Now YouTube are censoring videos critical of the establishment.

A few days ago, after examining evidence offered by certain bloggers who defend net neutrality we reported that allegations against Google of blocking access to sites that criticise Hillary Clinton's presidential election campaign or raise questions bout the candidate's very obvious health problems is is pretty irrevocable. Since then a reader mailed us an item on how YouTube are censoring videos whose content is critical of government or does not follow the government line on controversial issues such as tion.climate change or illegal immigration

Earlier this month, YouTube, was accused of censoring users who post political content. The site's management, and owners, Google, claim what is happening is not censorship but 'demonetisation' of content not suitable to be associated with advertising.

Claiming videos had been barred from making money through the company’s ad services, well esablished YouTube hosts like Philip DeFranco spoke out against the policy, claiming over “a dozen of his videos had been flagged as inappropriate for advertising, including one dinged for ‘graphic content or excessive strong language." Now while that, of itself, does not constitute censorship, if we are talking about net neutrality and freedom of expression it quickly becomes clear that the videos being censored are conservative, Christian or libertarian, while videos that are pure propaganda for a progressive liberal, politically correct, globalist agenda are being accepted even when they are full of untruths and misrepresentation. 

In a video entitled “YouTube Is Shutting Down My Channel and I’m Not Sure What To Do,” DeFranco called YouTube’s policy “censorship with a different name,” since users touching on what the company considers to be controversial subjects end up losing money. “If you do this on the regular, and you have no advertising,” DeFranco added, “it’s not sustainable.”

While YouTube has already confirmed its policy regarding what it considers unfit for monetization hasn’t changed, the issue might lie elsewhere now that the company seems more efficient in enforcing its own rules. As a matter of fact, the content policy changed in 2012, when YouTube first introduced its “ad-friendly” guidelines.

But while an algorithm is allegedly used to spot and “de-monetize” videos that break the company’s rules, many continue to accuse the company, currently owned by Google, of having “vague” descriptions of what its leadership considers ad-friendly.

YouTube rolled out its monetization tool in 2006, when ads consisted of videos that would pop up at the bottom of the user’s screen. If the user did not click on it, it would roll for about ten seconds before going away. But as ad executives pressured YouTube to “to do a better job at promoting its creators,” the relationship with its advertisers changed. As better and even more intrusive ads were added to YouTube videos, the company allegedly became more concerned with the content.

Those who are affected often complain about copyright claims, but some complain about another type of targeting — one that involves power players.

On this site we carry some ads but not with any serious intention of making money, they serve as separators between sections of content more than anything. Even so we have noticed our traffic take a serious dive since we started reporting on Hillary Clinton's health issues.

The irony is that while this blog scores very moderately for traffic and is really most useful for getting new content indexed quickly, extended versions of most posts appearing here are posted on our main site which is indexed by search engines in China, India, Russia and around the world. And we don't mind people using our content, it is trying to get ideas out that matter, not pulling in money. So a very big chunk of the global population that cannot be controlled by Google have the opportunity to read our content.

RELATED POSTS:


Judge Denies Attempt To Block Obama's Transfer Of Internet Oversight To UN

October 2016: In a last ditch effort to block Obama's plan to allow the US Commerce Department to hand over oversight of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to a multi-stakeholder community - which includes the technical community, businesses, civil society and foreign governments - 4 state attorneys went to a Texas federal court alleging that the transition, in the absence of congressional approval, amounts to an illegal forfeiture of U.S. government property. Confirming once more that under Obama's Presidency the judiciary and legal system have been totally politicised, their case was thrown out on a technicality.

Fact Checker Snopes Lie About Obama ‘Birther’ Smear.
Yesterday US Presidential candidate Donald Trump said that President Barack Obama was born in the U.S., and by doing so he “finished a birther controversy” which he said was started by Hillary Clinton in 2008. “Hillary Clinton and her campaign of 2008 started the birther controversy. I finished it, I finished it. You know what I mean," he told a campaign event audience.

Free speech threat
Importance of free speech
Free speech censored
Free speech being abolished?
Threat to the free press
Free Speech murdered - omnibus
Germany begins internet censorship
Robot censors for internet?
University censorship
Surveillance society: cellphone fascism

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

MPs attack Cameron over Libya 'collapse'

Not before time Britain's politicians are asking for justification of our role in the bombing campaign againsyt the regime of colonel Gadaffi in Libya, which since 2011 has led to that country, at the time the most prosperous and advanced nation in Africa, becoming a chaotic failed state with three different groups all claiming to be the legitimate government.
 
David Cameron's partners in crime be Presisent Nicolas Sarkozy of France, and inevitably the warmonger in chief, United states President barack Hussin Obama. The British parliament can only hold Cameron to account of course, but it is good to know that ion the wake of the brexit vote or elected representatives are starting to behave as a democratically elected national assembly should, and not as a wholly owned subsidiary of the USA and EU.
 
According to the Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee the then PM David Cameron lacked a coherent strategy for the air campaign. The intervention had not been "informed by accurate intelligence", and that it led to the rise of so-called Islamic State in North Africa, the report commented.
 
The UK government said it had been an international decision to intervene but in fact Britain and France were bullied into joining a US led (the FUKUS axis) regime change operation after Libyan leader Gadaffi defied the US ally Saudi Arabia. The action was called for by the Arab League and authorised by a trumped up UN Security Council resolution after the USA had miseld Russia and China on the nature of the operation, claiming it was necessary for humanitarian reasons, when in fact it was an act of war against Libya.
 
The coalition, fronted  by Britain and France with Obama 'leading from behind' launched a campaign of air and missile strikes against Muammar Gadaffi's forces in March 2011 after the regime threatened to attack the rebel-held city of Benghazi. But after Gadaffi was toppled, Libya descended into violence, with rival governments and the formation of hundreds of militias, while so-called Islamic State, also known as Isil and Daesh, has also gained a foothold and now holds territory in Libya's unpopulated but oil rich south.


RELATED POSTS:

Libya intervention

Libya: The boat people scandal

Libya: Military lose control

Africa refugees

1,000 British elite troops deployed to Libyan oil fields to ‘halt the advance of ISIS’

A Memo To Those Who Said Libya Could Not Have Been Better Under Gadaffi Than After ‘Liberation”

The First Casualty (Libya)

Cameron To Escalate UK Involvement In Libyan Civil War?



Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ...  [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Julian Assange Confirms Sanders Was Threatened By Clinton Campaign Thugs

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has confirmed what we all guessed … that having repeately pledged to fight Hillary Clinton 'all the way', even as far as forcing a vote at the Democraric Party convention, Bernie Sanders cave in and appeal to his supporters to 'get behind Hillary' was a result of his being physically threatened.

During a recent interview with the highly respected Australian investigative journalist John Pilger, Assange said that Sanders was forced to drop out of the race due to threats to himself and his wife from the Clinton campaign.

Assange’s allegations substantiate claims by the Kremlin who revealed they had evidence that Jane Sanders was physically threatened in order to “get Bernie on board” with Hillary’s campaign.

Trueactivist.com reports:

Pilger, who is working on a documentary about Assange, asked:

“Julian, we [The BBC Andrew Marr Show] cut you off earlier this year when you were talking about what you felt were the most significant emails that you have released. Is there any last one that you’d like to mention? And also, do you have any thoughts on Bernie Sanders? I mean what is your opinion why Bernie Sanders drop out of the race?”

Assange responded:

“Look, I think you know, we know how politics works in the United States. Whoever, whatever political party gets into government is going to merge with the bureaucracy pretty damn fast. It will be in a position where it has some levers in its hand. And Bernie Sanders was independent candidate trying to get the nomination through the Democratic Party and if you ask me he did get the nomination, but he was threatened to drop out.”

(It has been widely rumoured that the Democrat National Committee was complicit in widespread voter registration fraud in the primaries campaign; had not thousands of Sanders suppoters' name been removed from the registers, and had all votes been counted, the Maverick socialist would have won the nomination easily, as we reported HERE and HERE.

Again, Assange has promised to release incriminating emails which are sure to result in Clinton’s indictment. He says he has evidence that Hillary made deals with an alleged Islamic state sponsor, as well as damning information about the Clinton Foundation.

The Clinton campaign knows he’s on to her, too, which is why a strategist called for an assassination of Assange on TV.

“Of course, we’re very interested in revealing the truth about any candidate and yes we have some material about Bernie Sanders that will be published,” Assange added.

This is the real face of Hillary Clinton folks! She wants to bully and threaten her way into the Presidency. However, WE THE PEOPLE, won’t sit and watch this happen.

Let’s share this article everywhere and expose Hillary!

RELATED POSTS:
Hypocrite Hillary Brands Trump Tax Cheat For Using Same Loophole As She Does

RELATED POSTS:

Latest Clinton Foundation Hack Shows Abuse Of Power For Personal Gain
Julian Assange was not bluffing it seems, although he appeared to back off from dropping the promised bombshell that would finish Hillary Clinton, a document dump by Goccifer2 contains stuff that is dynamite, revealing email exchanges between Clinton and associates that discuss the abuse of power and position for financial gain, in short giving preferential treatment in warding State Department contracts to people and organisations that made generous donations to the Clinton Foundation ...

FBI Drops Hints They Are Ready to INDICT Hillary Clinton

Sources close to the FBI investigation into Democratic Party presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's offences relating to national security when she was Secretary of State say the Feds are ready to indict the frontrunner in the nomination process on charges relating to classified information.

Yes, the Panama Papers Could Really End Hillary Clinton’s Campaign
We've been chronicling the downfall of Hillary Clinton, from her seemingly unassailable position as the anointed successor to Barack Obama, whose path to first the Democratic Party nomination and then the Presidency itself had been carefully planned and all obstacles removed. The fixers and deal makers had reckoned without two factors however, Bernie Sanders and Mrs. Clinton's poor image with voters, a result of her spoiled little rich girl arrogance and the incompetence she showed in office as Secretary of State.
Obama's price for saving Daves seat on the EU Gravy train
America being destroyed by neo - liberalism

America global hegemony
Failure of American leadership
Washington flatulence creates American trump
Wikileaks Drops Hillary Email Bomb That Could End Her Campaign but FB Censored It
Servergate: Hillary Clinton, Arrogant, Ignorant or both?
Servergate: 'Immune' Hillary IT-Staffer Reportedly A "Devastating Witness" - FBI
Undemocratic Democrats – Nearly 10% Of Democratic Party Superdelegates Are Corporate Lobbyists
Hillary Should Be Terrified After Judge Grants Staffer Immunity On Email Scandal
More Evidence That Hillary Clinton Leaked Secrets damaging To The USA

The Birth Of Cultural Marxism
Ever wondered when and where the idiotic pseudo -philosophies of hippys and the idiotic and divisive politically correct dogmas of the modern left were born. The Social justice Warriors (aka 'liberals' or progressives' though they are really neither of these things but instead are moralistic authoritarians who hate free speech and personal liberty and support censorship, government control of media and criminalisation of dissent.

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Hillary Clinton has 'ONE year to LIVE' Shock New Health Claim By Anonymous Doc.

Hillary Clinton during on of her increasingly frequent 'eppy' episodes (Image source: Express )

Accordiong to a shick claim posted on the web by an anonymous person who claims to be a senior doctor working in a medical school, HILLARY CLINTON is probably suffering from advanced vascular dementia.

The 68-year-old Democratic Party presidential candidate, who has repeatedly denied she is battling serious health issues, has “never recovered” from a serious blood clot in 2012  which “triggered” the degenerative disease and is already in the latter stages of the illness as recent “complex partial seizures” show and “extremely unlikely” to live beyond 18 months.

The latest controversial claims about Hillary's health purportedly come from a professor at a US medical school, who has posted them anonymously online.

In a detailed 10 minute YouTube video, using brain scans, disputed medical records and slow motion clips of Mrs Clinton, the “professor” – who claims to have taught at three medical institutions – sets out the case.  

“Hillary Clinton is running a campaign for president knowing that she will die.” the doctor alleges, “Patients who are diagnosed with vascular dementia are given a three to five year life expectancy.

“We can see Hillary demonstrating problems with motor movement, with verbal communication, with forgetfulness and weakness. Subcortical vascular dementia is an especially difficult form of the disease because it is affects the brain stem, which controls many of themost primitive and essential body functions. 

The Professor continues: “I have treated many patients with brain anomalies throughout my career. “I can tell you that Hillary is showing decline consistent with a progressive disease like vascular dementia.

“Very few doctors are speaking out about this because they don’t want to get involved.
“Hillary Clinton is sick and likely dying. I am not making this up or overstating this. This is typical of the progression of vascular dementia.”

The video, which has had 30,000 views in just 24 hours, continues: “To say that nothing is wrong with Hillary is dishonest.

“Her cognition and mentation are noticeably affected.

“Very soon she will be cognitively unable to fulfil the office and requirements of the presidency.”

Though there may be valid reasons for the doctor having posted this anonymously, the fact that the originator of the content is not named must damage its cedibility. On the other hand, even in the days leading up to Hillary's latest 'medical episode', which culminated in a revelation that the candidate has pneumonia, several prlonged coughing fits were dismissed by campaign staffers as being due to 'allergies'.

This behaviour by Clinton and those around her reveals that whenever threatened their first instinct (triggered by the brain stem?) is to lie and try to bluff their way through the problem.  
 

Vascular dementia is caused by reduced blood supply to the brain due to diseased or damaged blood vessels – and according to the analysis, this is exactly what happened to Mrs Clinton when she suffered serious concussion four years ago.

The former US Secretary of State contracted a stomach virus in December 2012. That caused sickness and dehydration, leading her to faint, fall and bang her head causing concussion.

A week later, she was diagnosed with a serious blood clot in her head, which caused a blockage in a vein that drains blood from the brain.

The clot – the second that Mrs Clinton has suffered – resulted in a stay in hospital and several days of treatment, forcing her to wear special glasses for several months afterwards.

According to the NHS vascular dementia is a common form of the disease that  affects more than 135,000 people in the UK.

It is a degenerative cognitive impairment associated with gradual death of brain cells. It's rare in anyone younger than 65.

Many cases of vascular dementia start with early warning signs, including slowness of thought, difficulty with planning, language problems, attention and concentration difficulties and mood or behavioural changes.

Mrs Clinton has been filmed on a number of occasions visibly shaking and appearing to lose her train of thought. In recent weeks she has also been affected by coughing fits.
The Democrat nominee has repeatedly denied claims that she has a degenerative disease and her advisers have rubbished the “medical records” used in the analysis.

 

 

RELATED POSTS:



Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Hillary Clinton To Go Invisible For Next Five Days:

by Arthur Foxake

Hillary Clinton is escorted from the 9/11 event in New York by aised ans security men after the fainting episode. (source: images1.ynet.co.il

Major topics in this post - click for listing
Clinton
Conspiracy
Google

The story is all over the web so there's no point in repeating it in full. We cannot let it pass without a mention however taken a dive as recently our traffic has taken a dive and our web expert has found we are getting little traffic from Google and appear to be victims of the Search Engine Operator's policy of blocking access to posts critical of Hillary Clinton and her campaign to become President of the USA.

Google aren't as smart as they think, people may not be looking at our stuff here but this blog is tiny compared to our main site. So Ian uses a way of displaying the content on a site viewed by thousands of people a day, while having it indexed as belonging to this Boggart Abroad site which was getting about 5 to 8 hundred but is now only getting around a hundred. Now read about the latest crazy conspiracy theory, the one about Hillary's failing health, that is turning out to be true.

Hillary Clinton To Withdraw From Public For Next Five Days: 

from DC Whispers:

Late yesterday, D.C. Whispers indicated Hillary Clinton’s intention to withdraw from public view for the next five days – a report that has been subsequently confirmed via other media outlets.

Now this video from Mrs. Clinton’s last public appearance yesterday is circulating among alternative media and various readers that shows a very fatigued Hillary Clinton who has to abruptly cut off her statements after standing on stage for about six minutes and then shuffle slowly away, coughing, and appearing to gasp for breath right before getting herself out of sight of the cameras
 

Read more and see video at DC Whispers

RELATED POSTS:
Hypocrite Hillary Brands Trump Tax Cheat For Using Same Loophole As She Does
Clinton Foundation Is Charity Fraud Of Epic Proportions", Analyst Charges In Stunning Takedown
Are Sites That Criticise Hillbillary Clinton Are Being blocked By Google?
If This Does Not Disqualify Hillary For The Presidency, It's Hard To Know What Will
Hillary and the Clinton Foundation: Exemplars of America’s Political Rot
The Difference In Voting For Hillbillary or Trump Is One Promises War With Russia, (the other is named Donald)
Wiki Leak Found Email Linking Obama, Clinton To ISIS
Partisan US Media Coverage Of Candidate Health Goes From Hysterical To Bizarre
Nigel Farage Swipes Back At Irrational, Screeching, Crazy Clinton
New Emails Reveal Hillary Clinton Gave Special Access To Foundation Donors
Another Hack: Is A Leak Of Incriminating Clinton Foundation Documents Imminent?
Hillary Clinton’s Health In Rapid Decline – Will She Even Make It To Election Day At This Rate?
DC Leaks Expose George Soros Manipulating Elections
Clinton E-mails Show When Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton Allowed George Soros To Dictate Foreign Policy
It Looks As If Demonising Russia Is All Discredited Hillary Clinton And Her Supporters Have Left
Anonymous FBI Informant Says Treason In Govt At The Highest Levels
One Year of Silence on Hillary Clinton Uranium Deal



Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

To Those Web Sites That Complain About Ad Blockers - Two Words. The Second Is OFF!

Forbes Mag are pissed off with me. Although I only look at their site if I follow somebody else's link, whenever I do I get a teaser and this pithy little message about how monstrously unfair I am being to sites like their which depend on advertising revenue for income. OK, I understand that, and if I particularly want to look at an item I will whitelist the site (any site, not just Forbes), read the article, not click on any ads (not so much as a matter of principle as because everything advertised on the web is shite,) and then block them again.

Is this not hypocritical of you Boggart Blogger, you might well ask because this site runs a couple of ads. It could be considered so, although we have no ethical objection to internet advertising. The reason we block ads is so many of them are intrusive, violate privacy by collecting user data, and slow down older computers by employing CPU heavy scripts. And we don't object to people running ad blockers, if you don't want to see advertising, its your choice and we respect that. We can't guarantee ads on our pages don't violate your privacy but as the host, blogger, is owned by Google, your privacy is being violated already.

Now I read that those of us running ad blockers are involved in a protection racket (yeah, we are protecting our personal data)

from a BBC report:

In a speech at the Oxford Media Convention earlier this year, the culture secretary said the fast-growing use of software that blocked advertising presented an existential threat to the newspaper and music industries.

He vowed to set up a round table involving major publishers, social media groups and adblocking companies in the coming weeks to do something about the problem.

“Quite simply – if people don’t pay in some way for content, then that content will eventually no longer exist,” he said. “And that’s as true for the latest piece of journalism as it is for the new album from Muse.”

Note how the government, which ought to protect our interests seeks to help corporate bastards like Forbes. On yes, they'll be representated at the round table, they government will help them violate our privacy, steal our personal data and target us with ads for shite no sane person would buy. Not usof course,not the poor punters driven to use ad blockers to shut out those irritating little animations because they drive us bonkers (and on mobile devices use up data allowance.) No, not us, but the poor, hard - up corporate media including hard up billionaire Steve Forbes.

What will these fuckwits in the political establishment impose on us next, an idea I trod on while setting up a privatised phone network in Sweden 20 years ago, giving people free phone calls so long as they allowed the network to interrupt calls with messages from sponsors? Forcing us to watch the ads on the telly? Making the shopping channel the co - producer of all popular dramas, soaps, talk shows and Strictly. I don't mind non - active ads on the net, for example a little pucture of a widget and the slogan, "Buy Wignall's wonderful Widgets because they're good." It's unlikely I would ever click on the ad but static ads are easily ignored, just as websites like Huffington Post and The Daily Beast are easily ignored.

As for paying for content on the web, the idea is bollocks. There is a wealth of free information out on the net, published by amateurs like the people who contribute to this blog. Much of it (Facebook excepted) is of a far higher quality and far more accurate than the chumps in the MSM produce. Who wants to read about Kim Kardiashian's arse, she didn't grow it herself after all.

I would not mind paying for a newspaper, but the cupid stunts who own them think they can get away with charging me the same for an online edition as for the print version. No paper and ink to buy, no printing machines to maintain, vastly reduced staff (no printers, labourers, typesetters), no distribution costs, no newsagents margin. And they want a pound a day. Do they think us punters are really that stupid?

I use a Kindle and it's a bit of a bummer having to pay almost the same for ebooks from a leading other as print books (see above re print newspapers). But I've had several really good books self published or from small publishers for £0.99, £1.99, £2.99 which makes up for it and gets one back at the thieving corporations. Music and video again is different from news content, musicians deserve to be paid, buy vinyl or CDs or at least pay for downloads (although the corporate piracy comes into play here - we should not have to pay the same for a digital download album as for a CD, again there are no production or distribution costs)

So websites that rely on ad revenue, give your ad brokers some earache, tell them punters do not want intrusive ads, we are suspicious of what scripts might be doing with the 90% of CPU capacity they grab, we hate cutesy - pie little animations so you can take your condescending attitude and fuck the fucking fuck off.



RELATED POSTS:

Internet business model
Internet is making us stupid
When internet algorithms rule your life
Internet dystopia
Internet threats humans as comuters
News no longer communicates information thanks to internet
Internet: There's no privacy online
Internet technology catalogue

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Music is an entirely different matter. I buy my music on CD and then rip it for playing in the car. I do, occasionally download directly if it is not available on CD – and I pay for it. So fuck off with the adverts.

Hillary's Facebook Attempt To Connect With Voters Misses Target Again

The biggest advantage Donald Trump has in the US Presidential race is that his opponent Hillary Clinton not only has a terrible reputation for being involved in dodgy dealings is but is a cold, unlikeable person who is seen as selfish, egotistical, petulant and inclined to gloat in moments of triumph. In an attempt to redress some of the harm this impression is doing to her campaign, Hillary has taken to Facebook with this post.

Unfortunately Hillary get its wrong again by referring to how hard her husband, former President Bill Clinton and the man she hopes to succeed, Barack Hussein Obama have to work at appearing relaxed, natural and at ease in public. She has not noticed that in spite of what the ever loyal chatterati of mainstream media might say, both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama are regarded by most people as complete phoneys and a couple of 'sleekit wee shites' to employ a rather onomatopoeic phrase from the Scottish vernacular.


RELATED POSTS:

Hypocrite Hillary Brands Trump Tax Cheat For Using Same Loophole As She Does
Is it possible to eradicate all diseases?
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife have dreamed up this great money making scheme. They have announced they will try to eradicate all diseases by the end of the century. It follows down the same path of greed and self interest previously trodden by Bill and Melinda Gates and their Gates Foundation which has been so sucessful in its efforts to eradicate disease and poverty that it now gets $2 from governments and the United Nations for every $1 it spends ...

Clinton promises tyranny for USA
Clinton Links To Soros
The Difference In Voting For Hillbillary or Trump Is Only One Promises War With Russia
Nigel Farage Swipes Back At Irrational, Screeching, Crazy Clinton
Media Blackout Of Hacked George Soros Documents
New Emails Reveal Hillary Clinton Gave Special Access To Foundation Donors
Washington's Global Hegemony Dream Is Fading Fast
Another Hack: Is A Leak Of Incriminating Clinton Foundation Documents Imminent?
Hillary Clinton’s Health In Rapid Decline – Will She Even Make It To Election Day At This Rate?
DC Leaks Expose George Soros Manipulating Elections
Clinton E-mails Show When Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton Allowed George Soros To Dictate Foreign Policy
Julian Assange Says: “1,700 Emails In Hillary Clinton’s Collection” Proves She Sold Weapons To ISIS In Syria
It Looks As If Demonising Russia Is All Discredited Hillary Clinton And Her Supporters Have Left
Anonymous FBI Informant Says Treason In Govt At The Highest Levels
One Year of Silence on Hillary Clinton Uranium Deal
Whistleblower Claims "NSA Has All Of Hillary's Deleted Emails
Hacked Emails Leaked By 'Russians' Reveal That 'Crooked Hillary' Clinton Threatened Sanders’ Wife
Leaked DNC Emails Confirm Democrats Rigged Primary, Reveal Extensive Media Collusion
FBI Insider Leaks All: Clinton Foundation Exposed! Involves Entire US Government!
Can this woman possibly be a fit and proper person to serve as President Of The USA

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

"Clinton Foundation Is Charity Fraud Of Epic Proportions", Analyst Charges In Stunning Takedown

by Tyler Durden, Zero Hedge


In early May, we introduced readers to Charles Ortel, a Wall Street analyst who uncovered financial discrepancies at General Electric before its stock crashed in 2008, and whom the Sunday Times of London described as "one of the finest analysts of financial statements on the planet" in a 2009 story detailing the troubles at AIG. Having moved on beyond simple corporate fraud, Ortel spent the past year and a half digging into something more relevant to the current US situation:"charities", and specifically the Clinton Foundation’s public records, federal and state-level tax filings, and donor disclosures.  

Four months ago, Ortel began releasing his preliminary findings in the first of a series of up to 40 planned reports on his website. His allegation was simple: “this is a charity fraud.”

To learn more about the Clinton Foundation, Ortel decided to "take it apart and see how it worked" and he has been doing that ever since February 2015. 

“I decided, as I did with GE, let’s pick one that’s complicated,” said Ortel. “The Clinton Foundation is complicated, but it’s really very small compared to GE.”

When Ortel tried to match up the Clinton Foundation’s tax filings with the disclosure reports from its major donors, he said he started to find problems. That includes records from the foundation’s many offshoots—including the Clinton Health Access Initiative and the Clinton Global Initiative—as well as its foreign subsidiaries.

"I decided it would be fun to cross-check what their donors thought they did when they donated to the Clinton Foundation, and that’s when I got really irritated,” he said. “There are massive discrepancies between what some of the major donors say they gave to the Clinton Foundation to do, and what the Clinton Foundation said what they got from the donors and what they did with it."

As previously reported, last year the Clinton Foundation was forced to issue corrected tax filings for several years to correct donation errors. But Ortel said many of the discrepancies remain. “I’m against charity fraud. I think people in both parties are against charity fraud, and this is a charity fraud,” he said.

To be sure, Ortel's efforts were to be commended: digging through the foundation's numbers can not have been easy, considering that the nation’s most influential charity watchdog put the Clinton Foundation on its “watch list” of problematic nonprofits in 2015. Furthermore, the Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid. That's because the organization spent the vast bulk of its windfall on "administration, travel, salaries and bonuses", with the fattest payouts going to family friends.



RELATED POSTS:

Latest Clinton Foundation Hack Shows Abuse Of Power For Personal Gain
Julian Assange was not bluffing it seems, although he appeared to back off from dropping the promised bombshell that would finish Hillary Clinton, a document dump by Goccifer2 contains stuff that is dynamite, revealing email exchanges between Clinton and associates that discuss the abuse of power and position for financial gain, in short giving preferential treatment in warding State Department contracts to people and organisations that made generous donations to the Clinton Foundation ...


Hacker Dumps Thousands Of Emails From Close Clinton Insider, Reveals Hillary's New Email Address
The data dump of Clinton emails and digital documents by Guccifer 2.0 we reported yesterday has so far proved something of a disappointment. Today however, another whistleblower site, DCLeaks, the group responsible for the massive Soros Foundation hack recently, has just released thousands of emails taken from the personal account of Capricia Marshall, a long-time Clinton associate who worked for Hillary at the State Department.

Hypocrite Hillary Brands Trump Tax Cheat For Using Same Loophole As She Does
Clinton promises tyranny for USA

Clinton Links To Soros

Fact Checker Snopes Lie About Obama ‘Birther’ Smear.

Yesterday US Presidential candidate Donald Trump said that President Barack Obama was born in the U.S., and by doing so he “finished a birther controversy” which he said was started by Hillary Clinton in 2008. “Hillary Clinton and her campaign of 2008 started the birther controversy. I finished it, I finished it. You know what I mean," he told a campaign event audience.

Clinton E-mails Show When Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton Allowed George Soros To Dictate Foreign Policy

It Looks As If Demonising Russia Is All Discredited Hillary Clinton And Her Supporters Have Left

Anonymous FBI Informant Says Treason In Govt At The Highest Levels

One Year of Silence on Hillary Clinton Uranium Deal

Snowden Mocks Claims That Russia Hacked The Democrats Campaign Computer System

Will 'President Trump' Mean The End Of NATO?

Assange Promises Next Hillary Leak Will Ensure Her Arrest

Leaked DNC Emails Confirm Democrats Rigged Primary, Reveal Extensive Media Collusion

Democratic Party Primaries Vote Rigging Whistleblower Found Murdered

FBI Insider Leaks All: Clinton Foundation Exposed! Involves Entire US Government!


Operation “Summer of Chaos” plan exposed: Obama Admin, Soros, Black Lives Matter, to activate martial law before General Election?

Trump Questions if Bill Begged Lynch to Spare Hillary During Tarmac Meeting

Low And Middle Income Whites and Blacks Feel Threatened As Crime Soars Under Obama

So Was What Trump Said On Abortion REALLY So Bad?

Mac Slavo of SHTFplan.com Discovers Real Reason Why Trump Scares The Establishment


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Juncker Faces Court Challenge Over ‘Illegal’ Ban on Early Brexit Negotiations

from Breitbart London

Jean-Claude Juncker, the President of the European Commission, may be hauled before the courts for issuing a “Presidential Order” banning Commissioners from holding Brexit talks with British representatives – after it emerged that no such powers exist.

In the days following Britain’s historic referendum vote to leave the EU, Juncker used a televised speech to prevent his officials from opening exit negotiations with Britain until Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty had been invoked.

Juncker claimed during the speech that the decree was a “Presidential Order”.

But the Commission has since admitted that there is no such thing as a Presidential Order, and that Juncker had no right to prevent negotiations from going ahead. Consequently, he may now face legal action for ordering the bogus ban, to the possible detriment of the British people.

The challenge is being brought by Fair Deal for Expats, a non-profit organisation representing British ex-patriots living and working in European Union (EU) countries, which is having to crowd-fund the thousands of pounds required to take the matter to court.

Last night the group’s legal team told The Sun that Juncker’s so-called order “breaches the duty of ‘sincere cooperation’ that the Commission is required to abide by” as it “discriminates against the UK and its people”.

Read full article >>>


RELATED POSTS:

After Brexit European Union Moves To Abolish Free Speech!

While European citizens are increasingly at risk of arrest for "hate speech" and "xenophobic remarks" (both terms for which there is no legal definition in any state of Europe,) the law does not apply equally to all Europeans, the ruling elites it sems can say what they like about whom they dislike.

RIP the British Steel Industry, murdered by The EU. Vote Leave
As the future of not just Port Talbot steelworks but british steelmaking hangs in the balance with Indian conglomerate Tata Industries deciding the fate, we reflect that (A) the latest disaster for manufacturing is the fault of the EU and (B) We've been here before with Tata, a steelworks and a carbon credits scam.

A Return To Bush-Era Foreign Policy – Prez Candidate Kasich Regrets Turkey Not Being In The European Union
One of the overlooked moments (and understandably so) of last night’s Republican candidate debate was the moment Gov. John Kasich told the audience that he would have liked to see Turkey joining the European Union (EU).

Johnson’s article lines up his reasons why Britain must exit on June 23rd. It’s time to be brave
OK, I know a lot of you think Boris is most accurately described by a word many people find offensive, but he’s put together a very good argument here on why we must leave the EU. Published in part here under ‘fair use’ terms and conditions, in the public interest ...

Juncker: "Dutch 'NO' Vote Will Lead To A Big Continental Crisis"
In April the Dutch people will vote on the European-Ukraine association treaty. In an interview with the NRC, a Dutch leading newspaper, Juncker warned the Dutch voters a “NO” will lead to a big continental crisis. “Russia and anti European movements will profit from a Dutch No, the Dutch has to vote yes for reasons not related to the treaty, the Dutch should act like an European strategist” according to Mr Juncker.

Head Of European Institute: Brexit ‘Better’ For Everyone
Brexit would be the best result of Britain’s in / out referendum for both Britain and the EU i a Belgian professor who heads up the European Institute at the London School of Economics (LSE) has said.

Cameron's Hopes For EU Membership Reforms For UK Torpedoed By Tusk
David Cameron’s hopes of winning serious concessions on sovereignty, border controls, contributions, trade agreements, human rights and labour laws so he could claim to have won a better deal for Britain by the time the in / out referendum starts next year European Union suffered an early blow when European Council President Donald Tusk warned that reaching a deal would be “very tough” ...

Europe in Free Fall - The 28 member EU makes no economic sense

The omens have been clear for a long time (for those who have ears to hear and eyes to see. The ideologues who have been driving the Federal European Superstate project are blind to their own folly as ideologues always are, and also blind it seems to the unfolding social, economic and political catastrophe that is unfolding and threatens to destroy not only the european Union but its individual member states.

New EU Tax Laws Force Thousands of Businesses to Close in Just Six Months
Our editorial policy has for years been to expose the EU for the anti - business, anti - democracy European wing of the Global Government cartel. And let's be honest, a quick browse through our Europe index will provide plenty of evidence to suppport our view. Given the and their collectivist dupes' talent for ignoring evidence however, every hammer blow we can strike that exposes their global, totalitarian, bureauceatic dictatorship will help get the message across.

Greece, Monetary Union and Europe - Omnibus
The Greek financial meltdown and inevitable exit from the European Monetary System (Euro) and possibly the EU may be staved off a little longer but will happen. If the burden of Euro membership can wreck strong economies like France, Austria and The Netherlands, how can a basket case like Greece ever cope.


NEIN! Germany's Bild Comdemns Latest Greek Can Kicking Exercise
With just a day left before a key vote in the German Bundestag on ratifying the 4-month Greek bailout extension, the biggest-selling, mass-market newspaper of the EU's most powerful economy, with a circulation of 2.5 million, Bild, has let the Ruling Bureaucrats of Brussels feels about the latest financial acrobatics aimed at preventing poo old Greece from escaping the slavery imposed on it by membership of the Euro.

Merkel Agrees That Immigrants Abuse EU Welfare Systems
In a surprise statement German Chancellor Angela Merkel has agreed with Prime minister David Cameron that there is an urgent need to address the “abuses” of Britain’s benefits system by immigrants. It was the first time Chancellor Merkel publicly offered any support to the Prime Minister’s bid to reform the EU welfare system.

The Perils Of Centralized Power
We show how the increasing centralization of power has led to the public becoming disenfranchised and feelinf unable to control their own lives. it has also facilitated the growth of a culture of corruption and cover up in public life, the justice system, education, the churches and other areas where the elite have become remote and out of touch with the citizens they serve.

After Europe's Political Earthquake Scandal, Sleaze, and Corruption Are Gifts for Le Pen, UKIP and Eurosceptics
Our New Unhappy Lords, the smooth faced, soft handed pen pushers and bean counters of europes ruling bureaucratic dictatorship must have though they were coasting towards their goal of integratinf the European Unions member states into a single federal technocracy. Unfortunately for them they voters are not as stupid or apethetic as they imagined, neiher were the politicians of establishment parties as competent as they claimed.

If There Is An Anti EU Surge Across Europe What Should Cameron Do?
There is a solar storm of anti European Union feeling surging across the EU, from Finland to Greece. The integrationist bureaucratic dictatorship in Brussels has devivered economic disaster, political chaos and foreign policy humiliation and yet they march on toward the abyss proclaiming theirs is the only way. As the UK Independence Party are one of the largest and best organised anti - EU parties, the shock waves of a protest vote will be felt more acutely in Britain.

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Are Sites That Criticise Hillbillary Clinton Are Being blocked By Google?

The Unrelenting Pundit-Led Effort to Delegitimize All Negative Reporting about Hillary Clinton ...

... read the headline to a  Glenn Greenwald report on The Intercept. I did eventually find out what this was a ll about though it was an absolute bugger of a job getting on to The Intercept. A glitch on their website? you might well ask. Well maybe it was but this was the fourth time today I have tried to access an article criticising Hillary Clinton's secretiveness, greed, lack of familiarity with the concept of telling the truth, tendency to gloat, foul mouthed outbursts at people who ask her difficult questions (especially about her health), cronyism and WTF haped to those missing emails.

The excellent Mr. Greenwald was commenting on how, as opinion  polls relating to the US Presidential Elections later this year start to swig towards Republican candidate Donald Trump as the campaign proper begins, the usual suspects, the chatterati, showbiz luvvies, academics and assorted troughers of taxpayers money are closing ranks around the establishment's anointed candidate.

The Greenwald article focused on comments from the Nobel Prize winning economist and architect of the Greater Depression of 2008 to ongoing, which has now lasted longer than the Great Depression of the 1930s. As if wishing to show that he knows less about economics and how nations and corporations function, Krugman now claims to end the recession we need more policies based on his idiotic theories which caused the crisis in the first place. 

In politics, Krugman is expounding the view that all criticism of Hillary Clinton, her personality and policies is monstrously unfair and the work of 'conspiracy theorists'.

 

Here's a snipped of Glenn Greenwald's response:

 

In his New York Times column yesterday, Paul Krugman did something which he made clear he regarded as quite brave: he defended the Democratic Party presidential nominee and likely next U.S. President from journalistic investigations. Complaining about media bias, Krugman claimed that journalists are driven by “the presumption that anything Hillary Clinton does must be corrupt, most spectacularly illustrated by the increasingly bizarre coverage of the Clinton Foundation.” While generously acknowledging that it was legitimate to take a look at the billions of dollars raised by the Clintons as she pursued increasing levels of political power – vast sums often received from the very parties most vested in her decisions as a public official – it is now “very clear,” he proclaimed, that there was absolutely nothing improper about any of what she or her husband did.

Krugman’s column, chiding the media for its unfairly negative coverage of his beloved candidate, was, predictably, a big hit among Democrats – not just because of their agreement with its content but because of what they regarded as the remarkable courage required to publicly defend someone as marginalized and besieged as the former First Lady, two-term New York Senator, Secretary of State, and current establishment-backed multi-millionaire presidential front-runner. Krugman – in a tweet-proclamation that has now been re-tweeted more than 10,000 times – heralded himself this way: “I was reluctant to write today’s column because I knew journos would hate it. But it felt like a moral duty.”

True fact: I was reluctant to write today's col because I knew journos would hate it. But it felt like a moral duty https://t.co/ldee224frl

— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) September 5, 2016

As my colleague Zaid Jilani remarked: “I can imagine Paul Krugman standing in front of the mirror saying, ‘This is *your Tahrir Square* big guy.'” Nate Silver, early yesterday morning, even suggested that Krugman’s Clinton-defending column was so edgy and threatening that The New York Times – which published the column – was effectively suppressing Krugman’s brave stance by refusing to promote it on Twitter (the NYT tweeted Krugman’s column a few hours later, early in the afternoon). Thankfully, it appears that Krugman – at least thus far – has suffered no governmental recriminations or legal threats, nor any career penalties, for his intrepid, highly risky defense of Hillary Clinton.
That’s because – in contrast to his actually brave, orthodoxy-defying work in 2002 as one of the few media voices opposed to the invasion of Iraq, for which he deserves eternal credit – Krugman here is doing little more than echoing conventional media wisdom. That prominent journalists are overwhelmingly opposed to Donald Trump is barely debatable; their collective contempt for him is essentially out in the open, which is where it should be. Contrary to Krugman’s purported expectation, countless Clinton-supporting journalists rushed to express praise for Krugman. Indeed, with very few exceptions, U.S. elites across the board – from both parties, spanning multiple ideologies – are aligned with unprecedented unity against Donald Trump. The last thing required to denounce him, or to defend Hillary Clinton, is bravery.

 

Just as he got his economic theory arse first (when drowning in debt, spend more), Krigman has his politics the wrong way round. He seems to think democracy works by the establishment appointing a president and the electorate being given a chance to endorse that appointment. But woe betide you if you thing the elitists made the wrong choice by trying to hand the presidency of the USA to a proven crook, liar, traitor and war criminal. 

Oh BTW, I notice access to this blog's posts that tell the truth or ask the awkward questions about Hillary Clinton are rather difficult to access via Google.I've also noticed the modest traffic to this site has gone down the pan since the beginning of August, I'm still getting the usual from Yahoo, Bing, Yandex, Baidu and other search Engines but hardly anything from GOOGLE, the US Government's Propaganda Dept Search Engine. Funny isn't it?

DON'T BE EVIL - THAT'S GOOGLE'S JOB.

RELATED POSTS:

Latest Clinton Foundation Hack Shows Abuse Of Power For Personal Gain
Julian Assange was not bluffing it seems, although he appeared to back off from dropping the promised bombshell that would finish Hillary Clinton, a document dump by Goccifer2 contains stuff that is dynamite, revealing email exchanges between Clinton and associates that discuss the abuse of power and position for financial gain, in short giving preferential treatment in warding State Department contracts to people and organisations that made generous donations to the Clinton Foundation ...

Hacker Dumps Thousands Of Emails From Close Clinton Insider, Reveals Hillary's New Email Address
The data dump of Clinton emails and digital documents by Guccifer 2.0 we reported yesterday has so far proved something of a disappointment. Today however, another whistleblower site, DCLeaks, the group responsible for the massive Soros Foundation hack recently, has just released thousands of emails taken from the personal account of Capricia Marshall, a long-time Clinton associate who worked for Hillary at the State Department.

Hypocrite Hillary Brands Trump Tax Cheat For Using Same Loophole As She Does

Clinton promises tyranny for USA

Clinton Links To Soros

Fact Checker Snopes Lie About Obama ‘Birther’ Smear.

Yesterday US Presidential candidate Donald Trump said that President Barack Obama was born in the U.S., and by doing so he “finished a birther controversy” which he said was started by Hillary Clinton in 2008. “Hillary Clinton and her campaign of 2008 started the birther controversy. I finished it, I finished it. You know what I mean," he told a campaign event audience.

Clinton E-mails Show When Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton Allowed George Soros To Dictate Foreign Policy

It Looks As If Demonising Russia Is All Discredited Hillary Clinton And Her Supporters Have Left

Anonymous FBI Informant Says Treason In Govt At The Highest Levels

One Year of Silence on Hillary Clinton Uranium Deal

Snowden Mocks Claims That Russia Hacked The Democrats Campaign Computer System

Will 'President Trump' Mean The End Of NATO?

Assange Promises Next Hillary Leak Will Ensure Her Arrest

Leaked DNC Emails Confirm Democrats Rigged Primary, Reveal Extensive Media Collusion

Democratic Party Primaries Vote Rigging Whistleblower Found Murdered

FBI Insider Leaks All: Clinton Foundation Exposed! Involves Entire US Government!


Operation “Summer of Chaos” plan exposed: Obama Admin, Soros, Black Lives Matter, to activate martial law before General Election?

Trump Questions if Bill Begged Lynch to Spare Hillary During Tarmac Meeting

Low And Middle Income Whites and Blacks Feel Threatened As Crime Soars Under Obama

So Was What Trump Said On Abortion REALLY So Bad?

Mac Slavo of SHTFplan.com Discovers Real Reason Why Trump Scares The Establishment


Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]