Woman Leaves Politically Correct Politicians Gobsmacked As She Claim Immigrants Prioritised Over Disabled People For Social Housing

An angry woman voters who claims her disabled mother has been bumped down the social housing waiting list because immigrants are prioritised, stunned politically correct Europhile politicians during the first Brexit TV debate broadcast by the BBC last night. Emily Wood laid into the smug, self righteous pro-Brussels politicians in a heated exchange on the EU in a broadcast dominated by the immigration issue and the effect mass immigration and huge nimbers of illegal immigrants has on Britain.

In a stunning attack Ms. Wood, a music producer, from Dorset, revealed her disabled mother had been bounced down the waiting list for a single storey house by town council bueaucrats who, allegedly acting on instructions from central government, prioritise immigrants for all social housing, demanding: "Where are we going to put them all?"

Anti EU cmapaingner Emily Wood who claims her mother is being blocked from social housing because priority is given to immigrants (picture source: Daily Express

Woods passionate plea to voters to support leaving the EU, Brexit, came just hours after official figures revealed that net migration has soared to 333,000 in the year to December, the second highest annual level on record. This is in spite of government promises to reduce net immigration to tens of thousands. One of the main campaign claims made by supporters of Brexit is that Britain cannot possibly regain control of its borders while the country is part of the European Union.

The point about immigrants abusing the social housing system at a time when Britain has a serious housing crisis is well made. Due to crazy purchase prices and rents in the private housing sector, many families and single people are unable to afford their own home, and social housing is being given to immigrants in order that they may cheat the system. All this week, 23 - 27 May 2016, on daytime TV (which us disabled, retired people have free time to watch,) the BBC has been running a documentary series on abuses of the social housing system. Day after day cases were highlighted in which unscrupulous people had fraudulently obtained tenancies of local authority or housing association owned properties, claimed housing allowance in the name of a fictitious tenant to cover the rent, and then sub - let properties designed for a couple of a family to three or four tenants.

As the other audience members supported Emily Wood and tried to make left wing politicians acknowledge the impact immigration has on access to housing for young people and lower income families, Miss Wood rounded on pro-Brexit former SNP leader Alex Salmond and Labour’s Alan Johnson, who said people were wrong to link the houseing crisis to immigration. Neither could satisfactorily explain what is causing it of course, maybe its because not enough of us believe in the 'house fairy'. Left wing and politically correct thinkers certainly seem to believe utopian can be delivered but only if everyone wished hard enough.

When Salmond replied to Ms Wood's point about housing ans immigration levels by saying: "I wouldn't make that connection - if we have a housing shortage, we should build more houses, not kick people out of the country." she hit back by saying:

"How the heck are we meant to house them when we haven't got enough houses as it is? Where are you going to put them? Where?"

The BBC debate was skewed by pro - EU audience member using the usual left wing tactic of trying to shout down anyone who opposed their views. Asked for his thoughts on the row, former Tory defence secretary Liam Fox said Britain should use the £10 billion a year we sent to the EU to pay for more housing and to boost the NHS.

He said: “Does anybody think we could not use £10billion to help improve the quality of health service, housing or anything else?"

UKIP’s Diane James, also representing Brexit, told another young voter that they stood virtually no chance of ever affording a home if we stay in the EU because immigration is pushing prices out of ordinary people’s reach.

Much like the referendum campaign itself, the conversation during a fractious and at time uncontrolled debate focused on the twin subjects of immigration and the economy.



RELATED POSTS:


German Streets Descend Into Lawlessness -part 1

During the first six months of 2016, migrants committed 142,500 crimes, according to the Federal Criminal Police Office. This is equivalent to 780 crimes committed by migrants every day. The data includes only those crimes in which a suspect has been caught. Thousands of migrants who entered the country as "asylum seekers" or "refugees" have gone missing. Many are thought to be engaging in robbery and criminal violence.


Useful Infidels Helping Fundamentalists Islamise The West
A left wing academic whose research was used to make the case for an investigation into Sharia courts in the UK has warned that liberals and 'progressives' are enabling fundamentalists to spead extremistS Islam in the West. Dutch legal scholar Machteld Zee said that if politically correct thinking stifles fair criticism of Islam, helping fundamentalist Muslims segregate Islamic communities and encourage them to be more religious and insular.


Migrants Consider Quitting Violent Sweden To Return To War-Zone Homelands For Safety
The Swedish ruling elite's politically correct obsession with immigrants has turned parts of this once peaceful, civilised and safe country into a lawless hell hole and borderline failed state. Perhaps the clearest indication of how bad things are in Sweden now is the news that Sweden is now so dystopian even migrants from some of the most violent and chaotic areas of Africa and the middle east want to return to their homelands

No Easy Answers For Immigration
The most sensible immigration policy is one that matches demand for labour with supply. While ensuring compassion and capacity for genuine refugees, we should take care that new arrivals looking for 'a better life' do not land in such numbers they become a burden on those that host them.
When A White Guy Killed Immigrants In Sweden It Was Terrorism, When An African Immigrant Killed White People, It Was The Victim's Fault. Why?
Surging Support for Germany’s Anti Immigration AfD Party Shows Contempt For Merkel's Open Doors Policy
Pegida Organizes Anti-Islamization Protests Throughout Europe
Are The Ruling Elites waking Up At Last To The Problems Cause By Mass Muslim Immigration?
"Our Europe Is Dying": Young Germans Video Blasts Merkel's "Multicultural Utopia": Censored By Facebook.
Women Fear To Go Out Alone In Danish Town Due to Migrant Assaults
Landmark Report Explodes The Myth Of Economic Benefits From Mass Immigration
Sweden ‘Facing Collapse’ Thanks To Migrant Influx, Foreign Minister Warns
Le Pen's Front National On Course For President As Migrant Opposition Grows In France
Warring Migrant Tribes, Street Shootouts, Grenade Attacks, Government Says Its Multiculturalism? WTF Is Going On In Sweden?
No Go Zones For Whites In Swedish Cities
Europe posts menu

Help! Immigrants have taken over our town, pleads German Mayor

The mayor of ski resort Garmisch-Partenkirchen, in Bravaria, has sent a plea for help to the regional government begging for help in tackling the problem of crime among refugees. Police officers say "blacks are in charge of the town." The letter, intended to serve as a warning to authorities in Germany's immigrant hot spots, has been sent by Mayor Sigrid Meierhofer on Sunday, according to Merkur newspaper


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

EU Member States Halt Visa-Free Deals for Ukraine, Georgia

On May 20, security ministers of EU Member States approved European Commission's proposal to make changes to plans for visa-free travel arrangements with non EU countries following warnings of further growth in illegal immigration. The measure was taken amid EU-Turkey visa free regime talks, which now also look set to fail because of Turkey's refusal to implement required reforms in human rights law.

The move came as the European Union was actively engaged in negotiating visa-waiver programs with Turkey, Ukraine, Georgia and Kosovo and against the background of a widening migrant crisis, and increasing dissatisfaction among member states of the way EU commission bureaucrats have repeatedly ducked their responsibility for dealing with the immigration crisis.

"Visa liberalisation has great advantages for the EU and other countries. Yet we need an emergency brake for all visa free countries to make sure that visa liberalisation cannot be abused," Council President Klaas Dijkhoff was quoted as saying in a press statement after the Brussels meeting.

Dijkhoff, also the Dutch migration minister, said he was "pleased that ministers had agreed on a mechanism that would make it easier to act against abuse". Next stage would be discussing the plan with the European Parliament, he added.

The revised mechanism sets out grounds for suspending visa-free travel agreements with non-EU members, such as an increased transit of third-country nationals through countries that the EU has agreements with. It is not the same as open borders travel, theoretically only available to EU citizens in the Schengen zone, but widely abused because of left wing ideological committments to a border free world (and ultmately the dystopian nightmare of a world government.
 

"EU states do not intend to exempt Ukraine and Georgia from the decision to halt progress of the visa waiver  suspension mechanism," a source told RIA Novosti. "such an intention may considerably slow down the process of granting a visa-free regime for Ukraine and Georgia."

The new mechanism sets out possible grounds for suspending free-travel agreements with non-EU members, such as an increased transit of third-country nationals through countries that the EU has agreements with.
In December 2015, the European Commission gave a positive assessment of Ukraine and Georgia successfully meeting all benchmark requirements necessary for the liberalization of the visa regime with the bloc. In spring, the Commission made a proposal to the European Council and the European Parliament to add Ukraine and Georgia to the list of countries the citizens of which could travel to the Schengen Area without visas.

However, no decisions on these issues have been approved by either of the EU bodies so far. It looks like this could develop into another battle between the Brussels bureaucrats and elected governments of member nations.

RELATED POSTS:

Is Brexit A Harbinger Of Doom For The 'Experts'
The Brexit vote, the decision by a democratic majority in Britain to leave the European Union has sent shockwaves around the world. Not only does the EU now face a tsunami of departures, the usurpation of democracy by 'experts' ( technocrats ) has been challenged and exposed as a sham.

EU Vows To Use Powers To Block All Elected ‘Far Right’ Politicians From Power
France Says No to Ukraine-EU Visa-Free Travel
Dystopian Fiction Becomes Political Reality
Latest From Project Fear On Brexit Is Complete Bollocks
EU Commission Backs Turkey Visa-Free Travel Amid Terrorist Cautions
So Long, Schengen: Six EU States to Resurrect National Borders in Mid-May
French, Belgians, Dutch, Italians Follow Britain in Euroscepticism
Ignorance Is Strength: European Parliament Ready To clamp Down On Free Speech
'We Got Duped': Ukraine Billionaire Slams EU Free Trade 'Fraud'
Schengen agreement scrapped: E U falling apart?
Castrating Project Fear: Former-UK Army Chief Shoots Down Claims of Brexit Impact on NATO
Why Won’t The Panama Papers Lefty Leakers Expose EU or American Establishment Figures?
Control Freak Cameron Wants to Vet Foreign Leaders’ Speeches To Curtail Free Speech On Brexit



Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

The Anger Of The Masses Is Rising

Privilege serves the same purpose as power, benefiting the few at the expense of the many, regardless of the system's ideological labels: Charles Hugh Smith

Anger personified (image source: universesings.com)

Disenchantment with the status quo and disgust with the corrupt elites, corporate cronyism and politically correct authoritarianism has not only triggered a surge of anti establishment, anti - globalist anger across Europe, as has been demonstrated (and further fuelled by) the establishment stitch ups and election rigging that have kept Front National in France, The Danish People's Party, UKIP in Britain, Germany's AFD, The Sweden Democrats and most recently the Austrian Freedom Party rightful and well earned success in elections, and kept anti EU-federalisation politicians chosen by the people from fulfilling the roles they were elected to. The same broad-based anger has fuelled the populist campaigns of Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump in the campaigns for the Democratic and Republican Party nominations in the U.S. Presidential Election.

Globally, the people disenfranchised by the status quo, in Peggy Noonan's phrase, the unprotected, people like myself for example, for many years a supporter of the UK's Liberal Party (when it knew what 'liberal' meant), I have always lived in either safe Conservative or Labour constituencies so under our first-past-the-post election system my vote has never been likely to elect a candidate I wanted to represent me. I now vote for UKIP, it is more a protest vote than from political conviction and also write blogs and contribute to online news and opinion sites. Others, in Britain, throughout Europe and in the USA, Canada and Aistralia are starting to express their discontent in the streets, in social media and in elections.

Why are the disenfranchised people around the world getting so angry. And why are there so many more of them that suspected? It's obvious to everyone in the unprivileged classes and a mystery to the "we're doing just fine here, what's your problem?" privileged classes: The system is rigged to benefit the elite few, say 5% of people (not necessarily based on earnings or personal wealth), and marginalize the many. For a long time people thought that was the way things were, unlike myself, many were happy to vote left or right on the basis of who they thought was the least bad. In recent years however, the few have become so blatant in their abuse of privilege and the gap between rich and poor has widened so much, hollowing out the middle income groups, the administrative and skilled worker groups, that something had to give.

The two structural engines of disorder at the heart of the system according to Charles Hugh Smith in his book Why Our Status Quo Failed and Is Beyond Reform, are:

Automation, software and the forces of globalization are disrupting jobs and wages everywhere.

Centralized hierarchies and the forces of globalisation have extended the power of privilege globally so the few are benefiting at the expense of the many.

The growing concentration of wealth and power in the privileged elites is evidenced by the fact that 8% of the world's populace owns 85% of its wealth. What is driving this increasing concentration of wealth and power?

To understand growing disparity between rich and poor and the increasing concentration of wealth in the hands of the old elites and corporate powers we must first understand the dual nature of privilege. Just as there is hard power (military power) and soft power (exporting cultural wares and values) so there is hard and soft privilege. hard privilege is exercised by authoitarian governments that criminalise free speech and dissent and operate oppressive surveillance and policing policies.

Soft privilege operates by utilising the tyranny of weakness. "Oh but how can you not be moved by a picture of a beaten puppy on Facebook?" How can you be indifferent to a picture of a starving African child in a television charity appeal. How can you not support the right of big, hairy arsed blokes in frocks to go into the same toilet as little girls are using. What a cruel, heartless, brutal, racist, sexist, homophobic person you are. Do you recognise the technique?

Yes, perfectly rational and acceptable reactions are branded extreme because they do not conform to what the elites have decreed you ought to think And few people are eager to stand aside from the crowd and exercise their right to be individuals. No, you do not have to care about abused puppies or starving children (there's probably nothing you can do about it, there will always be some people who abuse animals and we have been throwing money at Africa for fifty years but nothing has changed. As for the blokes in frocks, sorry guys it does not matter what you 'identify' as, or if you have your dick and balls cut off, if you never had a womb and ovaries you cannot possibly be a woman. If you can't get your head round that, you're very sick.

Privilege serves exactly the same purpose as power, benefiting the few at the expense of the many regardless of the system's ideological labels. Socialist, Communist and free-market capitalist regimes all throw up oligarchical elites that loot the system and plunder the national assets that should benefit the populaces. Those who came to do good and stayed to do well as the saying goes, must first gather privileges before they can acquire wealth and power.

The grievances of Chinese workers robbed of their wages, Greek small-business owners burdened by ever-rising taxes and EU imposed austerity measures, downsized corporate warriors in the U.S.A and redundant industrial workers in Britain and France may appear to be different, but in reality their grievances all arise from one source: unearned privileges that benefit the few at the expense of the many.


RELATED POSTS:

UK Conservative Politician Says Referendum Is An Establishment Stitch Up

As This Blog Predicted, Austrian Election Result Was An EUronazi Stitch Up

Organizations That Paid Hillary Clinton From 2013-2015

Snowflake Special: Snowflake Professor blasts students for walking out of patronising lecture.


Is Brexit A Harbinger Of Doom For The 'Experts'
The Brexit vote, the decision by a democratic majority in Britain to leave the European Union has sent shockwaves around the world. Not only does the EU now face a tsunami of departures, the usurpation of democracy by 'experts' ( technocrats ) has been challenged and exposed as a sham.

EU Vows To Use Powers To Block All Elected ‘Far Right’ Politicians From Power

Federal Judge Censures US Department Of Justice Over Unethical Conduct In Immigration Case

Pope Francis Implicated In Argentine Church Child Abuse Cover Up?

TTIP:Here In A Single Article Is The Key To Why People Do Not Trust Mainstream Media

EU Politicians Slam New Tax Deal That Lets Big Business Avoid Probes

EU Turkey Migrant Deal Set To Fail

After Yugoslavia NATO changed from a mutual defence alliance to an organisation for military aggression.

Free Speech Under Attack Online

The True State Of The US Economy: Retail Companies Reporting Sales Targets Missed

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Hillary Clinton’s email problems just got off the scale worse

We are totally bored with the story of Hillary Clinton's email server and breaches of security protocol when she was Secretary of State, but we know our readers around the world are avid followers of our reports in the slow motion train wreck of Hillary's campaign (especially in Russia, wonder if that is anything to do with the alleged 20,000 hacked emails the Kremlin has and whether President Putin will release them just before the Democratic Party convention to plunge the American election process into chaos).


So are our final post for today (it's nine p.m. here even if it is only around noon in California) here's something from The Washington Post:

One of the two big dominoes in the Hillary Clinton email controversy toppled today: The State Department's inspector general released its report on the email practices of Clinton and a number of other past secretaries of state. (The other major domino is, of course, the FBI investigation into Clinton's decision to exclusively use a private email server while serving as the nation's top diplomat.)

The report, which you can read in its entirety here, badly complicates Clinton's past explanations about the server and whether she complied fully with the laws in place governing electronic communication. And it virtually ensures that Clinton's email practices will be front and center in Donald Trump's fusillade of attacks against her credibility and honesty between now and Nov. 8.

Here's the key passage from the Roz Helderman and Tom Hamburger's article on the report:

The inspector general, in a long awaited review obtained Wednesday by The Washington Post in advance of its publication, found that Clinton’s use of private email for public business was “not an appropriate method” of preserving documents and that her practices failed to comply with department policies meant to ensure that federal record laws are followed.

The report says Clinton, who is the Democratic presidential front-runner, should have printed and saved her emails during her four years in office or surrendered her work-related correspondence immediately upon stepping down in February 2013. Instead, Clinton provided those records in December 2014, nearly two years after leaving office.

Clinton used an inappropriate method of preserving her documents. Her approach would not have been approved if it had been requested by a more junior member of the State Department staff.  The report also suggests that despite a Clinton aide's insistence that the method of preserving her emails had been submitted to a legal review back in 2010, there is no evidence that such a review took place. And, here's the kicker: Clinton refused to sit for a formal interview.
Oomph. Double oomph. Heck, that might merit a triple oomph.



It's going to be an entertaining few weeks ahead for Clinton watchers, but will Bernie Sanders get the nomination or, as is widely rumoured, will Democratic Party managers kick democracy into touch and parachute in Joe Biden (possibly a worse candidate that Clinton in terms of electability)


RELATED POSTS:

State Dept. IG: Clinton violated rules with private server, did not cooperate with investigation

Prior to today the silence and secrecy around the FBI investigation of Clinton’s private server meant there was relatively little detailed information in the public domain. And that meant that Clinton and her team could say almost anything about the matter without fear of contradiction.

For instance, she could claim, as she did last March, “I fully complied with every rule that I was governed by.” She could claim (again from last March) that she set up the server because “I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of two.” She could claim, as she did two weeks ago, “I’m more than ready to talk to anybody, anytime.” And she could claim, as she did early on, that her private server was perfectly secure because it was guarded by the Secret Service. Well, Hillary can’t say any of those things after today.
Read More:
State Dept. IG: Clinton violated rules with private server, did not cooperate with investigation


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ...  [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

UK Conservative Politician Says Referendum Is An Establishment Stitch Up

The EU referendum campaign is really starting to warm up now as various polls show wildly different figures for the REMAIN and LEAVE campaigns. Nobody really knows why but telephone polls tend to show big leads for REMAIN while online polls are indicating narrow leads, with upward momentum for LEAVE. What this might suggest other than that REMAIN supporters are the kind of clowns who spend all their time dicking about on their smartphones and who will be unable to vote unless somebody sends them an app that will make up their minds for them is unclear.

While the REMAIN campaign is based totally on fearmongering (if we leave the EU nobody will want to be our friend), the LEAVE people are not short of that commodity either, but at least their claims have some basis in reality.

Britain will be unable to stop Turkey from becoming a member of the European Union (EU), the Minister of State for the Armed Forces, Penny Morduant, has said. Predicting that up to a million Turkish people could come to the UK unless Britain votes to leave the EU in June, declared that the EU referendum is an “establishment stitch-up”.

This may be a coincidence but earlier today we were reporting on another stitch up perpetrated by EU agencies and the political establishment of a member state, in this case Austria, where after holding a solid lead with only twelve per cent of the votes to be counted, the anti - immigration, anti - EU candidate was narrowly beaten amid evidence of voting irregularities (149% voter turnout in one area with a high immigrant population).

Speaking on BBC television, Ms. Mordaunt said it was very likely that a million Turkish migrants would come to the UK over the next eight years if the British public opt to stay within the EU, in part because of the "migrant crisis." Turkey has a population of around 80 million. Mordaunt pointed out that Home Secretary [Theresa May], a supporter of Remain, made a speech earlier in the campaign revealing EU plans to extend Europe's economic community way beyond the geographical borders of the continent and into eastern Asia and north Africa and questioning the merits of the EU having a land border with Syria, Iraq and Iran and visa free travel arrangements with Egypt, Lybia and Algeria.

Morduant shot down the notion that the British people had a veto on whether Turkey joins, saying "We are not going to be able to have a say." What she means is we will not get to vote on it. Although the British government does have a veto on Turkey joining the EU, Mordaunt made it clear that Gayid Cameron has expressed his enthusiasm for getting Tukey into the EU, shortly after Cameron's bum chum Obama had said Turkey belogs in Europe (this showing that history and geography are not among his adademic strengths either)thus the British people would not be consulted on the matter. She added: "This is a matter for the British people I think to decide and the only shot that they will get at expressing a view on this is in this referendum."

As the Prime Minister David Cameron has made it clear that he welcomes Turkey joining the EU, Ms Mordaunt’s suggestion is that the veto would go unused, against the will of the British people. She agreed with Andrew Marr’s suggestion that the EU referendum is turning out to be “an establishment stitch up.”

Her comments directly contradict those of David Cameron, who has insisted that Turkey will not be joining the EU any time soon. Slapping down Ms Mordaunt yesterday, he joked that it will be the year 3,000 before Turkey is able to join.

"It is not remotely on the cards that Turkey is going to join the EU any time soon,” he told ITV’s Robert Peston shortly after Mordaunt’s interview.

"They applied in 1987. At the current rate of progress they will probably get round to joining in about the year 3000 according to the latest forecasts."

The traitor and war criminal Cameron is a two faced shit however. Officially, the government supports Turkish accession, a position which a Downing Street spokesman confirmed this morning has not changed. The spokesman added: “The Prime Minister has made it clear that he would veto any new country joining the EU if it wasn’t in Britain’s interests” – a statement which suggests the Prime Minister is attempting to spin his way out of the hole his love of the EU and glonalism has dug for him.

Leave campaigners have asked why, if the government is likely to veto Turkey joining the EU, we are contributing to Brussels spending £2 billion on helping Ankara to prepare their application. "If it isn’t on the cards why are taxpayers footing the bill for it already?” a spokesman for the official Leave campaign said. "As with so much in the referendum the remain campaign are saying one thing now before the vote but are planning for the exact opposite after 23 June."

Commenting on Cameron's double talk, former Foreign Secretary Lord Owen added: "Only 9 weeks ago David Cameron committed the country at the European Council to re-energise the accession process of Turkey into the EU. The EU is continuing the preparatory work for Turkey at an accelerating pace with all of this going forward in parallel."





RELATED POSTS:
EU Vows To Use Powers To Block All Elected ‘Far Right’ Politicians From Power
Brexit: Another Honest Opinion Of The EU
The Stuff Gayvid Cameroink Will Not Tell You About Remaining In The EU
EU Politicians Slam New Tax Deal That Lets Big Business Avoid Probes
EU Turkey Migrant Deal Set To Fail
Turkey Threatens To Unleash Migrant Wave On Europe
Russian Foreign Affairs Dept Accuses Turkey Of Hindering Syrian Peace Talks
EU / Tukey Migrant Crisis Deal One Veto Away From Being Wrecked
Russia Revealed Evidence Of ISIS-Turkey Oil Trade
E U offers Turkey Cash And Membership In Return For Cooperation On Migrant Crisis
Know Your Enemy - Who Of Those We Think Are On Our Side Is Helping ISIS



Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

As This Blog Predicted, Austrian Election Result Was An EUronazi Stitch Up

Early on Monday as results showed conservative candidate whom mainstream media insisted on calling extreme right wing although he is actually moderate) holding a 4% lead over an independent backed by the Green Party with 12% of the votes still to be counted, I predicted a late surge and a narrow victory for the independent Alexander van der Bellen, a former leader of the Austrian Green Party (who is an extremist and would open the floodgates to hostile immigrants, abolish free speech and criminalise dissent). The result played out as I predicted, the EU were never going to let the will of the voters triumph. And also as I predicted, some extremely dodgy statistics are emerging as. the linked story reveals.

AUSTRIA - Suspicious Numerical Evidence of FRAUD in the Vote Count - Was the Presidential Election Rigged and Stolen?

While looking at the EU debate here on FB yesterday I saw some daft tart commenting that she was voting REMAIN because she's scared of what would happen if BoJo becomes Prime Minister. To her and all others who think we should stay in because ALL-JOIN-HANDS-AND-SING-KUMBAYA I say,"Believe me sweetiepops, if we stay in, what the authoritarian, elitist EU Commissioners have planned is far worse than anything BoJo, Georgie Osborne, Jezza Corbyn or even Nick Griffin could possibly do to this country.

And life in the EUronazi superstate, with democracy and national sovereignty relegated to the realm of folklore, dissent criminalised, total surveillance in operation, and a European Police Force (Europol) with more far reaching powers that the Nazi's Gestapo or Soviet Russia's KGB enjoyed, able to kick your door in, beat you to a pulp, throw you in a cell and hold you indefinitely without charging you, presenting any evidence or granting a court hearing, on the basis of 'Artificial Intelligence' deciding you indulge in 'behaviour likely to lead to criminal acts', a government run by any other British politician, even Nick Griffin of the right wing BNP, looks quite an attractive prospect in comparison to a future in the dystopian, fascist, Federal European superstate.



RELATED POSTS:

As Conservative Candidate Moves ahead In Austria, Left Wing Lie Machine Goes Into Overdrive

EU Vows To Use Powers To Block All Elected ‘Far Right’ Politicians From Power

France Says No to Ukraine-EU Visa-Free Travel

The Stuff Gayvid Cameroink Will Not Tell You About Remaining In The EU

EU Politicians Slam New Tax Deal That Lets Big Business Avoid Probes

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Organizations That Paid Hillary Clinton From 2013-2015

We asre not globalist at this blog, we are internationalists, all of our contributors love to travel in Europe and elsewhere, and we enjoy meeting the people and absorbing the culture. The DIVERSITY of these cultures and the varieties of way human communities make their society work is endlessly fascinating. But we are not globalists, we believe in nations running their own affairs without meddling from the big powers or supranational bureaucracies. Call us old fashioned if you like possums but we think the Westphalian system worked well.

And so, though not Americans, we dread the prospect of another incompetent liberal meddler following Barack Obama as US President. Because not only is Hillary a hypocritical liberal, she claims altruistic motives but is really the ultimate corporate crony, even more driven by self interest that Obama has been. A look at the list complied by The New York Post of corporate
donorsclients that paid Hillary for speeches and such (aka buying influence with someone likely to become President of The United States) shows she is the kind of person who will happily take money from the richest, most ruthless corporate clients while being hypocritical enough to present herself as a friend of the poor FFS.

 How corporate America bought Hillary Clinton for $21M - The New York Post

The actual list of corporate clients that paid Hillary Clinton a minimum of $225,000 for her speeches is too long to publish here, follow the link if you want to see them all.. Even if she was someone who had  built up a moderately successful business into a Billion Dollar international property and leisure empire, and could consequently claim to be a business mogul that's a lorra lorra money for a half hour speech (and she isn't a great orator by any means).

 So if you are one of those naive people who is thinking of voting for Hillary because fairness and equality, read just a few names from a long list of firms that between them paid Hillary Clinton $21 million in 2015 for doing very little, ask yourself what they could have been expecting in return for that kind of money. And then think again about whether you want such a greedy, self inteested person as president a nation that has the world's most powerful economy and some of the most appalling levels of deprivation in the world..

RELATED POSTS:
Can this woman possibly be a fit and proper person to serve as President Of The USA
Wall Street 'Whistleblower' Exposes Clinton Foundation Fraud
Hillary Clinton To Face FBI Interview Very Soon
Obama's Economy Is Bad; Clinton's Would Be Worse
Lifelong Feminist Camille Paglia Slams Hypocrite Hillary Clinton And Her 'Liberal' Supporters
Bernie Earns less In A Year Than Hillary Gets For One Speech To Bankers
'I Pray for Sanders' - Oliver Stone Condemns Clinton’s ‘Corrupt’ Policy
With Hillary Clinton’s Email Lies Unravelling, 147 FBI Agents Are On Her Heels
Wikileaks Drops Hillary Email Bomb That Could End Her Campaign but FB Censored It
Mac Slavo of SHTFplan.com Discovers Real Reason Why Trump Scares The Establishment
Servergate: 'Immune' Hillary IT-Staffer Reportedly A "Devastating Witness" - FBI



Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

EU Vows To Use Powers To Block All Elected ‘Far Right’ Politicians From Power

Jean Claude Juncker the President of the unelected European Commission, the executive arm of the European Union (EU) or more accurately the bureaucratic dictatorship that now runs Europe has vowed to block all 'right wing extremists' from power across the continent, shortly after acquiring the power to exert “far-reaching sanctions” on elected governments. Juncker and his jackbooted goons European Commission colleagues have a rather idiosyncratic definition of what constitutes right wing extremism. To them a 'right wing extremist' is anyone who opposes their plans to turn Europe's twenty eight member states into a single fascist dictatorship.

Before the final run off for the Austrian presidency last Sunday, Juncker promised to overturn the result and exclude conservative, anti immigration candidate Norbert Hofer, the leader of Austria’s Freedom Party (FPÖ), from all EU decision-making if he was elected. In the event, as we predicted, from holding a comfortable lead with only twelve per cent of the vote to be counted, Hofer was narrowly beaten by a left wing extremist who supports uncontrolled immigration, open borders and the surrender of Austrian sovereignty to the Nazi European Union superstate.

“There will be no debate or dialogue with the far-right,” the authoritarian liberal bureaucrat told Agence France Presse.

The FPÖ has been Austria’s top-polling political force for some time. However, after leading the pack for most of the presidential race, the right-wing candidate lost out by 0.6 per cent to the Green party, after the inclusion of postal votes, and months of Europe’s mainstream media calling the centre-right right Hofer a "far right extremist".

Populist social conservatives are regularly topping the polls across the Europe, but have been victims of EU orchestrated stitch ups to keep them out of power and ddeny the democratic will, in France, Sweden, Holland, and now Austria – and anti-migrant populists are already in power in Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic.

Mr. Junker’s definition of “far right” is somewhat broad, noted by him previously describing Hungary’s conservative president, Viktor Orbán, as a "fascist". This is wonderful unintended irony from Juncker (or the man reputed to have brandy for breakfast was simply too rat arsed to know what he was saying) because the tree EU Presidents, Juncker, Martin Schulz (European Parlaiment) and Donald Tusk (Council of Europe) have all shown considerably more fascist tendencies than Mr. Orban.

With the continent-wide democratic surge against the fascist E U, the anti-democratic Commission could be in for a challenge in their attempt to exclude each and every elected government they deem to be 'far right' (i.e. opposed to their authoritarianism and lunatic policies).

However, as of 2014, the Commission granted itself a tranche of new powers that it now intends to use to do just this, powers already being mobilised against Poland’s elected, conservative leaders.

The Commission can now invoke a “rule of law mechanism” (Article 7 TEU) against nations it perceives as deviating from "the common constitutional traditions of all Member States." Ultimately, "far-reaching sanctions" can be exerted, and a country can be stripped of all voting rights in the EU and have funding blocked.

In January this year, Frans Timmermans, the first ever unelected Commission “vice president,” who is in charge of "human rights," used the mechanism for the first time against Poland’s government which came to power in a record-breaking, landslide election in 2015. We should remember that the E U also deposed elected governments in Greece and Italy a few years ago, when the leaders of those nations defied Brussels diktat on austerity.

Mr. Timmerman and Commission gave Poland an ultimatum and deadline to back down by, which expired yesterday. As reported by Breitbart London today, the commissioner has now travelled to Poland to “negotiate” with the government there. There is no precedent to indicated what will happen next.However, the backlash has already begun against the new, explicitly anti-democratic EU Commission. Hungary’s Victor Orbàn has vowed to help Poland fight the Commission, and other Eastern, Visegrad group nations are likely to join the growing coalition.

RELATED POSTS:

EU fast track to fascism
Brexit: Another Honest Opinion Of The EU
Eurozone becoming a bureaucratic empire
As Conservative Candidate Moves ahead In Austria, Left Wing Lie Machine Goes Into Overdrive
European Dictator Schulz
France Says No to Ukraine-EU Visa-Free Travel
Euronazi Superstate
The Stuff Gayvid Cameroink Will Not Tell You About Remaining In The EU
Anti integration mood grows in Europe
Turkey Threatens To Unleash Migrant Wave On Europe
EU boss defends institutional secrecy
Copenhagen Swamped With Foreign Criminals - Prompts Calls For Strong Border Controls
Europe put business before people
EU IN TURMOIL: Hungary threatens REBELLION against Brussels over forced migration
Europe: ddemocracy versus integration
EU to Keep Part of TTIP Trade Deal Papers Under Wraps
The fascist European Union
Europe Unglues
Brussels Reaction to Dutch EU-Kiev Deal Vote Heats Up Brexit Issue
Dutch Referendum This Week Shows why We Should Leave The EU.
Secret ECB Docs Warn Of More Financial Mayhem on the Horizon

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Brexit: Another Honest Opinion Of The EU

On the day that UK Prime Minister David Cameron lost the plot completely over the EU 'Brexit' Referendum by accusing people intending to vote LEAVE of being unpatriotic, a member of another site where I promote myself another site left this articulate and passionate comment explaining very clearly why she will vote OUT in the EU referendum:

from Rowena: To be honest, I see a vote for out as a vote FOR Europe. The EU, as both Remain and Leave campaigns are happy to declare, and as millions of fellow Europeans agree, is in serious need of reform. Yet somehow a remain vote will help this happen? I don't buy it. Not when it seems patently obvious that the Eurocrats in charge don't want reform; they want more of the same. Even the monthly move of the European parliament from Brussels to Strasbourg, which costs €100m+ annually and is widely regarded by EU employees themselves as ridiculous, can't be changed.

The only thing I can see having a chance of causing real reform is a real shock to the EU status quo. Brexit. Even if that reform is, ultimately, of the break it up and start from scratch variety.

I'm not even going to go into the inherent racism of our current migration system, where the likelihood of any more of my Malaysian family being able to live and work here, even for a short while, is close to zero, no matter how many skills they might have that could be of serious benefit to our economy.

Just look at those European countries who are seriously suffering now. Massive youth unemployment. Unable to devalue their currencies in order to kick start a boost in trade. Falling birth rates as people are scared to have kids that they can't afford. What is the EU proposing to do in order to help these countries? There doesn't appear to be a plan.

I do think that our economy is likely to suffer in the short term. Markets hate uncertainty and it's going to take a while and some serious wrangling to sort out trade agreements, especially with some terribly affronted and petty bureaucrats. But we need to look longer term if we are seriously to consider what we want for future generations.

And us leaving may provide the impetus for others to leave - others who, I assume, would be only too happy to form agreements with us for trade, migration, security and other issues.

Why is the EU seen as the only way for European countries to collaborate? Perhaps because it holds too much power over individual countries. How can this change?

Revolution is messy. Scary. Expensive. Uncertain. And, ultimately, principled.

I don't see the virtue in going down with a sinking ship, especially when I don't believe it to be the best way to save fellow European passengers.

I love Europe. I'm proud to be European. I'm voting out.

Absolutely right. A lot of lefties and globalists are supporting 'Remain' because diversity

But it is neither racist nor Xenophobic to oppose mass migration and the deliberate destruction of our national culture. I am anti EU, anti mass immigration and anti globalisation, but I love the European nations I have spent time in and their people and cultures. And because I enjoy the DIVERSITY, I want Britain to stay British ( warts and all) and the French, Germans, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese, Danes and Swedes and Belgians to stay as they are too. Where's the effing diversity in living in a pan European federal superstate whose Nazi founders aim was to abolish national identity and imposed a synthesised monoculture?


RELATED POSTS:


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

As Conservative Candidate Moves ahead In Austria, Left Wing Lie Machine Goes Into Overdrive

*UPDATE* 20:40 UK time. Well I was right with my prediction - no spoilers, you'll have to read al least half the article.

In spite of blatantly biased reporting from The BBC, while print and commercial broadcast media virtually ignore the story, a result from the presidential election in Austria looks set to send shockwaves through Europe. The candidate referred to by the BBC as 'extreme right wing' looks to be heading for victory. Firstly, the candidate in question, Norbert Hofer, is not extreme, he is a social conservative. To be opposed to uncontrolled mass immigration and raise the issue of the crimewaves attributable to recently arrived Muslim economic migrants posing as refugees or asylum seekers, and to resist the further integration of the European Union members, sovereign states with deomcratic government, into a federal superstate dominated economically and politically by Germany is not extremist, it is egalitarian.

Such views recognise that the people of Europe, the straight, white (or whitish in the case of people from Southern Spain, Southern Italy and Greece who tend to be born with genetic suntans), family oriented are entitled to exactly the same rights and privileges as members of the anointed minorities as designated by the neo - fascist 'left. As was stated in the law of the Roman republic, and as is still stated in The British Common Law (passed by King Alfred in the ninth century and still fit for purpose), nobody can be beyond the law, not the King or Emperor, not the politicians, judiciary, police or military and certainly not the gays and lesbians, transgender freaks, black and mixed race people, Muslims, illegal immigrants, refugees and special snowflakes whose delicate sensibilities are offended by everything.

In fact it is those who have claimed the label 'left' because they think it is cuddlier who are the real right wing extremists, the authoritarians who would use force of law or force of arms to impose their prejudices on all.

Source: crwflags.com

This morning The BBC reported that the Austrian election is too close to call. With 12% of the votes yet to be counted, Herr Hofer has a 3.9% lead over his rival, an independent backed by the Greens, Alexander van der Bellen. At such an advanced stage that looks a fairly commanding lead to me. Polling firms claim an error margin of plus or minus 3% percent on sampling only a tiny fraction of the 75% of votes so far counted.


Maybe the BBC know something we don't. The presidents of the European Commission and the European Parliament, Jean-Claude Juncker and Martin Schulz, both of whom have publicly expressed contempt for the principle of democracy have expressed concern over the consequences of a Hofer victory for the European project. So it way be the Euronazis of Brussels have decided they will not allow a candidate who opposed their authoritarian agenda to win. Very strange things have happened in recent elections in France, Germany and Britain and always these bizarre events (in the recent Oldham by election in Britain two districts returned over 100% turnout of elegible voters and in both, 100% of the votes cast were for the Labour candidate.

Looking to Britain's state broadcaster the BBC for honest, factual reporting of the news is a rather futile pastime these days. The BBC's left wing bias becomes more blatant every day. In spire of it's charter requiring it to be politically neutral (the BBC is theoretically not government controlled, but having been established by Royal Charter is owned by the nation. It's funding comes from a licence fee rather than general taxation)But now the bias has reached levels of criminal deception as the BBC collaborates openly with government and the EU to push the agendas of globalisation, European Federalisation, and the sidelining of democracy in favour of bureaucratic dictatorship.

If Norbert Hofer is cheated of the Austrian Presidency as Front National in France, AfD in Germany, UKIP in Britain and The Sweden Democrats have been cheated it should inspire us to resist more determinedly the Nazification of the EU and the destruction of Europe's educated and informed working and middle classes by paranoid elites.


RELATED POSTS:
Europe becoming a bureaucratic empire
EU refugee quotas doomed
Europe after the election earthquake
Europe turns against integration
EU boss defends lack of transparency
Corruption destroying the EU
The European Fascist Union
How EU Bureaucrats steal national sovereignty

France Says No to Ukraine-EU Visa-Free Travel
TTIP:Here In A Single Article Is The Key To Why People Do Not Trust Mainstream Media
EU Politicians Slam New Tax Deal That Lets Big Business Avoid Probes
Turkey Threatens To Unleash Migrant Wave On Europe
WHO are you? A Bunch Of F***ing Useless W***ers That's Who
Germany: Merkel's Christian Democrats Haemorrhage Support To Anti Immpigration Party AfD
EU IN TURMOIL: Hungary threatens REBELLION against Brussels over forced migration
Britain's Choice: Democracy Or Eurocracy
Brussels Reaction to Dutch EU-Kiev Deal Vote Heats Up Brexit Issue
Dystopian Fiction Becomes Political Reality
EU Membership Vote in UK to Paralyze Decision Making
Secret ECB Docs Warn Of More Financial Mayhem on the Horizon









Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]