The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant. - Maximilien Robespierre.

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Russia, Iran and Turkey To Negotiate Peace Deal For Syria Without US Involvement



Translated from Deutsche Wirstschafts Nachrichten by Google Translate

The Foreign Ministers of Russia, Turkey and Iran agreed on a "Moscow Declaration" on Tuesday, Haberturk reports. The declaration, which has already been signed, stipulates that all three countries will act as official guarantee powers in Syria in future to secure the cease-fire and to conclude further agreements.

Russia, Turkey and Iran want to start peace negotiations for Syria without the West. After talks between Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu with their colleagues from Ankara and Teheran in Moscow, the three states jointly announced a corresponding advance. They would stand as guarantor powers for an agreement between the Syrian government and the opposition. According to Lavrov, the three states agree that the fight against terrorism should take precedence over a government change in Syria. He also announced that the evacuation of the contested areas in Aleppo would be completed in two days.

The three states are to act as mediators between the Syrian government and the Syrian "opposition" to negotiate an agreement and then to act as guarantee powers of that agreement. A martial solution to the Syrian conflict reject Moscow, Ankara and Tehran, reports the Russian state news agency Sputnik.

"All the attempts made so far by the USA and its partners for a coordinated approach were doomed to failure. They have had no influence on the happenings on the ground, "The Daily Mail quoted Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu.

The news agency Anadolu quotes the Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu: "We are talking about an armistice for the whole of Syria. However, this does not apply to the terrorist organizations ISIS and Al-Nusra. We will continue to fight these organizations (...). There are Hezbollah and other groups. The aid for all these groups must be cut off. "

The statement stated that all countries had been called to participate in the new initiative, which would have "an impact on the situation on the ground". Lavrov said Kazakhstan had offered itself as a host of new peace talks.

It is perhaps notable that the negotiated peace deal and armistice does not extend to terrorist organisations. One of the reasons the conflict in Syria has lasted so long and been so destructive is that the USA, supported by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, has been supporting ISIS and Al Nusra by supplying arms and ammunition and avoiding airstrikes on terrorist bases because as we have reported many times, the priority of US foreign policy under Barack Obama was to remove the legitimate government of Assad. Obama has always been a friend of terrorists as he promised he would be in 2008.

Google Translate for Business:Translator


RELATED POSTS:
US to attack Syria
Syria and Obama
USA fighting a proxy war in Syria
Syria is biggest US blunder ever
Obama frames Assad for US war crimes
Obama's Al Qaeda allies
ISIS was a US creation
West's lies demonise Russia
UK Govt Cash Funded ISIS & Al Nusra In Syrian Conflict
Syria: USA & NATO scream ‘War Crimes’ as US backed rebels shell Aleppo civilians.
Western media part of political elite, will never report Syrian massacre by US-led forces
Crazy Obama Administration Claims It Brought Peace And Security To Syria In 2015
Obamas ‘moderate Rebels’ Are mostly Syrian Gangsters
US ‘Mission Creep’ In Syria Nudges World Towards War
Atrocities In Iraq As Syrias brave Freedom Fighters Advance
Syria: The West Fails To Understand Again.
Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer Headlines]

[ Ian at Facebook ]

Aluminium DOES cause Alzheimer's: Expert says new findings confirm the metal plays a role in the devastating brain disease


(Image source: http://www.preemodj.com/)


Medical researchers studying the growing plague of Alzheimer's Disease in developed socireties have suspected a link between between aluminium and the disease has existed for many years. Lack of evidence prevented the scientific community and the alternative health lobby from recommending avoidance of aluminium in cooking utelsils and other activities as a means of significantly reducing chances of developing the disease. However, new research confirms the metal plays a role in the cognitive decline that is the most visible symptom of the disease.

Professor Chris Exley, of Keele University, UK,  says his latest research confirms the role of the metal in cognitive decline. Here, in a piece for medical-blogging website The Hippocratic Post, he reveals the findings from his latest study. 
 
There has been strong but not conclusive evidence of a link between human exposure to aluminium and the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease for half a century or more.  Without demonstrable proof however, there can be no consensus in the scientific community about the role of aluminium, a known neurotoxin in the development of the disease.

Exley's research, published in the medical science Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, makes a convincing case for the veracity of the link. Exley claims the findings are unequivocal in their confirmation of a role for aluminium in some if not all Alzheimer’s disease and his published research certainly seems to back that up. At the very least, these new results should encourage everyone and even those who have steadfastly maintained that aluminium has no role in the disease to think again.

Aluminium is probably not the only factor, so we are not looking at a way of totally eradicating the disease but we should all perhaps think more carefully about certain lifestyle choices in future. When the new results are put into the context of what is already known about aluminium and Alzheimer’s disease the significance of this research becomes too great to ignore as is clearly shown in the linked articles.

RELATED POSTS:

Age timebomb
Health tyranny closer
Health and blood pressure
Age, aluminioum, Alzheimers
Is age the new apartheid
More Demented Mice Science ? With Mobile Phones
As we were saying about science not making sense …
Alcohol Protects Against Dementia
They’re having a laugh aren’t they?

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer Headlines]

[ Ian at Facebook ]



Monday, December 19, 2016

It Wasn't Russia That Rigged The Election For Trump, It Was The Democrats That FAILED To Rig It For Crooked Hillary.

As the USA's electoral college goes through the formality of endorsing the election of Donald Trump's election as President of the USA, there seem to be no last minute surprises, the Democrats have failed to engineer a rebellion among the electors states appoint to cast their votes (according to population) for the candidate each state voted for.

Since election day (November 8) Clinton supporters, angry that voters had chosen anybody other than the candidate for political correctness and corporate crime had been trying to claim US electoral law should be ignored and the Presidency awarded to 'Crooked Hillary' because she had won the popular vote by a majority of three million votes.

News just in via the excellent Milo Yiannopoulis however reveals that three million votes in the election tally were cast by illegal immigrants. Now we don't know how they broke down but we know that Barack Obama had overtepped the limits of his executive power and, in a blatant attempt to rig the election for the Democrats, instructed democrat run states to allow illegals to vote, and had also tried to push through an amnesty allowing illegal immigrants to become full US citizens without going through the appropriate legal process.

So we may assume those three million votes went, by a very large majority to the Democrat candidate.

Which destroys what little credibility the Democrats claims to have won the popular vote ever had.

Read the full story on Milo's page:


Illegal Immigrants Cast More Than 3 Million Votes In Presidential Election

 

 


RELATED POSTS:

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer Headlines]

[ Ian at Facebook ]

You Heard About The Yahoo Hack But Mainstream Media did Not Tell Everything you Need To Know.



Can't give you a source for this, when I clicked through on the search results
it returned a '404', which means I guess, that the site is being blocked.
That seems very appropriate in the context of the article below.


Its very likely that if you use the Internet and are conscious, you know about the Yahoo hack1 BILLION (that’s BILLION with a “B”) Yahoo accounts were breached in 2013 but Yahoo kept the story quiet until now, and for very good reasons which we will get to. According to information released by Yahoo, stolen user data included names, email addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth and passwords.

Not much of a problem you may think, if like us Boggart Bloggers you do not use email for conducting any sensitive or confidential business. If you have a Yahoo account and haven't changed your password since before 2013 do it. (I changed mine in 2015 , after getting locked out of my account because I tried to log on from Spain and they decided I was hacking myself,) but before that incident I had used the same password for ten years).

 If you do use your mail for stuff you'd rather keep private, get a new, secure emain account (not Gmail or Hotmail, see below,) services like, for example, StartMail, a Netherlands based company. More of this type of service are coming online. There's a small monthly fee, but as I long time IT pro, I have always said the 'everything's for free' business model would prove to be the internet's downfall.

For reasons not related to the hack, StartPage.com private search canceled its Yahoo contract stating they had lost confidence in the company on learing that Yahoo allegedly allowed a US government agency install a spy tool onto its system so agents could secretly read incoming email. Google, Microsoft, Facebook and other US based web cprporations have done similar favours for the US Government, helping advance its agenda of spying on the whole world.

What this means is:

The Yahoo hacks and scandals are just the tip of the iceberg because every US-based organization has to comply with government surveillance requests in accordance with the Patriot Act—and they can’t breathe a word about it legally without winning a court challenge.  If your email account uses Yahoo, Ymail, Gmail, Hotmail or another US-based email service, every US government agency has been able to read your email since 2015.  

For email privacy think in terms of organisations that charge a small fee (pay $£€2 per month and you'll get rid if a lot of spam too), look to European companies that offer Search services like StartPage, Good Gopher (American owned but hosted outside US jurisdiction) or the oddly named DuckDuckGo. The European Union has many faults and is an undemocratic organisation, but it does at least protect the privacy rights of citizens in member states.


RELATED POSTS:
Internet access as a human right
Is the Internet making us stupid
Nothing good has come of the internet
How Google tweaks alorithms to serve its business interests
Bloggers censored on internet
Internet privacy theft
Internet sceadugengan
Technology: Opoen windows serve authoritarian governments
The technology of mind control
Technology monster
Google Now Has Access To Millions Of Patient’s Health Records
The Right To Tell Politicians To Eff Off In An Age Of Self Appointed Censors, and Compliant Media
Facebook begins Europe-wide censorship campaign against free speech.
Drinking from a firehose – internet
Shellshock: Can anything stop the hackers? Yes, me and you can.
A Chronicle Of Decay

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer Headlines]

[ Ian at Facebook ]

Sunday, December 18, 2016

Wikileaks Operative Speaks Out - Russia Did Not Hack US Election, It Was A Disgusted Democrat

A few posts ago we reported that former UK Ambassador to Afghanistan, Craig Murray, had said that claims made by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton that Obama's anointed successor Hillary Clinton lost November's presidential election to Donald Trump because the election process was influence by the publication of emails by Wikileaks that were obtained illegally by Wikileaks after being stolen from Democrat Party and private computers by Russian hackers.

If you missed that story you can read it here > Democrats Russian Hacking campaign claims are bullshit.

Now we have the full story of how Wikileaks obtained the emails that have been so damaging personally and politically to Obama, Clinton and the Democrats. And as usual it was left to alt - media and to British and European media to report this YUGE story, mainstream media in the USA, loyal to the traitor and liar Obama and the crook and liar Hillary, have hardly mentioned this story with concerns all Americans.

from The Daily Mail

EXCLUSIVE: Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers

A Wikileaks envoy today claims he personally received Clinton campaign emails in Washington D.C. after they were leaked by 'disgusted' whisteblowers - and not hacked by Russia.
Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, told Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September.
'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'
His account contradicts directly the version of how thousands of Democratic emails were published before the election being advanced by U.S. intelligence. 

 

 



RELATED POSTS:
Democrats ‘Russia Hacked Us’ and Failed Recount Campaign is Political Suicide
An Item In Todays News About US Gov’t Internet Security Hack has Tipped Our Editor Over The Edge
UK Govt Cash Funded ISIS & Al Nusra In Syrian Conflict
Obama Leads Down The Path To Nuclear War – Hillary Clinton Runs To Keep Up …

American Attempts To Demonise Russia Look More Pathetic Than Desperate

Do Progressive Liberals Really Find “White Trash” More Threatening Than Nuclear War?

Hope Not Hate ‘Exaggerated’ Jo Cox Hate Speech Claims by 3000 Per Cent

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer Headlines]

[ Ian at Facebook ]

Saturday, December 17, 2016

US Democrat's Refusal To Accept They Lost The Election, It's The Gift That Keeps On Giving.

Russia's role in US election hacks and the possible influence on the result.


To read, watch or listen to the mainstream media, the 2016 US presidential election was decided by internet hackers rather than voters.
At least, that's the way government officials and mainstream media newsbots would like to spin it. Both before and after election day, news coverage has focused on leaked incriminating emails reportedly written by key Democrat party officials, including presidential candidate Hillary Clinton herself, fake news which turned out to have more substance than most of the 'real news' or propaganda as it should more accurately be called. Everyone, from the US's leading spy agencies and politicians to the public at large, is caught up in disagreement about who the hackers are and what influence they may have had on the eventual outcome of the vote


The weeks weeks since the election have brought five separate calls from Congress for investigations to learn how much the hacks really influenced the elections. Add to that public comments this week by the the outgoing President Barack Obama (in which he warned the Russians He (personally?) would retaliate for the alleged interference in US politics, the US Department of Homeland Security and the US Department of State on how Russia was involved in influencing the vote and when. There have been wildly inaccurate stories in the New York Times and Washington Post about disagreements between the CIA and the FBI over why Russia conducted the hacks.

To round it all off, President Elect Donald Trump is arguing nobody knows for sure that Russia and President, Vladimir Putin were behind the hacks. Trump (correctly at it happens) maintains that even though the US intelligence community and the forensic experts who first examined the hacked systems are highly confident Russia is the bad guy there is no actual evidence. (I explain below why there can be no evidence).

NBC News reported on Wednesday 15 December that US intelligence officials believe "with a high level of confidence" that Putin was personally involved in the effort to interfere in the election.

President Barack Obama has little doubt the Russians were behind the hacks. And in an interview with NPR published Friday, he said that the US would respond.

"When any foreign government tries to impact the integrity of our elections ... we need to take action," Obama said. "And we will -- at a time and place of our own choosing. Some of it may be explicit and publicized; some of it may not be."

The Russian government, in turn, has called the US accusations groundless. "They should either stop talking about that or produce some proof at last," said a spokesman for Putin, according to CNN, citing Russian state news agency Tass.

For the record, there hasn't been any evidence found of hacked voting machines, according to election officials or security experts. Trump won the election because of the way the US voting system works, even though Clinton won the popular vote. In fact, in the three states where Green Party candidate Jill Stein, acting as a proxy for The Clinton Crime Syndicate, tried to demand recounts to upset the result, two denied recounts because the evidence of error or fraud required by State law could not be provided and in the third, Wisconsin, where a recount was completed, Trump actually gained a few hundred votes on his rival.

There is no reliable way of telling where a hack came from other than the IP address in the packet header? And because our laptops and tablets do not have their own IP address, but instead one allocated dynamically by the server they connect to, what does that prove? Only that the computer was in a certain place the time (even this can be faked very easily by using a proxy server). The hacker could have been a CIA operative sitting in a Moscow hotel planting a false flag, a British geek sitting in a MacDonalds in London, logged on via the restaurant Wi-Fi, via a proxy server in Andorra, via a proxy server in Russia to a server in Hilary Clinton's attic for all we know. If the IP address were really from Russia it was almost certainly not the Russian government doing it because the government would have covered their tracks by paying for a plane trip to a banana republic in Central America.

As we in the IT community have been seeing for some years, hackers have moved on from the old ways of writing malicious code and distributing in email attachments. They are now writing and selling the tools for others to distribute or use and it is big business and growing. The people who create such software know about the 'postern gates' deliberately put into software by corporations like Microsoft, Google, Apple and Facebook, for which cooperation they are well rewarded by government agencies. And as long as robots can be programmed to access the right logical port, Windows operating systems are wide open. That is why it is nearly impossible to know who is initiating the attacks. Throw in the complete distrust the population has in the NSA, CIA, FBI, GCHQ, MI6, Europol and the politicised legal and judicial systems and it is no wonder that there is little concern about who is hacking except for those who want to blame a faceless entity for their loss of control over government.

There is in fact no proof or even convincing evidence that Russia in fact did the hacks. Wikileaks founder Julian assange has categorically stated it was not Russia! A more likely scenario is that is was in fact an inside job done by a DNC staffer disgusted by the collaboration of party managers with The Clinton Campaign to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders.

Having said that, if Hillary was a bank robber, and Russia revealed that Hillary was a bank robber, are the nations of the western coalition supposed to go to war with Russia to save a known crook and liar from a humiliating but deserved defeast? And can anyone tell us why there was no outcry from supporters of the globalist left about the Obama administration's attempts to influence outcome of the Israeli election.

I doubt Russia swayed one single vote. The track record of Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party, a record of dishonesty, misrepresentation, corporate cronyism and warmongering, is what lost the election for them. There are far more important issues to the majority of people than Gay BLT rights.


RELATED POSTS:

Elementary My Arse

Michelle Obama’s Stupid Attack On Trump Shows What A Cow She Is

Former UK Ambassador Says Obama's 'Russian Hacking' Claims Are Bullshit

Former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, who has always publicly opposed the demonization of Russia by United States and European Union official propaganda and has in the past collaborated with WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange to expose western propaganda as being aimed at persuading voters war with Russia and China,is justified has dismissed the CIA's claims that Russia interfered in last month’s presidential election as "bullshit"

An Item In Todays News About US Gov't Internet Security Hack has Tipped Our Editor Over The Edge
The US election was on November 8, by November 12 it should have gone away, but the Democrats, proven crooks and liars who crookedly rigged their own selection process to cheat a man who could have beaten Trump out of the nomination and ensure their candidate was the traitor, war criminal, liar, AND head of the Clinton Crime Syndicate Hillary Clinton as their candidate.

Democrats Russia Hacked Us and Failed Recount Campaign is Political Suicide.
The US Democratic Party’s inability to accept that they lost the Presidency to Donald Trump is turning into a slow political suicide. The party that has always been quick to scream ‘conspiracy theorist’ to discredit critics of its dealings with overseas governments and foreign billionaires like Soros has revealed in its efforts to overturn the result by claiming that Russian hacking influenced voters in favour of Trump.

The Internet Purge Of Politically Incorrect (aka truthful) Content Begins

Facebook, Google (owners of YouTube) and Microsoft have long been known as CIA collaborators and it has been acknowledged that Obama's move in divesting the US government of responsibility for ICANN allows The White House to make outraged noises about suppression of free speech while using Search Engine Operators as proxies to shut down anything challinging US and NATO propaganda (on the grounds no doubt that challenging the politically correct orthodoxy constitutes hate speech.)

ABC/Wapo Effectively Admit To Poll Tampering As Hillary's "Lead" Shrinks To 2-Points

A few days ago the solidly 'liberal' mainstream media were crowing that the American presidential election was all over bar the shouting and Hillary Clinton could order new curtains for The White House. As evidence of their claims they cited an ABC / Washington Post opinion poll which gave 'Crooked Hillary' a 12 point lead. The poll and Hillary's media shills are of course all as bent as a boxing day turd, if this and other big leads claimed for the Democrat are anything to go by. href="https://wordpress.com/post/originalboggartblog.wordpress.com/20798890">Clinton Crime Syndicate Involved In Green Party Recount Scam, But No Evidence Hacking Influenced US Vote.

American Attempts To Demonise Russia Look More Pathetic Than Desperate

In spite of all the screeching from Hillary Clinton's campaign team, the bombast of the Obama administration and they hysteria in mainstream media it should be obvious even to a prepubescent kid whose computing skills are limited to playing games on an android tablet that the hacking of the Democrat's campaign servers, Obama's private email address and the State Department is an inside job.

Ideologue Obama Declares War On Ideologies

When the idealists of the left have top resort to suppressing the free press and free speech because they are losing the argument it is time to forget all the empty talk of hope and change, look at the track record of war and destruction and recognise these so called liberals for what they are, authoritarian tyrants.

America Is Lost: Rigged election, Rigged Media, Rigged Candidate says Assange
To paraphrase Mark Twain, reports of Julian Assange's death were greatly exaggerated. After his web feed was cut by staff at the Ecuadorian Embassy earlier this week Assange's usual stream of tweets, leaks and posts was stilled. The web, being the web, went mad with conspiracy theories but Wikileaks themselves did not comment on the wilder speculation. Well Julian is back on Hillary's case, and this time it's more personal than ever.

FBI Leaks Expose Elusive "Shadow Government" Protecting Hillary In National Security Investigation

Big Foot, The Yeti and The Loch Ness monster continue to elude us but the existence of one creature previously though to be a modern myth has been confirmed when official records of its existence were revealed in documents relating to the FBI investigation into the case of former Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton's negligent handling of highly sensitive classified government material on a private server.

Pussy Grabber versus Lying, Money Grubbing Traitor For US President?

Yesterday, too late for this British based blog to pick up, Wikileaks released by far the most devastating leak of the campaign. In any other democratic nation this would be game over. This act of treason this betrayal of three hundred million people, is in complete violation of US electoral law and makes Trump’s dirty talk video, that US liberals have been in hysterics about, look like an episode of The Teletubbies.

Latest Clinton Foundation Hack Shows Abuse Of Power For Personal Gain
Julian Asange was not bluffing it seems, although he appeared to back off from dropping the promised bpmbshell that would finish Hillary Clinton, a document dump by Goccifer2 containst stuff that is dynamite, revealing email exchanges between Clinton and associates that discuss the abuse of power and position for financial gain, in short giving preferential treatment in warding State Deprtment contracts to people and organisations that made generous donations tio the Clinton Foundation ...




Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer Headlines]

[ Ian at Facebook ]

Friday, December 16, 2016

Former UK Ambassador Says Obama's 'Russian Hacking' Claims Are Bullshit.

Some days, inevitably, real life interferes with the blogging activities of us new media current events commentators. Today has been such a day so here is a story which concerns us all, based on information sourced from The Belfast Telegraph



Former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, who has always publicly opposed the demonization of Russia by United States and European Union official propaganda and has in the past collaborated with WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange to expose western propaganda as being aimed at persuading voters war with Russia and China,is justified has dismissed the CIA's claims that Russia interfered in last month’s presidential election as "bullshit".

On December 16, 2016 the Washington Post reported on a secret document circulated by the CIA (to mainstream media - well there's secret and secret I guess, which accused Russian intelligence services of hacking the Democratic National Committee's servers and private severs of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton and her campaign chairman, the alleged paedophile John Podesta, in order to help get Donald Trump elected as US president.

In a statement responding to the CIA allegations as reported by The Washington Post, Murray said: "I know who leaked them. I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.

As this blog has reported before and Wikileaks have always maintained, the available evidence points to the hacks having been the work of an insider, either a disgusted technical officer in one of the US security agencies, or a Demovratic Party staffer disgusted at the way senior party managers colluded with Hillary clinton's campaign team to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders.

"If what the CIA are saying is true, and the CIA’s statement refers to people who are known to be linked to the Russian state, they would have arrested someone if it was someone inside the United States. America has not been shy about arresting whistleblowers and it’s not been shy about extraditing hackers. They plainly have no knowledge whatsoever", Mr Murray told reporters.

The Kremlin has rejected the hacking accusations while Julian Assange has previously said the DNC leaks were not linked to Russia.

The claims also drew a rebuke from President Elect Trump’s transition team, which said in a statement: "These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction."

Meanwhile Trump himself called the CIA's assessment "ridiculous".

"Can you imagine if the election results were the opposite and WE tried to play the Russia/CIA card. It would be called conspiracy theory!" Trump tweeted earlier in the week when news of the CIA accusation was first leaked.

Mr Trump rejected the CIA's conclusion that Russia tried to interfere with the presidential election and blamed "very embarrassed" Democrats for the public release of the assessment.

Trump described the CIA's assessment as"Ridiculous," but added that he does not totally oppose President Barack Obama's order for a review of election campaign hacking. "If you're going to do that, I think you should not just say 'Russia'. You should say other countries also, and maybe other individuals." He said.

The White House has said the probe would focus on any breaches by other countries, and past elections.









RELATED POSTS:

Democrats Russia Hacked Us and Failed Recount Campaign is Political Suicide.
The US Democratic Party’s inability to accept that they lost the Presidency to Donald Trump is turning into a slow polictical sucicide. The party that has always been quick to scream ‘conspiracy theorist’ to discredit critics of its dealings with oversreas governments and foreign billionaires like Soros has revealed in its efforts to overturn the result by claimING that Russian hacking influenced voters in favour of Trump.

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer Headlines]

[ Ian at Facebook ]


Thursday, December 15, 2016

If Russia Was Hacking, Why Did White House Only Complain After Hillary Lost? Asks Trump

While mainstream media in the USA and the Democratic Party / Clinton Crime Syndicate get their knickers in a twist about the totally unsubstantiated allegations coming from people with connections to the Democratic Party / Clinton Crime Syndicate about the "Russian hacking" scandal, which has now entered the realm of surrealism with accusations that Vladimir Putin himself hacked the Democrat / Clinton crime Syndicate campaign computer and voting machines in 'swing states'. According to an NBC report which reported no new evidence of the alleged hacking, Trump threw himself into the melee this morning (15 December) when he raised questions on Twitter about Russia's reported role in cyber attacks on U.S. political parties and individuals as well as the timing of the White House's response under President Barack Obama.

"If Russia, or some other entity, was hacking, why did the White House wait so long to act? Why did they only complain after Hillary lost?" Trump wrote in a post on Twitter.


A very good question, but then Donald Trump is a succesful businessman rather than a community organiser and novice politician. Hillary Clinton, the Democrat candidate Trump defeated in the election held on November 8 had during the campaign accused Russia of a carrying out cyber attacks against U.S. political organizations in order to try to discredit the whistleblower web site Wikileaks and divert attention from leaked emails that showed criminal activity on the part of Clinton and members of her campaign team. After the shock election defeat for the Democrats, Barack Obama said he warned Russian President Vladimir Putin about consequences and last week ordered a review by the U.S. intelligence agencies.

The CIA released a report asserting that the attacks were aimed at helping Trump win the 2016 election, but this was rejected by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the FBI, according to a senior U.S. official, because it did not offer any credible evidence to support claims that Russia was involved in the hacking. Wikileaks are on record as saying that the hacks were probably the work of dissident staff in the US security agencies or a Democratic Party staffer disgusted at the way the party collaborated with the Clinton campaign to cheat Bernie Sanders out of the nomination that should have been his. All this suggests Trump is correct to questioning the narrative being spun by the White House.


RELATED POSTS:

Michelle Obama’s Stupid Attack On Trump Shows What A Cow She Is

Democrats Russia Hacked Us and Failed Recount Campaign is Political Suicide.
The US Democratic Party’s inability to accept that they lost the Presidency to Donald Trump is turning into a slow polictical sucicide. The party that has always been quick to scream ‘conspiracy theorist’ to discredit critics of its dealings with oversreas governments and foreign billionaires like Soros has revealed in its efforts to overturn the result by claimING that Russian hacking influenced voters in favour of Trump.

Expect Atrocious Language. An Item In Todays News About US Gov’t Internet Security Hack has Tipped Our Editor Over The Edge.

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer Headlines]

[ Ian at Facebook ]

Monday, December 12, 2016

As Aleppo Falls ISIS Fighters Regroup To Recapture Palmyra

Reports coming from Russian military advisers in Syria claim 4,000 Islamic State aka IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daesh terrorists, equipped with tanks (now what bunch of turkey's did they get those from we wonder?),armoured vehicles, and modern artillery are staging an offensive to retake the Syrian city of Palmyra after regrouping following retreats from Aleppo and Mosul in Iraq, the Russian Center for Reconciliation in Syria says.

According to Russian sources, the terrorists have also benefitted from considerable reinforcement, including heavy military hardware from the regions of Raqqa and Deir ez-Zor.

“IS has dispatched a considerable force to Palmyra from the area of Raqqa, where militants, backed by the US and the international coalition ceased combat action against the terrorists this week,” the statement by the Russian military says. The Reconciliation Center notes that the Syrian Army and their Iranian allies are engaging the jihadists in combat.

"Despite heavy losses in manpower and hardware, the terrorists seek to gain a foothold in the city while the Russian Air Force is not conducting airstrikes against residential areas in the city of Palmyra," the statement reads.

Palmyra was seized by IS in 2015, however in March this year Syrian government forces reinforced by troops from Iran and backed by Russian air support, managed to liberate the city. On Saturday night however, the Syrian Army, backed by Russian air strikes, managed to repel several attacks on Palmyra, killing up to 300 jihadists, the Russian Defense Ministry said.

Also on Saturday, terrorists reportedly entered some of Palmyra’s districts forcing the Syrian troops to withdraw from some of their positions. According to AP, citing the activist-run Palmyra Coordination network, jihadists gained footholds in the northern and northwestern districts of Palmyra.

Back in October, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned that terrorists “were fleeing from Mosul to go to Syria.”

Meanwhile, the IS news agency Amaq has claimed that the jihadists have seized the city completely. In particular they claimed IS has control of the ancient castle in Palmyra, which overlooks the city.

In an interview with Russia Today, British journalist Martin Jay alleged that some of the fighters now attacking Palmyra might indeed have come from Iraq.

"Mosul in the early months of the campaign was quite open and there were many so-called rat runs for ISIS fighters to leave the city and headfor ISIS controlled territory. I think in the first few weeks of the campaign when it was first announced by Prime Minister Abadi in Iraq, many fighters fled and moved to different areas across the border in Syria," Jay said.

He noted that the fresh battle for Palmyra could take "quite some time" and in fact become a "prolonged" one. To prevent Russian aircraft from helping Syrian government forces, terrorists might also go deep into residential areas and take people there hostage. using them as shields.

"That's the tactic that worked for them from the very early days, you know, use civilians as buffers against air strikes." Jay also noted that Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) might use the attack on Palmyra [listed as UNESCO heritage] as a PR tool since "the world cares a great deal [more] about Palmyra than it probably does about Aleppo, and ISIS knows this."



RELATED POSTS:

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer Headlines]

[ Ian at Facebook ]

Lights To Go Out On Britain Thanks To EU Loonytoons Energy Policy

Britain Facing Energy Crisis Thanks Government Obsession With Renewables
Britain is facing an imminent and unprecedented energy crisis thanks to its growing dependency on Sustainable" energy sources such as wind and solar, an spokesman for the country’s electricity and gas regulator has warned.

Andrew Wright, a senior executive at Ofgem, told a conference on future energy supplies that some households would have to pay more just to keep the lights on while others “sit in the dark” due to failure of electricity supplies to meed demand.

Because of the closure of coal mines and solid fuel power generators, Britain has lost much of its energy producing capacity, meaning there is “much less flexibility” in the supply.

Wright warned that in future richer customers may be able to pay a premium for a more reliable level of service while poorer people have their electricity supply rationed.

“At the moment everyone has the same network – with some difference between rural and urban – but this is changing and these changes will produce some choices for society,” he said.

“We are currently all paying broadly the same price but we could be moving away from that and there will be some new features in the market which may see some choose to pay for a higher level of reliability. One house may be sitting with their lights on, charging their Tesla electric car, while the people next door will be sitting in the dark.”

The Telegraph reports that he laid the blame for this looming crisis on renewable energy.

“The system we are all familiar with has some redundancy built into it,” he said. “It was pretty straightforward and there was a supply margin, but increasing intermittency from renewable energy is producing profound changes to this system.

This blog and our associate The Daily Stirrer have reported many times on the ways in which, since our treasonous politicians signed us up to the European Union (EU) emissions trading scheme – there has been an increase in renewable energy – average energy prices have risen by 63 per cent, because the clever 'scientists' who recommended wind and solar generators as replacements for coal, oil and gas overlooked the absofuckinglutely obvious, that the wind does not blow consistently as a suitable strength to turn wing turbines, and wherever you are on the planet, over the course of a year the sun is only above the horizon for on average twelve hours a day.



RELATED POSTS:

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer Headlines]

[ Ian at Facebook ]