe Muslims Would Blend Into Britain…
Facebook begins Europe-wide censorship campaign against free speech.
Wikileaks Drops Hillary Email Bomb That Could End Her Campaign but FB Censored It



Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Sunday, January 10, 2016

At Last, A Candidate I Feel I Could Support Were I An American Voter

 Gary Johnson. Honest? I wouldn't know. Thought provoking? Certainly (image source)

Recently I have been accused (on facebook, people don't comment on my posts here for some reason) that I am a Donald Trump fan, and that I', a Bernie Sanders fan. Now I am not a supporter of either, I'm British and so don't have a vote in November and if I did I would not vote for either of those mentioned, not any other contender for the Democrat or Republican nomination.

What has interested me about both campaigns is that the support for Sanders and Trump represents the kind of rejection of mainstream politics we have been seeing in Europe (represented in numbers of votes but not election victories due to some pretty sordid deals being done between mainstream parties that are traditional rivals for the sake of preserving the status quo.

Neither Bernie Sanders nor Donald Trump is likely to win their party's nomination of course, the Washington fixers will find a way to spike the guns of both candidates.

Today however, I stumbled on a candidate that, were I entitled to vote in the election, I could support.

from Russia Today:

'A lot of disenfranchised voters': Libertarian Gary Johnson discusses his presidential bid

 In a presidential race that seems more polarized than ever, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson may have a longshot bid for the presidency. However, he is confident that he can shift the debate as voters are “disenfranchised” by both parties.

Johnson, who served as governor of New Mexico from 1995 to 2003, won the nomination for the Libertarian Party in the 2012 presidential election. He only acquired 1 percent of the popular vote, but that’s considered a big achievement for third-party candidates in the United States’ two-party system. In 2016, he is confident that he can shake up the Democrat-Republican dichotomy even further by offering ideas that distinguish him from both parties. READ ALL >>

Gary Johnson will not win the election of course, which is a lot to do with why I could vote for him, I'm proud to say I have never voted for the winner in any election I have cast a vote in. but he does bring new ideas and thought provoking policies to the campaign and that might lead people to question more closely the vacuity of Hillary Clinton and the buffoonery of Donald Trump.



RELATED POSTS:
At Both Ends Of The Political Spectrum Americans Agree The Government Is FUBAR
For the Democrats there is, on the left a socialist, selling a political philosophy that has peviously been anatemas to American voters, yet generating the most enthusiasm of any of the other candidates. On the other end of the spectrum, Republican voters are gravitating, nay stampeding, toward Donald Trump. The only serious rival to Trump is Ted Cruz although it is early days yet and we can expect a compromise candidate to emerge

Mac Slavo of SHTFplan.com Discovers Real Reason Why Trump Scares The Establishment

So if Trump is in fact as liberal as the corporate sock puppet Obama, what is it about him that has the ruling elite so scared the corporate owned mainstream media are resorting to desperate measures to discredit him while politicians plot increasing unfeasible ways to stop him becoming president.

Could The Unthinkable Happen - Bernie Sanders Looks like Winning Democrat Nomination
At Last, A Candidate I Feel I Could Support Were I An American Voter
Lefties Trying To Troll Trump Show They Are Illiterate Morons
Maverick Sanders surpasses Obama, with $33mn from individual donors
Loud Trump Resonates Throughout America.



Main Keywords: USA, democracy, election, politics,
Lefties Trying To Troll Trump Show They Are Semi Literate Morons
Maverick Sanders surpasses Obama, with $33mn from individual donors
Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Authorsden blog ]

Thursday, July 10, 2014

Liberal Democrat Defects To UKIP At His Own Election Count

As someone who had the usual 'racist' smears hurled as be by the illiberal bigots of the 'profressive left' during the European Parliament election campaign, I loved this story. And my support for UKIP was based on my belief  as a libertarian (a belief I have a right to express under the Geneva Convention on human rights -funny how the political faction who scream most loudly about human rights forget they extend to people who disagree with them) that we need to get out of the EU because the Brussles bureaucracy is marching us towards Naziism. We also need to control immigration of course but that will come with regaining our sovereignty, it is nothing to do with racism.
 Read full article
Liberal Democrat Defects To UKIP At His Own Election Count

Voter Backlash against Media UKIP Smears Is Good For Democracy
 Pontificating celebrities and media luvvies, don't you hate them. What gives these mostly has been the idea that their opinion is worth more than the opinion of everyman and woman. What makes these people who might have been talented before theiy disapeared up their own arses (yes I'm talking about you Eddie Izzard, Lenny Henry, Ben Elton, J K Rowling, just about every Mocker on Mock The Week. Even if you were still funny guys, nobody gives a fuck what you think about politics.
Read full article;
Voter Backlash against Media UKIP Smears Is Good For Democracy