At least 40 injured, many arrests in Paris anti-labor reform protests

At least 40 people, including 29 police officers, were injured when the latest protest against France’s highly unpopular labor law reforms turned violent as demonstrators clashed with police in Paris today. Police arrested many prostors and used tear gas and water cannons to disperse the crowd.

Paris police chief Michel Cadot said he estimated "maybe more than 50,000 demonstrators" joined the protest in the city.

Clashes took place near the capital’s Port Royal railway station. Dozens of people, mostly wearing hoods, threw stones and firecrackers at the security forces, who responded with force to disperse the demonstration.

The unpopular reform, initiated by Labor Minister Myriam El Khomri, forces employers to pay only 10 percent of overtime bonus, instead of the current 25 percent. The bill technically maintains the 35-hour working week, but says that in case of “exceptional circumstances,” employees can be asked to work up to 60 hours a week.

The seven main French unions were hoping to attract a million workers to the protest against French President Francois Hollande's controversial labor reforms, despite falling support for the mass protests that have disrupted France since early March. A series of strikes and mass demonstrations have brought chaos to the rail network, the Paris Metro, airports, and road transport, because of industrial action and blockades at fuel refineries and depots.

The action is aimed at overturning reforms to the highly codified French workers' rights laws — known as the Code du travail — in order to give employers more flexibility. The labor reforms were largely directed at making companies take on more workers on permanent contracts, rather than temporary ones including zero hours contracts, to bring down the unemployment rate from ten percent. The trend to contract working and part time work was set in train by restrictive rules imposed by the EU which, at the same time as they imposed unacceptable restrictions on European employers, made it easier to 'offshore' jobs or to subcontact work through agencies to foreign firms which under EU law, are answerable to the law of the country in which the form is registered. Hollande's proposals would give employers more scope to lay-off workers and cut costs and allow some employees to work far longer than the current 35-hour week.

The reforms were pushed through by Hollande, who invoking a little used piece of the constitution — Article 49.3 — bypassed the Senate — which is dominated by Republicans, who are against the reforms.

Opinion polls show that, while four out of five, disagree with the labor reforms, there is dwindling support for the industrial action — particularly with the eyes of the world on France, which is hosting the current Euro 2016 football tournament. France 24 reported that only 4.5 percent of employees at state-owned national rail company SNCF were on strike Monday (June 13) — which is significantly smaller than previously.


RELATED POSTS:

Is Brexit A Harbinger Of Doom For The 'Experts'
The Brexit vote, the decision by a democratic majority in Britain to leave the European Union has sent shockwaves around the world. Not only does the EU now face a tsunami of departures, the usurpation of democracy by 'experts' ( technocrats ) has been challenged and exposed as a sham.

EU's Bureaucratic Dictatorship Is Losing The Support Of The Most Loyal Nations
Mayor Of Paris To Help Illegal Migrants Get To Britain
France Chaos Becoming A Threat To The Entire European Union
Media Silent as Biggest Protests Since nineteen Sixties Sweep France
Hollande Survives Confidence Vote As France Slides Deeper Into Chaos
After The Brexit The Frexit;1 in 3 French Voters Want Out Of The EU
French, Belgians, Dutch, Italians Follow Britain in Euroscepticism
Jews Fleeing From France In Record Numbers Because Of Antisemitism
France’s Slide Into Martial Law
France: Left and Right Unite In Desperation To Keep Power
Officially Confirmed: Turkey is Blackmailing the EU On Migrant Crisis’
Adolf Hitler: His Part In Our Downfall
EU Vows To Use Powers To Block All Elected ‘Far Right’ Politicians From Power
France Says No to Ukraine-EU Visa-Free Travel
WHO are you? A Bunch Of F***ing Useless W***ers That's Who
Dystopian Fiction Becomes Political Reality
French, Belgians, Dutch, Italians Follow Britain in Euroscepticism
Ignorance Is Strength: European Parliament Ready To clamp Down On Free Speech



Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Assange Says Wikileaks will publish ‘enough evidence’ to indict Hillary Clinton.

Image source: qpressSatanic Killary

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has revealed the whistleblower website has more damning information on Hillary Clinton which will be published if Barack Obama and the US Department of Justice continue to block the FBI's efforts to indict the Democratic Party presidential nominee. Assange claims what Wikileaks have is enough to indict Mrs. Clinton if the US government is courageous enough to do so, in what he predicts will be “a very big year” for the whistleblowing website.

That said of course, as Boggart Abroad has reported many times, the FBI have more than enough to indict Hillary on charges relation to her using a private, non - secure server to handle top secret information, and also on charges relating to misappropriation of funds from the former First Lady's charity The Clinton Foundation. On top of that the Clinton campaign faces several accusations of voter fraud from her opponent for the democrats nomination, Bernie Sanders. In New York and California, (where the result was called for Killary with millions of votes still uncounted), two states that could between then reverse the outcome of the nomination process, thousands of Sanders supporters say their names had been removed from the register and they were not allowed to vote.

In a TV interview screened on Sunday morning, Assange expressed concerns about the Democratic presidential candidate, who he claims is monitoring him, Assange described Republican presumptive nominee Donald Trump as an “unpredictable phenomenon”, but predictably, given their divergent political views, didn’t say if he preferred the billionaire to be president.

Peston did not ask if he supported Green Party candidate Jill Stein, even though she said she would immediately pardon Wikileaks whistleblower Chelsea Manning if elected, or Libertarian Gary Johnson.

“We have emails relating to Hillary Clinton which are pending publication,” Assange told Robert Peston of UK's Independent Television News (ITN) on Sunday when asked if more of her leaked electronic communications would be published.

About 32,000 emails from her private server have been leaked by Wikileaks so far, but Assange would not confirm the number of emails or when they are expected to be published.

Speaking via video link from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London where he has been banged up for three years in order to avoid extradition on trumped up charges, Assange said that there was enough information in the emails to indict Clinton, but that was unlikely to happen under the current Attorney General, Obama appointee Loretta Lynch.

He also said he thinks "the FBI can push for concessions from the new Clinton government in exchange for its lack of indictment." This of course would be typical of Hillary Clinton and her equally crooked husband.

RELATED POSTS:


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Details Are Emerging About The Orlando Shootings but They Raise More Questions Than They Answer

Are Americans being told the truth about the Orlando shooting?

13 June 2016
Came across this post relating to the Orlando shootings on Intellihub, usually quite a reliable site. Now I could not tel you if there is any substance in the story or not, the job of us new media jurnos is to report what is in the news and in this case the unconfirmed rumours are news and people are entitled to answers. It's called holding those in authority to account.

Multiple suspects on the loose in Orlando; total media blackout of eyewitness accounts?

ORLANDO, Flor. (Shepard Ambellas  INTELLIHUB) According to heavily censored eyewitness reports, totally suppressed from the mainstream, there were likely several other radicalized perpetrators involved with Saturday night’s terror attack, which led deaths of 49 club-goers at Pulse and over 50 others being injured.

One eyewitness to the attack, who was inside the nightclub when it happened, was giving his testimony to the attack, after being trapped inside the club, live on-air, to a mainstream news source when he was abruptly cut off after providing a crucial detail. The eyewitness said that during the attack “there was a guy there that was trying to […] hold the door closed so that we couldn’t exit,” as pointed out by an investigative reporter on YouTube.

 Additionally, there were reports that police could be seen quietly conducting an “active search” for accomplices who may have already exited the nightclub after the attack.

 Another crucial detail that the press is leaving out is that the shooter or shooters were initiating "rapid fire;" which means that the weapons used were likely fully automatic, as depicted by the same eyewitness when he made an animated machine gun-like sound with his mouth for the press to hear.

See full article with pictures, video clips and witness statements not reported by mainstream media

RELATED POSTS:
Appeasement of Islamic extremists makes things worse
Islamic terror: The Elephant in the room
islamic extremist terror hits Paris, France
Muslim intolerance
Obama's jihad against civilised values
Obama and his Al Qaeda allies

French Movement To Reclaim National Identity: The French Have Been Silent Too Long
Bombs Kill 33 at Busy Baghdad Markets
Black Belgians Refute ‘Poverty, Discrimination’ As Causes Of Arab Terror - It's A Cultural Thing
We Will Never Defeat Terrorists While Idiots Like This Are Allowed To Hold Public Office
The Truth About Europe’s Muslim ‘No-Go Zones’
Brussels Bombings: Todays News, Old Headlines
Britain’s Terror Chief Warns Of Likely Islamic State Terror Attacks
Obama More Concerned Islamists' Rights Than Protecting America
We Are Living Amid An Islamic Threat", French Mayor Says: "Our Country Is At War Inside Our Borders
Six Months On From Cologne Outrage: Government Admits Sex Attackers WERE ‘Refugees’
Clooney, Streep Open Berlin Islamophiliac Film Festival
Islamic State Using Dead Syrians And Left Wing Media Islamist Propaganda?
Politician Blasts Conviction For Speaking The Truth On Anti-Semitism In Europe
I Would Have Never |Guessed The Ethnic Origin Or Religious affiliation Of These Despicable Sex Attackers School Inspectors Find Books ‘Promoting Stoning People To Death’ In Islamic School
Women Fear To Go Out Alone In Danish Town Due to Migrant Assaults
The Source Of Islamic Radicalism Is biggest US Ally In The Middle East
Tacit Approval From US Liberals For Islamic Indoctrination In US Schools.Paris Horror Demonstrates Limits On Tolerance And Need For Border Controls
Paris Horror Demonstrates Limits On Tolerance And Need For Border Controls



Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

It's Not Just The British Want Out Of The EU - Eurosceptic PODEMOS in Spain Are Surging Ahead Of Election

With the EU Bureaucrats and Europe's political elites (not to mention the world domination freaks in Washington) in a blind panic over the surge of support for LEAVE in the Brexit campaing, pro EUronazi people in the UK are screeching "Racism", "Xenophobia" and trying to pretend that Britain is the only EU member state dissatisfied with the way the European Union has been run. This is in spite of surges in support across Europe for anti EU parties such as Front National in France, The Sweden Democrats, Alternatif fur Deutschland, the Danish People's Party and the Freedom Party in The Netherlands. Last month we saw victory stolen from the anti EU candidate in the Austraian Presidential Election and last week anti EU, pro - Democracy candidate Virginia Raggi established a comfortable lead in Rome's Mayoral Election.

And then there's this:

Following the inconclusive election outcome in Spain st December, the crisis torn country is preparing to go to the polls again. Already in a panic over the way the In / Out referendum in Britain looks to be heading, the smooth face bureaucrats and crooked deal makers who run the EU will have been further dismayed by a sudden surge in the popularity of Spain’s Eurosceptic Podemos (United We Can) party.

Podemos (Image source)

Center right Popular Party (PP) leader and acting prime minister, due to the refusal of Podemos to enter a coalition with any pro EU party, Mariano Rajoy was expected to gain seats following the failed election in December 2015. However polls shows PP is losing seats to left wing anti-EU party Podemos (the labels left and right have little meaning now) as the graphic below shows, with 22% of respondent declaring undecided; (don't worry if you don't speak Spanish, words are not needed.)

Image source: El Pais

The Financial Times (London) comments Spain’s Once-Mighty Socialists Set to be Eclipsed by Far-Left.

The Spanish left is heading for a wrenching realignment at this month’s repeat general election, with a closely watched new poll suggesting that the centre-left Socialist party will be eclipsed by the far-left Unidos Podemos bloc.

With the official election campaign set to kick off at midnight on Thursday, Unidos Podemos was forecast to win 25.6 per cent of the vote and 88-92 seats in the 350-strong parliament.

The latest poll, by the respected state-funded CIS research institute, gave the once-mighty Socialists just 21.2 per cent and 78-80 seats. If confirmed on June 26, the day of the election, that shift would offer fresh evidence of the deepening crisis facing Europe’s embattled social democrats.

Last month, the anti-austerity Podemos party and the United Left, which includes Spain’s former Communist party, decided to set aside their rivalry and run on a joint list dubbed Unidos Podemos (United We Can). For the Socialists, the traditional standard-bearer of the left, the fallout from that deal appears to be highly damaging.

According to the CIS survey, the Socialists and Unidos Podemos could control as many as 172 seats in parliament, just four shy of an absolute majority. Meanwhile, the PP and the centrist, pro-business Ciudadanos party are predicted to win at most 160 seats between them.
But party leaders and analysts alike caution that the Socialists are deeply reluctant to throw in their lot with Unidos Podemos, especially if that alliance were to be led by Podemos chief Pablo Iglesias.

“I don’t see the Socialists supporting Iglesias as prime minister,” said José Fernández-Albertos, a political scientist at the CSIC research centre. “The more likely outcome is that they will abstain and let Rajoy govern [in minority] but will go into the opposition themselves. They will tell their supporters: We cannot support the PP but we also have to be responsible.”

As the polls stand now, mathematically, it appears likely the outcome of the election will once more be inconclusive. Adding to Spain' economic problems a coalition will be difficult because none of the other parties like PP or its corrupt leader, Mariano Rajoy.

A government of national unity, a three-way coalition between Unidos Podemos, PSOE, and Ciudadanos, previously proposed by King Felipe seems the least likely outcome as it was rejected earlier this year by all parties except PP, whose leader Rajov is no fan of democracy and rather than accept that he is the problem and stand down will apparently do anything to hold on to power.

The undecideds will determine the outcome and they are currently breaking towards Unidos Podemos, to give the party its full name which literally translates as “United We Can”, a nice campaign slogan. If Unidos Podemos plus PSOE can achieve an absolute majority, it seems likely that after some cracking together of heads, the socialist parties will unite, if only for the sake of returning Spain to a functioning democracy.



RELATED POSTS:

Is Brexit A Harbinger Of Doom For The 'Experts'
The Brexit vote, the decision by a democratic majority in Britain to leave the European Union has sent shockwaves around the world. Not only does the EU now face a tsunami of departures, the usurpation of democracy by 'experts' ( technocrats ) has been challenged and exposed as a sham.

Spain: Austerity is the road to ruin

Google Quits Spain In Paid Content Row

Green policies cause pain in Spain

Spain's top economists says only prostitutes can save European economy

This Will Make Globalists Understand Why They Should Have Voted For UKIP

In Spain They Are Taxing The Sunshine.

Brexit posts menu


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Orlando Shooting Suspect Identified As Omar Mateen, An Afghan With Links To ISIS

Omar Mateen, the terrorist who killed over 50 people in a gay club in Orlando, Florida, earlier today, is now known to have called emergency services and pledged allegiance to ISIS before he committed the atrocity. As the New York Post reports, Omar Mateen had committed himself to ISIS before carrying out the bloodiest mass murder on US soil in history at a gay nightclub federal officials said, according to California Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat Congressman on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, told CNN.

According to Washington Post, the ex-wife of the 29-year-old Afghan born  shooter said he was violent and mentally unstable and beat her repeatedly while they were married. The ex-wife said she met Omar Mateen online about eight years ago and decided to move to Florida and marry him. At first, the marriage was normal, she said, but then he became abusive.

(UPDATE: After logging off last night we learned the Orlando attacker was in fact born in New York to Afghan parents - apologies for the error, our sources for breaking are 24 hour news feeds and it is difficult to verify details given in early reports of major news stories)

“He was not a stable person,” said the ex-wife, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because she feared for her safety in the wake of the mass shooting. “He beat me. He would just come home and start beating me up because the laundry wasn’t finished or something like that.”

 Mir Seddique, the Afghan father of Mateen, said it is intolerance of homosexuality, and not affiliations with ISIS or any other terror group fanatical supporters of Islam, that likely provoked the attack. "This has nothing to do with religion," he told NBC, stating that he was “in shock like the whole country.”

He went on to relate a “recent incident” that demonstrated his son’s attitudes. "We were in Downtown Miami, Bayside, people were playing music. And he saw two homosexuals kissing each other in front of his wife and kid and he got very angry. They were kissing each other and touching each other and he said, 'Look at that. In front of my son they are doing that.' And then we were in the men's bathroom and men were kissing each other."

It is difficult to say that any good can come of such and incident, but if this outrage serves as a warning to 'liberals' (particularly the pair in The White House who are obsessed with gay and transgender rights) that it is sheer folly for a nation apparently determined to elevate gays and lesbians to the status of an elite caste to be equally enthusiastic about importing followers of a religious group in which homosexuality is not tolerated.


RELATED POSTS:
Gay cake controversy
We have a duty to tolerate homosexuality, we do not have to celebrate it
The folly of appeasing Islam
ISIS Paris atrocity
Muslim intolerance
America is being destroyeed by political correctness
American Liberal
A Liberal's Dilemmas
What drives Liberal Hate

Six-Figure Fines for failing to use the right transgender Gender Pronouns?
Gay Rights Lobby Calls for Ban on LGBT Therapy After Finding Hundreds of Health Workers Believe in a Cure
French Goss Mag Outs Gay Politician, Sparks Privacy Row
Obama More Concerned Islamists' Rights Than Protecting America
Barack Obama: A Pacifist Turned Warmonger Threatens Nuclear Holocaust
Six Months On From Cologne Outrage: Government Admits Sex Attackers WERE ‘Refugees’
Former Head Of UK Equalities Commission Admits He Was Wrong To Believe Muslims Would Blend Into Britain…
Christians, Gays, Women Fleeing European Asylum Centres After Persecution By Muslim Men


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

'Leave' Takes Shocking 19-Point Lead In Brexit Poll

Now I'm not one to place a lot of confidence in opinion polls for many reasons, one of the main ones is that not only do the polling companies nor publish a figure for how many people responded don't know / don't care / eff off and don't call me again. That last category is the most significant one, thirty years ago, even twenty, people would fall over themselves to make their opinions known if given a chance. Now trust in the political system and the media has eroded to such an extent that pollsters often have to phone on average five people to get one willing respondent (source UK Polling Report)

But what the polls published over this weekend do tell us is that the REMAIN campaign had a terrible week.

The headlines go from bad to worse for the David Cameron, and the UK and EU political establishments as hot on the heels of two polls showing LEAVE opening a ten point lead this weekend the latest. by Opinium, shows "Brexit" leading by a remarkable 19 points (52% chose to leave the EU against 33% choosing to keep the status quo).  This surge in "leave" probability comes despite an additional 1.5 million voters having registered this week (which many expected to increase "remain" support). Further anger towards EU was exposed when former cabinet minister Iain Duncan Smith warned that seven new prisons will need to be built in the UK by 2030 to cope with the rising number of migrant criminals (presumably due to 'staying' in the EU).
 
The Express reports,

The Opinium Poll, commissioned by the Brexit-backing Bruges Group think tank, is further evidence that the Leave camp is gaining support and delivers the biggest margin of victory for Brexit so far, after giving voters the option of a choice of free trade agreements with the EU.

It found 52 per cent chose to leave the EU, with only 33 per cent choosing to keep the status quo.

Despite there being less than two weeks before the crucial referendum, on June 23, a further 15 per cent said they still didn't know.

Of those who voted to leave the majority, 39 per cent, said that Britain should have some sort of Free Trade Agreement with the EU, similar to the one currently enjoyed between the US, Canada and Mexico.

Speaking last night Robert Oulds, director of the Bruges Group, said it was important to  which allow trade with the European Economic Area.

"This new poll shows there are a majority of voters who prefer an economic rather than economic and political arrangement with the EU. These include people who might otherwise have voted to remain in the EU," he said.

“Clearly we can be free, have more democracy and be better off if we ditch or cancel our EU membership, and join a Free Trade Agreement like the one people thought they were voting for in 1975.”

He's right and the REMAIN gang screwed up badly when they relied on smear and sneer tactics and the notorious Project Fear, with Europhiles making ridiculous claims about economic catastrophe, and even trying to tell people that Britons would not be allowed to visit EU countries for holidays.

The political left have further antagonised working class voters with risible claims that supporters of REMAIN are more intelligent, liberal and open minded and Brexit supporters are knuckle dragging, racist, Xenophobic neanderthals. It is typical of the arrogance and stupidity that they believe such behaviour will win over their opponents. 


RELATED POSTS:

Dutch Referendum This Week Shows why We Should Leave The EU.

Few of you were aware probably that there is an EU referendum vote in The Netherlands this week. As usual with anything negative about the EU barely a word has been printed in the topic in mainstream media and the silence from our notionally unbiased national broadcaster The Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) has been deafening.

French, Belgians, Dutch, Italians Follow Britain in Euroskepticism

Europeans want us British to lead them out of Europe. Don't be fooled by project fear, the European Union (aka the Euronazi Federal Superstate) is falling apart. There will not be chaos if we leave, there will be chaos if we stay.

Head Of European Institute: Brexit ‘Better’ For Everyone

Brexit would be the best result of Britain’s in / out referendum for both Britain and the EU i a Belgian professor who heads up the European Institute at the London School of Economics (LSE) has said.

Johnson’s article lines up his reasons why Britain must exit on June 23rd. It’s time to be brave

OK, I know a lot of you think Boris is most accurately described by a word many people find offensive, but he’s put together a very good argument here on why we must leave the EU. Published in part here under ‘fair use’ terms and conditions, in the public interest ...

Cameron’s EU Package: Not A Deal But A Few Turns In The Spin Machine
As we and almost everybody else predicted, David Cameron's deal to improve Britain's relationship with the EU is worthless. It changes nmothing, and can be vetoed once we have voted to stay in.

Cameron Plays Deal Or No Deal In Europe

David Cameron, who was apparently up all night trying to make other European leaders understand why his country needs a better deal in order to poersuade the prople it is a good idea stay in the EU. Unless Cameron gets what will enable him to sell the idea of surrendering national sovereignty to a Federal European Superstate ruled by a committee of unelected bureaucrats in to the British public he will not campaign for the UK to remain in the bloc

EU Refuses to Block Eurozone Integration to Reach Agreement With UK

Austrian Chancellor Werner Faymann said at the E?U summit on British membership terms that the European Union wants to reach an agreement with the United Kingdom, but it is not prepared to compromise the banking union (financial integration) or the further integration of monetary union (UK being forced to abandon the pound join the Euro?) to achieve this goal.

Cameron's EU Deal Worthless. It Can Be Vetoed In European Parliament?
Opinion polls show Britain is evenly divided on the question of whether to leave or remain in the EU, though it has been suggested up to 10 million other voters, many of them women, have yet to make a decision. How they cast their vote will shape the future of the world’s fifth largest economy and the EU itself. But what is really at stake is more important than economics ...

Obama's intervention in UK politics triggers angry backlash
Angry Britons have launched a petition calling for U.S. President Barack Obama to be prevented from speaking in the UK parliament on Britain's forthcoming referendum on European Union (EU) membership.

NATO Rhetoric About Russian Threat is 'Absurd'

The reasons being given for the latest NATO military buildup in Eastern Europe, the idea that the Russian 'Russian threat' to Eastern Europe grows every day is "simply absurd," according to former US diplomat and Senate policy advisor Jim Jatras. Effectively, Jatras says, the buildup is an attempt by the US to keep Germany and France on board with Washington's world domination agenda and ...

E U To Push TTIP Trade Deal Before Obama Leaves Office

TTIP, the Trans Atlantic Trade And Investment Partnership is being promoted bt the US government and the EU Commission as a free trade deal that will create thousands of jobs and bring economic benefits to partners. It's critics however claim it is a blatant attempt to shift power from national governments to corporate business.

Europe posts menu

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

NSA Planning To Exploit 'Internet Of Things' Including Biomedical Devices

The post might appear from the headline to be aimed primarily as a US audience, but with US Government Surveillance now global and The Internet sliding its tentacles into domestic appliances, cars and even the plumbing in our houses it affects us all.

The Internet of Things in a Big Brother society (Image source: satiztpm)

We learn via whistleblowers that the USA's The National Security Agency (NSA) is exploring the potential of the so called 'Internet Of Things' as a means of gathering data worldwide. One area of particular interest to the government snoopers is internet-connected bio - medical devices like pacemakers, according to the source
.
“We’re looking at it sort of theoretically from a research point of view right now,” Richard Ledgett, the NSA’s deputy director, said at a closed conference on military technology in Washington on June 10. Biomedical devices could provide nformation helpful to the NSA’s obsessive fascination with the idea of using 'big data to build computer models of group behaviour. This kind of thinking shows a failure to distinguish science fiction from reality, but that is a well know mental defect in many silicon valley idiot - savants, and paranoid control freakery is de rigeur for members of national security organisations.

When asked if the entire scope of the Internet of Things — billions of interconnected devices — would be “a security nightmare or a signals intelligence bonanza,” he replied, “Both.”

“As my job is to penetrate other people’s networks, complexity is my friend,” he said. “The first time you update the software, you introduce vulnerabilities, or variables rather. It’s a good place to be in a penetration point of view.”

In choosing the most effective ways exploit different new devices, the NSA has to prioritize its resources, which are usually focused on the “bad guys’” tech of choice rather than popular gadgets in the U.S., Ledgett explained. This should have prompted the question, "Then why not focus on the bad guys rather than spying in everybody?" Perhaps nobody asked because they knew an answer would not be forthcoming.

When asked why the agency was looking at spying on ctizens through washing machines and TVs when they could not break the security on a terrorists iPhone Ledgett explained the NSA wasn’t able to help the FBI crack the iPhone of the San Bernardino shooter, because NSA had not yet invested in exploiting that particular model of phone. “We don’t do every phone, every variation of phone,” he said. “If we don’t have a bad guy who’s using it, we don’t do that.”

In other words, "We spy on everybody and hope our prsing of Big Data throws up something suspicious." In that case one would think one of the most popular cell phines in the world would be a priority. but then it has often been said that Military Intelligence is a contradiction in terms.

RELATED POSTS:


Judge Denies Attempt To Block Obama's Transfer Of Internet Oversight To UN

October 2016: In a last ditch effort to block Obama's plan to allow the US Commerce Department to hand over oversight of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to a multi-stakeholder community - which includes the technical community, businesses, civil society and foreign governments - 4 state attorneys went to a Texas federal court alleging that the transition, in the absence of congressional approval, amounts to an illegal forfeiture of U.S. government property. Confirming once more that under Obama's Presidency the judiciary and legal system have been totally politicised, their case was thrown out on a technicality.

Cellular Technology: Can Governments Use It To Rearrange Your Brain
The controversies around cellular technology and the cellular masts or towers that make up the network grids just will not go away. It is not just the issue of do cellphone damage brain tissue that concerns us now, but certain rumours about what might be transmitted from the masts into the electro-magnetic mush that surrounds us all.


Internet of things
Internet: privacy online
Technology of mind control
Slaves of the machine
Surveillance society
Surveillance goes over to the dark side
Surveillance: Cellphone fascism
Surveillance, the tool of the totalitarian state
Surveillance will be total soon

Silicon Valley's War On Free Speech: Google Plays Politics
New German Government Smartphone Spyware Will Monitor Citizens’ Calls, Typing AND See Through Their Camera Lenses
US-EU Privacy Shield Data-Sharing Agreement Blasted as Inadequate
John Kerry Calls For The Internet To Be Placed Under The Authority Of The United Nations
World Domination Freak Bill Gates Appeals For World Government
The Internet Of Things: A Dystopian Nightmare Where Your Entire Life Will Be Monitored On The Internet
Google buys Nest for $3.2 billion: Does this home automation acquisition point to ‘the internet of things
Thousands To Make Legal Stand Against UK Government Surveillance
Virtual ID has arrived – why you should resist taking it up
Google a step closer to developing machines with human-like intelligence
World’s largest supercomputers took 40 minutes to calculate 1 second worth of human brain activity
Google Driverless Car Project
Transhumanism - Elitist and Mad Scientist Collaboration To Turn Us Into Automatons.
The Robotification Of Human Society Is being Implemented




Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Is Bilderberg A Sinister Group That Runs The World Or Just A Tea Party For Rich And Powerful People

Are the Bilderberg Group meeting, this weekend in Dresden, Germany, really The Shadow Government (the New World Order, The Illuminati,) that rules the world?

For years the Bilderberg Group denied its own existence. Now thanks to the diligent work of dedicated investigative journalists we know it is real, yet many 'liberals' 'progressives', globalists and university dumbed down idiots still insist it is all a conspiracy theory.

But when you look at who is attending the shindig in Dresden this weekend it's hard to imagine such people giving up their time just to get together for a chat. If fact their multiple links to big power and big money make a complex web that links the world's major banks, corporate businesses and political organisations.

Here's a handy chart to show who's who (or more accurately who owns whom) at Bilderberg. Click through on the image and then enlarge until the text is readable (only suitable for PCs, Laptops and tablets.)

 

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/06/04/bilderberg%20group_1.jpg

In 2008 may new media commentators, myself among them, reported an item that appeared on a whistleblower site and revealed a deal had been done with The Clintons for Hillary to take a dive (she cudda been a contender) because the shadow government had decided a black president in the USA would serve their agenda better. We can only guess at what that agenda really is of course, but you can bet that destabilisation of societies in the developed world is a prominent item.  The report also leaked the news that Hillary Clinton was tagged by the faceless ones to be the next president of the United States of America even though she will be seventy if she takes office next January and has several known health concerns (not to mention the possibility of her being buried by the email scandal, the Clinton foundation scandal and Donald Trump's 'Crooked Hillary' taunts. Barrack Obama having served a double term marked by vacillation, weakness, indecision, incompetence and an obsession with issues only of concern to gays, trannies and other minorities has hardly left a glowing legacy for his anointed successor. Shameless Clinton, having dismissed questions about her honest with the phrase "What difference does it make?' is now pressing ahead to be the next president as decreed.

( Unfortunately, after intensive searching I can’t find the original article, the blog site I mentioned it on closed last year and the best I can do is draw your attention to the snippet below which relates to the 2012 Bilderberg meeting, but sums up how Bilderbrg operates and proves that US voters have no say in the matter of who becomes president.

 When the Bilderbergs met in 2008, from June 5 to 8, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were neck-in-neck in the battle for the Democratic Party’s presidential candidacy. On June 5 of that year, both Barack and Hillary mysteriously “disappeared” for some hours “somewhere in the DC area,” their agendas blocked out.

The media kept mum about that, save for an Associated Press report on the campaign trail saying that “reporters traveling with Obama sensed something might be happening between the pair (i.e. Obama and Hillary) when they arrived at Dulles International Airport after an event in Northern Virginia and Obama was not aboard the airplane. Asked at the time about the Illinois Senator’s whereabouts, Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs smiled and declined to comment.” (The AP dispatch “Obama and Clinton meet, discuss uniting Democrats” is, strangely, “no longer available” on their website).
Two days later, Hillary withdrew from the race and Obama became the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate. Did Bilderberg make Hillary “an offer she couldn’t refuse” to clear the way for Obama to the White House? Did they promise her that she would become his Secretary of State?

A favorite Bilderberg method consists of inviting wannabe future heads of state to their meetings to determine whether they will go along with their agenda. George H. W. Bush attended their 1985 meeting, Bill Clinton attended their 1991 meeting, Tony Blair in 1993, and Romano Prodi, former head of the EU Commission, in 1999.
So what exactly is Bilderberg?  It’s neither an organization nor a lobby. The “Bilderberg Meetings,” as they dub themselves in their (apparently) official website http://www.bilderbergmeetings.com, is a “by-invitation-only” club of around 140 very high-power people from business, finance, oil, politics, media, industry, academia and nobility who come together in a very private no-media / no cameras / extremely-tight-security surroundings to discuss…  Well… there’s the rub: what exactly do they discuss?
They describe themselves as “a small, flexible, informal and off-the-record international forum in which different viewpoints can be expressed and mutual understanding enhanced. Bilderberg’s only activity is its annual Conference. At the meetings, no resolutions are proposed, no votes taken, and no policy statements issued.”

You can find the rest of that at fellowship of the minds website. I'm not familiar with the site but my gut instince tells me they are reliable (as any of us  in new media can be because we don't have budgets to pay researchers and such) and as this is a subject mainstream media are not allowed to go near, 

RELATED POSTS:

Is Brexit A Harbinger Of Doom For The 'Experts'
The Brexit vote, the decision by a democratic majority in Britain to leave the European Union has sent shockwaves around the world. Not only does the EU now face a tsunami of departures, the usurpation of democracy by 'experts' ( technocrats ) has been challenged and exposed as a sham.

News From Davos: America Is Finished Global Governance And NWO To Rule

Are The Ruling Elites waking Up At Last To The Problems Cause By Mass Muslim Immigration?

Will TTIP Make Europe A Colony Of The USA?

Kissinger, The Original Dr. Evil

Who Runs America, The White House Or The Shadow Government?

 Global Corruption: USA Instrumental In Getting Saudi Arabia On UN Human Rights Panel

 New World Order? What's That All About?

Will Bilderberg End Privacy As We Know It? Agenda Suggests The Elite Will Know Everything About You

The Global Conspiracy?

David Cameron denies migrant crisis is a 'giant David Icke conspiracy' to keep us in the EU.

Is The World Turning Against The New World Order Elitists

The basis of mass mind control

World Domination Freak Bill Gates Appeals For World Government

Holy City (slam poem)
Bilderberg market rigging
Bilderberg goes for total control
A conspiracy of bankers
Global government project
Corporate monopoly men
New World Order (all posts)
New World Order whistleblower?
New World Order cashless society project



Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

FBI Begins Leaking Damaging Evidence Of Hillary's Treason As Obama and DoJ Block Indictment

We have been reporting (with increasing glee if we're honest) the scandal of Hillary clinton's email misdemeanours (which have turned out to be somewhat more than misdemeanous - high treason in fact) and recently how the corrupt and depraved Obama administration has been blocking the FBI in its attempts to bring this appalling, greedy, insensitive, hypocritical woman to justice.

Now things are really getting hot.

via Zero Hedge

The ongoing criminal probe surrounding Hillary's email server has been marked by opacity and lack of virtually any disclosure, not to mention a major turf war between the FBI and the DOJ, which is why many were surprised when overnight the WSJ revealed that at the center of the probe over Hillary's handling of classified information are a series of emails between American diplomats in Islamabad and their superiors in Washington about whether to oppose specific drone strikes in Pakistan.

As the WSJ writes, the 2011 and 2012 emails were sent via the “low side’’—government slang for a computer system for unclassified matters—as part of a secret arrangement that gave the State Department more of a voice in whether a Central Intelligence Agency drone strike went ahead, "according to congressional and law-enforcement officials briefed on the Federal Bureau of Investigation probe." Note the last and recall that two months ago we noted that according to Chuck Grassley, an FBI "source" may leak what the FBI has uncovered so far, to wit:

“Is there going to be political interference? If there’s enough evidence to prosecute, will there be political interference?” Grassley wondered aloud on Friday. "And if there’s political interference, then I assume that somebody in the FBI is going to leak these reports and it’s either going to have an effect politically or it’s going to lead to prosecution if there’s enough evidence."

It appears that this is precisely what may have happened, and the "source" used the WSJ as the distribution platform. And now that we (don't) know the "who", here is the "what."

The CIA drone campaign in Pakistan, though widely reported in Pakistan, is treated as secret by the U.S. government. Under strict U.S. classification rules, U.S. officials have been barred from discussing strikes publicly and even privately outside of secure communications systems. The State Department said in January that 22 emails on Clinton’s personal server at her home have been judged to contain top-secret information and aren’t being publicly released. Many of them dealt with whether diplomats concurred or not with the CIA drone strikes, congressional and law-enforcement officials said.

As the WSJ adds, some of the [drone-related] emails were then forwarded by Clinton’s aides to her personal email account, which routed them to a server she kept at her home in suburban New York when she was secretary of state, the officials said. Investigators have raised concerns that Clinton’s personal server was less secure than State Department systems.

The vaguely worded messages didn’t mention the “CIA,” “drones” or details about the militant targets, officials said. The still-secret emails are a key part of the FBI investigation that has long dogged Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, these officials said. They were written within the often-narrow time frame in which State Department officials had to decide whether or not to object to drone strikes before the CIA pulled the trigger, the officials said.

This is an issue, and potentially a criminal one, because "law-enforcement and intelligence officials said State Department deliberations about the covert CIA drone program should have been conducted over a more secure government computer system designed to handle classified information. State Department officials told FBI investigators they communicated via the less-secure system on a few instances, according to congressional and law-enforcement officials. It happened when decisions about imminent strikes had to be relayed fast and the U.S. diplomats in Pakistan or Washington didn’t have ready access to a more-secure system, either because it was night or they were traveling."

There is also the question whether leaked emails may have tipped off drone strike targets about an imminent CIA assassination attempt.

The WSJ adds that emails sent over the low side sometimes were informal discussions that occurred in addition to more-formal notifications through secure communications, the officials said.

Read full article >>>

You might think it could not get any worse for Hillary Clinton but you would be wrong. We know the Russians do not want this insane warmonger to be President. And it has been reported that The Kremlin is in possession of a vast tranche of Hillary's emails, including some of those she tried to delete to save her wrinkly old arse.

And Vladimire Puting will use them in the way that will gain him most advantage.


RELATED POSTS:
Approriate Ending To The Democratic Primary Saga?
Hillary Clinton’s email problems just got off the scale worse
Can this woman possibly be a fit and proper person to serve as President Of The USA
Pundits Said It could Not Happen: Trump Now Tied With Hillary In Latest National Poll
Wall Street 'Whistleblower' Exposes Clinton Foundation Fraud
Hillary Clinton To Face FBI Interview Very Soon
Obama's Economy Is Bad; Clinton's Would Be Worse
Lifelong Feminist Camille Paglia Slams Hypocrite Hillary Clinton And Her 'Liberal' Supporters
Yes, the Panama Papers Could Really End Hillary Clinton’s Campaign
With Hillary Clinton’s Email Lies Unravelling, 147 FBI Agents Are On Her Heels
Ruling Elites In Panic: Trump Presidency Would End Their Golbal Government Dream]
More Evidence That Hillary Clinton Leaked Secrets damaging To The USA

Obama the real danger to world peace

New Hampshire Primary:Sanders and Trump Victory For Vox Populi
At Both Ends Of The Political Spectrum Americans Agree The Government Is FUBAR
Loud Trump Resonates Throughout America.
Soros Attacks Trump: The New World Order Are Afraid ...

New World Order
Living With The Conspiracy


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Six Months On From Cologne Outrage: Government Admits Sex Attackers WERE ‘Refugees’

by Arthur Foxake

Members of the lying left have been cruicified on the cross of truth once again.

Image source: Inquisitor

Pro immigration and pro - Euronazi federalisation of Europe left wing activists have always strenuously denied that the mass orgy of rape and sexual abuse that took place in Cologne, Germany last New Year was the work of immigrants, most of the muslim. Neo Nazi lefties first tried to claim the story was a fabrication, then said the attacks had been carried out by German men. Now the allegations that recently arrived migrants were behind the Cologne mass sexual assaults have been proved.

In the wake of sexual violence Cologne on New Year’s Eve 2015, hundreds of witnesses and people claiming to be victims of assault identified their attackers, with over 1,500 complaints in all received by police in the weeks following the night. Most of the victoims described the men who had assaulted them as “North African or Arab origin”.

The German government propaganda machine went into overdrive and the needy, emotionally retarded 'liberals' and 'progressives' went on the attack, decribing the rape victims are racists and right wing extremists. One left wing politician even went so far as to say to the women who had been raped and assaulted it was their own fault for dressing and behaving in way that were offensive to Islam. Can you imagine the outcry if a white, European rapist defended his act by saying, "She was asking for it."
 
Conscious to defend Hauisfrau - Volksfuhrer Merkel's policy on mass migration and the ‘culture of welcome’ the left seems to think all Germany supports, many journalists and politicians tried to excuse the attacks, which ranged from rape, to sexual assault, and theft, by blaming German women and the racist attitudes of Germans while denying Cologne and the many other outrages involving rape and assault had anything to do with the migrant crisis.

One of those who spoke out most vigorously was Cologne’s staunchly pro-immigration mayor Henriette Reker, who denied there was any link whatsoever between the attacks and migrants. Even in January, this was contradicted by Cologne’s police.

Yet today German regional newspaper the Rheinische Post reports the eyewitness accounts were “largely consistent with the recent results of the investigations”.

The new statistics and facts confirm not only that the majority of men committing the assaults were not of “German origin”, but that most of them had been in the country less than twelve months. Despite their recent arrival to Germany, a remarkable two-thirds had already received the attention of the police for criminal behaviour.

The revelation that shows 70 per cent of the suspects of the attacks had been in Germany for less than a year totally discredits the previous line that those responsible were actually long-time residents from North Africa.
At the same time as the data release this week a spokeswoman for the German interior minister insisted despite the New Year’s attacks: “Immigrants are not as criminal as Germans”. Yet in just a matter of hours this assertion was too debunked.


RELATED POSTS:

Muslim Migrants: We Burn Cars Because Swedes are Racist
Picked up this essential post at the lovely Pam Geller's site. Reblogged here for enlightenment of those idiots who are saying we should give Sharia Law equal status with British law and if that does not happen it proves the British are racist.That’s rich. The fact that Islam is not a race is seemingly besides the point.

Multiculturalism Today: Child Marriage, Honour Killings, Sharia Law Zones, & ‘Punishment’ Gang Rapes


Germany's problem with Islam
Germany: Muslims demand pork ban
Immigrant rapes epidemic in Europe
The unstoppable immigrant tide
Immigrant Sharia zones in European cities
Immigration marginalisting European working classes
Swedsish dystopia caused by immigration
Swedish government wants white genocide
Rioting Asylum Shelter Inhabitants Scream ‘Allahu Akbar’ as They Attack Police
Germany Needs A Revolution, Anti-Islam Campaigner Tells PEGIDA Supporters in Dresden

Help! Immigrants have taken over our town, pleads German Mayor

The mayor of ski resort Garmisch-Partenkirchen, in Bravaria, has sent a plea for help to the regional government begging for help in tackling the problem of crime among refugees. Police officers say "blacks are in charge of the town." The letter, intended to serve as a warning to authorities in Germany's immigrant hot spots, has been sent by Mayor Sigrid Meierhofer on Sunday, according to Merkur newspaper

Germany: Merkel's Christian Democrats Haemorrhage Support To Anti Immpigration Party AfD
German Justice Minister Runs From Stage As Angry Audience Members Yell "TRAITOR!"
Forced To Defend Her Insane Immigration Policy, Merkel Blames Anti Immigrant Party For Crisis
German Politician Predicts White Germans Will Be A Minority. Faces Calls to Quit.
Merkel Isolated As Europe Splits Over Refugee Crisis
Pegida Organizes Anti-Islamization Protests Throughout Europe
Anti Muslim Feeling Spreads Through All Levels Of German Society
German Feminist Says Authorities Covered Up Muslim Sex Crime For Twenty Years
German Socialist Idiot Minister: Criticism Of Migrant Rapes Are As Bad As Rapists Themselves
New Year's Eve, Germany: 1,000+ Migrants Brawl, Rape, Sexually Assault, And Steal At Cologne Railway Station
German Police Admit They Have Lost Control Of Immigrant ‘Problem Neighbourhoods’
Hausfrau - Volksfuhrer Merkel Forces Germans To Kneel To Her Muslim Allies


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ...  [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]