Pcture: www.mortapresvaccination
With rumours circulating about the WHO and various global health charities running rehearsals for how they will respond to the next pandemic (which probably means they've developed the vaccine and now only have to genetically engineer the pathogen to go with it,) we should remind ourselves that five years after the rollout of COVID vaccines began and with nearly 50,000 reports of potentially fatal cardiac adverse events following the rollout of AstraZeneca’s covid vaccine, the UK’s medicines regulator continued to assure the public that the vaccine was safe and effective an FOI request has revealed.
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) received 48,472 cardiac event reports in 2021 alone but made no attempt to suspend the jab, denying a causal link. The data from a freedom of information (FOI) request shows that almost half the reports were received in the first three months after the rollout.
By late March 2021, 23,914 cardiovascular events had already been reported in the 18 years-plus age group. (MHRA data also shows 11,600 children received first doses plus 10,000 second doses resulting in 248 Yellow Cards giving a reporting rate of 1-in-47.)
According to MHRA data, in addition to heart issues they received 6,175 reports of blood-clotting events during the same period. The number of heart-related reports was roughly 685 per cent higher than the number of blood-clot reports received by the MHRA.
Vaxzevria, the vaccine’s brand name, became known as the ‘clot shot’ on social media as it caused vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Potentially fatal blood clots could form in the brain, abdomen, lungs or large veins, usually 5-30 days after the first vaccination. But we were still told the shot was 'safe and effective,' and those of us who did some research on the history of MRNA gene editing tehniques and on the true nature of the SARS-Cov2' virus were dismissed as conspiracy theorists, cranks, anti - science nutters and granny killers.
Fve years later as the COVID narrative unravels with the vaccine from Astra Zeneca having beeen proved 100% ineffective and dangerous to many people, the deeper truth is now staring o come out.
In October 2019, shortly before the COVID outbreak, Bill Gates and other influencial individuals began planning how to censor vaccine safety advocates from social media during a table-top simulation of a worldwide pandemic, known as Event 201.
Gates’ co-conspirators included representatives from the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, Bloomberg/Johns Hopkins University Populations Center, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, various media powerhouses, the Chinese government, a former Central Intelligence Agency director, the Big Pharma cartel, and the finance and biosecurity industries.
The participants primarily focused on planning industry-centric, fear-mongering, police-state strategies for managing an imaginary global coronavirus contagion culminating in mass censorship of social media.
The participants discussed mechanisms for controlling “disinformation” and “misinformation,” by flooding the media with propaganda, imposing penalties for spreading falsehoods and discrediting the anti-vaccination movement.
Jane Halton, of Australia’s ANZ Bank, one of the authors of Australia’s oppressive “no jab, no pay” policy, assured the participants that Gates Foundation is creating algorithms “to sift through information on these social media platforms” to protect the public from dangerous thoughts and information.
George Gao, the director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control, worries about how to suppress “rumors” that the virus is laboratory generated: “People believe, ‘This is man made’ and some pharmaceutical company made the virus.”
Chen Huang, an Apple research scientist, Google scholar and the world’s leading expert on tracking and tracing and facial recognition technology, role-plays the newscaster reporting on government countermeasures.
He blames riots on anti-vaccine activists and predicts that Twitter and Facebook will cooperate in “deleting a disturbing number of accounts dedicated to spreading misinformation about the outbreak” and to implement “internet shutdowns … to quell panic.”
Dr. Tara Kirk Sell, a senior scholar at Bloomberg School of Health’s Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, worries that pharmaceutical companies are being accused of introducing the virus so they can make money on drugs and vaccines:
“We have seen public faith in their products plummet.” She notes with alarm that “Unrest, due to false rumors and divisive messaging, is rising and is exacerbating spread of the disease as levels of trust fall and people stop cooperating with response efforts. This is a massive problem, one that threatens governments and trusted institutions.”
Sell reminds her fellow collaborators that “We know that social media is now the primary way that many people get their news, so interruptions to these platforms could curb the spread of misinformation.”
There are many ways, Sell advises, for government and industry allies to accomplish this objective: “Some governments have taken control of national access to the Internet. Others are censoring websites and social media content and a small number have shut down Internet access completely to prevent the spread of misinformation. Penalties have been put in place for spreading harmful falsehoods, including arrests.”
Stephen Redd, then chief of the Public Health Service, had the notion that governments should mine social media data to identify people with negative beliefs: “I think with the social media platforms, there’s an opportunity to understand who it is that’s susceptible … to misinformation, so I think there’s an opportunity to collect data from that communication mechanism.”
Adrian Thomas of Johnson & Johnson announces “We are doing clinical trials in new antiretrovirals and vaccines.” He recommends a strategy to address the problems to these companies when rumors were spreading that their products “are causing deaths and so patients are not taking them anymore.” He suggests, “Maybe we’re making the mistake of reporting and counting all the fatalities and infections.”
Kevin McAleese, communications officer for Gates-funded agricultural projects, observes that: “To me, it is clear countries need to make strong efforts to manage both mis- and disinformation. We know social media companies are working around the clock to combat these disinformation campaigns.
So maybe the conspiracy theorists were right all along and the pandemic was a hoax, a psyop staged by globalist and corporate interests for profit and political advantage.
As it happens, the latest DOJ batch of
Epstein files reveal that by the time the world encountered COVID-19,
the financial, philanthropic, and institutional machinery to manage—and
profit from—a pandemic was already firmly in place.
While the Epstein files have reignited scrutiny around specific relationships, their deeper significance lies in how they intersect with a much longer and largely unexamined timeline. Public records, institutional initiatives, and financial instruments indicate that the conceptual foundations of pandemic preparedness as a managed financial and security category began to take shape in the late 1990s and early 2000s, as philanthropic capital, global health governance, and risk finance increasingly converged. Following the 2008 financial crisis, this framework rapidly accelerated—expanding through reinsurance markets, parametric triggers, donor-advised funding structures, and global simulations—years before COVID-19 made the architecture visible to the public.
Now who can say the vaccine sceptic are cranks and nutters.
FROM THE ARCHIVE:
The issues caused by the ‘vaccines’ have never been fully catalogued, and additional issues might also become apparent in the future. The definition of ‘excess death’ has even been changed to hide the spike in the death rate across all developed nations since the vaccine roll out. How overt does the cover up need to be before some people will admit we have all (yes even the unvaccinated,) been victims of the greatest crime against humanity ever perpetrated?
The rise of other diseases partly attributable to a lack of vaccination, cited by some oficial sources as proof the excess deaths are not vaccine related can be squarely blamed on our porous borders. The most obvious illustration of this is the return of Tuberculosis, unknown in the developed nations for over fifty years until globalist policies unleashed waves of mass immigration.
With Big Pharma's absolutely horrendous and well documented past behaviours - the public mistrust is just about where it should be, zero. Not your ordinary zero but absolute zero. If you do not understand why your memory is deficient.
“Misinformation came from both sides…”?
This is probably your most disingenuous attempt at re-framing the narrative.
We all witnessed between 2020 and 2023 an industry and a government blatantly, deliberately and repeatedly misrepresent and manipulate information in almost all its communications. And yet those of us who challenged this campaign of lies were dismissed as conspiracy theorists, flat earthers, climate deniers, anti - science loons, and worse.
But the real conspiracies were the lies about the origins, lies about the deaths, lies about therapeutics and prophylactics from vitamin D to Ivermectin, the so called ‘horse medicine’, hydroxychloroquine (that centuries old, well proven and safe drug Quinine,) were dismissed with lies about their lack of efficacy. We witnessed a massive and concerted effort at censorship. not of conspiracy theorists, but of well qualified individuals like Prof. Dalglish, Dr. Robert Malone, the late Cory Mullis who developed the PCR tests that gave 80% false positives because, as its inventor, Dr. Mulis warned, it was never intended to be used as a diagnostic tool. And thousands of individuals like myself, whose qualifications lie in other areas, who were simply asking the questions governments, health agencies and Pharmaceutical companies did not want to have to answer in public.
Vaccinating everyone despite knowing that immunity did not result and transmission still occurred is criminal. Not only does it accelerate the virus’ ability to circumvent the vaccine, it also killed young people unnecessarily. It should have been reserved for the most vulnerable. But we didn’t really care about them, remember?
Next, what a monstrous gamble it is to unnecessarily vaccinate an entire population with a hurriedly developed, untested, experimental medication against a non-existent probability of a human extinction event. Many of the decisions implemented in the COVID response were criminal, even more irresponsible and opportunistic.