https://order-order.com/2022/12/05/online-safety-bill-report-stage-sends-half-of-it-back-into-committee/
It s gratifying for supporters of free speech that the UL Government's Online Safety Bill, which had been described by members of the campaign to defend free speech as a charter for censors, has been ripped apart by the parliamentary committee tasked with scrutinising it and will have to be redrafted entirely apart from the title.
When the House of Commons the Speaker, whose poition is one of impartiality, savages a Bill it must be bad, so from the moment Lindsey Hoyle told MPs that the text of the bill was 'all over the shop' (a good old northern phrase from a northern politician,), and that at least half its clauses "would be getting the treatment," in particular that measure which aimed to force Social Media platforms to remove content which was "legal but harmful," those of us who have tried to defend the right of free speech against onslaughts from the United Nations and its various subsidiaries, The World Health Organisation, the World Economic Forum and all other globalist organisations that want to control information so we cannot find out what new mendacity they are planning, considered we had won a victory. Members of Parliament agreed with us that the danger in the wording of such a clause is if a thing is legal who gets to define what is harmful.
Obviously Social Media groups which promote self harm, suicide, paedophilia and such are not legal because it has always been illegal to incite crime. But web pages that question the efficacy of certain vaccines, the role of humans in exacerbating climate change or attempt to give unbiased reports on the causes and progress of the war in Ukraine are legitimate topics for public debate.
One of the most controversial subjects recently has been the transgender issue, and the elites have jumped on a bandwagon of insanity set rolling a couple of decades ago to the extent that in some liberal democracies it is now a crime to address a person by the pronouns appropriate to their biological sex rather that their those their 'feelings' dictate. Is it harmful to refer to a six foot two tall broad shouldered person with big hands and feet, an Adam's apple, a bead and a hairy chest as 'he' or 'him' because he chooses to wear a woman's dress? It is certainly scientifically correct but while we are told we must 'follow the science' and accept a vaccine that will not immunise us against a disease that is unlikely to cause anything worse that common cold symptoms unless we are very old or already seriously ill, but ignore the science (biology,) that tells us a placental mammal born with a penis is male and can never be anything but male except in extremely rare cases where a foetus does develop the incomplete reproductive organs of both sexes.
News reports last week led us to believe that the Bill's “legal but harmful” clause would be omitted. The Secretary of State included an Amendment to that effect. It now looks like there is resistance to changing that stupidly worded statement. If an idea is potentially harmful (such as promoting self hsrm or paedophilia as acceptable lifestyle choices, they should be, and usually are illegal. If saying transgendered women are nor real women is to be forbidden because though true it upsets a tiny but noisy minority then we are no longer living in a democracy and how long will it be before that same tiny but noisy minority are demanding the the extermination of certain groups they do not like in order to 'cleanse' society.
Sceptics say: the adult “harm” element of the Bill has monstrous unintended consequences like the ones I have just alluded to. That it provides the means for anyone who feels they have suffered harm by things seen on social media to demand redress without having to prove actual harm because it would be impossible to argue that an individuals feelings were not really hurt and their complaint is malicious or self serving.
A trans activist may say that they have seen a post saying Transwomen Are Transwomen, not women, claim that their “existence has been erased” and that they are now suicidal. As long as the 'legal but harmful' clause exists in the Bill, that post must be taken down and the publishers punished. Whatever public good the clause might allow, it is also a charter for censorship, suppression of dissent by extremist activists, and rent - seeking lawsuits lainched by vexatious litigants.
We undfulerstand today that the “legal but harm” clause cannot be simply omitted. It is referred back to its Public Bill committee for 10 days for drafting, redrafting, reformatting, reinterpreting and circle-squaring.
Alex Davies-Jones, speaking for Labour, gave voice to the thoughts many harbour – that the internet should not be a wild west where, for example, Hitler glorifiers and vegetables' rights advocates can say anything they want. Or as one commentator claimed, “Everything Kanye West says is abhorrent and has no place online.” These are the extremes to which these arguments go.
To say that everything Kanye West says is abhorrent can’t be right. He says many things that are verifiably true whether certain individuals agree with them or not. It is only when he addresses certain topics like Black Lives Matter or Jewish influence in world politics, or when he's simply talking egotistical bollocks with statements like "I am like a vessel, and God has chosen me to be the voice and the connector," that he gets weird. Claiming that such bollocks has no place online really does amount to erasing his existence. (Ms Davies-Jones should perhaos watch that film that ends with the fallen hero crying: “Oh no! I’ve become everything I’ve ever hated!”) But her comments resonate with many social media users, particularly university brainwashed millenials. To her credit Secretary of State Donelan has held out as far as this but there are many virtue signallers on her own side agitating in support of “legal but harmful” being adopted into law as a censors charter for suppressing all dissent frtom or questioning the 'woke' ideology of the cancel cult.
Alex Davies - Jones made the Labour Party's far - right position on censorship by defending“legal but harmful ,” saying it was the Law Commission who had proposed
it. That they were the experts and that expert advice should be taken.
There is an equal and opposite opinion – with many common law precedents
– that experts can be idiots as was strikingly confirmed many times during the COVID pandemic. On an issue that affects every member of the public there must be room for the voice of the public.
Home Secretary Priti Patel, perhaps from consideration for families of child suicides, teenagers who have been influenced by anorexia promoting websites to starve themselves to death and people whose lives had been destroyed by exposure to the worst of the sick shit published on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Tik Tok said, “Victims must be at the heart of everything we do.” This is a strong declaration of sympathy but it is absolutely wrong. We who aren’t victims have are partners in society and have rights as well. If a group opposing the self harm cult gets a site promoting self harm to teenagers as a cool thing to do taken down, what is to stop a site for religious fundamentalists getting the web pages of a Heavy Metal rock band removed because of 'coded Satanic messages.'
We have a feeling this story still has a long way to run.
RELATED:
Will The Online Safety Bill Protect Free Speech Or Assist Censorship?
The UK Online Safety Bill is presented to parliament for its final reading next week. Secretary of State for Digital Culture Michelle Donelan announced this morning that the controversial “legal but harmful” clause has been removed and thus free speech has been protected. Anti self-harm activists and groups opposinthe Gay BLTQ movement's push for paedophile equal rights and the sexualisation of children don’t like it one little bit, though free-speech enthusiasts should take no comfort from that. The Bill puts into legal jeopardy anything that creates “a material risk of significant harm to an appreciable number of adults in the United Kingdom”.
Government of Ireland announced new hate speech laws which will permit courts to jail ‘Hate Speech’ offenders for up to five years, but still cannot decide on a legal definition for what constitutes hate speech. Meanwhile the Irish government is finding itself accused of suppressing free speech while its new anti - hate laws are arousing a lot of hate
Despite the fact that they represent only the interests of big business, big finance and themselves, the oligarchs of the World Economic Forum are now calling for a policy of merging human and artificial intelligence systems so that computer chips implanted in our brain can edit and censor “hate speech” and “misinformation” online before it is articulated trough spoken of written word online.
French Police Use Teargas As Freedom Convoy Brings Thousands Of Protestors To Paris
Inspired by Canada's freedom Convoy, a sponaneous protest by drivers of heavy trucks against the fasistic and oppressive curtailment of individual freedoms by Prime Minister Trudeau's regime, French truck drivers protesting President Macron's similarly authoritarian measures converged on Paris where they were met by riot police enforcing Macron's ban on protests against government policy ...
SStarmer Outs Himself As More Fascist Than Boris Bonkers or Dementia Joe Biden
The leader of the UK’s official opposition party, Labour, Sir Kier SStarmer after a year of starring in a remake of The Invisible Man has finally decided to let us see who he is. Responding to remarks made by Home Secretary Priti Patel, SStarmer said education authorities should be allowed to use exclusion orders to stop anti-vaccine activists from protesting outside schools ... Continue reading >>>
Goodbye Freedom, Hello Global Governance.
If at any time during the chaos the past eighteen months you have wondered what kind of idiots are running the world and have gleefully trashed economies, disrupted social and commercial life and stripped citizens of their rights and liberties only to bring us, in late October 2021, right back to where we were in late February 2020 when the words pandemic and COVID crept into our consciousness ...Continue reading >>>
Big Tech tyranny is the biggest threat to democracy in our era
This weeks main story, pushing Coronavirus aside at last, has been the attempt by Twitter to censor U.S. President, classifying his somewhat rabid tweets as misinformation. Whether you love or hate Trump or any other occupant of The White House, their utterings can never be dismissed as ‘misinformation’ because they represent what one of the most powerful people in the world is thinking.
University free speech society told free speech a 'red risk', external speakers must be vetted
Sheffield University’s recently formed Free Speech Society has been warned that free speech is a “red risk” and all external speakers at events it organises will have to be vetted by the University Thought Police squad and the topics they intend to talk about shown to be in line with ideas and opinions the titty - sucking babies who run the Student Union are not frightened by.Merkel Isolated As Europe Splits Over Refugee Crisis
With the UK Prime Minister David Cameron still desperately trying to convince his 'revised terms' of British membership of the EU are a really good deal, when in fact they will change nothing, our attention should shift to developments elsewhere in Europe.
The Right To Tell Politicians To Eff Off In An Age Of Self Appointed Censors, and Compliant Media Our right of free speech is increasingly under attack from control freak politicians, politically correct left wing activists and the dark forces of corporatism.
Breaking: Brazilian Military Moves Against Socialist Lula After Corrupt Court Refuses Election Audit
For a few days now we have been seeing unconfirmed reports that the Brazilian military, which strongly supports right wing leader Jair Bolsonaro, has taken action to overturn the result of the recent election which was narrowly won by far - left former President Luiz Ignatio Lula da Silva (Lula), was corrupted by extensive vote rigging by Lula's supporters. This follows news that Brazil's Supreme Court, which Lula packed with his communist supporters during his presidency, refused to authorise and investigation into strongly evidenced claims of vote switching
Conspiracy Theories, reality and null hypothesis
Cast you minds back about 18 months, there was a conspiracy theory going round that a 100% Safe and Effective Vaccine had been developed by pharmaceutical corporations, to be freely administered by governments and injected into billions of people around the globe ostensibly to save their lives from a deadly virus pandemic was in fact not a vaccine but a gene editing technology that would alter DNA, lead to millions of early deaths and usher in an era of global tyranny under an authoritarian world government.
Forget The Hype About COP26 Saving The Planet, Here's The Reality
The Great Genocide: Dutch Govt Plans to Shut Down Up To 3,000 Farms To Comply With Euronazi Union Green Law
As we reported earlier in the year, in order to comply with new, economically suicidal European Union environmental laws the Dutch government’s plans to force the closure of thousands of dairy and livestock farms in order to comply with the latest and most insane to date batch of EU environment laws which aim to limit notrogen as well as Carbon Dioxide emissions. The European Union green agenda directive has been branded as the “Great Reset turned up to eleven”.
Despite the fact that they represent only the interests of big business, big finance and themselves, the oligarchs of the World Economic Forum are now calling for a policy of merging human and artificial intelligence systems so that computer chips implanted in our brain can edit and censor “hate speech” and “misinformation” online before it is articulated trough spoken of written word online.
We The Good Guys Versus They The Bad Guys Reporting Does Not Make Sense For The Ukraine Crisis
Mainstream media reporting of the conflict in Ukraine has disappointed. Perhaps I was naive to suppose that lessons might have been learned from the hits their print sales and online traffic rates took as a result of their handling the COVID pandemic But instead of focusing on the most obviously newsworthy aspect of the build up to and escalation of the war, Russia’s view of NATO expansion into Ukraine and even further to Georgia and Kazakhstan, news reports have simply demonised Russia and portrayed Ukraine as the good guys.
French Police Use Teargas As Freedom Convoy Brings Thousands Of Protestors To Paris
Inspired by Canada's freedom Convoy, a sponaneous protest by drivers of heavy trucks against the fasistic and oppressive curtailment of individual freedoms by Prime Minister Trudeau's regime, French truck drivers protesting President Macron's similarly authoritarian measures converged on Paris where they were met by riot police enforcing Macron's ban on protests against government policy ...
Political elites and super-bureaucrats must be very worried. New start up political parties, dismissed as populist byt in reality listening to the concerns of voters are making inroads into the political status quo. New media investigative journalists and op-ed writers are challenging the official propaganda (and gaining an ever bigger audience). It’s becoming harder to control consensus reality. France Moves to Make ‘Conspiracy Theories’ Illegal by Government Decree
Political elites and super-bureaucrats must be very worried. New start up political parties, dismissed as populist byt in reality listening to the concerns of voters are making inroads into the political status quo. New media investigative journalists and op-ed writers are challenging the official propaganda (and gaining an ever bigger audience). It’s becoming harder to control consensus reality.
Another Big Result For The 'Conspiracy Theorists' - US CIA Corrupts Western Journalists.
Ever wondered why anybody trying to report news truthfully or initiate intelligent discussion is branded a conspiracy theorist, especially if their news or opinion is critical of the American government of American business interests? Read the content of this page and you will know a lot more about what is going on.
Will The Online Safety Bill Protect Free Speech Or Assist Censorship?
The UK Online Safety Bill is presented to parliament for its final reading next week. Secretary of State for Digital Culture Michelle Donelan announced this morning that the controversial “legal but harmful” clause has been removed and thus free speech has been protected. Anti self-harm activists and groups opposinthe Gay BLTQ movement's push for paedophile equal rights and the sexualisation of children don’t like it one little bit, though free-speech enthusiasts should take no comfort from that. The Bill puts into legal jeopardy anything that creates “a material risk of significant harm to an appreciable number of adults in the United Kingdom”.
Government of Ireland announced new hate speech laws which will permit courts to jail ‘Hate Speech’ offenders for up to five years, but still cannot decide on a legal definition for what constitutes hate speech. Meanwhile the Irish government is finding itself accused of suppressing free speech while its new anti - hate laws are arousing a lot of hate
After years of being called 'conspiracy theorists' the wise people who noticed how Google were manipulating search result listings to server the corporation's business and political ambitions have been proved right ...
Google Now Has Access To Millions Of Patient's Health Records
A controversial deal between tech giant Google and the National Health Service (NHS) will allow artificial intelligence units access to 1.6 million confidential medical records. Since 2014, Google has partnered with several scientists in an attempt to understand human health, but a new report reveals the data gathering goes far beyond what was originally anticipated - well now there's a surprise.
List Of Alternatives To Google Products
This blog is no fan of Google as our readers know.Not only do we believe Google’s origins as the brainchild of a couple of dysfunctional nerds is a myth and that the company was spawned by the US government’ s DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) for military and civil surveillance projects, we are also sure it has fallen under the control of a bunch of Silicon Valley weirdos, who want to covertly control the world
Punish Google Tax Dodging And Sink The Corporate Pirates
With tax avoidance once more in the news but vying for top spot with stories of western industrial decline and Islamic penetration of civilised socities in Europe we hardly know where to start
While some conservative ministers have admitted that the party has consistently over-promised and underdelivered” may be considered a step in the rightthe brutal truth is successive Condervative or Conservative led governments have consistently promised one thing and done the exact opposite. In the run up to every election they have promised to control immigration and reduce immigrant numbers, especially of unskilled and poorly educated economic migrants who have been delivered by Non Government Organisations (NGOs) engaged in a globalisation project to abolish national borders.
In fact such people, who rarely speak any English and do not consider themselves subject to UK laws once they are here, have been actively encourages by the laxity of Conservative administration in enforcing border controls and properly vetting new arrivals.
The verse embossed on the plinth of New York's Staue of Liberty reads:
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me ..."
A modern UK version ofvthat, approved by Conservative Central Office might read:
"Give me your useless, beggars and thieves
Your idle wasters yearning to claim benefits
The stinking scumbags of your city streets,
Send me your murdering, rapist shits."
Yes the modern UK Conservative approach to defending British culture and values is to welcome the scum of the earth to our green and pleasant land, no questions asked. How can this possibly be interpreted as trying to control immigration.
To do the exact opposite of what was clearly promised in the 2015, 2017 and 2019 election campaigns reveals a dangerous truth about our political system (because make no mistake, Labour governments would have done no differently): leaders across the political spectrum have repeatedly lied, they have repeatedly masked their real intention. How can this be called a democracy? How can a democracy function like this when the people we elect to serve our best interests are intent on advancing the globalist agenda of a cabal of obsecenely wealthy elitists who would see 99% of us either ensalved or replaced. Has a democracy been functioning at all these past 25 years? If this isn’t a democratic decision, who is deciding this?