The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant. - Maximilien Robespierre.

Showing posts with label Moderate rebels. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Moderate rebels. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Reports By Mainstream Media Of Deliberate Hospital Bombings In Syria Are Fake News

After the kerfuffle over 'fake news' that resulted from Obama's gobsmackingly idiotic (even by his standards) whining about how 'fake news' of Facebook and Twitter had helped Donald Trump win the US Presidential Election on November 8, Alt - media, the sector Obama singled out along with social media sites, for criticism have as usual pushed back and shown that Obama's fake news blethering was just one of his paranoid conspiracy theories. No news is 100% reliable (not even this blog, we make mistakes and are occasionally guilty of posting click bait) but most of the 'fake news' available online is government propaganda published and broadcast by corporate controlled mainstream media.


Rebel held Eastern Aleppo - there have been no functioning hospitals here for some considerable time (image source: Daily Mail)

It was entirely predictable that right after the Russian air force and the Syrian Army resumed the initiative to push Islamic extremist rebels out of Aleppo and their other remaining strongholds in Syria, western media would start up the anti Assad propaganda again. Sure enough we are now reading claims that the Syrians and the Russians are deliberately bombing hospitals in Aleppo and elsewhere and are using gas and other banned weapons against Obama's beloved 'moderate rebels' (the same moderate rebels that have videoed their enemies, including western journalists and aid workers being beheaded with kitchen knives or burned alive, who have posted online videos of their 'warriors' dismembering the corpses of people who opposed them and eating the raw, bloody and still warm vital organs torn from those bodies, who have taken thousands of totally innocent Shi'ite, Yazidi, Christian and Jewish girls as sex slaves and who have done more than their fair share of shelling hospitals, schools and residential property in areas loyal to Assad.

No one has ever explained why the Russians and the Syrians would intentionally attack hospitals in this way. President Assad has pointed out that it makes no sense and would be completely counterproductive for the Syrians to do so, only serving to generate hostility to his regime among the majority of Syrians who have remained loyal to him throughout the Washington sponsored ISIS uprising.

In any discussion of alleged hospital bombings in Syria, the following must always be considered.

There are no Western journalists in Jihadi controlled eastern Aleppo and scarcely anywhere else in Syria. We reported several months ago on the last independent westerners reporting from Syria. The Western journalists that are in Syria largely stick to the government controlled areas. Very occasionally the odd Western journalist travels into Jihadi controlled areas, but it is a long time since any have visited eastern Aleppo, in fact – they have not done so since it came under siege. Syrian journalists reporting from inside the rebel held area have complained of pro - rebel bias in western media reports of the conflict.

The US and the Western powers have an intelligence operation in Syria, but due to the limitations of technology it is not especially well-informed about the situation on the ground. This may be one reason why all requests the Russians have made of the US for intelligence information are refused. Whilst the hostility of the Obama administration and the Washington hawks to Russia plays the dominant role, it is possible US agencies are also reluctant to disclose how little information about the realities of the situation in Syria it actually has.

Though the Western powers and the tame Western media pretend otherwise, there is no doubt control of information in the Jihadi held areas of Syria lies with ISIS and Al-Qaeda. Both are violently anti-Western and any Western journalist entering areas they control would be risking their life. Apart from that, the days when Western media agencies employed large numbers of special correspondents, stringers and war reporters are long gone.

What that means in practical terms is that reports that come out of the Jihadi controlled areas of Syria – including eastern Aleppo – and which appear in the Western media, are reports made at second hand, usually from Jihadist propaganda because TPTB in the west have decided Assad is the guy wearing a black hat so anything even slightly suportive of his government must be lies. Western reporters do not tour the sites of the allegedly bombed hospitals. Rather the Western media is simply passing on reports alleged eye witnesses who are actually ISIS loyalists, and without questioning the substance are reporting them as verified facts. The same applies to Western governments, including the US and UK governments.

There was once a time when the Western media was careful to indicate that it was reporting unconfirmed stories or unsubstantiated allegations, or even reporting stories via a third party. 'Sources in ...' was a common phrase showing a story was not from reports that are entirely reliable or was relying on local sources in reporting the news it was publishing. Such journalistic devices told us news came from one side or another in an armed conflict and shold be read with a certain amount of scepticism.

For quite some time now, the Western media has stopped doing this. Mainstream news is no more reliable that what you read in blogs, on Russia Today or PressTV of Iran, both English language news sites staffed mainly by people whose first language is English. The BBC and CNN are particularly prone to presenting totally biased propaganda drek as factual news. Just look at the coverage of the US election provided by both these organisations.
What this means in the Syrian case is that all the reports of the attacks on the hospitals are provided by persons who to a greater or lesser extent operate under Jihadi control. In northeast Syria that essentially means Al-Qaeda contol.

None of this means that bombing of hospitals or schools has never taken place in Syria or that illegal weapons have not been used. What it does mean is that the scope for terrorist organisations like Al-Qaeda, ISIS and The Obama administration to manipulate the stories is boundless. In any war situation, there is always a high risk that the propaganda of one side or the other will be accepted, unconfirmed accounts of events by one party are often the only information available. However when the parties in question are Al-Qaeda, al Nusra front or ISIS, violent, brutal, internationally proscribed terrorist organisation, it is absolutely certain the reported events will be total fabrication.


RELATED POSTS:
Syria: USA & NATO scream ‘War Crimes’ as US backed rebels shell Aleppo civilians.
Western media part of political elite, will never report Syrian massacre by US-led forces
Turkey Will “Definitely” Join Ground Operation In Syria, Accuses Russia Of “War Crimes”

Road To World War III: Turkey Shells Syria For Second Day As Saudi Warplanes Arrive
Obama's ‘moderate Rebels’ Are mostly Syrian Gangsters
US ‘Mission Creep’ In Syria Nudges World Towards War
Fake News Alert: US Govt Puts Out Ten Year Old Propaganda
FUKUS axis war in Syria
Are chemical weapons being used in Syria
ISIS in Syria
Barbarity of Syrian rebels
Syria news being censored?
Syria is Obama's very own foreign disaster
The real western agenda in Syria
Syria Is US Proxy War Against Russia
Syria biggest US foreign policy blunder ever
ISIS was a US creation
ISIS bombing war
NATO turns blind eye to ISIS illegal oil trade with Turkey


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

[ Ian at Facebook ]

Reports By Mainstream Media Of Deliberate Hospital Bombings In Syria Are Fake News

After the kerfuffle over 'fake news' that resulted from Obama's gobsmackingly idiotic (even by his standards) whining about how 'fake news' of Facebook and Twitter had helped Donald Trump win the US Presidential Election on November 8, Alt - media, the sector Obama singled out along with social media sites, for criticism have as usual pushed back and shown that Obama's fake news blethering was just one of his paranoid conspiracy theories. No news is 100% reliable (not even this blog, we make mistakes and are occasionally guilty of posting click bait) but most of the 'fake news' available online is government propaganda published and broadcast by corporate controlled mainstream media.


Rebel held Eastern Aleppo - there have been no functioning hospitals here for some considerable time (image source: Daily Mail)

It was entirely predictable that right after the Russian air force and the Syrian Army resumed the initiative to push Islamic extremist rebels out of Aleppo and their other remaining strongholds in Syria, western media would start up the anti Assad propaganda again. Sure enough we are now reading claims that the Syrians and the Russians are deliberately bombing hospitals in Aleppo and elsewhere and are using gas and other banned weapons against Obama's beloved 'moderate rebels' (the same moderate rebels that have videoed their enemies, including western journalists and aid workers being beheaded with kitchen knives or burned alive, who have posted online videos of their 'warriors' dismembering the corpses of people who opposed them and eating the raw, bloody and still warm vital organs torn from those bodies, who have taken thousands of totally innocent Shi'ite, Yazidi, Christian and Jewish girls as sex slaves and who have done more than their fair share of shelling hospitals, schools and residential property in areas loyal to Assad.

No one has ever explained why the Russians and the Syrians would intentionally attack hospitals in this way. President Assad has pointed out that it makes no sense and would be completely counterproductive for the Syrians to do so, only serving to generate hostility to his regime among the majority of Syrians who have remained loyal to him throughout the Washington sponsored ISIS uprising.

In any discussion of alleged hospital bombings in Syria, the following must always be considered.

There are no Western journalists in Jihadi controlled eastern Aleppo and scarcely anywhere else in Syria. We reported several months ago on the last independent westerners reporting from Syria. The Western journalists that are in Syria largely stick to the government controlled areas. Very occasionally the odd Western journalist travels into Jihadi controlled areas, but it is a long time since any have visited eastern Aleppo, in fact – they have not done so since it came under siege. Syrian journalists reporting from inside the rebel held area have complained of pro - rebel bias in western media reports of the conflict.

The US and the Western powers have an intelligence operation in Syria, but due to the limitations of technology it is not especially well-informed about the situation on the ground. This may be one reason why all requests the Russians have made of the US for intelligence information are refused. Whilst the hostility of the Obama administration and the Washington hawks to Russia plays the dominant role, it is possible US agencies are also reluctant to disclose how little information about the realities of the situation in Syria it actually has.

Though the Western powers and the tame Western media pretend otherwise, there is no doubt control of information in the Jihadi held areas of Syria lies with ISIS and Al-Qaeda. Both are violently anti-Western and any Western journalist entering areas they control would be risking their life. Apart from that, the days when Western media agencies employed large numbers of special correspondents, stringers and war reporters are long gone.

What that means in practical terms is that reports that come out of the Jihadi controlled areas of Syria – including eastern Aleppo – and which appear in the Western media, are reports made at second hand, usually from Jihadist propaganda because TPTB in the west have decided Assad is the guy wearing a black hat so anything even slightly suportive of his government must be lies. Western reporters do not tour the sites of the allegedly bombed hospitals. Rather the Western media is simply passing on reports alleged eye witnesses who are actually ISIS loyalists, and without questioning the substance are reporting them as verified facts. The same applies to Western governments, including the US and UK governments.

There was once a time when the Western media was careful to indicate that it was reporting unconfirmed stories or unsubstantiated allegations, or even reporting stories via a third party. 'Sources in ...' was a common phrase showing a story was not from reports that are entirely reliable or was relying on local sources in reporting the news it was publishing. Such journalistic devices told us news came from one side or another in an armed conflict and shold be read with a certain amount of scepticism.

For quite some time now, the Western media has stopped doing this. Mainstream news is no more reliable that what you read in blogs, on Russia Today or PressTV of Iran, both English language news sites staffed mainly by people whose first language is English. The BBC and CNN are particularly prone to presenting totally biased propaganda drek as factual news. Just look at the coverage of the US election provided by both these organisations.
What this means in the Syrian case is that all the reports of the attacks on the hospitals are provided by persons who to a greater or lesser extent operate under Jihadi control. In northeast Syria that essentially means Al-Qaeda contol.

None of this means that bombing of hospitals or schools has never taken place in Syria or that illegal weapons have not been used. What it does mean is that the scope for terrorist organisations like Al-Qaeda, ISIS and The Obama administration to manipulate the stories is boundless. In any war situation, there is always a high risk that the propaganda of one side or the other will be accepted, unconfirmed accounts of events by one party are often the only information available. However when the parties in question are Al-Qaeda, al Nusra front or ISIS, violent, brutal, internationally proscribed terrorist organisation, it is absolutely certain the reported events will be total fabrication.


RELATED POSTS:
Syria: USA & NATO scream ‘War Crimes’ as US backed rebels shell Aleppo civilians.
Western media part of political elite, will never report Syrian massacre by US-led forces
Turkey Will “Definitely” Join Ground Operation In Syria, Accuses Russia Of “War Crimes”

Road To World War III: Turkey Shells Syria For Second Day As Saudi Warplanes Arrive
Obama's ‘moderate Rebels’ Are mostly Syrian Gangsters
US ‘Mission Creep’ In Syria Nudges World Towards War

FUKUS axis war in Syria
Are chemical weapons being used in Syria
ISIS in Syria
Barbarity of Syrian rebels
Syria news being censored?
Syria is Obama's very own foreign disaster
The real western agenda in Syria
Syria Is US Proxy War Against Russia
Syria biggest US foreign policy blunder ever
ISIS was a US creation
ISIS bombing war
NATO turns blind eye to ISIS illegal oil trade with Turkey


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

[ Ian at Facebook ]

Thursday, October 06, 2016

UN Peace Council: The Syria conflict is a proxy invasion by the United States

This blog and  our other publications have been saying ever since the 'Arab Spring' was stirred up by a stupid, demogogical speech made in Cairo by Obama, that the US aim was a proxy war with Russia and Iran in the middle east. Look what happened since then. Secular Muslim leaders in Egypt and Libya were overthrown by US led regime change campaigns, turning Libya into a failed state and Egypt into an Islamic fundamentalist theorcracy run by the extremists of the Muslim Brotherhood) Fortunately theorcratic rule was only temporary, the nation's powerful military asserted itself  and imposed a dictatorship that would rule in the style of deposed leader Honsi Murbarak.

The extremists were ousted byt not before they had time to slaughter several thousand Egyptians for crimes such as being Coptic or Ethiopian Christians, Jews, Homosexuals, atheists or simply the wrong sort of Muslim.

The other great American middle eastern foreign policy disaster of the Obama presidency is of course Syria (Iraq and Afghanistan were inherited from the Bush administration although the rent boy president did not cover himself in glory in his handling of either.) Syria is of course a strategically important ally of Russia and Iran and while of less strategic value as an ally to China it is important politically, and so when the US created and funded ISIS and Al Nusra human-organ noshing head amputators failed to depose Assad, Obama's plan to intervene directly to overthrow the Syrian dictator's regime was thwarted by the intervention of Russia and Iran.

Feigning injured innocence the Obama regime in Washington tried to claim they had been preparing to intervene on 'humanitarian grounds' because of human rights violations by the Syrian government. This was hypocritical to say the least, in the brutal conflict is Syria there were human rights violations by both sides (that's what happens in a war), but Obama's cronies were prepared to turn a blind eye to the atrocities, mass rapes and taking of women as sex slaves by the rent - boy president's beloved 'moderate rebels' and focus only on what the Assad loyalists were doing in their efforts to stop the nation falling into the hands  of Washington backed barbarians. 

At last the United Nations Peace Council has blown the gaff on Washington Imperialism by ruling that the war in Syria is not a civil conflict but an invasion by proxy by the USA, which has been the main animator of the rebellion.. This is  a long video, but worth watching if you care to know the truth about what is going on in Syria and how Obama has been lying to the world again, please take the time to watch it (direct link below if embed does not work) ... 


Syria Not Civil War But US Invasion - United Nations Peace Council 


RELATED POSTS:

Chemical weapons used in Syria
Syruia: the American deception
Dirty war in Syria
Syria versus the FUKUS axis
Syria holocaust: ISIS slaughter Christians, Jews, Shi'ites
Syria rebels barbarity
Syria: Obama's very own foreign disaster
How Obama underestimated Syria and Assad
US proxy war in Syria
Syria biuggest US foreign blunder
US and UK hypocrisy over Syria
Lawless Libya
Libya intervention folly
Ukrain conflict orchestrated by soros
Ukraine regime change US led?
Ukraine: Donbass war
New World Order Regime Change machine
NWO needs a global catastrophe
America calalogue
Middle east catalogue

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Wednesday, October 05, 2016

Syrian-born journalist slams MSM for Aleppo bias

by Arthur Foxake

Syrian-born journalist Harout Ekmanian has slammed the New York Daily News and the UK's Independent newspaper for showing bias in attacking forces of the Assad government of shelling rebel held areas, but not menioning that Barack Obama's beloved 'moderate rebels'  have been shelling residential areas controlled by government forces. Ekmanian, who supports Assad because he knows the alternative is worse, laments that the MSM is not covering all sides of the war.

The journalist was speaking to RT about his disgust at the deliberate misreporting of the death of a Syrian swimmer and her 12-year-old brother. Mireille Hindoyan and her younger sibling were killed in the Villi district of West Aleppo on Friday.

“I think the first victim of the war is the truth, especially in the Syrian war where journalism and journalists suffered a lot. Preserving impartiality has become a very difficult task for journalists,” he said.

Ekmanian, who now lives in New York, wrote an editorial in the New York Daily News explaining what had happened, only for the publication to remove a section in which he said the rebels were responsible for the deaths of the brother and sister. Thus by giving the impression that Assad loyalists were the only ones shelling targets in the city, the report appears to exonerate the 'moderate rebels' war crime.

“The New York Daily News published my contribution, but a paragraph was removed. I don’t think personally that was a very serious editorial decision and I am still waiting for an explanation,” the Syrian writer told RT.

Ekmanian, who was born into  Aleppo's Armenian community, says he has spoken to eyewitnesses who “specifically confirmed” the shelling that killed the young siblings was carried out by rebel forces. He complains that his reporting of the Syrian conflict for major US publications have also run up against a determined policy in mainstream media of not reporting any negative stories about the fabled 'moderate rebels'. It is disheartening to see how the conflict in Syria is being reported, he says.

“The issue of this media censorship or media bias about some facts about the Syrian war [shows] there is a general atmosphere of media bias or restricting the narrative to certain news trends. I think this is the general issue that I see to the experience that I went through.”

He also slammed the UK online news site The Independent (formely a newspaper, until the print edition was can celled earlier this year) which he accused of “trying to shift the blame onto the government side.”

“The Independent article didn’t actually say it was a result of the rebel shelling. They tried to blame it on the government shelling or its allies,” he told RT.

“We know that the government’s allies are no angels and there are also violations committed by that side, by the Russian airstrikes also. But this particular case was rarely documented and happened in a neighborhood that I come from, and I talked with eyewitnesses and they specifically confirmed this was carried out by rebel shelling.”

While the MSM has given blanket coverage to its reporting of western Aleppo, which is largely controlled by forces opposed to Syrian President Bashar Assad, Ekmanian says that the same media is ignoring the plight of towns being bombarded by the rebels because it does not fit the Obama administration's narrative which aims to justify all out war in Syria.

“You rarely see any information about Kefreya or Al-Fuah that are besieged towns in Syria and are besieged by the rebels. They [the rebels] are not shying away from using the same tactics that they are criticizing,” he said.

“When we talk about double standards, it can work both ways. I rarely see pieces in the international media and even on social media by different activists or different public figures that talk about violations or tactics that are against international humanitarian law that are being committed by the anti-government sides.”



My oped on . Reference to swimmer death & media bias about it was removed w/o my consent

Fortunately for posterity, the article appears to have been restored and you can Read It Here


Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Kerry Demolishes Obama's 'Moderate Rebels' Syria Narrative

Aspen Institute President  Walter Isaacson, in a conversation with US Secretary of State, John Kerry casually revealed that just as Boggart Abroad has told you many times, the 'moderate rebels' in Syria of whom Barack Hussein Obama and other members of his administration are so fond, are every bit as extreme and hostile to western people, culture and values as ISIS.  The conversation, held in front of an audience at the Aspen Ideas Festival held in Colorado on June 28th 2016, was recorded by the US State Department.
What John Kerry said in this conversation effectively demolishes the foundations of US “regime change” policy in Syria and its support of certain Islamic terrorist groups Muslim - loving Obama likes to call “moderate rebels”.


 Many journalists, State Department whistleblowers and independent Syrian businessmen and intellectuals, such as the intellectual who writes under the pen name  Yalla la Barra have explained that the US State Department has run a policy of shielding  “moderate rebel” gangs under the Ahrar al Sham umbrella which creates an impression they are separate from the Al Nusra/Al Qaeda body of terrorism and facilitates designating them a branch of US friendly “opposition” conveniently “intermingled” with Al Nusra thus prohibiting Russian targeting of Al Nusra in case they hit one of the moderates in the process.


“Throughout the two and a half months that have passed since the start of the Cessation of Hostilities (CoH), the State Department has refused to acknowledge that the US backed rebel factions  are fighting in Aleppo and elsewhere alongside Jabhat al-Nusra, Al-Qaeda’s branch in Syria. 


There has not been a single press briefing where the spokesman has not accused Russia and Syria of targeting US backed rebel factions and civilians.

Whether it’s John Kirby or Mark Toner, the spokesman keeps talking about intermingling between the “moderates” and the Al-Qaeda affiliate and that the Russians/Syrians need to be able to separate the two. At the the press briefing of April 25, 2016 Mr Kirby said:

“So again, I go back to what I said before. We want to see the cessation observed by all parties. As I said in my answer to Said, we’re not blind to the fact that it’s a very dynamic situation in Aleppo and that there is intermingling. We’ve said that for a while now…”  ~ US Smoke and Mirrors to Protect Terrorist Proxies in Syria

In July 2015, former US Ambassador to Syria and suspected death squad creator, Robert Ford had this to say about Ahrar al Sham in an article penned by Ford and Ali el Yassir, entitled appropriately, Yes, Talk with Syria’s Ahrar al Sham.
“Moreover, lumping Ahrar and Nusra together is intellectually sloppy, especially when they exhibit ideological and political differences…. Our refusal even to talk with groups like Ahrar further reduces the little influence Americans still have in Syria. As the Assad regime steadily weakens, the administration keeps trying to lead the opposition from behind, hoping for an opposition white knight to appear. Instead, because Islamist groups like Ahrar strongly influence decisions about the fate of Syria, Washington will be left behind.
Ford insisted on dialogue with Ahrar al Sham and attempted to distinguish them from Al Nusra/Al Qaeda, somehow whitewashing their brutality by highlighting their nationalism, a claim that is rather bizarre when we remember how these barbarians posted videos of their member cutting vital organs from the still warm corpses of Assad loyalists and EATING THEM. Few Syrians, if any, actually belong to this guerilla group which is made up predominantly of foreign mercenaries as are 90% of the US, Turkey and Saudi Arabian funded "opposition" to Assad in Syria.

UK educated leader of Ahrar al Sham, Labib Al Nahhas, has even been given columns in TheWashington Post: to sell his terrorist case to Americans.

 In May 2016, Ahrar al Sham massacred scores of Alawite villagers in Al Zara and took others to be sold as slaves.  Claims that the brutal terrorists did not harm anyone who did not resist were cited by Reuters and other western media outlets but witness and survivor statements told a different story. One photo that circulated after this horrifying mass murder showed Ahrar al Sham fighters standing over the dismembered and bloodied corpses of women. And you can bet the women were thoroughly raped and degraded by Obama's allies before they were killed.

Ahrar al Sham made no effort to deny this atrocity, they glibly announced the women had taken up arms and as such were legitimate victims of their bloodlust, a claim seemingly endorsed by dutiful and obedient western media pundits who staunchly stood by their “moderate” killers.



RELATED POSTS:

Obama-Duterte Blow Up: What the Corporate Media Doesn’t Get
The recent bad blood between US President Barack Obama and Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte is based on hostilities far more profoundthan could be caused by a simple clash of personalities.


Syria: Obama's Worst Mistake?
The real legacy of Obama's administration of course will be in the area of foreign policy, where the utter ineptitude of Obama and his liberal cronies have reduced his promise to usher the world to an era of harmony and prosperity to ridicule as he has stumbles from one disaster to another. A very special kind of incompetence was required to make the messes created by his predecessor George W Bush in Iraq and Afghanistan worse, but Obie managed to pull it off.


Russia Loses Patience In Syria, Unleashes Hell On ISIS
The Hidden Genocide In Syria:Obama's Moderate Rebels As Brutal As ISIS
Russian Foreign Affairs Dept Accuses Turkey Of Hindering Syrian Peace Talks
ISIS Sends 400 Specially Trained Jihadists To Terrorise Europe.
Russia's Surprise Withdrawal From Syria? "If We Don't Go Away, We Can't Come back Again."
Britain’s Terror Chief Warns Of Likely Islamic State Terror Attacks
Turkey Blames Kurds, Assad For Terrorist Attack, Vows Swift Response
US Allies Now Fighting CIA-Backed Terror Groups In Syria
Captured ISIS fighter says ‘trained in Turkey, ISIS thinks it’s safer than Syria’
Did Saudi Arabia Just Announce Its Intention To Invade Syria And Iraq?
US 'Mission Creep' In Syria Nudges World Towards War
German Intelligence Warns: Saudi Arabia Has "Destabilizing Role" In The Middle East
Turkey's Links to Islamic State
Russia Launches Cruise Missiles Against ISIS Targets
There's No Such Thing As ISIS": Whistleblowing Journalist Destroys West's Terror Narrative, Warns Of Crackdown On "Dissidents
The Truth Of What Is Going On In Syria
Turkey and Sadui Arabia Already Have Troops Fighting In Syria
The Source Of Islamic Radicalism Is biggest US Ally In The Middle East
Former NATO Boss Explains Why US Did Not Oppose ISIS 'With Extreme Prejudice'
Secret Pentagon Report Reveals US "Created" ISIS As A "Tool" To Overthrow Syria's President Assad
Why Do The Western Powers, The United nations And The EU Continue To Tolerate The Terror Sponsor Erdogan And Turkey

CIA Director Brennan Warns Islamic State Militants Are Entering USA As Refugees
Europe Rejects Obama Doctrine - US Exceptionalism Is Not Acceptable
Obama Deploys 250 Special Forces to Syria: Will They Depose Assad?
New Report Shows How Hillary Clinton Sold Obama on Regime Change in Libya

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]