The Self Righteous Minority That Threaten Free Speech

(Image source: deliberation.info

Until recently Universities were places where any ideas were welcome and any economic, social, or scientific theory, no matter how extreme would be given a fair hearing and debated openly. Were that not the case, how far do you think the ideas of Isaac Newton and Robert Boyle, respectively the fathers of modern physics and chemistry would have progressed in a world still dominated by religious dogma.

In the past five decades however, and with increasing intensity, the freedom of thought and speech cherished in universities (as well as the press and regular drinkers in public bars) in democratic societies has increasingly come under attack from those who style themselves 'The Left'. This of itself is bizarre because left wing thinking ought to be about freedom of the individual, self determination and personal development. People died for the right to speak freely, just as they did for the right of every citizen to vote in democratic elections. So where did it all start to go wrong? How did the idea that there is only one set of acceptable answers to society's problems (the 'pensée unique' to use a French phrase I am fond of) and that those who challenge the orthodoxy should be silence and prevented from broadcasting their ideas in print or verbally.

Literally translated, 'pensée unique' means single thought but in modern usage it means single mindset, as in the ideal of complete conformity to the orthodoxies of a society. At a recent G20 conference (London, 2009) a proponent of globalism called on governments of the developing nations to work towards creating not just a system og global governance but a global culture . "To persuade all the peoples of the world to accept a common set of values and morals is the only way forward," he said.

"On the contrary," a delagate from one of the emerging economies replied, "it will leave those who do not accept the single mindset by the wayside. To ignore people's sense of national allegiance and the role of the nation-state and force people to accept the'single mindset ' which you embody is out-of-date and dangerous."

It is in fact as out of date and dangerous as Marxism; in his Communist Manifesto Karl Marx predicted in a communist world people would cease to exist as invididuals and be only components of a mechanistic state. Marx's sociopathic state offers a grim enough prospect to warn all thinking people off his version of communism. But not our current generation of students it seems. From being the crazy, anarchic idiots of National Lampoon's Animal House in the 1970s, students have become self righteous prigs.

In a time where college students are offended by just about everything that causes them to question their indoctrination, US magazine The Federalist Papers reports that one professor at University of North Carolina, Wilmington decided to cut through the politically correct rhetoric and let his students know that they aren’t "the special snowflake liberals" and their parents and school teachers would have them believe.

His epic class introduction has gone viral, and for good reason: this is the most common sense lecture to come out of any college in a long time. Here's a taster:

Welcome back to class, students! I am Mike Adams your criminology professor here at UNC-Wilmington. Before we get started with the course I need to address an issue that is causing problems here at UNCW and in higher education all across the country. I am talking about the growing minority of students who believe they have a right to be free from being offended. If we don’t reverse this dangerous trend in our society there will soon be a majority of young people who will need to walk around in plastic bubble suits to protect them in the event that they come into contact with a dissenting viewpoint. That mentality is unworthy of an American. It’s hardly worthy of a Frenchman.

Let’s get something straight right now. You have no right to be unoffended. You have a right to be offended with regularity. It is the price you pay for living in a free society. If you don’t understand that you are confused and dangerously so. In part, I blame your high school teachers for failing to teach you basic civics before you got your diploma. Most of you went to the public high schools, which are a disaster. Don’t tell me that offended you. I went to a public high school.

Of course, your high school might not be the problem. It is entirely possible that the main reason why so many of you are confused about free speech is that piece of paper hanging on the wall right over there. Please turn your attention to that ridiculous document that is framed and hanging by the door. In fact, take a few minutes to read it before you leave class today. It is our campus speech code. It specifically says that there is a requirement that everyone must only engage in discourse that is “respectful.” That assertion is as ludicrous as it is illegal. I plan to have that thing ripped down from every classroom on campus before I retire.

One of my grandfathers served in World War I. My step-grandfather served in World War II. My sixth great grandfather enlisted in the American Revolution when he was only thirteen. These great men did not fight so we could simply relinquish our rights to the enemy within our borders. That enemy is the Marxists who run our public universities. If you are a Marxist and I just offended you, well, that’s tough. I guess they don’t make communists like they used to.

Unbelievably, a student once complained to the Department chairwoman that my mention of God and a Creator was a violation of Separation of Church and State. Let me be as clear as I possibly can: If any of you actually think that my decision to paraphrase the Declaration of Independence in the course syllabus is unconstitutional then you suffer from severe intellectual hernia.

Indeed, it takes hard work to become stupid enough to think the Declaration of Independence is unconstitutional. If you agree with the student who made that complaint then you are probably just an anti-religious zealot. Therefore, I am going to ask you to do exactly three things and do them in the exact order that I specify.

First, get out of my class. You can fill out the drop slip over at James Hall. Just tell them you don’t believe in true diversity and you want to be surrounded by people who agree with your twisted interpretation of the Constitution simply because they are the kind of people who will protect you from having your beliefs challenged or your feelings hurt.

Second, withdraw from the university. If you find that you are actually relieved because you will no longer be in a class where your beliefs might be challenged then you aren’t ready for college. Go get a job building houses so you can work with some illegal aliens who will help you gain a better appreciation of what this country has to offer.

Finally, if this doesn’t work then I would simply ask you to get the hell out of the country. The ever-growing thinned-skinned minority you have joined is simply ruining life in this once-great nation. Please move to some place like Cuba where you can enjoy the company of communists and get excellent health care. Just hop on a leaky boat and start paddling your way towards utopia. You will not be missed.

Professor Adams hits the nail on the head, but it is not just themselves the precious little liberal luvvies believe should be protected from anything that might offend. As all Boggart related online publications have reported, they are always eager to take offence on behalf of others. There are few genuine cultural divisions in the world that cannot be overcome with a little goodwill on both sides. Most of the issues that divide people are arbitrarily created, not only by the ruling elites who, like the Roman, know that human nature changes little, and so Cicero's strategy of divide and rule is still effective two thousand years later, but also by the useful idiots of Uncle Joe Stalin's famous phrase and the mindless sycophants (sheeple) who have infiltrated our higher education systems.

It is not coincidence that cultural Marxists, "social justice warriors", Politically Correct busybodies, militant feminists and globalists tend to create artificial divisions between people and classes through their obsession with identity politics. This is what cultural Marxists and followers of The Fabian Society do.

Their chief weapons are the use of arbitrary "victim status" to various minorities, based on how "oppressed" or "marginalised" they supposedly are thus dividing them from each other and from mainstream society. The less statistically prominent a particular group is (less represented in a job field, media, education, population, etc.) in any western society based on their color, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, etc., generally the more victim group status is afforded to them by social justice gatekeepers. Fashions change as rapidly in the world of cultural Marxism, Muslims are the currently favoured religious minority (that Muslim culture is sexist, homophobic and justifies rape of infidel women hasn't penetrated the SJWs self righteousness shields yet). Whites and males (straight white males especially) are at the bottom of the list of people who can be seen as victims of society and we are repeatedly targeted by SJW organizations and left wing online hate mobs as upholders of an absurd theory they call "the patriarchy" (Again, they reveal their ignorance by favouring the most patriarchal culture on the planet, Islam.

In the end however, Cultural Marxism harms every individual in the long run it harms the concept of individualism itself. The pensée unique has no rooms available for indiviuals.

RELATED POSTS:
New German Government Smartphone Spyware Will Monitor Citizens’ Calls, Typing AND See Through Their Camera Lenses

The German Interior Ministry has revealed a new “Bundestrojaner” or government trojan horse software that will enable security agencies to track the smartphone activities of anyone who downloads it. We understand Chancellor Merkel's government has also adopted an “off the shelf” tool from a company which is said to help authoritarian regimes track their citizens ...

Politically Unbiased BBC Launches Left Wing Attack On Donald Trump For Illegal Immigrants Stance

The BBC, Britain's publicly funded broadcaster is bound by a charter which commits it to be balanced and non partisan in its news reporting. Repeatedly however, the BBC, its management now doniated by left wing luvvies is becoming more and more blatantly left wing in its unbiased reporting

Death of Democracy
Free Speech Murdered by Media and Academics
Free speech - most of our posts

Snowflake Special: Snowflake Professor blasts students for walking out of patronising lecture.


Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Origninal Boggart Blog] ... [ TSU ]

Chemical Weapons Used By 'Moderate' Anti - Assad Forces In Syria - Reuters

Chemical weapons in Syria (Image source)

Chemical weapons experts in the middle east have confirmed that mustard gas was used in a Syrian town where Islamic State insurgents were battling another group of anti - Assad rebels, according to a report by an international watchdog. Previous incidents in which the use of illegal weapons such as toxic gas have been unofficialy attributed to the Assad regime by people linked to the Obama administration in Washington.

However a confidential report published on October 29 by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), a summary of which was leaked to Reuters, concluded "with the utmost confidence that at least two people were exposed to sulfur mustard" in the town of Marea, north of Syria's largest city, Aleppo, on Aug. 21.

"It is very likely that sulfur mustard caused the death of a baby," the report said. The findings provide the first official confirmation of use of mustard gas in Syria during the current hostilities.

The report did not mention Islamic State or Al Nusra as the responsible party, as the fact-finding mission was not mandated to assign blame. Diplomatic sources said the chemical had been used in the clashes between Islamic State and another rebel group taking place in the town at the time.

Confirmation of the use of mustard gas adds to a growing body of evidence that the Islamic State group and other rebel groups have obtained, and are using, chemical weapons in both Iraq and Syria.

Kurdish authorities earlier this month accused Islamic State's forces of firing mortar rounds containing mustard agent at Kurdish Peshmerga fighters in northern Iraq during clashes in August. They said blood samples taken from around 35 fighters who were exposed in the attack southwest of the regional capital of Erbil showed "signatures" of mustard gas.

A team of OPCW experts has been sent to Iraq to confirm the findings and is expected to obtain its own samples later this month, one diplomat said.

Human Rights Activists Impoverish Thai Peasants To Protect Monkey's Rights.

Macaque harvesting coconuts in Thailand (Image source)

According to animal rights campaigners abused monkeys are a key ingredient in your pre - prepared curry sauces and healthy, non dairy coconut milk. While the practice of using monkeys to harvest coconuts dates back hundreds of years in Thailand and Malaya, it has only recently come to the attention of Social Justice Warriors (SJWs) whose latest thing is 'human rights for animals'.

Inevitably then, the SJWs sooner or later had to take up the monkeys' cause. It was intolerable that people in the west were willing to tolerate the abuse of Macaques for the sake of tasty curries or milk substitutes for lactose intolerant people.

A lifelong environmentalist and author of Spiritual Ecology: A Quiet Revolution, Dr Leslie Sponsel had reservations about while watching primate coconut pickers at work. Instead of calling for a nationwide boycott of coconut products as some have done, Sponsel did what every anthropologist worth his salt is trained to do: take pause and observe. He noted that neither his wife — a Thai Buddhist — nor a fellow Thai professor from a local university framed the practice in moral terms and concluded that monkeys on task are a part of peninsula living.

Early twentieth century British explorer Robert Shelford observed in his 1916 book: A Naturalist in Borneo:

"The modus operandi is as follows: — A cord is fastened round the monkey’s waist, and it is led to a coconut palm which it rapidly climbs, it then lays hold of a nut, and if the owner judges the nut to be ripe for plucking he shouts to the monkey, which then twists the nut round and round till the stalk is broken and lets it fall to the ground; if the monkey catches hold of an unripe nut, the owner tugs the cord and the monkey tries another. ... [At times] the use of the cord was dispensed with altogether, the monkey being guided by the tones and inflections of his master’s voice.

Defending the practice of using monkeys, Sponsel says, “Working macaques are the difference between a livelihood and abject poverty for many farmers in South Thailand. Snake bites, stinging ants, and life-ending falls face whoever or whatever goes up those trees.”

Considering monkeys can harvest coconuts up to and over twenty times faster than the most skilled human, the incentive to continue with the time honoured system is clear. While engaged in fieldwork, Sponsel reports having never observed or heard of monkeys being abused by their keepers. He wrote that most are treated in a similar way to a Western family pet. “For some households,” he commented, “they may even rise even to the level of being a family member.”

In a country that rounds up its stray dog population and ships the pooches to Vietnam for Tet New Year dinners, the Thai macaques have it easy. Sponsel says: "Young ones are trained and kept on a rope or chain tethered to the handler or to a shelter when not working."

It is this practice that has earned the ire of some activists who conveniently forget that in Euro / American society it is a matter of civility (and sometimes of law) to keep pets on a leash. And who hasn’t seen the mother who puts a pair of reins on her children as they walk through a busy street just has not been looking. According to Sponsel, the monkeys he observed were well-fed, groomed and cared for.

"This debate about how we treat primates is not new," Sponsel tells his readers. “Back in 1952, Jean Marcel Brulle’s novel The Murder of the Missing Link tackled our moral obligation to primates," a man impregnates a female monkey and then kills the child to force a jury to deliberate whether murder extends beyond humankind. Some people may recall that Burt Reynolds played the lead in the 1970s movie Skullduggery, based on Brulle’s story.

As happens so often, we see the left impaled by their own insatiable self righteousness. By taking up the monkey's cause (without the monkeys having asked them to) they are quite happy to turn a blind eye to the harm they are doing to third world subsistence farmers. As bored little rich kids in London and New York, L.A., Paris and Bonn turn up the moral outrage dials to eleven, there are calls for a boycott of Thai and Malay coconuts. A bandwagon is starting to roll.

The SJWs do not even pause to seriously consider ways in which their campaign for monkeys rights may negatively impact the livelihood of poor farmers and their families. But then left wing activists always manage to appear more concerned with earning the good opinion of their peers than the harm their actions may cause to poor people, even though the latter have rights too.”

In a perfect world, Thai farmers would have coconut harvesting machines and monkeys would swing from tree to tree in an unspoiled wilderness while "The Watchers" (see Book Of Enoch) benignly look down from their lofty towers. But, for the world we have, where habitat destruction wipes out entire populations, coconuts and successful harvesting of them is the only thing that keeps Macaques from progressing beyond the status of family pet to the status of family dinner.

RELATED POSTS:

Human Rights bombshell dropped by Theresa May’s government while the media whined on about Traingate

Thus screeched a headline at The Canary, a hard left news website. The writer, Kerry Anne Mendoza, who has never knowingly written an unbiased word and trades in distortions, half - truths and misdirection, went on to gove the impression that the "evil Conservative government" is about to strip British citizens of all human and civil rights while 'evil right wing media' obesess over Jeremy Corbyn's newly revealed hypocrisy.

Refugee Children In Turkey Being Forced To Work In Sweatshops

Human rights dictatorship
Human rights fascism
Human rights omnibus
The tyranny of moral relativism
Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Origninal Boggart Blog] ... [ TSU ]

India Outlaws Greenpeace. Grand Gesture Ahead Of Paris Climate Change Conference

A tea plantation in Darjeeling - target of latest Greenpeace bansturbation session (Image source)

With the Paris climate change conference looming near (Slogan: I love you Flash, but we only have twenty four hours to save the Earth), governments, well governments in the developed world are falling over themselves to parade their environmentally friendly credentials before the world media. Well most governments in the developed world. Certain emerging economies do not seem so impressed as Cameron, Hollande, Merkel and Co. to embrace the loonitoons idealism of the capitalism hating left or the delusions of the wannabe God - King Obama, who on finding his administration has failed in every respect is now trying to use environmentalism to destroy the global economy.

The Indian government has just banned Greenpeace. The 'save-the-two-toed-toad activists are of course spinning this as a monstrous injustice and a blow for freedom of speech and a government / capitalist conspiracy against Mother Earth.

"This is an extension of the deep intolerance for differing viewpoints that sections of this government seem to harbour," Vinuta Gopal, the interim executive director of Greenpeace India, said in a press release. Well given their behavior in the climate debate it is hypocritical for any Greenpeace executive to complain about the suppression of free speech. How many left wing neo - Fascists have we heard demanding that 'climate deniers' should be thrown into prison.

Alternatively, you could argue, it’s the Indian government doing what not even Putin’s Russia was capable of doing when push came to shove (during the Greenpeace Arctic 30 affair): telling this richly-funded, pan-global outfit of anti - civilisation nut jobs, these lying, cheating, data falsifying malfeasant bleeding hearts, these wealthy, privileged meddlers exactly where they can stick their environmental Naziism.

The ban has been introduced on the legal grounds that Greenpeace has violated various commerce rules in the southern Indian state of Tami Nadu where it has its Indian headquarters. Allegedly it “fraudulently conducted business by falsifying balance sheets" and other code violations. Greenpeace is now contesting the charges.

But whatever the official reasons for the ban, it looks like the case is Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his government are flexing their muscles to show the green QANGO India’s economic development is not going to be hamstrung by the political meddling of left wing bullying masquerading as green activism.

The Government will be supported in this by the majority of his people, one thing the people of developing nations hate is western do-gooders telling them how to live their lives.India has environmental problems – such as the pall of smog that hangs over Delhi – just like anywhere else but it also has a burgeoning middle class eager for a better standard of living. Like China, India has made it clear that industrial progress comes before fashionable, politically correct Western liberal causes like "climate change".

They are also profoundly pissed off with western (particularly American) efforts to help them which usually fail spectacularly because the people running the scheme do not, and do not want to, understand how Indian society works. The attitude is seen as, "You will all be much better off if you stop behaving like Indians and start behaving like westerners."

Greenpeace has not helped itself by deciding, with the characteristic high-handed arrogance of the left, to attack one of India’s top export industries: tea.

Last year the environmentalists published a report titled "Trouble Brewing On Indian Tea" which alleged that Indian tea was laden with hazardous pesticides and suggesting it was not fit for export to the Europe, Britain and the USA.

Given that tea is India’s second largest employer – with 3,500,000 workers employed in over 1,500 tea estates – this headline - grabbing exercise was bound to go down like a lead zepplin Indian people, especially in tea growing areas.

And then, as stated at the top of the article, it is a good way to draw a line in the sand ahead of the climate change conference, because if Indian tea is off limits for western political activists, Indian steel and Indian textiles are going to be as sacrosanct as the holiest Hindu Temple.

RELATED POSTS:

The ‘Colossal Unmentionable’ of the Climate Fraud

An incisive analysis from The Wall Street Journal that shows who and what will benefit from the great climate change scam (clue, it will not be the climateor the environment and it will certainly not be people like you and me.)

Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Origninal Boggart Blog] ... [ TSU ]

Autumn Gets More Interesting As Merkel Admits She May Have Caused New Balkans War.

The autumn of 2015 has been interesting with the escalation of the war against ISIS by Russian air Force jets and Iranian ground troops in Syria and Iraq, Europe's migrant crisis pushing prosperous north European nations towards civil unrest, and the downing of a Russian airliner over Sinai by as yet unknown causes though western intelligence reports suggest a terrorist bomb was planted on board before take off.

And it is set to get more interesting.

Border Security staff erect a fence in Hungary (source: Financial Times)

Merkel admits she may have just caused a second Balkans war

Hausfrau Volksfuhrer Angela Merkel admitted in a speech yesterday that reversal of her open doors immigration policy or going back on her pledge that all the world's three billion poor and disadvantaged people were welcome in Germany (she might not have used those exact words) may cause another war in the Balkans. Since not only federal German state, Bavaria but Hungary, Austria and, Croatia and Slovenia are rushing to erect razor wire barriers along their their borders before 2016 to stem the flood of illegal immigrants crossing europe's outer borders every day, Merkel's admission is an overdue acceptance of her role in causing an imminent second Balkans war. Is it now too late to avert such a disaster adding to Europes many problems?

Economic migrants housed in the UK military base in Cyprus, meanwhile, imagined they could blackmail the UK into giving them fast-track entry into Britain, were told to eff off and threw a hissy fit, burning the tents supplied by the UK authorities yesterday as the base commanders stood firm and reiterated the choices on offer: claiming asylum in Cyprus, or being returning them to the Lebanon. One even pretended to hang himself yesterday - but in a carefully non lethal way and very theatrically for news cameras.

These poor, victimised refugees and asylum seekers are suffering from a shortage of dead infants, crying babies and doe - eyed teenage beauties who can cry at will, all of which are essential to attract the attention of news crews. We hear that the annual Pusey Bear schlockfest is to carry a special appeal from the Cyprus refugees for donations of unwanted babies, dead infants or doe eyed teenage girls (cute kittens and sad looking puppies will also be acceptable.

The United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) is reported to have responded to a wave of criticism over mismanagement and squandering funds by headhunting a New York PR firm to 're image' the organisation; the contract could include a multi-million pound TV ad campaign together with celebrity endorsements for the embattled Agency's senior managers.

Merkel is also beginning to realise that with France's precipitous economic decline into sick man of the Eurozone status, only Germany and the UK are rich enough to subsidise the rest of Europe - and if we leave, Germany will have to pick up the tab alone. Given the scores of billions at stake, expect a covert onslaught of secretly funded publicity from Berlin for the 'stay' campaign - and explicit support for Cameron from Merkel, for as long as she remains in power.

Winter is set to be even more interesting ...

RELATED POSTS:

Immigration - Europe's burden
Immigration: the plight of the Mediterranean boat people
Is Sweden's immigration policy national suicide
Immigration: there is no promised land
Immigration marginalising the white working classes
The impact of immigration on hospitals and schools
Germany's Immigration Crisis
Latest Posts

Merkel Hit By German Citizens Backlash As Her Anti - German, Pro - Immigration Policy Indtroduces Violence, Rape and Third World Lawlessness To Germny's Muslim Ghettos

As the lawless criminal scum imported by Merkel in her efforts to suck up to Obama threaten to turn Germany into a third world human cespit, it seems public opinion in European is waking up.

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Origninal Boggart Blog] ... [ TSU ]

Russian Plane Brought Down Over Sinai By ISIS Bomb?

Experts examining the wreckage say damage indicates explosion inside the aircraft forced shrapnet to punch its way out through the fuselage (Image source: The Independent)

The latest British and U.S. intelligence on the Russian airliner downed over Sinai suggests that the crash on 30 October, 2015 was probably caused by a bomb planed on the plane by an agent of ISIS or an ISIS affiliate.

No formal conclusion has been reached by the international intelligence community and the Russia government has been very restrained in its comments despite mounting evidence throughout the week that the crash was not due to a technical fault on the aircraft.

The move to express an opinion on the cause ahead of conclusive evidence may be a response to hysterical suggestions in certain US 'liberal' news networks loyal to the warmonger Barack Obama that Russian incompetence was responsible for the crash and that Putin and The Kremlin propagandists would use it to justify a ground invasion of Syria to sped the destruction of US sponsored Islamist forces trying to overthrow the Assad regime in Syria.

It is well known that the Obama administration has been trying to provoke Russia into acts of armed aggression against western interests for several years, in the hope of being handed an excuse to launche a full scale war against Assad.

While British media are trying to spin the 'bomb theory' as disastrous for Putin's image as a strongman leader, the Russian President cannot be held responsible for security lapses in Egypt. The British government's line can be understood however when we recall that the catastrophe and its aftermath have filled news in the week Egypt's President Sisi is vistiting the UK to discuss trade and political cooperation.

Russian Plane 'May Well Have Been Brought Down By An Explosive Device'

"There is a definite feeling it was an explosive device planted in luggage or somewhere on the plane," an official, who is familiar with the latest U.S. intelligence analysis of the crash, told CNN. Other U.S. officials also told CNN that the analysis is pointing toward the cause being a bomb.

Based on the same intelligence, the U.S. belief is that ISIS or an ISIS-affiliated group is responsible for the attack, the official said.

There are currently about 15,000 British nationals in Sharm El-Sheikh and as evidence of a terrorist outrage at the local airport they may have to be evacuated by military transport planes as the airspace over Sinai is declared unsafe by commercial airline operators.


Reuters is reporting that the cause of crash was an "explosion" on board the aircraft. A source close to the Egyptian Civil Aviation regulator has said investigation of the black boxes suggests the cause of the crash is looking more like an explosion, but as yet it is unclear if it was caused by fuel or a bomb.

They also said that investigators are studying sand from the plane crash site for signs of a bomb attack

Additionally, a Egtyptian judiciary source in the investigation team told Egyptian newspaper Al Masry Alyoum,, that "the cause of the crash is an explosion at the engine. The reason of the explosion will be determined on the examination of the crash site and the test of the bodies."

He added that at the present stage investigation did indicate any terrorist involvement but it cannot be ruled out.

Flights to Sharm El-Sheikh cancelled by most European airlines which suggests their experts think the flight having been brought down by "explosive device" is a leading possibility.

A British government spokeswoman said: "While the investigation is still ongoing we cannot say categorically why the Russian jet crashed. But as more information has come to light we have become concerned that the plane may well have been brought down by an explosive device.

"In light of this, and as a precautionary measure, we have decided that flights due to leave Sharm for the UK this evening will be cancelled.

RELATED POSTS:

Back to Contents table

Russian Civilian Aircraft Downed In Sinai: Cui Bono?
Russians Say Aircraft Downed In Sinai Broke Up Due To 'Mechanical Impact'
Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Origninal Boggart Blog] ... [ TSU ]

German Opposition Party Warns, Nation Is "At The Edge Of Anarchy, Civil War Is Coming"

Germans protest against Islamification of their country

Germany's crisis of illegal immigration is now so far out of control, the country is descending into anarchy and sliding towards civil conflict, or to becoming a lawless banana republic without any effective government, Hansjoerg Mueller of the Alternative Fur Deutschland party, Germany's anti - EU party, has warned.

While we consider that appraisal is probably a bit dramatic, Germany is certainly in big trouble socially, economically and politically and it is all a result of Hausfrau Volksfuhrer Merkel's open doors immigration policy.

In an interview with RT.com, Herr Mueller highlights just how divided the nation is becoming:

Commenting on a statement by Bavarian official Peter Dreier who is reported to have called German Chancellor Angela Merkel to tell her personally that if Germany welcomes a million refugees, his town of Landshut will only take in around 1,800. Any extra will be put on buses and sent to her Chancellery in Berlin. Mueller commented: Dreier is the district head of Landshut, a town close to Munich. Usually he does not have the power, but we are not living in usual times. What we are now looking at is more and more Germany sliding towards anarchy. In this situation I think less and less is determined by law, more and more is determined by who acts. And the person who acts in fact has the power. So if he sends ... refugees to Berlin, he sends them!

Between the above comments and the recent "Meanwhile in an average German city" , a report on Islamophobia (and its causes, among which is the penchant of migrants for raping and sexually assaulting German women and girls), the repercussions of Obama's 'empire of chaos' in The Middle East has only just begun. As Raul Ilargi Meier recently wrote:

Ignorance and denial threatens to lead to a needless increase in nationalism, fascism, violence, misery, death and warfare. If we were to acknowledge that the change is inevitable, and prepare ourselves accordingly, much of this could be avoided.

There are two main engines of change that have started to transform the Europe we think we know. First, a mass migration spearheaded by the flight of refugees from regions in the world which Europeans have actively helped descend into lethal chaos. Second, an economic downturn the likes of which hasn’t been seen in 80 years or so (think Kondratieff cycle).

Negative ideas about refugees are already shaping everyday opinion and politics in many places, and this will be greatly exacerbated by the enormous economic depression that for now remains largely hidden behind desperate sleight-of-hands enacted by central bankers, politicians and media.

Humans are genetically biased against change because change means potential danger. We are not the only animals that do not cope well with change, in fact it was our superior ability to adapt tht propelled us to the top of the feeding chain (well OK, along with opposable thumbs). This means that when change comes, human societies are largely unprepared or underprepared for it.

Apply this to the group as well as the individual because group adaptation is part of our survival instinct, and you find the bias multiplies and becomes self-confirming. Members of the community reinforce each other’s bias. When change comes in small and gradual steps, as it mostly does, this can work relatively well (e.g. evolution). When it comes in large and sudden steps, trouble ensues.

That may sound like psychology 101, but it is indispensable knowledge if we wish it to recognize the implications to Europe and the entire world of allowing the unchecked mass migration of people whose mindset dictates theirs is the superior culture and must be imposed an the European savages ('Ifidels'), when technological advance, rapid population growth and cultural revolution have combined to push humanity into a period of change so profound it is impossible to predict what the long term impact might be.

Ignorance or denial of the stresses existing in society before the mass migration began inevitably led to an increase in nationalism, and when that nationalism confronted large scale immigration of people who came with the intention not of integrating, but of replacing national and ethnic populations, violence, misery and civil conflict must ensue.

People on the 'left' of the the political spectrum urge us to accept that change is inevitable, and prepare ourselves to surrender our values and traditions to a new dominant culture. but as humans we are not born to surrender what is ours.

There are two main engines of change that have combined to transform the Europe, a mass migration spearheaded, according to mainstream thought, by the flight of refugees from regions or alternatively engineered by a political, business and academic elite do destabilise the populations of educated and demanding people in the developed world, and the disintegration of an unsustainable global economic system which Europeans have been active alongside the USA in creating, into lethal chaos.



Second, an economic downturn the likes of which hasn’t been seen in 80 years or so (think Kondratieff cycle).

Hillary Clinton Supporting Feminists Demand Sharia Law For USA

How the Sharia Religious Police punish a woman who disobeys her husband. Yes she is buried up to her neck, and yes those are the stones that were thrown at her head.(Image source)

On a scale of 'completely and utterly idiotic' to 'brain dead' how stupid are American liberals, particularly the female ones? Who would think anybody who supports gender and racial quality and is repulsed by systems that enshrine the oppression of women by men and make it a criminal offence punishable by public stoning or whipping for women to ..... well do anything that resembles fun, without the permission of their husband or father.

Yet some of the feminist supporters of the Democratic Party Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton (who is qualified for the job of running the world's most powerful nation by virtue of having been married to a previous President - still that's more relevant experience than Obama brought to the role,), shown in the video below have been getting their tits out in support of their demand that Islamic Sharia law be recognised in the USA.

You don't actually see any bared tits in the video, it being a clip from a mainstream news channel, but you do see the beyond stupid supporters of Hillary's run, dutifully agreeing that America needs sharia law even though it would mean homosexuality, sex before or outside marriage and most or the 'rights' of women and gays won by equal rights campaigners would become criminalised.

This video is frightening. OK we know that such reports are edited and people who knew what Sharia law is about or asked for more information before offering an opinion would not make the cut, but that these young women don't even know what Sharia law is, but they bob their heads in unison, as ready to worship The blessed Hillary (The Butcher Of Benghazi) as they were to follow The Obamessiah speaks volumes about why the USA is in such deep shit as a nation.

Don't the silly tarts know that under Sharia law, a woman who shows her tits in a bikini or cutaway T shirt (or even goes out in public with her hair uncovered) is looking to be stoned to death.

The really frightening thing however is idiots like these have a vote in a democratic election.



RELATED POSTS:

Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Origninal Boggart Blog] ... [ TSU ]

Libyan Government Issues Gaddafiesque Threat To Flood Europe With MORE Migrants

British Royal Marines rescue hundreds of migrants stranded on a small boat 30 miles off the coast of Libya (Image source)

One of the three self-declared governments currently fighting each other for power in Libya, in the wake of 2011's FUKUS axis (France, Uk, USA) regime change war which turned Africa's most prosperous nation into a failed state, has issued a Gaddafi style ultimatum, warning that it will 'flood Europe with hundreds of thousands of new migrants if the European Union (EU) declines to recognise the Islamic State political wing as the legal government.

The threat that the IS faction in Libya will charter boats to ferry increasing numbers of African murderers, rapists, mutilators, head amputators and professional useless bastards or brain surgeons as they like to claim across the Mediterranean was made by Libya’s General National Congress (GNC). The GNC part of the Libya Dawn coalition which took control of Tripoli and the coastal areas from whence most migrant boats set off for Europe last year. Libya Dawn and forces controlled the internationally - recognised House of Representatives government have fought an inconclusive civil war for control of the western cities since the fall of the Gadaffi regime.

The GNC’s foreign affairs spokesman said it currently spends tens of millions of pounds a year on detention centres and repatriation programs which prevent Mediterranean crossings. Speaking to The Daily Telegraph, Jamal Zubia said a continued refusal to recognise the authority of the GNC could see the policy reversed:

“To be honest, I have advised my government many times already that we should hire boats and send these illegal immigrants to Europe. We are protecting the gates of Europe, yet Europe does not recognise us and does not want to recognise us. So why should we stop the migrants here?”

Vincenzo Camporini, Italy’s former defence chief, criticised the EU’s refusal to recognise the GNC. He told the EUobserver website: “The EU should be more flexible, more realistic, in its discussions with local authorities.”

Libya has always been a centre for sub-Saharan African migrants trying to enter Europe illegally, the chaos left following the fall of Gaddafi has caused the numbers leaving the north African nation in unseaworthy boats to surge out of control.

Last year an estimated 170,000 migrants arrived in Italy on boats from Libya and yesterday the United Nations refugee agency said that 218,394 crossed the Mediterranean to Europe in the month of October alone – a monthly record.

Libya does not, in fact, ignore people smuggling on migrant boats. Large numbers of people who enter the country illegally are detained and the International Organisation for Migration assists local authorities running voluntary repatriation programmes. However, local officials are said to resent deploying their own resources to combat what they see as Europe’s problem, a consequence of politically correct border control policies and over generous welfare systems.

This is not the first time Libya has threatened to flood Europe with migrants. In 2005, during a visit to Italy he warned: “We need support from the European Union to stop this army trying to get across from Libya, which is their entry point. Colonel Gaddafi threatened to “turn Europe black” if Europe did not pay him £4.1 billion in aid a year. The threat was repeated by "Mad Dog Muammar" as the Colonel was affectionately known, during the FUKUS axis bombing campaign.

Mr Zubia said: “Gaddafi did this threat and brought Europe to its knees.

“You need to remember that we are doing your border control for you. We cannot stay forever doing this craziness, spending lots of money on nothing.”

“At the moment there is a dangerous level of immigration from Africa into Europe and we don’t know what will happen. What will be the reaction of the white Christian Europeans to this mass of hungry, uneducated, uncivilised Africans?

“We don’t know if Europe will remain an advanced and cohesive continent or if it will be destroyed by this barbarian invasion. We have to imagine that this could happen but before it does we need to work together.”

Critics have warned that a Western-backed move to remove President Assad from office in Syria will leave behind a power vacuum and chaos similar to that in Libya and trigger another immigrant invasion. Many of those allegedly arriving from Syria as refugees now are actually coming from Turkey and elsewhere, having been taken in by the outrageous promises and left wing European anti - civilisation groups, that free houses, medicine and a wage for doing nothing await them in Europe.

RELATED POSTS:

Immigration: The boat people

<The Immigration Omnibus

Germany's Immigration Crisis

A special immigration problem at Calais

Sweden's Dystopian Paradise

Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Origninal Boggart Blog] ... [TSU ]

Russian Civilian Aircraft Downed In Sinai: Cui Bono?

ISIS hipsters in Egypt (Image source)

The news has been dominated by the mid air explosion of a Russian operated Airbus A321 airliner over Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, killing all 220+ passengers flying home to St. Petersburg after a holiday on the Red Sea. There are certain similarities to the destruction of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 over a civil war zone in Ukraine and the usual propaganda wars about who was responsible are now going on.

Islamic fundamentalist as active in Sinai, there is ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine in nearby Gaza and the US vs Russia proxy war in Syria goes on. So how do we make a reasonable guess at what happened?

Marcus Tullius Cicero said, "Always ask "Cui bono?" Who benefits.

So looking at the various claims being made by involved parties such as the governments of Russia and Egypt, the leaders of ISIS and Al Qaeda, and other parties who, on the surface do not appear to be involved, and leaving aside the propaganda mainstream media are passing off as news reporting, let's ask who can gain from this and how, if as some aviation experts are suggesting, the aircraft broke up in mid air because of a bomb planted on board; as ISIS are claiming, they shot it down with a surface to air missile (SAM), a claim dismissed by the Russian aviation controller; or as certain European and US news organisations are trying to suggest that the aircraft crashed because the uncaring Russian regulators could not be bothered maintaining it properly.

The ISIS claim is unlikely. According to flight radar data, confirmed by Egyptian air traffic control, the plane was flying at 30,000 feet when whatever happened occurred. Islamic State guerillas in Sinai have surface-to-air weapons but only of types no effective above altitudes of 10,000 feet.

Another suggestion, that ISIS infiltrated the airport at the Egyptian tourist resort Sharm el-Sheikh where the plane was was coming from and smuggled a bomb on board is more feasible but still unlikely. The usual travel arrangements for Sharm el-Sheikh are groups of tourists on package holidays where anyone not belonging to a group would be suspicious. Security at Sharm el-Sheikh is usually tight, the resort is in the middle of one of the most politically volatile reas on the planet.

There have also been reports that preliminary investigations point to a technical failure, but these have been brought into the public domain by western mainstream media and seem to emanate from sources in Washington.

The fact that Islamic State, the wannabe and IraqCaliphate that wants to dominate from Spain to Shanghai claimed responsibility can and will be used by propagandists, in Russia to justify an escalation of operations in Syria and Iraq. Since the days of Ivan The Terrible, Russia has been paranoid about its vulnerable southern borders and the Islamic fundamentalism preached by ISIS threatens to stir up a lot of trouble in the former Soviet buffer states to the south of Russia and Siberia.

But also the US government and its European allies, whose objective in supporting Ilamic militant groups has been to bring down the Assad regime in Syria could use it to demonstrate that ISIS now poses a threat to western interests and justify firing a salvo of cruise missile from warships in the eastern Mediterranean on "IS targets" in Syria and Iraq? And who would complain if some of those cruise missiles hit targets in areas loyal to Assad?

All this is mere speculation, but with the world drifting inexorably towards a major conflict between east and west and official news channels having shown they cannot be trusted, we have a right to specuilate. Experience tells us we would be foolish to trust the elite.

That IS claims to have taken down an airliner shows that it has intent to do such. That ought to end the stupid arguments of the Obama administration that it will be necessary to equip and work with IS towards middle east peace or to let the caliphate live and prosper. The claim will also the end to any attempt to give serious air defense weapons to "moderate insurgents" in Syria. The weapons could easily (as they already have) end up in Al-Qaeda or IS hands and it is now clear what they would be doing had they access to advanced weapons.

RELATED POSTS:

Back to Contents table


Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Origninal Boggart Blog] ... [ TSU ]